Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 88 references

Finite relational quantum processes can yield Boolean records, acyclic causal order, a Lorentzian metric–measure limit, and an induced Einstein kernel — provided the input order and volume unit are supplied.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 11:01 UTC pith:RVLFCITZ

load-bearing objection Honest, theorem-indexed framework with exact finite-model gems; the order–volume theorem is real but consumes the inputs—order and absolute volume—that the program still has to derive. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26672 v1 pith:RVLFCITZ submitted 2026-07-29 quant-ph gr-qc

Relational Quantum Causal Processes: Exact Models, Continuum Limits, and the Boundary of Emergent Gravity

Yipeng Xu This is my paper
classification quant-ph gr-qc MSC 81P4546L1083C0581T20 PACS 03.67.-a04.60.-m03.65.-w
keywords relational quantum processesemergent spacetime geometryinfluence algebraBoolean recordsLorentzian metric–measure reconstructioninduced gravitydissipative causal orderorder–volume bridge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that a finite operational quantum process can carry the seeds of spacetime. Working from a single foundational assumption — probabilities are normal positive functionals on local completely positive maps — it shows that response differences generate an influence algebra whose center projections are exactly readable Boolean events, and it constructs explicit models in which classical Boolean records, a sharp memory-to-record phase transition, and an acyclic causal order arise from local dissipative dynamics. The central reconstruction is 'order plus number': a margin-certified partial order together with a positive additive record measure defines an intrinsic finite volume clock, and under compactness and identifiability conditions the finite data converge to a Lorentzian metric–measure space with no assumed manifold, with proper time recovered by subdividing local interval volumes and geometry determined up to measure-preserving isometry. A separate same-link model removes the bare curvature action: scalar matter on the same records induces a strictly positive two-derivative transverse-traceless Einstein kernel with a determined lattice Newton coefficient. The paper insists on its own boundaries: every result is labelled proved, controlled, conditional, or open, and no single autonomous dynamics yet generates the adjacency, acyclicity, volume unit, dimension, signature, nonlinear constraints, and matter that the reconstruction consumes.

Core claim

Two load-bearing claims organize the paper. First, relational records reconstruct geometry: a margin-certified response order plus a positive additive record measure defines a finite volume clock with an exact reverse triangle; under strong-profile compactness and identifiability, these objects converge along a subsequence to a compact Lorentzian metric–measure space (Thm 17.2), and admissible smooth limits recover proper time from subdivided local interval volumes, unique up to measure-preserving isometry. Second, gravitational response need not be postulated: on a same-link record lattice, integrating out scalar matter with no bare curvature action yields a strictly positive two-derivative

What carries the argument

Three constructions carry the argument. (1) The influence algebra: response differences define an algebra whose center projections are the jointly readable Boolean events — the operator-algebraic seed that turns classical 'facts' into an output. (2) The finite volume clock: local interval volume ℓ = ζ^{−1/d} μ[I]^{1/d} completed by path maximization; its exact reverse triangle and strong-profile compactness convert order-plus-number into a Lorentzian metric–measure limit. (3) The same-link determinant: Γ[q] = (N_s/2) Tr log D(q), whose zero-momentum second derivative is strictly positive — the induced-gravity mechanism producing a two-derivative TT Einstein kernel from linked scalar matter.

Load-bearing premise

The geometric reconstruction theorem consumes a margin-certified partial order and a positive additive record measure — it proves that order plus number implies Lorentzian geometry, but it does not generate the order or fix the absolute record-volume unit; unless some autonomous microscopic dynamics produces the acyclic order and the scale-stable capacity-to-volume conversion, the reconstruction has no physical source.

