Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 5 cited by

This paper claims that operating a trapped ion far outside the Lamb-Dicke regime makes atom-light nonlinearities strong enough to stabilize and read out multi-component Schrödinger-cat states of a mechanical oscillator.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Trapped-ion experiments realize nonlinear reservoir engineering outside the Lamb-Dicke regime to stabilize and measure 2- to 5-component Schrodinger cat manifolds of a mechanical oscillator.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid experimental demonstration of NLRE-stabilized multi-component cat states, with a disclosed sub-manifold occupation that the abstract overstates but the data supports. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.05734 v1 pith:RRMLGEBJ submitted 2025-09-06 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Non-linear cooling and control of a mechanical quantum harmonic oscillator

Matteo Simoni , Ivan Rojkov , Matteo Mazzanti , Wojciech Adamczyk , Alexander Ferk , Pavel Hrmo , Shreyans Jain , Tobias S\"agesser
show 2 more authors
Daniel Kienzler Jonathan Home
This is my paper
classification quant-ph physics.atom-ph
keywords Nonlinear reservoir engineeringSchrödinger cat statesTrapped-ion motional oscillatorLamb-Dicke regimeHigh-order sidebandsRotation-symmetric bosonic codesFock-state tomographyn-mod-d parity readout
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum harmonic oscillators are linear, so making their states non-classical usually requires borrowing nonlinearity from an auxiliary spin. This paper shows that the atom-light coupling itself is nonlinear, and that by deliberately operating a trapped-ion oscillator outside the usual Lamb-Dicke regime, the high-order processes (up to fifth order) become strong enough to act as a resource rather than a nuisance. The authors use nonlinear reservoir engineering to cool the motion into manifolds of Schrödinger-cat states with 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-fold rotational symmetry, and then use a single high-order sideband with approximately linear level dependence to measure the oscillator's excitation modulo 3, purifying a three-component mixture from 47% to 77% target population. If correct, this is the first experimental demonstration that such high-order nonlinear processes can control non-classical mechanical oscillator states, opening a route to rotation-symmetric bosonic error-correction codes.

Core claim

The paper claims that the intrinsic nonlinearity of the atom-light interaction, normally suppressed by working in the Lamb-Dicke regime, can be used as a primary resource for quantum control of a mechanical oscillator. Driving a single trapped-ion oscillator with Raman beams at a Lamb-Dicke parameter of about 0.5, the authors access high-order sidebands (up to fifth order) whose coupling strengths are Bessel functions of the Fock index. By simultaneously driving a raising sideband of order r and a lowering sideband of order l while optically pumping the spin, they engineer a Lindblad jump operator whose destructive interference produces dark states that are d-fold superpositions of Fock stat

What carries the argument

The central object is the Bessel-function coupling of Eq. (1): the sideband matrix element between Fock states |n⟩ and |n+Δn⟩ is g J_{Δn}(2η√(n+Δn+1/2)). Its n-dependence makes high-order processes strong outside the Lamb-Dicke regime. The nonlinear-reservoir-engineering jump operator of Eq. (2) combines a raising process of order r and a lowering process of order l; where their strengths cross, population accumulates in dark states that are d-fold superpositions of Fock states spaced by d = r + l, with destructive interference between the two paths. The readout uses a fourth-order sideband whose matrix elements are approximately linear in n over the occupied range, so its Rabi flop revives

Load-bearing premise

The n-mod-3 readout works only if the fourth-order sideband coupling stays exactly linear in the oscillator level index with zero offset across the populated Fock range; if the coupling bends or the offset is nonzero, the revival signal becomes quasi-periodic rather than periodic and the demonstrated purification degrades.

