Boundary Witten effect in multi-axion insulators

Giandomenico Palumbo

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Boundary Witten effect in multi-axion insulators

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Three axion fields make boundary vortices carry half-integer charge.

desk verdict Worth refereeing; the boundary half-integer charge is very likely right, but the paper leaves the key fermion integration unshown and has a normalization typo in Eq. (35). read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16919 v1 pith:R6I2L5MR submitted 2025-04-23 cond-mat.mes-hall hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Giandomenico Palumbo This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hallhep-thmath-phmath.MP

keywords multi-axioninsulatorsWitteneffectaxionelectrodynamicstopologicaldefectshopfionsdimensionalreductionfractionalchargeChern-Simonstheory

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a three-dimensional insulator with three independent spacetime-dependent axion fields — a multi-axion insulator — has a topological response that a single-axion insulator cannot produce. The central object is a three-axion electromagnetic coupling, Eq. (9), obtained by dimensional reduction of a (6+1)-dimensional Chern-Simons theory, which in the bulk supports real-space monopole-like defects and hopfions. Once one axion is pinned to $\pi$, the bulk coupling becomes a total derivative and generates a gapped (2+1)-dimensional boundary theory in which point-like vortices bind half-integer electric charge. If correct, this extends the Witten effect to the boundary of a solid-state system and gives a unified effective field theory for bulk topological textures and boundary fractional charge in multi-axion insulators.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the triple axion-electromagnetic coupling of Eq. (9), written as $S_{M\theta} = \frac{1}{32\pi^3}\int d^4x\, \epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho} B_{\mu\nu} F_{\lambda\rho}$, where $B_{\mu\nu} = \epsilon^{abc}\theta_a\partial_\mu\theta_b\partial_\nu\theta_c$ is a composite antisymmetric two-form field built from three axions. The derivation chain is: a (6+1)-dimensional massive Dirac fermion integrates to a Chern-Simons action with third Chern number, and compactifying three directions promotes the gauge-field components $A_4,A_5,A_6$ to the axion fields. This machinery is what turns real-space textures of the axions into a bulk topological current and, under $\theta_4=\pi$, into a boundary term that makes vortices carry half-integer charge.

What would settle it

A direct one-loop evaluation of the fermion determinant for the Hamiltonian of Eq. (10) or Eq. (12) with spacetime-varying mass terms $m_4,m_5,m_6$ would settle the claim: if the resulting low-energy effective action does not contain Eq. (9) with the stated coefficient, or contains additional symmetry-allowed terms, the predicted boundary charge $Q_e = w_{1D}/2$ does not follow from the stated microscopic model. Experimentally, measuring the charge bound to vortices on the gapped surface of a multi-axion insulator after introducing a vortex lattice would test the half-integer prediction directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that multiple pseudoscalar fields can coexist in a 3D insulator and generate a new topological electromagnetic coupling, $S_{M\theta} = \frac{1}{32\pi^3}\int d^4x\, \epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}\epsilon^{abc}\theta_a \partial_\mu\theta_b \partial_\nu\theta_c F_{\lambda\rho}$ (Eq. 9), with $a,b,c \in \{4,5,6\}$. This term follows from compactifying a (6+1)-dimensional Chern-Simons theory and treating three gauge-field components as the axions $\theta_4,\theta_5,\theta_6$. In the bulk, suitable configurations of $\theta_5$ and $\theta_6$ reproduce the field of a magnetic monopole and give a quantized Hopf invariant, so the theory supports monopole-like defects and hopfions. At the boundary, fixing $\theta_4=\pi$ reduces the coupling to a (2+1)-dimensional theory whose vortices satisfy $Q_e = \frac{1}{2}w_{1D}$, the boundary Witten effect. The paper also identifies the underlying microscopic model, a Dirac theory with three mass terms and an eight-band lattice Hamiltonian, as the physical setting in which these axions arise.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that integrating out the massive fermions in the Dirac model (Eq. 10) and its eight-band lattice version (Eq. 12) really produces the three-axion term of Eq. (9) with the coefficient $1/32\pi^3$; the paper points to an anomaly-inflow derivation rather than showing the one-loop calculation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Multi-axion insulators admit real-space topological defects, monopole-like configurations and hopfions, that do not exist in conventional single-axion insulators.
With $\theta_4$ pinned to $\pi$, the gapped boundary supports point-like vortices carrying electric charge $Q_e = w_{1D}/2$, a direct analog of the Witten effect in one lower dimension.
The boundary charge is tied to the axion change $\Delta\theta_5 = \pi$, so controlling axion dynamics on the surface controls the fractional charge.
The same dimensional-reduction scheme gives a classification route for multi-axion phases through higher Chern numbers and composite antisymmetric tensor fields.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension is a vortex-array charging experiment on a gapped surface of an antiferromagnetic axion insulator with spatially modulated mass terms; charge $e/2$ per vortex would confirm the boundary Witten effect.
Because the paper invokes anomaly inflow rather than showing the one-loop determinant, the coefficient $1/32\pi^3$ should be checked by a direct fermion-integral computation; lattice-size corrections would appear as deviations from the continuum coefficient.
The same triple-compactification logic can be iterated to build four- and higher-axion couplings, projecting onto richer defect structures and possibly linking to tensor-monopole physics in four spatial dimensions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

