REVIEW 4 cited by
CEGA: A Cost-Effective Approach for Graph-Based Model Extraction and Acquisition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated remarkable utility across diverse applications, and their growing complexity has made Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) a viable platform for scalable deployment. However, this accessibility also exposes GNN to serious security threats, most notably model extraction attacks (MEAs), in which adversaries strategically query a deployed model to construct a high-fidelity replica. In this work, we evaluate the vulnerability of GNNs to MEAs and explore their potential for cost-effective model acquisition in non-adversarial research settings. Importantly, adaptive node querying strategies can also serve a critical role in research, particularly when labeling data is expensive or time-consuming. By selectively sampling informative nodes, researchers can train high-performing GNNs with minimal supervision, which is particularly valuable in domains such as biomedicine, where annotations often require expert input. To address this, we propose a node querying strategy tailored to a highly practical yet underexplored scenario, where bulk queries are prohibited, and only a limited set of initial nodes is available. Our approach iteratively refines the node selection mechanism over multiple learning cycles, leveraging historical feedback to improve extraction efficiency. Extensive experiments on benchmark graph datasets demonstrate our superiority over comparable baselines on accuracy, fidelity, and F1 score under strict query-size constraints. These results highlight both the susceptibility of deployed GNNs to extraction attacks and the promise of ethical, efficient GNN acquisition methods to support low-resource research environments.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Intellectual Property in Graph-Based Machine Learning as a Service: Attacks and Defenses
A systematic review that organizes graph-ML IP protection into model-level and data-level attacks and defenses, and ships a benchmark library, PyGIP.
-
A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives
The paper classifies model extraction attacks and defenses into attack, defense, and computing environment categories and surveys their current state.
-
DESIGN: Encrypted GNN Inference via Server-Side Input Graph Pruning
DESIGN uses encrypted node degrees to prune graphs and adaptively choose polynomial activations, reporting 1.7x-2.4x speedups over a basic FHE GNN baseline.
-
A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models
A taxonomy of model extraction attacks and defenses for large language models, with proposed evaluation metrics and future research directions.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.