What would settle it

Drive the fourth-order sideband from the stabilized (r, l) = (1, 2) manifold and resolve the Rabi frequency for each occupied level, comparing with g J4(2η√(k + 9/2)); a deviation from a line through the origin over the occupied levels, or a missed revival at t_rev = 170 µs with the predicted P0 ≈ 0.09 and P1 ≈ 0.91 spin-correlation values, would falsify the readout claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • High-order reservoir engineering can stabilize non-Gaussian manifolds with arbitrary d = r + l rotational symmetry in a mechanical oscillator; the paper demonstrates d = 2 through 5.
  • The mean excitation number and the Mandel Q parameter can be tuned largely independently via the Lamb-Dicke parameter and the relative sideband strengths, giving control over amplitude and squeezing of the stabilized states.
  • A single high-order sideband with approximately linear matrix elements can map the discrete rotation parity (n mod d) onto the spin state, enabling post-selective purification of cat-manifold mixtures.
  • The work establishes a toolbox in which up to fifth-order nonlinear boson processes are used coherently and dissipatively for quantum state control, applicable to bosonic error correction, computation, and sensing.
  • The reservoir-engineering construction does not rely on the specific form of the nonlinearity, so the same approach could transfer to other nonlinear oscillator platforms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the same carrier (Δn = 0) nonlinearity could be used to synthesize high-order Kerr-type Hamiltonians, extending beyond sideband probes to generate phase-sensitive or generalized non-Gaussian states directly.
  • Editorial extension: repeating the probe-and-post-select cycle, or using longer revival times, should converge the mixture toward a single component of the cat manifold, effectively turning the parity readout into a purification step limited mainly by coherence.
  • Editorial extension: the revival-parity readout suggests a scalable syndrome-measurement primitive for rotation-symmetric bosonic codes, provided the sideband matrix-element linearity can be engineered over larger Fock ranges than demonstrated here.
  • Editorial extension: in multi-ion Coulomb-coupled chains, combining nonlinear reservoir engineering with normal-mode couplings could realize arrays of driven-dissipative nonlinear quantum oscillators, bringing nonlinear oscillator-network physics into the quantum regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments on a single trapped-ion mechanical oscillator driven outside the Lamb-Dicke regime. Using non-linear reservoir engineering (NLRE) with two resonant sidebands of orders (r,l) = (0,2), (1,2), (1,3), (2,3), the authors stabilize oscillator states whose Fock populations accumulate near Bessel-function crossing points and whose reconstructed Wigner functions display rotational symmetry. They report fidelities of 82-90% against no-imperfection simulations, demonstrate independent tuning of the mean occupation n̄ and Mandel Q, and use a fourth-order sideband to implement an approximate n mod 3 readout, post-selecting a 3-component mixture from 47% to 77% target population. The paper claims the first experimental use of high-order non-linear boson processes for control of non-classical oscillator states.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a notable experimental advance: it exploits the intrinsic nonlinearity of the atom-light coupling rather than an ancilla nonlinearity, enabling high-order boson processes (up to order 5) and dissipative stabilization of non-Gaussian manifolds. The paper's concrete strengths are direct Fock-state measurements with bootstrap error bars, MLE-reconstructed Wigner functions with negativity, and independent control of amplitude and squeezing. The central caveat is that the stabilized steady states occupy only a subset of the predicted dark-state manifold for d=3,4,5, so the headline claim of full multi-component cat manifolds needs re-scoping; additionally, the revival-based readout is approximate because its linearity/zero-intercept assumption is not exactly satisfied. These issues are acknowledged in the text but are load-bearing for the abstract's strongest claims and for the QEC motivation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2 and following paragraph] The text states that for (r,l) = (1,2), (1,3), (2,3) the steady state occupies only l of the d dark states (2/3, 3/4, 3/5 respectively). The abstract nevertheless claims generation of "localized multi (2,3,4,5)-component Schrödinger's cat manifolds" and "first time manifolds of 3-,4-,5-component cat states have been stabilized". These claims are not supported: the full d-dimensional manifold is not populated, and the reported fidelities are computed against no-imperfection simulations that include the same leakage, not against ideal d-component cat manifolds. This matters because the QEC motivation requires the full code space. Please either demonstrate preparation and stabilization of each |ψ_m> (as done for |ψ_0>, |ψ_1> in the (1,2) case) or revise the claims to l-component manifolds.
  2. [Supplementary Sec. IV, Eq. (2)] The parity readout assumes ̃f(k) is linear in k over the occupied range with f0 = 0. For the implemented fourth-order sideband, Eq. (1) gives ̃f(k) = g J4(2η√(k+9/2)), which has f0 ≠ 0 and is only approximately linear on a limited range. The supplement itself notes that for d=3 the conditions P_m = 1 and P_m' = 0 cannot both be met, and t_rev is numerically optimized with realized spin-state correlation 0.87. Thus the "n mod 3 measurement" is an approximate, not exact, projector, and the 47% → 77% purification is contingent on the populated states remaining in the quasi-linear region. Please quantify the sensitivity to f0 and the occupied Fock range, or explicitly present the readout as approximate with propagated uncertainties on the inferred probabilities.
  3. [Methods, MLE; Supplementary Sec. III] For (r,l) = (1,2), (2,3), only Re[ξ(α)] is measured; the imaginary part, which fixes the π/d orientation, is replaced by the constraint Im(ρ_{0d}) = +√(ρ_{00}ρ_{dd}). The reconstructed Wigner functions therefore do not independently establish the d-fold rotational symmetry; part of the observed symmetry is imposed by the reconstruction. Please state this caveat clearly where the Wigner functions are presented, and consider showing how the data constrain the orientation (e.g., likelihood as a function of rotation angle) to support the claim of direct observation of rotational symmetry.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3] The Wigner functions shown for the five parameter settings are simulations, not experimental reconstructions. Please state this explicitly in the figure caption to avoid confusion.
  2. [Fig. 4(d)] The notation |ψ'_0> is introduced only loosely. Specify that it denotes the state after the fourth-order sideband shift, and define the shift explicitly.
  3. [Methods, Eq. (5)] The decoherence parameter γ in the sideband-population fit is not calibrated or quantified. Please provide a value or a reference to its calibration.
  4. [Supplementary Sec. IV] The assertion "In the experiment f0 = 0" is not obviously compatible with Eq. (1), which gives a nonzero J4 at the lowest occupied Fock states. Please justify this with a fit of the measured sideband matrix elements or clarify that f0 is an extrapolated parameter, not the actual k=0 value.
  5. [Abstract] The phrase "localized multi (2, 3, 4, and 5)-component Schrödinger's cat manifolds" should be qualified given the partial occupation of the dark-state manifolds. Suggest wording such as "manifolds with dark-state dimension d" to separate the theoretical code-space dimension from the experimentally occupied subset.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the NLRE theory is self-cited, but the central experimental claims are independently calibrated and not reduced to the theory by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central prediction—that the engineered dissipation stabilizes manifolds of rotationally symmetric cat states—is taken from the authors' prior theory [64] and implemented experimentally. This self-citation is real, but it is not the only justification: Eq. (1) is the standard Bessel-function sideband coupling, and Eq. (2) follows from adiabatic elimination of the spin. The experimental evidence is not merely a simulation of the same Eq. (2): Fock populations are extracted from measured sideband Rabi oscillations using independently calibrated parameters (η, sideband strengths, qubit frequency), and the real part of the non-linear characteristic function is measured directly and processed with MLE. The d-fold periodic structure in the Fock distributions and the rotational symmetry of the Wigner functions are raw-data features, not outputs of the fitted model. The fidelities quoted against no-imperfection simulations are a benchmark, but they are not the only support for the claim. The acknowledged leakage for (r,l)=(1,2),(1,3),(2,3) is a limitation on the abstract's 'multi-component' wording, but it is an overstatement/correctness concern, not a circular reduction. The revival-readout assumption of an approximately linear sideband matrix element with f0=0 is a fragility of the control protocol, not a circular step: the revival time is numerically optimized and the resulting spin-state correlation (0.87) is measured, not defined by the model. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness claim is imported solely from same-author citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities: no new particles, mediators, forces, or dimensions. The 'dark states' are derived superpositions of Fock states from the NLRE jump operator, not invented ingredients. The free parameters listed are experimental calibrations and one numerically optimized protocol time (t_rev); none of them is fitted to the central symmetry claims.