Short version: the paper deserves a serious referee, and the central physical result—half-integer charge on boundary vortices—is very likely right. But the key microscopic derivation is asserted rather than shown, and one equation in the boundary section is written with a normalization typo that will trip up readers.

What is new: Eq. (9) is a natural but not previously written three-axion coupling, and the dimensional reduction from 6+1D Chern-Simons theory is clean. The bulk monopole-like and hopfion configurations are standard maps, but seeing them fall out of one action is nice. The paper is also honest about prior work: Eq. (28) is explicitly attributed to Refs. [17,64], and the 2+1D vortex charge is acknowledged to agree with known fermionic results. The contribution is the unified effective-field-theory packaging, not the boundary phenomenon itself.

The main soft spot is the connection between the microscopic Dirac/lattice models and the effective action. Eq. (10) is said to generate Eq. (9) by generalizing the Callan-Harvey anomaly inflow argument, but the one-loop computation is not shown. The coefficient 1/32π^3 is plausible from the 6+1D normalization, yet a referee should ask for the explicit integration. Without it, the claim that these multi-mass Dirac models are axion insulators in the sense of Eq. (9) is not established.

On the stress-test note: it does not hold up in its conclusion. The note correctly observes that Eq. (35) and Eq. (36) are inconsistent: the divergence of \tilde B_i = w_{1D} x_i/|x|^2 is 2π w_{1D} δ²(x), not w_{1D} δ²(x). But the paper's final formula, Eq. (38), is exactly what follows from Eq. (34) when the correct 2π divergence is used. So the missing factor is a typo in Eq. (35), not an error in the boundary Witten-effect derivation. The charge Q_e = w_{1D}/2 survives.

Minor issues: the text says there are seven independent gamma matrices and then "the last four ones" contribute to the mass terms, which should be "last three." The monopole field in Eq. (20) actually has flux 4π, so C1 = 2 if evaluated, though the paper does not commit to C1 = 1. Experimental realization is speculative, but that is not a defect for a theory paper of this kind.

Who is this for: people working on axion electrodynamics, topological response theory, and real-space topological defects. I would send it to peer review and ask for the microscopic derivation and normalization fixes. I would cite Eq. (9) once the derivation is on solid ground.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a (3+1)-dimensional effective field theory for 'multi-axion insulators', in which three pseudoscalar fields θ4, θ5, θ6 couple to electromagnetism through the topological term (1/32π^3)∫ ε^{μνλρ}ε^{abc} θ_a ∂_μθ_b ∂_νθ_c F_{λρ}. The authors obtain this term by triple dimensional reduction of a (6+1)-dimensional Chern–Simons theory and outline a Dirac/lattice realization with spatially varying masses. They show that particular field configurations represent magnetic-monopole-like and hopfionic textures in the bulk, and that fixing θ4 = π produces a boundary (2+1)-dimensional axion theory in which vortices carry half-integer electric charge, a 'boundary Witten effect'. The paper is short and mostly formal; no numerical or experimental data are reported.

