Pith. sign in

REVIEW 13 cited by

On-Policy RL with Optimal Reward Baseline

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.23585 v2 pith:R6VFQURK submitted 2025-05-29 cs.LG cs.CL

On-Policy RL with Optimal Reward Baseline

classification cs.LG cs.CL
keywords learningon-policyreinforcementtrainingbaselinemodelsoptimalreasoning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning algorithms are fundamental to align large language models with human preferences and to enhance their reasoning capabilities. However, current reinforcement learning algorithms often suffer from training instability due to loose on-policy constraints and computational inefficiency due to auxiliary models. In this work, we propose On-Policy RL with Optimal reward baseline (OPO), a novel and simplified reinforcement learning algorithm designed to address these challenges. OPO emphasizes the importance of exact on-policy training, which empirically stabilizes the training process and enhances exploration. Moreover, OPO integrates a practically feasible formulation of the optimal reward baseline that minimizes gradient variance. We evaluate OPO on mathematical reasoning benchmarks. The results demonstrate its superior performance and training stability without additional models or regularization terms. Furthermore, OPO achieves lower policy shifts and higher output entropy, encouraging more diverse and less repetitive responses. These results highlight OPO as a promising direction for stable and effective reinforcement learning in large language model alignment and reasoning tasks. The implementation is merged into the verl library at https://verl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/algo/opo.html.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Keep Policy Gradient in Charge: Sibling-Guided Credit Distillation for Long-Horizon Tool-Use Agents

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    SGCD reshapes GRPO token advantages via detached sibling-contrast credit from an external LLM, improving AppWorld and airline tool-use scores while keeping policy gradient as the actor update.

  2. Holder Policy Optimisation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HölderPO unifies token-level aggregation in GRPO via the Hölder mean with a tunable p parameter and annealing schedule, delivering 54.9% average accuracy on math benchmarks and 93.8% success on ALFWorld.

  3. Holder Policy Optimisation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HölderPO unifies token aggregation in GRPO via the Hölder mean with dynamic p annealing, reporting 54.9% average math-benchmark accuracy and 93.8% ALFWorld success.

  4. Understanding and Preventing Entropy Collapse in RLVR with On-Policy Entropy Flow Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    OPEFO prevents entropy collapse in RLVR by rescaling token updates according to their entropy change contributions, yielding more stable optimization and better results on math benchmarks.

  5. Beyond Uniform Credit Assignment: Selective Eligibility Traces for RLVR

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    S-trace adds sparse eligibility traces to RLVR that mask low-entropy tokens, outperforming GRPO by 0.49-3.16% pass@16 on Qwen3 models while improving sample and token efficiency.

  6. Kernelized Advantage Estimation: From Nonparametric Statistics to LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Kernel smoothing yields accurate value and gradient estimates for low-variance policy learning in LLM reasoning under tight per-prompt sampling budgets.

  7. Kernelized Advantage Estimation: From Nonparametric Statistics to LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Kernel smoothing enables accurate low-variance value and gradient estimates for policy optimization in LLM reasoning under tight sampling constraints per prompt.

  8. Policy Improvement Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PIRL maximizes cumulative policy improvement across iterations instead of surrogate rewards and is proven aligned with final performance; PIPO implements it via retrospective verification for stable closed-loop optimization.

  9. Modularized Reinforcement Learning on LLMs: From MDP Creation to Exploration and Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Survey mapping RL techniques onto LLM training and highlighting gaps in value-based, off-policy, and bootstrapping methods.

  10. Keep Policy Gradient in Charge: Sibling-Guided Credit Distillation for Long-Horizon Tool-Use Agents

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SGCD improves held-out scores on AppWorld and tau^3-airline by using LLM-summarized sibling contrasts to reshape GRPO advantages while keeping policy gradient in charge of the actor update.

  11. Policy Improvement Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PIPO adds closed-loop policy-improvement feedback to RL post-training so updates that raise measured performance are reinforced and those that drop it are suppressed.

  12. Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Derives a token-level entropy change approximation revealing four factors, identifies limitations in prior entropy interventions, and proposes STEER which adaptively reweights tokens to mitigate collapse and improve p...

  13. Keep Policy Gradient in Charge: Sibling-Guided Credit Distillation for Long-Horizon Tool-Use Agents

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    SGCD uses LLM-summarized contrasts from successful/failed sibling rollouts to adjust token advantages in GRPO, reporting modest gains on AppWorld and τ³-airline benchmarks.