REVIEW 2 cited by
Soft-prompt Tuning for Large Language Models to Evaluate Bias
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Prompting large language models has gained immense popularity in recent years due to the advantage of producing good results even without the need for labelled data. However, this requires prompt tuning to get optimal prompts that lead to better model performances. In this paper, we explore the use of soft-prompt tuning on sentiment classification task to quantify the biases of large language models (LLMs) such as Open Pre-trained Transformers (OPT) and Galactica language model. Since these models are trained on real-world data that could be prone to bias toward certain groups of populations, it is important to identify these underlying issues. Using soft-prompts to evaluate bias gives us the extra advantage of avoiding the human-bias injection that can be caused by manually designed prompts. We check the model biases on different sensitive attributes using the group fairness (bias) and find interesting bias patterns. Since LLMs have been used in the industry in various applications, it is crucial to identify the biases before deploying these models in practice. We open-source our pipeline and encourage industry researchers to adapt our work to their use cases.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Adaptive Prompting: Ad-hoc Prompt Composition for Social Bias Detection
On StereoSet and SBIC, a trained DeBERTa encoder that selects per-input prompt compositions from 64 options raises macro F1 above every fixed composition, but on CobraFrames it falls below the best fixed composition.
-
BELL: Benchmarking the Explainability of Large Language Models
BELL applies known prompting techniques and simple text-similarity metrics to rank seven LLMs on 'explainability' using math questions from OpenOrca.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.