Significance. If the central coupling and the boundary charge prediction are correct, the paper provides a useful unifying framework for multi-axion topological responses, connecting bulk real-space defects to boundary fractionalization, and it ties a known (2+1)-dimensional action to a concrete boundary Witten effect. The dimensional-reduction dictionary from 7D Chern–Simons theory to Eq. (9) is elegant and parameter-free, and the predicted Q_e = (1/2)w_{1D} is concrete and falsifiable. However, several normalization and derivation points currently prevent the claims from being accepted as written.

major comments (3)

[Sec. IV, Eqs. (35)–(38)] The vortex configuration (36), \tilde B_i = w_{1D} x_i/|x|^2, has divergence ∂_i \tilde B_i = 2π w_{1D} δ^2(x), not w_{1D} δ^2(x) as stated in Eq. (35). With Eq. (35) as written, inserting into Eq. (34) and integrating using Eq. (37) gives Q_e = w_{1D}/(4π) for Δθ5 = π, so Eq. (39) does not follow. Replacing Eq. (35) by ∂_i \tilde B_i = 2π w_{1D} δ^2(x) restores Eq. (38) and the claimed Q_e = w_{1D}/2. This correction is load-bearing because the half-integer vortex charge is the central prediction of the paper.
[Sec. II, Eqs. (9)–(12)] The claim that the Dirac theory (10) and the lattice model (12) generate the effective action (9) is asserted but not demonstrated. The dimensional reduction from Eq. (7) establishes consistency with a 7D Chern–Simons ancestor, but the statement that Eq. (9) 'can be directly derived ... by generalizing the Callan-Harvey anomaly inflow argument' does not show the one-loop fermion integration nor fix the coefficient 1/(32π^3). This is load-bearing for the central claim: if the one-loop response of Eq. (10) or Eq. (12) has different couplings or normalization, the proposed multi-axion insulator would not realize the boundary Witten effect. I request the explicit computation or a precise reference covering this multi-field case.
[Sec. III, Eq. (16)] For the normalization defined by Eqs. (14)–(17), direct variation of S_Mθ with respect to A_ρ gives J^ρ = −(2/(32π^3)) ε^{μνλρ} ∂_λ B_{μν} = −(1/(16π^3)) ε^{μνλρ} H_{μνλ} (using H_{λμν} = H_{μνλ}). Equation (16) states J_ρ = (1/(96π^3)) ε^{μνλρ} H_{μνλ}, which differs by a factor of −6. This inconsistency propagates to the bulk current expression (23) and must be corrected, or a convention for H must be introduced under which Eq. (16) follows from Eq. (14).

minor comments (4)

[Throughout] The text contains several typos and inconsistencies: 'once one the axions' (Abstract), 'a axion field' (Sec. II), 'time-reversional symmetry' (Sec. II), 'Blu arrows' (Fig. 1 caption), and the alternating use of 'AXI-EM' and 'AX-EM'.
[Eqs. (30)–(32)] The passage from Eq. (30) to Eq. (31) depends on the sign convention for ε^{0ij} and on the relation between ε^{ij} and ε_{ij}; with the 1/2 factor in Eq. (32), this is needed for the reader to verify the coefficient 1/(4π^2) and the sign in Eq. (31). Please state the conventions explicitly.
[Eqs. (11)–(12)] The index ranges in Eq. (11) are ambiguous: the sums over s and a are not explicitly restricted, and Eq. (12) contains cos θ_s inside a sum over both s and a, which conflates the spatial lattice directions with the three axion directions. Please rewrite the Hamiltonian with explicit index ranges.
[Eqs. (18)–(21)] With F_{ij} as defined in Eq. (18), the configuration (19) gives ε^{ijk} F_{ij} = 2 x_k/(x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2)^{3/2}, not x_k/r^3 as written in Eq. (20); please check the normalization of the monopole field and the value of C_1 in Eq. (21).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central results are dimensional reductions and Stokes-law boundary terms from an external 6+1D Chern-Simons action, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the sense defined by the analyzer. The central multi-axion term, Eq. (9), is obtained by substituting A4→θ4, A5→θ5, A6→θ6 into the 6+1D Chern-Simons action of Eq. (7), whose coefficient and form are quoted from external, non-self-cited literature (Refs. [17,54]). This is an acknowledged dimensional-reduction procedure, not a hidden redefinition of the target result; the output is explicitly a descendant of an independently known higher-dimensional topological action. The microscopic Dirac and lattice models in Eqs. (10)-(12) are offered as candidate realizations, and the paper states that the effective action 'can be directly derived ... by generalizing the Callan-Harvey anomaly inflow argument' but does not display the one-loop computation. That is an omitted proof and a correctness risk, not a circular step: no parameter is fitted to the boundary prediction, and the claimed result does not enter the derivation as an input. The boundary Witten effect in Sec. IV follows from fixing θ4=π, converting Eq. (27) into a total derivative, and using Stokes' theorem to obtain the boundary action Eq. (28); the subsequent vortex-charge derivation is a direct equations-of-motion calculation. There is an internal normalization inconsistency in Sec. IV — Eq. (36) gives ∂i(B̃i)=2π w1D δ²(x), so Eq. (35) and Eq. (38) are not mutually consistent as written — but this is a calculational error affecting the final numerical coefficient, not a circularity. The paper explicitly cross-checks the half-integer vortex charge against independent fermionic vortex calculations (Refs. [65-68]). Self-citations appear frequently, but they are peripheral (general topological-field-theory context, Hopf and tensor-monopole discussions, duality speculations); the load-bearing premises rest on external references such as Qi-Hughes-Zhang, Callan-Harvey, and the fermionic vortex literature. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the author's prior work to forbid alternatives. The stated goal is to organize and extend existing axion/CS results; the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of dimensional reduction from 6+1D Chern-Simons theory and on an unproven correspondence between the microscopic Dirac/lattice model and the effective action (9). No free parameters are fitted, but several formal assumptions are invoked without explicit derivation. The only invented entities are the new material class and a named effect, both without independent experimental evidence.

