REVIEW 3 cited by
MMLU-Pro+: Evaluating Higher-Order Reasoning and Shortcut Learning in LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MMLU-Pro+: Evaluating Higher-Order Reasoning and Shortcut Learning in LLMs
read the original abstract
Existing benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) increasingly struggle to differentiate between top-performing models, underscoring the need for more challenging evaluation frameworks. We introduce MMLU-Pro+, an enhanced benchmark building upon MMLU-Pro to assess shortcut learning and higher-order reasoning in LLMs. By incorporating questions with multiple correct answers across diverse domains, MMLU-Pro+ tests LLMs' ability to engage in complex reasoning and resist simplistic problem-solving strategies. Our results show that MMLU-Pro+ maintains MMLU-Pro's difficulty while providing a more rigorous test of model discrimination, particularly in multi-correct answer scenarios. We introduce novel metrics like shortcut selection ratio and correct pair identification ratio, offering deeper insights into model behavior and anchoring bias. Evaluations of six state-of-the-art LLMs reveal significant performance gaps, highlighting variations in reasoning abilities and bias susceptibility. We release the dataset and evaluation codes at \url{https://github.com/asgsaeid/mmlu-pro-plus}.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Bridging Compute- and Data-Optimal Pretraining
Pretraining loss obeys a single law in which repeated or paraphrased tokens count as η(N, data-per-parameter, expansion-ratio) fresh tokens, with total effective data saturating as derived tokens grow.
-
FORT-Searcher: Synthesizing Shortcut-Resistant Search Tasks for Training Deep Search Agents
FORT synthesizes shortcut-resistant search tasks by controlling four identified shortcut risks across entity selection, graph construction, question formulation, and refinement, producing training data that yields age...
-
Humanity's Last Exam
Humanity's Last Exam is a new 2,500-question benchmark at the frontier of human knowledge where state-of-the-art LLMs show low accuracy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.