free parameters (4)
  • Lamb-Dicke parameter eta = ~0.5
    Sets all Bessel-function coupling strengths (Eq. 1); determined from beam geometry k ~ 2 pi sqrt(2)/313 nm and calibrated omega_0, not fit to the target states.
  • Relative sideband coupling g_l/g_r = ratio set by optical power; <5% uncertainty
    Determines the crossing point n* and hence the mean Fock number of the steady state; calibrated by photodiode power measurement, not fitted to the state data.
  • Revival time t_rev = 170 us
    Chosen from numerical simulation to approximately maximize the |psi_0>/|psi_1> spin correlation for the parity readout; the d=3 revival conditions cannot be exactly satisfied (simulation gives P0=0.09, P1=0.91).
  • Sideband Rabi parameter g0 = fit per dataset
    Amplitude in Eq. 5 used to extract Fock populations from sideband Rabi oscillations; standard population-fit scale, not part of the central prediction.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Resonant sideband couplings follow J_dn(2 eta sqrt(n+dn+1/2)) (Eq. 1)
    Standard trapped-ion result from refs [46,47,64], used for all predictions, the tomography model, and the simulation benchmark.
  • domain assumption Two-tone driving plus continuous optical pumping reduces to the single Lindblad jump operator of Eq. (2) via adiabatic elimination of the spin
    Requires sideband drives weaker than the pumping rate gamma; this is the theoretical core of NLRE taken from ref [64], and the fidelity benchmark simulation inherits it.
  • domain assumption The non-linear SDD operator O(alpha X) with Bessel-weighted matrix elements correctly models the displacement used for tomography
    Used in the MLE likelihood (Eq. 3 and Supplementary Sec. III); its strength and eta are calibrated on ground-state data.
  • domain assumption The 4th-order sideband coupling is approximately linear over the occupied Fock range with f0 = 0
    Necessary for the revival-time parity readout (Supplementary Sec. IV); the paper acknowledges revivals are quasi-periodic for arbitrary f0 and exact discrimination fails for d=3.
  • domain assumption The MLE reconstruction need only fix the sign of one imaginary coherence to resolve the pi/d phase-space rotation
    The paper measures only Re[xi(alpha)] and imposes Im(rho_0d) = +sqrt(rho_00 rho_dd), a disclosed modeling choice that selects one of the d symmetric rotations.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-linear cooling and control of a mechanical quantum harmonic oscillator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RRMLGEBJ