assumptions (5)

standard math Integrating out massive fermions in (6+1)-D yields the Chern-Simons action (7) with C3=1.
Used in Section II as starting point; standard result from Refs [17,54].
domain assumption The substitution A4→θ4, A5→θ5, A6→θ6 followed by compactification is a valid dimensional reduction preserving the topological term.
Assumed in Section II; no explicit derivation of the compactification, radii, or the precise coefficient in Eq. (9).
ad hoc to paper The lattice model (12) has the same low-energy response as the effective action (9).
Stated but not proven; the one-loop fermion integration is not shown (Section II).
domain assumption The boundary of the 3D multi-axion insulator is gapped and supports vortex configurations with the assumed winding.
Needed in Section IV to derive the boundary Witten effect; no microscopic boundary model is provided.
standard math Standard vector calculus: ∂i(xi/r^3)=4πδ^3 and ε_{ij}∂i∂j φ=2πwδ for a vortex.
Used in Eqs. (20)-(21) and (35), though the paper's application in (35) is off by a factor.

invented entities (2)

Multi-axion insulator
purpose: A new class of 3D insulators with three spacetime-dependent mass terms that yield the effective action (9).
Proposed theoretically; no concrete material realization or predicted experimental signature is given beyond suggesting cold atoms and photonic crystals.
Boundary Witten effect
purpose: A (2+1)-dimensional analog of the Witten effect where vortices carry half-integer electric charge.
The effect itself is known for 2D Dirac vortices (Refs [65-68]); here it is re-derived from the multi-axion boundary action. No new measurable signature distinguishes it.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Boundary Witten effect in multi-axion insulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R6I2L5MR

@misc{pith2026250416919,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Boundary Witten effect in multi-axion insulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R6I2L5MR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16919}
}

read the original abstract

We explore novel topological responses and axion-like phenomena in three-dimensional insulating systems with spacetime-dependent mass terms encoding domain walls. Via a dimensional-reduction approach, we derive a new axion-electromagnetic coupling term involving three axion fields. This term yields a topological current in the bulk and, under specific conditions of the axions, real-space topological defects such as magnetic-like monopoles and hopfions. Moreover, once one the axions acquires a constant value, a nontrivial boundary theory realizes a (2+1)-dimensional analog of the Witten effect, which shows that point-like vortices on the gapped boundary of the system acquire half-integer electric charge. Our findings reveal rich topological structures emerging from multi-axion theories, suggesting new avenues in the study of topological phases and defects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.16919 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Probing Tensor Monopoles and Gerbe Invariants in Three-Dimensional Topological Matter
cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The Hopf invariants of 3D topological insulators are identified with Dixmier-Douady invariants of tensor Berry connections, which quantize magnetoelectric and shift-current responses.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Wang, X.-L

Z. Wang, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological field theory and thermal responses of interacting topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 84, 014527 (2011)

work page 2011
[2]

