Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Emergence of Pragmatics from Referential Game between Theory of Mind Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.07752 v2 pith:RT5R2WA7 submitted 2020-01-21 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LGcs.MA

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA
keywords agentscommunicationlanguageabilityadvantagealgorithmcontextmeanings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pragmatics studies how context can contribute to language meanings. In human communication, language is never interpreted out of context, and sentences can usually convey more information than their literal meanings. However, this mechanism is missing in most multi-agent systems, restricting the communication efficiency and the capability of human-agent interaction. In this paper, we propose an algorithm, using which agents can spontaneously learn the ability to "read between lines" without any explicit hand-designed rules. We integrate the theory of mind (ToM) in a cooperative multi-agent pedagogical situation and propose an adaptive reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm to develop a communication protocol. ToM is a profound cognitive science concept, claiming that people regularly reason about other's mental states, including beliefs, goals, and intentions, to obtain performance advantage in competition, cooperation or coalition. With this ability, agents consider language as not only messages but also rational acts reflecting others' hidden states. Our experiments demonstrate the advantage of pragmatic protocols over non-pragmatic protocols. We also show the teaching complexity following the pragmatic protocol empirically approximates to recursive teaching dimension (RTD).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Thinking vs. Doing: Agents that Reason by Scaling Test-Time Interaction

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Scaling the number of interaction steps, trained via a curriculum over rollout horizon, improves web-agent task success and outperforms scaling per-step reasoning under fixed token budgets.

  2. CoMet: Metaphor-Driven Covert Communication for Multi-Agent Language Games

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoMet couples a hypothesis-testing metaphor reasoner with a self-improving metaphor generator, and the resulting LLM agents win more often in metaphor-heavy language games.

Pith tools