What would settle it

Implement the fresh-cell collision circuit for dephasing (U = Z_i) on a few qubits and measure the response kernel R_{j←i}(t): the model predicts exponential decay governed by the graph Laplacian with an error bound independent of system size, whereas reusing the same bath cell gives recurrences like cos(2nθ); if coherent recurrences survive on the claimed kinetic timescale, the microscopic-to-kinetic derivation is falsified. For the inverse-geometry claim, a symmetric test is frozen-anchor fitting: if the rank-five Lorentzian inertia test or withheld target-pair invariants fail on redundant a

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the order–volume bridge is correct, any finite process that passes the order and capacity gates yields a Lorentzian spacetime without a presupplied manifold, clock, or signature: dimension, proper time, measure, and local topology become outputs with explicit abstention criteria.
  • The collision-circuit model derives Markovian response kinetics — rates, invariant algebra, and finite-step error — from a unitary network in one model, so for that class the Markov assumption is replaced by a controlled derivation.
  • The contact-process memory model makes Booleanity a dynamical phase: below threshold a full matrix algebra survives (genuine quantum memory); above it only diagonal records remain, with one scalar controlling noncommutativity, entanglement, and quantum capacity.
  • The same-link induced-gravity model shows the two-derivative Einstein kernel can originate in matter response on the very records that carry order and volume, with a positive, finite lattice Newton coefficient and no bare curvature term.
  • The paper's status discipline implies a sharper success standard for quantum gravity: each arrow (microscopic → kinetic → geometric) must carry its own controlled limit, so a single fit to Einstein's equation is never enough.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension (mine): The order–volume theorem isolates the true bottleneck for causal-set-style programs: any dynamics that autonomously produces a certified order and a scale-stable capacity-to-volume conversion would automatically inherit a continuum Lorentzian limit, so the search can be narrowed to that dynamical gate.
  • Extension (mine): The induced coefficient c_lat(m) is fixed at lattice spacing; a numerical scan of the ratio a²_*/G over graph languages, matter species, and masses could test whether the balanced two-moment condition of the regulator theorem is the only route to a cutoff-free Newton limit.
  • Extension (mine): The rigidity results — central operator-valued growth is coherence-blind, and the tested noncentral covariant square-operator branches are excluded — imply that any quantum theory of causal sets with genuine backreaction must live in a non-commuting region not yet constructed, a constraint on competing frameworks.
  • Extension (mine): The finite-anchor inverse theorem suggests a tabletop protocol: a few Ramsey-ratio probes of a conformal scalar in a curved-state simulator fix the curvature radius from six anchors and predict withheld target invariants, giving a physical, non-emergence test of response-based geometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a 'relational quantum causal process' framework in which finite operational contexts are described by normal positive functionals on local completely positive maps. It constructs an influence algebra whose center projections define Boolean facts, then presents a large collection of models and theorems: fresh-cell unitary collision circuits that yield dephasing-exchange kinetics with an exact charge algebra and a uniform finite-step kinetic limit; a contact-process-gated memory model exhibiting a transition between a full matrix algebra and Boolean records; a block-cactus defect dynamics generating a DAG and a derived Lyapunov ranking; a de Sitter Ramsey inverse-geometry theorem; a fixed-band modular response certificate; a generic order-volume bridge (Thm 17.2) that, conditional on a certified partial order and a positive additive record measure, produces a finite volume clock and a Lorentzian metric-measure subsequential limit; finite regulators for Einstein closure; a same-link induced TT gravity chain (Thm 27.1) with a strictly positive two-derivative coefficient from the scalar determinant and a controlled large-N_s Gaussian limit; and a host of open/phenomenological branches. The paper is explicitly structured as a theorem-indexed framework, with status labels for each claim and with detailed 'boundary of the result' paragraphs stating which inputs remain external.

