Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving Fairness in Deepfake Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.16635 v3 pith:RQZCAODE submitted 2023-06-29 cs.CV cs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CYcs.LG
keywords deepfakedetectionfairnessdetectorsavailabledifferentexistingimproving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the development of effective deepfake detectors in recent years, recent studies have demonstrated that biases in the data used to train these detectors can lead to disparities in detection accuracy across different races and genders. This can result in different groups being unfairly targeted or excluded from detection, allowing undetected deepfakes to manipulate public opinion and erode trust in a deepfake detection model. While existing studies have focused on evaluating fairness of deepfake detectors, to the best of our knowledge, no method has been developed to encourage fairness in deepfake detection at the algorithm level. In this work, we make the first attempt to improve deepfake detection fairness by proposing novel loss functions that handle both the setting where demographic information (eg, annotations of race and gender) is available as well as the case where this information is absent. Fundamentally, both approaches can be used to convert many existing deepfake detectors into ones that encourages fairness. Extensive experiments on four deepfake datasets and five deepfake detectors demonstrate the effectiveness and flexibility of our approach in improving deepfake detection fairness. Our code is available at https://github.com/littlejuyan/DF_Fairness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 2 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. TRIED: Truly Innovative and Effective AI Detection Benchmark, developed by WITNESS

    cs.CY 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The TRIED Benchmark is a 177-point, six-pillar checklist for rating AI detection tools on sociotechnical criteria, but its scoring thresholds are not empirically validated.

Pith tools