S. Ryu, J. E. Moore, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Electro- magnetic and gravitational responses and anomalies in topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 85, 045104 (2012)

work page 2012
[3]

A. Chan, T. L. Hughes, S. Ryu, and E. Fradkin, Effec- tive field theories for topological insulators by functional bosonization, Phys. Rev. B 87, 085132 (2013)

work page 2013
[4]

Palumbo, R

G. Palumbo, R. Catenacci, and A. Marzuoli, Topological effective field theories for dirac fermions from index theorem, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics B 28, 1350193 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979213501932

doi:10.1142/s0217979213501932 2014
[5]

Y.-Q. Zhu, Z. Zheng, G. Palumbo, and Z. D. Wang, Topo- logical electromagnetic effects and higher second chern numbers in four-dimensional gapped phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 196602 (2022)

work page 2022
[6]

X. Chen, A. Tiwari, and S. Ryu, Bulk-boundary cor- respondence in (3+1)-dimensional topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 94, 045113 (2016)

work page 2016
[7]

Palumbo and J

G. Palumbo and J. K. Pachos, Non-abelian chern-simons theory from a hubbard-like model, Phys. Rev. D 90, 027703 (2014)

work page 2014
[8]

Palumbo and J

G. Palumbo and J. K. Pachos, Holographic correspon- dence in topological superconductors, Annals of Physics 372, 175 (2016)

work page 2016

Show all 79 references

[9]

Witten, Fermion path integrals and topological phases, Rev

E. Witten, Fermion path integrals and topological phases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035001 (2016)

2016
[10]

Palumbo and J

G. Palumbo and J. K. Pachos, Abelian chern-simons- maxwell theory from a tight-binding model of spinless fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 211603 (2013)

2013
[11]

Palumbo, Geometric model of topological insulators from the maxwell algebra, Annals of Physics 386, 15 (2017)

G. Palumbo, Geometric model of topological insulators from the maxwell algebra, Annals of Physics 386, 15 (2017)

2017
[12]

Marzuoli and G

A. Marzuoli and G. Palumbo, Bf-theory in graphene: A route toward topological quantum computing?, Euro- physics Letters 99, 10002 (2012)

2012
[13]

Arouca, A

R. Arouca, A. Cappelli, and T. H. Hansson, Quantum Field Theory Anomalies in Condensed Matter Physics, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 62 (2022)

2022
[14]

Finch, J

P. Finch, J. de Lisle, G. Palumbo, and J. K. Pachos, Induced topological phases at the boundary of 3d topo- logical superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 016801 (2015)

2015
[15]

Wilczek, Two applications of axion electrodynamics, Phys

F. Wilczek, Two applications of axion electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1799 (1987)

1987
[16]

Coriano, M

C. Coriano, M. Creti, S. Lionetti, D. Melle, and R. Tom- 6 masi, Axion-like interactions and cft in topological mat- ter, anomaly sum rules and the faraday effect, Advanced Physics Research n/a, 2400043
[17]

X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195424 (2008)

2008
[18]

A. M. Essin, J. E. Moore, and D. Vanderbilt, Magneto- electric polarizability and axion electrodynamics in crys- talline insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 146805 (2009)

2009
[19]

L. Wu, M. Salehi, N. Koirala, J. Moon, S. Oh, and N. P. Armitage, Quantized faraday and kerr rotation and axion electrodynamics of a 3d topological insulator, Science 354, 1124 (2016), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaf5541

2016 doi
[20]

Sekine and K

A. Sekine and K. Nomura, Axion electrodynamics in topological materials, Journal of Applied Physics 129, 141101 (2021)

2021
[21]

Varnava and D

N. Varnava and D. Vanderbilt, Surfaces of axion insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245117 (2018)

2018
[22]

Varnava, I

N. Varnava, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Axion coupling in the hybrid wannier representation, Phys. Rev. B 101, 155130 (2020)

2020
[23]

N. H. Jo, L.-L. Wang, R.-J. Slager, J. Yan, Y. Wu, K. Lee, B. Schrunk, A. Vishwanath, and A. Kaminski, Intrinsic axion insulating behavior in antiferromagnetic mnbi6te10, Phys. Rev. B 102, 045130 (2020)

2020
[24]

B. J. Wieder and B. A. Bernevig, The axion insulator as a pump of fragile topology (2018), arXiv:1810.02373 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2018 arXiv
[25]