@misc{pith2026250905734,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-linear cooling and control of a mechanical quantum harmonic oscillator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RRMLGEBJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05734}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Non-linearities are a key feature allowing non-classical control of quantum harmonic oscillators. However, when non-linearities are strong, designing protocols for control is often difficult, placing a barrier to exploiting these properties fully. Here, using a single trapped-ion oscillator operated in the strongly non-linear regime of the atom-light interaction, we show how to generate localized multi (2, 3, 4, and 5)-component Schr\"odinger's cat manifolds using a novel form of non-linear reservoir engineering. We then specifically select Hamiltonians which allow us to perform measurements on these state manifolds. To our knowledge, our work is the first experimental use of such high order non-linear processes for control of non-classical states of a quantum harmonic oscillator, opening up a new toolbox which can be applied to bosonic quantum error correction, computation, and sensing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.05734 by Alexander Ferk, Daniel Kienzler, Ivan Rojkov, Jonathan Home, Matteo Mazzanti, Matteo Simoni, Pavel Hrmo, Shreyans Jain, Tobias S\"agesser, Wojciech Adamczyk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Protocols of coherent motion control for an interaction-driven Rydberg gate

    physics.atom-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Lattice pinning plus a motion-echo sequence suppresses position-induced errors in interaction-driven Rydberg CZ gates to the 10^-4 level at ~10 ns Rydberg dwell times.

  2. State-dependent Gaussian gate set using an optical tweezer for trapped ions

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An optical tweezer implements state-dependent displacement, squeezing, rotation, and beamsplitter gates on the motional modes of trapped 40Ca+ ions.

  3. Sequential Measurements as a Resource for Quantum Metrology

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Sequential weak measurements on a quantum harmonic oscillator enable simultaneous quadrature estimation, with backaction increasing information for some strengths and post-processing extending dynamic range while impr...

  4. Quantum theory for phonon lasing and non-classical state generation in mixed-species and single trapped ions

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A full quantum theory for phonon lasing in mixed-species and single trapped ions is presented, with analytic second-order coherence confirming lasing and proposals for non-classical squeezed states enabling up to 100x...

  5. Modulation theory formulation of atomic light-matter interaction

    physics.atom-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A modulation-theory reformulation separates mean position operators from quantum-fluctuation deviations to produce a Bessel-function approximation for atomic transition couplings whose error is attributed to the uncer...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlas- takis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge, M. Reagor, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Science347, 853 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    N. Ofek, A. Petrenko, R. Heeres, P. Reinhold, Z. Leghtas, B. Vlastakis, Y. Liu, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, L. Jiang, 6 M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Ex- tending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correc- tion in superconducting circuits, Nature536, 441 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Fl¨ uhmann, T

    C. Fl¨ uhmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevit- sky, K. Mehta, and J. P. Home, Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator, Nature566, 513 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    L. Hu, Y. Ma, W. Cai, X. Mu, Y. Xu, W. Wang, Y. Wu, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, C.-L. Zou, S. M. Girvin, L.-M. Duan, and L. Sun, Quantum error correction and univer- sal gate set operation on a binomial bosonic logical qubit, Nature Physics15, 503 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Campagne-Ibarcq, A