Significance. If correct, the exact model theorems are nontrivial and valuable: explicit unitary dilations, exact fixed algebras, spectral gaps, and controlled finite-size certificates are provided, and the positivity proof for c_lat in Eq. (143) is a genuine model-specific induced-gravity result. The paper's discipline in separating proved, conditional, and open statements, and its inclusion of negative controls and failure tests, are strengths. However, the paper's headline geometric claim is conditional in a way that is central: Thm 17.2 consumes order and measure inputs that no model in the paper generates jointly, and several key theorems are imported from companion manuscripts. The contribution is therefore best characterized as a collection of conditional mathematical mechanisms plus model checks, not as a completed derivation of spacetime geometry from quantum processes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 17.3 (Thm 17.2); Sec. 5.2, 5.4; Sec. 17.5] The central order-volume theorem takes a 'margin-certified response order' and a 'positive additive record measure' as hypotheses. The exact models do not produce these inputs jointly: Sec. 5.4 generates a DAG only on a supplied block-cactus skeleton and supplies no record measure, while Secs. 5.1-5.2 produce a global charge algebra span{P_0,...,P_N}, not per-vertex Boolean centers with local capacity log q_i and the v_*/c_* conversion used in Eq. (96). The paper explicitly concedes this in Sec. 17.5 and Remark 17.4. This is not an internal inconsistency, but it means the physical claim that 'quantum processes can produce spacetime geometry' is not established by the exhibited models; it is a conditional implication. The abstract and introduction should either present an autonomous model generating the order and a scale-stable capacity-density law, or state clearly that the contribution
  2. [Sec. 2.3, Table 2; Thm 5.4; Thm 17.2] Several results that carry the paper's narrative are imported from companion manuscripts and are only summarized here. Examples include the block-cactus order theorem (Thm 5.4, assigned to PRL-1) and the generic order-volume compactness theorem (Thm 17.2, assigned to BRIDGE-OV1). The present text does not contain full proofs of these statements, so the referees cannot verify the exact claims from the submission alone. For a journal paper, the proofs of all theorems on which the main claims depend must be included, or the status should explicitly be 'reported from unpublished companion work.' At a minimum, each theorem statement should cite the companion and state that the proof appears there.
  3. [Sec. 16.1, Thm 16.1] The theorem claims to close the constant metric mode and bound the complete geometric Euler covector, but it relies on an 'additional operational volume covector v_a' satisfying v_a(M_g 1)=1, with only a norm bound and a response bound assumed. No construction of v_a from the order-volume records of Sec. 17 is provided. Since the null frame is blind exactly to the metric mode, the entire burden of fixing that mode is carried by this extra input. The theorem is therefore conditional on a volume identification that is not derived. The theorem statement should list v_a as an explicit hypothesis, and the section should discuss how the record measure of Sec. 17 is supposed to supply it, with an error budget.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.3, Table 2] The list of more than twenty companion manuscripts is hard to track. A dependency graph or a table column showing which companions are submitted with this paper and which are published elsewhere would help the reader.
  2. [Eq. (96), Sec. 17.1] The notation bµ_N and bV_N is introduced quickly; the interval I_N(i,j) should be defined before it is used in the finite volume clock.
  3. [Sec. 5.6, Eq. (36)] The exponent -3.984 is an archived-data exponent from a frozen no-refit procedure. This is properly labeled as controlled numerical evidence, but the sentence should also remind the reader that it is not an all-size theorem.
  4. [Sec. 4.2 and Sec. 23.1] The paper correctly identifies the 2β/3α=1 derivation as circular if first-law matching is imposed at the target scale. To avoid giving that construction unintended credibility, the response-horizon free energy in Sec. 23.1 should be explicitly marked as an illustration of a circularity pitfall or as a target mechanism, not as a candidate derivation.
  5. [General] The paper is very long and repeats status declarations many times. Condensing Secs. 19-26 and 28-29 and moving some conditional/phenomenological material to appendices would improve readability without changing the substance.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The paper explicitly flags its own response-horizon derivation as circular; no load-bearing circularity found in the central order–volume or Einstein-response chains.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sections 3.5, 4.2, and 23.1 (response-horizon attractor)]
    "This calculation is internally consistent, but it does not independently predict LR = H−1: the scale at which the first-law matching is imposed is also the scale subsequently recovered from the extremum. ... Imposing first-law matching at L = H−1 and then deriving LR = H−1 is circular."