B. J. Wieder, K.-S. Lin, and B. Bradlyn, Axionic band topology in inversion-symmetric weyl-charge-density waves, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 042010 (2020)

2020
[26]

Devescovi, A

C. Devescovi, A. Morales-P´ erez, Y. Hwang, M. Garc´ ıa- D´ ıez, I. Robredo, J. Luis Ma˜ nes, B. Bradlyn, A. Garc´ ıa- Etxarri, and M. G. Vergniory, Axion topology in photonic crystal domain walls, Nature Communications 15, 6814 (2024)

2024
[27]

Witten, Dyons of charge eθ/2π, Physics Letters B 86, 283 (1979)

E. Witten, Dyons of charge eθ/2π, Physics Letters B 86, 283 (1979)

1979
[28]

Rosenberg and M

G. Rosenberg and M. Franz, Witten effect in a crystalline topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 82, 035105 (2010)

2010
[29]

E. J. Weinberg and P. Yi, Magnetic monopole dynam- ics, supersymmetry, and duality, Physics Reports 438, 65 (2007)

2007
[30]

R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977)

1977
[31]

Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys

S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978)

1978
[32]

Sikivie, Invisible axion search methods, Rev

P. Sikivie, Invisible axion search methods, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015004 (2021)

2021
[33]

R. Li, J. Wang, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Dynami- cal axion field in topological magnetic insulators, Nature Physics 6, 284 (2010)

2010
[34]

Wang and S.-C

Z. Wang and S.-C. Zhang, Chiral anomaly, charge density waves, and axion strings from weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 87, 161107 (2013)

2013
[35]

Y. You, G. Y. Cho, and T. L. Hughes, Response proper- ties of axion insulators and weyl semimetals driven by screw dislocations and dynamical axion strings, Phys. Rev. B 94, 085102 (2016)

2016
[36]

Mottola, A

E. Mottola, A. V. Sadofyev, and A. Stergiou, Axions and superfluidity in weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134512 (2024)

2024
[37]

J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, T. Qian, M. Smith, Y.-T. Yao, J. Ahn, Y.-F. Liu, A. Gao, C. Tzschaschel, H. Li, I. Petrides, D. B´ erub´ e, T. Dinh, T. Huang, O. Liebman, E. M. Been, J. M. Blawat, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. C. Fong, H. Lin, P. P. Orth, P. Narang, C...

2025 doi
[38]

J. E. Kim, H. P. Nilles, and M. Peloso, Completing nat- ural inflation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2005 (01), 005

2005
[39]

Coriano, N

C. Coriano, N. Irges, and S. Morelli, Stuckelberg axions and the effective action of anomalous abelian models 1. a unitarity analysis of the higgs-axion mixing, Journal of High Energy Physics 2007, 008 (2007)

2007
[40]

Coriano and N

C. Coriano and N. Irges, Windows over a new low energy axion, Physics Letters B 651, 298 (2007)

2007
[41]

Dimopoulos, S

S. Dimopoulos, S. Kachru, J. McGreevy, and J. G. Wacker, N-flation, Journal of Cosmology and Astropar- ticle Physics 2008 (08), 003

2008
[42]

Montero, A

M. Montero, A. M. Uranga, and I. Valenzuela, Trans- planckian axions!?, Journal of High Energy Physics 2015, 32 (2015)

2015
[43]

Fraser and M

K. Fraser and M. Reece, Axion periodicity and coupling quantization in the presence of mixing, Journal of High Energy Physics 2020, 66 (2020)

2020
[44]

X.-L. Qi, E. Witten, and S.-C. Zhang, Axion topological field theory of topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 87, 134519 (2013)

2013
[45]

K.-S. Lin, G. Palumbo, Z. Guo, Y. Hwang, J. Blackburn, D. P. Shoemaker, F. Mahmood, Z. Wang, G. A. Fiete, B. J. Wieder, and B. Bradlyn, Spin-resolved topology and partial axion angles in three-dimensional insulators, Nature Communications 15, 550 (2024)

2024
[46]

Bertolini and G

E. Bertolini and G. Palumbo, Fractonic self-duality and covariant magnetic fractons (2025), arXiv:2501.18510 [hep-th]

2025 arXiv
[47]