    P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, S. Touzard, E. Zalys- Geller, N. E. Frattini, V. V. Sivak, P. Reinhold, S. Puri, S. Shankar, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Frunzio, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator, Nature584, 368 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    J. M. Gertler, B. Baker, J. Li, S. Shirol, J. Koch, and C. Wang, Protecting a bosonic qubit with autonomous quantum error correction, Nature590, 243 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    de Neeve, T.-L

    B. de Neeve, T.-L. Nguyen, T. Behrle, and J. P. Home, Error correction of a logical grid state qubit by dissipative pumping, Nat. Phys.18, 296 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Z. Ni, S. Li, X. Deng, Y. Cai, L. Zhang, W. Wang, Z.- B. Yang, H. Yu, F. Yan, S. Liu, C.-L. Zou, L. Sun, S.- B. Zheng, Y. Xu, and D. Yu, Beating the break-even point with a discrete-variable-encoded logical qubit, Na- ture616, 56 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    V. V. Sivak, A. Eickbusch, B. Royer, S. Singh, I. Tsiout- sios, S. Ganjam, A. Miano, B. L. Brock, A. Z. Ding, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. De- voret, Real-time quantum error correction beyond break- even, Nature616, 50 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    R´ eglade, A

    U. R´ eglade, A. Bocquet, R. Gautier, J. Cohen, A. Marquet, E. Albertinale, N. Pankratova, M. Hall´ en, F. Rautschke, L.-A. Sellem, P. Rouchon, A. Sarlette, M. Mirrahimi, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, R. Lescanne, S. Je- zouin, and Z. Leghtas, Quantum control of a cat qubit with bit-flip times exceeding ten seconds, Nature629, 778 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Wolfgramm, A

    F. Wolfgramm, A. Cer` e, F. A. Beduini, A. Predojevi´ c, M. Koschorreck, and M. W. Mitchell, Squeezed-light op- tical magnetometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 053601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Hempel, B

    C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, P. Jurcevic, R. Gerritsma, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Entanglement-enhanced detec- tion of single-photon scattering events, Nature Photonics 7, 630 (2013)

    2013

  13. [13]

    Y. Wan, F. Gebert, J. B. W¨ ubbena, N. Scharnhorst, S. Amairi, I. D. Leroux, B. Hemmerling, N. L¨ orch, K. Hammerer, and P. O. Schmidt, Precision spectroscopy by photon-recoil signal amplification, Nature Communi- cations5, 3096 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    S. S. Szigeti, B. Tonekaboni, W. Y. S. Lau, S. N. Hood, and S. A. Haine, Squeezed-light-enhanced atom interfer- ometry below the standard quantum limit, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063630 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Didier, A

    N. Didier, A. Kamal, W. D. Oliver, A. Blais, and A. A. Clerk, Heisenberg-limited qubit read-out with two-mode squeezed light, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 093604 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Pezz` e, A

    L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    F. Wolf, C. Shi, J. C. Heip, M. Gessner, L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. Schulte, K. Hammerer, and P. O. Schmidt, Motional fock states for quantum-enhanced amplitude and phase measurements with trapped ions, Nature Com- munications10, 2929 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    K. A. Gilmore, M. Affolter, R. J. Lewis-Swan, D. Barberena, E. Jordan, A. M. Rey, and J. J. Bollinger, Quantum-enhanced sensing of displace- ments and electric fields with two-dimensional trapped-ion crystals, Science373, 673 (2021), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abi5226

    doi:10.1126/science.abi5226 2021

  19. [19]

    C. Wang, I. Gonin, A. Grassellino, S. Kazakov, A. Ro- manenko, V. P. Yakovlev, and S. Zorzetti, High-efficiency microwave-optical quantum transduction based on a cav- ity electro-optic superconducting system with long coher- ence time, npj Quantum Information8, 149 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    C. M. Caves, K. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drever, V. D. Sandberg, and M. Zimmermann, On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a quantum-mechanical oscillator. i. issues of principle, Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 341 (1980)

    1980

  21. [21]

    Bassi, A

    A. Bassi, A. Großardt, and H. Ulbricht, Gravitational decoherence, Classical and Quantum Gravity34, 193002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Tebbenjohanns, M

    F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frim- mer, and L. Novotny, Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space, Nature595, 378 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    T. L. S. Collaboration, Approaching the motional ground state of a 10-kg object, Science372, 1333 (2021), https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abh2634

    doi:10.1126/science.abh2634 2021

  24. [24]

    M. Bild, M. Fadel, Y. Yang, U. von L¨ upke, P. Mar- tin, A. Bruno, and Y. Chu, Schr¨ odinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator, Science380, 274 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    M. J. Jewell, A. F. Leder, K. M. Backes, X. Bai, K. van Bibber, B. M. Brubaker, S. B. Cahn, A. Droster, M. H. Esmat, S. Ghosh, E. Graham, G. C. Hilton, H. Jackson, C. Laffan, S. K. Lamoreaux, K. W. Lehnert, S. M. Lewis, M. Malnou, R. H. Maruyama, D. A. Palken, N. M. Ra- pidis, E. P. Ruddy, M. Simanovskaia, S. Singh, D. H. Speller, L. R. Vale, H. Wang, and...