    The stationary-point derivation gives LR = (2β/3α)H−1. The first-law matching is imposed at L = H−1, which enforces 2β/3α = 1, so LR = H−1 is recovered from the calibration rather than from an independent prediction. The paper itself labels this a diagnostic condition, not a theorem, and explicitly excludes it from support of the foundational chain.

full rationale

The main derivation chain is conditional and self-aware: influence algebra → Boolean records → order–volume compactness → conditional Einstein response. Each theorem states its inputs (certified order, additive record measure, declared phase action, supplied dimension/capacity unit) and does not claim to derive them. The order–volume theorem explicitly says it does not generate its order or absolute record-density unit, and the same-update/Einstein bridges list their supplied actions and regulators. This is missing-link structure, not circularity. The only explicit circular step in the manuscript is the response-horizon derivation, which the paper itself identifies as circular and classifies as open/phenomenological, so it is not load-bearing for the central results. Companion-manuscript citations are used as references for model results, but the core proofs are summarized in the text and the citations are not used to forbid alternatives. Overall, no significant circularity affects the main claimed derivations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 12 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on many inputs that are supplied rather than derived: the operational process functional, the block-cactus graph family, fresh one-pass baths, an external clock/scheduler, a certified order and record measure, a U(1) charge law, a prescribed action in the unified limit, and a fixed four-dimensional lattice in induced gravity. The paper is transparent about most of these; they are not hidden, but they are load-bearing.

