Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Measuring Societal Biases from Text Corpora with Smoothed First-Order Co-occurrence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.10424 v4 pith:RLAUC45M submitted 2018-12-13 cs.CL cs.LGstat.ML

Measuring Societal Biases from Text Corpora with Smoothed First-Order Co-occurrence

classification cs.CL cs.LGstat.ML
keywords biasapproachfirst-ordermeasuringwordapproachesbiasesco-occurrence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text corpora are widely used resources for measuring societal biases and stereotypes. The common approach to measuring such biases using a corpus is by calculating the similarities between the embedding vector of a word (like nurse) and the vectors of the representative words of the concepts of interest (such as genders). In this study, we show that, depending on what one aims to quantify as bias, this commonly-used approach can introduce non-relevant concepts into bias measurement. We propose an alternative approach to bias measurement utilizing the smoothed first-order co-occurrence relations between the word and the representative concept words, which we derive by reconstructing the co-occurrence estimates inherent in word embedding models. We compare these approaches by conducting several experiments on the scenario of measuring gender bias of occupational words, according to an English Wikipedia corpus. Our experiments show higher correlations of the measured gender bias with the actual gender bias statistics of the U.S. job market - on two collections and with a variety of word embedding models - using the first-order approach in comparison with the vector similarity-based approaches. The first-order approach also suggests a more severe bias towards female in a few specific occupations than the other approaches.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Identifying Implicit Bias in LLM-based Chat AI Toward People with Intellectual Disabilities

    cs.CY 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    Across 25,000 stories from five LLMs, an LLM judge rated stories mentioning intellectual disabilities as more infantile, paternalistic, dependent, and inspirational than stories without the label.