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A64, 012310 (2001)

    2001

  27. [27]

    Leghtas, G

    Z. Leghtas, G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, and M. Mirrahimi, Hardware-Efficient Autonomous Quantum Memory Protection, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 120501 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quan- tum computation, New J. Phys.16, 045014 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    Joshi, K

    A. Joshi, K. Noh, and Y. Y. Gao, Quantum information processing with bosonic qubits in circuit qed, Quantum Science and Technology6, 033001 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    Chamberland, K

    C. Chamberland, K. Noh, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. T. Campbell, C. T. Hann, J. Iverson, H. Putterman, T. C. Bohdanowicz, S. T. Flammia, A. Keller, G. Refael, J. Preskill, L. Jiang, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, O. Painter, and F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, Building a Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computer Using Concatenated Cat Codes, PRX Quan- tum3, 010329 (2022). 7

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Walschaers, Non-Gaussian Quantum States and Where to Find Them, PRX Quantum2, 030204 (2021)

    M. Walschaers, Non-Gaussian Quantum States and Where to Find Them, PRX Quantum2, 030204 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Lloyd and S

    S. Lloyd and S. L. Braunstein, Quantum computation over continuous variables, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1784 (1999)

    1999

  33. [33]

    S. D. Bartlett, B. C. Sanders, S. L. Braunstein, and K. Nemoto, Efficient classical simulation of continuous variable quantum information processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 097904 (2002)

    2002

  34. [34]

    N. C. Menicucci, P. van Loock, M. Gu, C. Weedbrook, T. C. Ralph, and M. A. Nielsen, Universal quantum com- putation with continuous-variable cluster states, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 110501 (2006)

    2006

  35. [35]

    Hudson, When is the wigner quasi-probability density non-negative?, Reports on Mathematical Physics6, 249 (1974)

    R. Hudson, When is the wigner quasi-probability density non-negative?, Reports on Mathematical Physics6, 249 (1974)

    work page 1974

  36. [36]

    Yurke and D

    B. Yurke and D. Stoler, Generating quantum mechanical superpositions of macroscopically distinguishable states via amplitude dispersion, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 13 (1986)

    1986

  37. [37]

    A. L. Grimsmo, J. Combes, and B. Q. Baragiola, Quan- tum computing with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes, Phys. Rev. X10, 011058 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    S. P. Jain, J. T. Iosue, A. Barg, and V. V. Albert, Quan- tum spherical codes, Nature Physics , 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Haroche and J.-M

    S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond,Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons(Oxford University Press, 2006)

    2006

  40. [40]

    Leibfried, R

    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 281 (2003)

    2003

  41. [41]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design de- rived from the Cooper pair box, Physical Review A76, 042319 (2007)

    2007

  42. [42]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    Malekakhlagh, A

    M. Malekakhlagh, A. Petrescu, and H. E. T¨ ureci, Life- time renormalization of weakly anharmonic supercon- ducting qubits. i. role of number nonconserving terms, Phys. Rev. B101, 134509 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Putterman, K

    H. Putterman, K. Noh, R. N. Patel, G. A. Peairs, G. S. MacCabe, M. Lee, S. Aghaeimeibodi, C. T. Hann, I. Jar- rige, G. Marcaud, Y. He, H. Moradinejad, J. C. Owens, T. Scaffidi, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, J. Iverson, H. Levine, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, M. H. Matheny, and O. Painter, Preserving phase coherence and linearity in cat qubits with exponential bit-flip ...