Sutcliffe, Hopfions, Reviews in Math- ematical Physics 30, 1840017 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X18400172

P. Sutcliffe, Hopfions, Reviews in Math- ematical Physics 30, 1840017 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X18400172

2018 doi
[48]

E. A. Kuznetsov and A. V. Mikhailov, On the topological meaning of canonical clebsch variables, Physics Letters A 77, 37 (1980)

1980
[49]

A. F. Ranada, Knotted solutions of the maxwell equa- tions in vacuum, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 23, L815 (1990)

1990
[50]

D. W. Alves, C. Hoyos, H. Nastase, and J. Sonnenschein, Knotted solutions for linear and nonlinear theories: Elec- tromagnetism and fluid dynamics, Physics Letters B773, 412 (2017)

2017
[51]

Arrayas, D

M. Arrayas, D. Bouwmeester, and J. Trueba, Knots in electromagnetism, Physics Reports 667, 1 (2017), knots in Electromagnetism

2017
[52]

Goldstone and F

J. Goldstone and F. Wilczek, Fractional quantum num- bers on solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 986 (1981)

1981
[53]

Reece, Extra-dimensional axion expectations (2024), arXiv:2406.08543 [hep-ph]

M. Reece, Extra-dimensional axion expectations (2024), arXiv:2406.08543 [hep-ph]

2024 arXiv
[54]

Yamamoto and M

K. Yamamoto and M. Koshino, Topological gap labeling with third chern numbers in three-dimensional quasicrys- tals, Phys. Rev. B 105, 115410 (2022)

2022
[55]

Palumbo, Fractional quantum hall effect for extended objects: from skyrmionic membranes to dyonic strings, 7 Journal of High Energy Physics 2022, 124 (2022)

G. Palumbo, Fractional quantum hall effect for extended objects: from skyrmionic membranes to dyonic strings, 7 Journal of High Energy Physics 2022, 124 (2022)

2022
[56]

Callan and J

C. Callan and J. Harvey, Anomalies and fermion zero modes on strings and domain walls, Nuclear Physics B 250, 427 (1985)

1985
[57]

This model resembles a composite version of the Abelian BF the- ory [58], and can in principle support topological defects that behave as extended objects

that transforms as Bµν → Bµν + 2π. This model resembles a composite version of the Abelian BF the- ory [58], and can in principle support topological defects that behave as extended objects. After adding a minimal coupling between the electromagnetic field and a charge current...
[58]

Palumbo, Fermion-fermion duality in 3+1 dimensions, Annals of Physics 419, 168240 (2020)

G. Palumbo, Fermion-fermion duality in 3+1 dimensions, Annals of Physics 419, 168240 (2020)

2020
[59]

Kalb and P

M. Kalb and P. Ramond, Classical direct interstring ac- tion, Phys. Rev. D 9, 2273 (1974)

1974
[60]

These spacetime-dependent axion fields will be analyzed in detail in a future work

by allowing all the three pseudoscalar fields to be spacetime dependent to generate, for instance, dynamical tensor monopoles [61–63]. These spacetime-dependent axion fields will be analyzed in detail in a future work. IV. BOUNDAR Y WITTEN EFFECT AND VOR TICES Here, we conside...
[61]

F. N. Rybakov, N. S. Kiselev, A. B. Borisov, L. Doring, C. Melcher, and S. Blugel, Magnetic hopfions in solids, APL Materials 10, 111113 (2022), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apm/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0099942/16491966/111113 1 online.pdf

2022 doi
[62]

Marco and M

D. Marco and M. A. Alonso, 4d topological textures in light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 123805 (2025)

2025
[63]

Palumbo and N

G. Palumbo and N. Goldman, Revealing tensor monopoles through quantum-metric measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 170401 (2018)

2018
[64]

Y.-Q. Zhu, N. Goldman, and G. Palumbo, Four- dimensional semimetals with tensor monopoles: From surface states to topological responses, Phys. Rev. B102, 081109 (2020)

2020
[65]

M. Chen, C. Li, G. Palumbo, Y.-Q. Zhu, N. Goldman, and P. Cappellaro, A synthetic monopole source of kalb-ramond field in diamond, Science 375, 1017 (2022), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abe6437

2022 doi
[66]

Fukuda and K

H. Fukuda and K. Yonekura, Witten effect, anomaly in- flow, and charge teleportation, Journal of High Energy Physics 2021, 119 (2021)

