Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

A precise sum rule among four B -> Kpi CP asymmetries

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-ph/0508047 v3 pith:RQQCTZOP submitted 2005-08-03 hep-ph

A precise sum rule among four B -> Kpi CP asymmetries

classification hep-ph
keywords ruleasymmetriesdecaystermsasymmetrycurrentdirectequal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A sum rule relation is proposed for direct CP asymmetries in $B\to K\pi$ decays. Leading terms are identical in the isospin symmetry limit, while subleading terms are equal in the flavor SU(3) and heavy quark limits. The sum rule predicts $A_{\rm CP}(B^0\to K^0\pi^0)=-0.17 \pm 0.06$ using current asymmetry measurements for the other three $B\to K\pi$ decays. A violation of the sum rule would be evidence for New Physics in $b\to s\bar qq$ transitions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. First observation of $CP$ violation and measurement of polarization in $B^+\to\rho(770)^0 K^*(892)^+$ decays

    hep-ex 2025-08 accept novelty 8.0

    First observation of CP violation in B+ to rho(770)^0 K*(892)+ decays with A_CP = 0.507 and longitudinal polarization fraction f_L = 0.720 from 9 fb^-1 of LHCb data.

  2. Isospin-based EWP-tree Relations

    hep-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives SU(2)_I-based EWP-tree relations for B→PP decays that match SU(3)_F in ΔS=0 but differ in ΔS=1, producing a 4-5σ SM discrepancy in the B→πK puzzle.

  3. Anomalies in Hadronic $B \to VV$ Decays

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Charmless B→VV decays under SU(3)_F show 5.2σ tension for ρ,K* modes and >7σ when ϕ and ω are included, while isospin-only ρK* fits remain acceptable.

  4. Axion-like particles solve the $B\to K\nu\bar\nu$ and $B\to \pi K$ puzzles

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A minimal ALP model with mass near the pi0, couplings to photons, top quarks, and a sterile neutrino explains the B to K inv excess via off-shell sterile neutrino pairs and B to pi K anomalies via pi0 mixing.

  5. QCD-factorization amplitudes from flavour symmetries: beyond the $SU(3)$ symmetric case

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A data-driven SU(3)-breaking analysis of B to PP decays yields QCD-factorization amplitudes that resemble dynamical predictions and require no enhanced annihilation terms.

  6. Precision measurement of CP violation and branching fractions in $B^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} h^{\pm}$ $(h = \pi, K)$ decays and search for the rare decay $B_c^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} K^{\pm}$

    hep-ex 2025-12 accept novelty 5.0

    Most precise CP asymmetry and branching ratio measurements for B± → K0S h± decays with no significant signal observed for the rare Bc decay.

  7. CP asymmetries in charged meson decay to two pions

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CP asymmetries for B+ to pi+ pi0, D+ to pi+ pi0, and K+ to pi+ pi0 are estimated in the Standard Model at roughly 3 times 10 to the -3, 10 to the -5, and 10 to the -6 using a unified formalism for isospin violation.

  8. Shedding New Light on the ${B \to \pi K}$ Puzzle

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Incorporating new Belle II data into the B to pi K system analysis provides fresh insight into the long-standing puzzle regarding CP violation.

  9. Comment on "QCD-factorization amplitudes from flavour symmetries: beyond the $SU(3)$ symmetric case''

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The authors argue that ETRs follow automatically from SU(3) group theory and identify weaknesses in a recent QCD-factorization fit that omitted them.