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    B˘ az˘ avan, S

    O. B˘ az˘ avan, S. Saner, D. J. Webb, E. M. Ainley, P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, G. Araneda, D. M. Lu- cas, C. J. Ballance, and R. Srinivas, Squeezing, trisqueez- ing, and quadsqueezing in a spin-oscillator system (2024), arXiv:2403.05471 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Vogel and R

    W. Vogel and R. L. de Matos Filho, Nonlinear Jaynes- Cummings dynamics of a trapped ion, Phys. Rev. A52, 4214 (1995)

    work page 1995

  47. [47]

    R. L. de Matos Filho and W. Vogel, Nonlinear coherent states, Phys. Rev. A54, 4560 (1996)

    work page 1996

  48. [48]

    Wallentowitz and W

    S. Wallentowitz and W. Vogel, Nonlinear squeezing in the motion of a trapped atom, Phys. Rev. A58, 679 (1998)

    work page 1998

  49. [49]

    Wallentowitz, W

    S. Wallentowitz, W. Vogel, and P. L. Knight, High-order nonlinearities in the motion of a trapped atom, Phys. Rev. A59, 531 (1999)

    work page 1999

  50. [50]

    Man’ko, G

    V. Man’ko, G. Marmo, A. Porzio, S. Solimeno, and F. Za- ccaria, Trapped ions in laser fields: A benchmark for deformed quantum oscillators, Phys. Rev. A62, 053407 (2000)

    work page 2000

  51. [51]

    Z. Kis, W. Vogel, and L. Davidovich, Nonlinear coherent states of trapped-atom motion, Phys. Rev. A64, 033401 (2001)

    work page 2001

  52. [52]

    Cheng, I

    X.-H. Cheng, I. Arrazola, J. S. Pedernales, L. Lamata, X. Chen, and E. Solano, Nonlinear quantum Rabi model in trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A97, 023624 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    Jarlaud, P

    V. Jarlaud, P. Hrmo, M. K. Joshi, and R. C. Thompson, Coherence properties of highly-excited motional states of a trapped ion, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys.54, 015501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    D. J. Wineland, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, D. Leibfried, B. E. King, and D. M. Meekhof, Experimental Issues in Coherent Quantum-State Manipulation of Trapped Atomic Ions, J. Res. Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol.103, 259 (1998)

    work page 1998

  55. [55]

    M. J. McDonnell, J. P. Home, D. M. Lucas, G. Imreh, B. C. Keitch, D. J. Szwer, N. R. Thomas, S. C. Web- ster, D. N. Stacey, and A. M. Steane, Long-Lived Meso- scopic Entanglement outside the Lamb-Dicke Regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 063603 (2007)

    work page 2007

  56. [56]

    M. K. Joshi, P. Hrmo, V. Jarlaud, F. Oehl, and R. C. Thompson, Population dynamics in sideband cooling of trapped ions outside the Lamb-Dicke regime, Phys. Rev. A99, 013423 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Diedrich, J

    F. Diedrich, J. C. Bergquist, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Laser cooling to the zero-point energy of mo- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 403 (1989)

    1989

  58. [58]

    D. M. Meekhof, C. Monroe, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Generation of Nonclassical Motional States of a Trapped Atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1796 (1996)

    1996

  59. [59]

    Monroe, D

    C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Demonstration of a fundamental quantum logic gate, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4714 (1995)

    1995

  60. [60]

    S. O. Mundhada, A. Grimm, S. Touzard, U. Vool, S. Shankar, M. H. Devoret, and M. Mirrahimi, Gener- ating higher-order quantum dissipation from lower-order parametric processes, Quantum Sci. Technol.2, 024005 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    G. C. M´ enard, A. Peugeot, C. Padurariu, C. Rolland, B. Kubala, Y. Mukharsky, Z. Iftikhar, C. Altimiras, P. Roche, H. le Sueur, P. Joyez, D. Vion, D. Esteve, J. Ankerhold, and F. Portier, Emission of Photon Multi- plets by a dc-Biased Superconducting Circuit, Phys. Rev. X12, 021006 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    W. C. Smith, A. Borgognoni, M. Villiers, E. Roverc’h, J. Palomo, M. R. Delbecq, T. Kontos, P. Campagne- Ibarcq, B. Dou¸ cot, and Z. Leghtas, Spectral sig- nature of high-order photon processes enhanced by cooper-pair pairing, arXiv:quant-ph/2312.15075 10.48550/arXiv.2312.15075 (2025)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.15075 2025

  63. [63]

    Vanselow, B

    A. Vanselow, B. Beauseigneur, L. Lattier, M. Vil- liers, A. Denis, P. Morfin, Z. Leghtas, and P. Campagne-Ibarcq, Dissipating quartets of exci- tations in a superconducting circuit, arXiv:2501.05960 10.48550/arXiv.2501.05960 (2025)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.05960 2025

  64. [64]