2021
[67]

C.-Y. Hou, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Electron frac- tionalization in two-dimensional graphenelike structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 186809 (2007)

2007
[68]

Seradjeh, C

B. Seradjeh, C. Weeks, and M. Franz, Fractionalization in a square-lattice model with time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 77, 033104 (2008)

2008
[69]

E. Lee, A. Furusaki, and B.-J. Yang, Fractional charge bound to a vortex in two-dimensional topological crys- talline insulators, Phys. Rev. B 101, 241109 (2020)

2020
[70]

S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, N. Kan, M. Koshino, and Y. Matsuki, Magnetic monopole becomes dyon in topological insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B 108, 155104 (2023)

2023
[71]

J. Yu, B. J. Wieder, and C.-X. Liu, Dynamical piezo- magnetic effect in time-reversal-invariant weyl semimet- als with axionic charge density waves, Phys. Rev. B 104, 174406 (2021)

2021
[72]

Bernabeu and A

J. Bernabeu and A. Cortijo, Axionic acoustic phonons (2025), arXiv:2502.01471 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2025 arXiv
[73]

A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Lattice model of a three-dimensional topological singlet super- conductor with time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 196804 (2009)

2009
[74]

Lin and B

K.-S. Lin and B. Bradlyn, Simulating higher-order topo- logical insulators in density wave insulators, Phys. Rev. B 103, 245107 (2021)

2021
[75]

Chatzistavrakidis, G

A. Chatzistavrakidis, G. Karagiannis, G. Manolakos, and P. Schupp, Axion gravitodynamics, lense-thirring ef- fect, and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 105, 104029 (2022)

2022
[76]

Coriano, S

C. Coriano, S. Lionetti, and D. Melle, Topological sum rules and spectral flows of chiral and gravitational axion- like interactions (2025), arXiv:2502.03182 [hep-ph]

2025 arXiv
[77]

Bermudez, L

A. Bermudez, L. Mazza, M. Rizzi, N. Goldman, M. Lewenstein, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Wilson fermions and axion electrodynamics in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 190404 (2010)

2010
[78]

S. Li, M. Gong, Y.-H. Li, H. Jiang, and X. C. Xie, High spin axion insulator, Nature Communications 15, 4250 (2024)

2024
[79]

G.-G. Liu, S. Mandal, X. Xi, Q. Wang, C. Devescovi, A. Morales-Perez, Z. Wang, L. Yang, R. Banerjee, Y. Long, Y. Meng, P. Zhou, Z. Gao, Y. Chong, A. Garc ˜Aa-Etxarri, M. G. Vergniory, and B. Zhang, Photonic axion insulator, Science 387, 162 (2025), https://www.science.org/doi/...

2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Wang, X.-L

Z. Wang, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological field theory and thermal responses of interacting topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 84, 014527 (2011)

work page 2011

[2] [2]

S. Ryu, J. E. Moore, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Electro- magnetic and gravitational responses and anomalies in topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 85, 045104 (2012)

work page 2012

[3] [3]

A. Chan, T. L. Hughes, S. Ryu, and E. Fradkin, Effec- tive field theories for topological insulators by functional bosonization, Phys. Rev. B 87, 085132 (2013)

work page 2013

[4] [4]

Palumbo, R

G. Palumbo, R. Catenacci, and A. Marzuoli, Topological effective field theories for dirac fermions from index theorem, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics B 28, 1350193 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979213501932

doi:10.1142/s0217979213501932 2014

[5] [5]

Y.-Q. Zhu, Z. Zheng, G. Palumbo, and Z. D. Wang, Topo- logical electromagnetic effects and higher second chern numbers in four-dimensional gapped phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 196602 (2022)

work page 2022

[6] [6]

X. Chen, A. Tiwari, and S. Ryu, Bulk-boundary cor- respondence in (3+1)-dimensional topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 94, 045113 (2016)

work page 2016

[7] [7]

Palumbo and J

G. Palumbo and J. K. Pachos, Non-abelian chern-simons theory from a hubbard-like model, Phys. Rev. D 90, 027703 (2014)

work page 2014

[8] [8]

Palumbo and J

G. Palumbo and J. K. Pachos, Holographic correspon- dence in topological superconductors, Annals of Physics 372, 175 (2016)

work page 2016