    Rojkov, M

    I. Rojkov, M. Simoni, E. Zapusek, F. Reiter, and J. Home, Stabilization of cat-state manifolds using non- linear reservoir engineering (2024), arXiv:2407.18087 8 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum Reser- voir Engineering with Laser Cooled Trapped Ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4728 (1996)

    1996

  66. [66]

    S. Jain, T. S¨ agesser, P. Hrmo, C. Torkzaban, M. Stadler, R. Oswald, C. Axline, A. Bautista-Salvador, C. Os- pelkaus, D. Kienzler, and J. Home, Penning micro-trap for quantum computing, Nature627, 510 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Kienzler, H.-Y

    D. Kienzler, H.-Y. Lo, B. Keitch, L. de Clercq, F. Le- upold, F. Lindenfelser, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevitsky, and J. P. Home, Quantum harmonic oscillator state synthesis by reservoir engineering, Science347, 53 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    Fl¨ uhmann and J

    C. Fl¨ uhmann and J. P. Home, Direct characteristic- function tomography of quantum states of the trapped- ion motional oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 043602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [69]

    Mandel, Sub-poissonian photon statistics in resonance fluorescence, Opt

    L. Mandel, Sub-poissonian photon statistics in resonance fluorescence, Opt. Lett.4, 205 (1979)

    work page 1979

  70. [70]

    Lescanne, M

    R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Delbecq, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator, Nat. Phys.16, 509 (2020)

    2020

  71. [71]

    Rousseau, D

    R. Rousseau, D. Ruiz, E. Albertinale, P. d’Avezac, D. Banys, U. Blandin, N. Bourdaud, G. Campanaro, G. Cardoso, N. Cottet, C. Cullip, S. Del´ eglise, L. De- vanz, A. Devulder, A. Essig, P. F´ evrier, A. Gicquel, ´E. Gouzien, A. Gras, J. Guillaud, E. G¨ um¨ u¸ s, M. Hall´ en, A. Jacob, P. Magnard, A. Marquet, S. Miklass, T. Per- onnin, S. Polis, F. Rautsch...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.07892 2025

  72. [72]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature584, 205 (2020)

    2020

  73. [73]

    Stobi´ nska, A

    M. Stobi´ nska, A. S. Villar, and G. Leuchs, Generation of kerr non-gaussian motional states of trapped ions, Euro- physics Letters94, 54002 (2011)

    work page 2011

  74. [74]

    W. C.-W. Huang, H. Batelaan, and M. Arndt, Kapitza- dirac blockade: A universal tool for the deterministic preparation of non-gaussian oscillator states, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 253601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    P. T. Grochowski, H. Pichler, C. A. Regal, and O. Romero-Isart, Quantum control of continuous systems via nonharmonic potential modulation, Quantum9, 1824 (2025)

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Y. Li, Y. Li, X. Cheng, L. Wang, X. Zhao, W. Hou, K. Rehan, M. Zhu, L. Yan, X. Qin, X. Peng, H. Yuan, Y. Lin, and J. Du, Programmable multi-mode en- tanglement via dissipative engineering in vibrating trapped ions, Science Advances11, eadv7838 (2025), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.adv7838

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adv7838 2025

  77. [77]

    Goto, Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computa- tion with a nonlinear oscillator network, Scientific Re- ports6, 21686 (2016)

    H. Goto, Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computa- tion with a nonlinear oscillator network, Scientific Re- ports6, 21686 (2016)

    work page 2016

  78. [78]

    M. H. Matheny, J. Emenheiser, W. Fon, A. Chap- man, A. Salova, M. Rohden, J. Li, M. H. de Badyn, M. P´ osfai, L. Duenas-Osorio, M. Mesbahi, J. P. Crutchfield, M. C. Cross, R. M. D’Souza, and M. L. Roukes, Exotic states in a simple network of nanoelec- tromechanical oscillators, Science363, eaav7932 (2019), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aav7932

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aav7932 2019

  79. [79]

    Mohseni, P

    N. Mohseni, P. L. McMahon, and T. Byrnes, Ising ma- chines as hardware solvers of combinatorial optimization problems, Nature Reviews Physics4, 363 (2022)

    2022

  80. [80]

    ´Alvarez, D

    P. ´Alvarez, D. Pittilini, F. Miserocchi, S. Raamamurthy, G. Margiani, O. Ameye, J. del Pino, O. Zilberberg, and A. Eichler, Biased ising model using two coupled kerr parametric oscillators with external force, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 207401 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.