free parameters (6)
  • Collision-step parameters (θ, h, κ, γ) = h = t/n; κ, γ > 0 chosen by hand
    Rates and step size in the collision-circuit model are operational inputs; they set the kinetic generator but do not affect the exact fixed algebra or the gap formula.
  • de Sitter radius R = R^2 = (1^T A^{-1} 1)^{-1}
    In the inverse-geometry theorem, R is fit from six anchor Ramsey responses, with held-out pairs used as blind tests.
  • Fixed modular band cutoff Λ and sparse correction coefficients = Λ = 8; correction coefficients selected on N≤128 and frozen
    The modular response certificate uses a chosen physical band; the cubic coefficient is analytic, the linear coefficient was fit on training sizes and then tested without refitting.
  • Microscopic length/volume conversions (ℓ_I, a_0, a_*, v⋆/c⋆) = varies by regulator
    Converts record capacity to physical volume/area; the paper explicitly says this unit is an input, not derived.
  • Induced Newton coefficient G_ind = G_ind = a_*^2 / (8π N_s c_lat)
    Derived from the scalar determinant, but depends on the microscopic lattice spacing a_* and the number of species N_s; cutoff-dependent, not a universal constant.
  • Response-horizon coefficients α, β = not computed; 3α=2β imposed by matching
    Open phenomenological branch; the paper admits that using the matching condition to predict LR=H^-1 is circular.
axioms (12)
  • domain assumption QI1: normal positive multilinear process functional on completely positive local operations
    Foundational operational input for the whole framework (Assumption 3.1).
  • domain assumption Block-primitive mixing / asymptotic abelianness on the invariant range
    Used in Theorem 4.1 to turn CP coarse-graining into a Boolean infrared algebra; the paper gives sufficient conditions but they remain assumptions on the channel class.
  • domain assumption Fresh one-pass bath cells and external collision clock
    The microscopic kinetics result requires product bath input, one-pass cells, an external schedule, and calibrated collision strength (Sec. 5.1).
  • ad hoc to paper Block-cactus graph family and monitored edge-orientation registers
    The dissipative causal-order model is exact on a restricted graph family; generic graphs remain open (Sec. 5.4).
  • domain assumption Imported contact-process critical threshold λ_c = 0.3032280(18)
    The order-formation gap uses the accepted numerical contact-process threshold; it is an external input, not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Certified margin order and positive additive record measure
    The generic Lorentzian metric-measure reconstruction consumes a certified partial order and an additive record measure; it does not generate them (Sec. 17, Remark 17.4).
  • domain assumption Bunch-Davies state and conformal scalar model class on dS4
    The de Sitter inverse theorem is an inverse problem inside this specified field-state-geometry family (Sec. 5.5).
  • domain assumption Microscopic U(1) charge conservation
    The dynamical charge-center theorem assumes a number-conserving local channel; no theorem identifies this charge with metric volume.
  • ad hoc to paper Supplied Einstein-Hilbert plus massless-scalar action and four-dimensional manifold topology
    The unified continuum limit and FLRW realization use a prescribed action and T^3 topology; the paper does not derive these.
  • ad hoc to paper Four-dimensional graph language, program/clock state, fair scheduler, and fixed spacing in induced gravity
    The same-link induced-gravity chain compiles an unlabeled PL × T^3_L lattice from a supplied constructor language; it does not select dimension or topology.
  • domain assumption Finite real spectral-triple consistency hypotheses
    The Standard-Model-like algebra C⊕H⊕M_3(C) is obtained only under spectral-triple axioms; it is a conditional classification, not derived from the influence-channel flow.
  • standard math Split property / nuclearity for Type III algebras
    Used for Type I split buffers in record laboratories; paper cites this as an external AQFT theorem.
invented entities (2)
  • Response-horizon free-energy attractor no independent evidence
    purpose: Proposed cosmological mechanism relating a response length to the de Sitter horizon
    Labeled open/phenomenological; the coefficients α and β are not independently computed, and the paper admits the matching-circle concern.
  • Response-superfluid dark condensate no independent evidence
    purpose: Proposed dark-sector mechanism with PR(X) ∝ X√|X|
    Labeled open/phenomenological; the infrared singularity is an assumption, not derived.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 50731 in / 15735 out tokens · 161363 ms · 2026-08-01T11:01:51.589482+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Relational quantum causal processes formulate finite operational contexts as normal positive functionals on local completely positive maps. Response differences generate an influence algebra, and its central projections define jointly readable Boolean events. We develop this starting point through a sequence of exact and controlled models. Fresh-environment unitary collision circuits produce dephasing-exchange kinetics with an exact charge-center fixed algebra, a uniform finite-step limit at fixed response order, and graph-controlled metastable Markov dynamics. An absorbing-state model exhibits a sharp transition between non-Abelian quantum memory and Boolean records. A reversal-covariant defect dynamics generates a locally finite partial order on a restricted graph family without assuming a Lyapunov time. Conditional on a certified order, a positive additive record measure, compactness, and identifiability, we prove subsequential convergence to a Lorentzian metric-measure space, finite reconstruction bounds, and uniqueness of admissible smooth limits. Complementary finite regulators provide controlled tests of modular-to-boost response, null tomography, same-update variational identities, induced quadratic gravity, and compatible common-refinement limits. These results are exact or controlled within their stated models, but they do not yet constitute a single background-independent microscopic law that jointly generates adjacency, time, volume normalization, dimension, signature, nonlinear Einstein constraints, and quantum matter. We therefore present RQCP-QG as a theorem-indexed framework that separates established mechanisms, conditional compositions, and open assumptions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26672 by Yipeng Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The information-to-order core of RQCP-QG. Panels 1–5 retain the mechanism of the original full-process diagram: local UCP coarse graining, a generally noncommutative Choi–Effros range, and its reduction to Boolean center records in block-primitive dynamics. The collision panel displays the fresh-cell unitary dilation realized by the solvable microscopic model. Panel 6 incorporates the later causal-order re… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Unified operational continuum limit. Panel (a) records the common microscopic data: the same qh = (aj , ϕj , Nj ) and h = N −1 generate directed response records, integer Boolean capacities, and a Ramsey phase action. Panel (b) keeps geometry reconstruction and analytic variation independent; rank-nine null data plus one volume row determine all ten components of a symmetric four-tensor. Panel (c) collects… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Deterministic synthetic refinement tests for the unified continuum certificate. All panels use the common sizes N = 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32. The order–volume observables, independent Ramsey/variation defects, and four-dimensional tensor residuals decrease under the same refinement. The complete certificate falls from 0.630515 to 0.042254, with fitted power 1.949 over the displayed sizes. The gray O(h 2/3… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Model-specific same-link chain. (a) Anonymous local pair interactions compile an unlabeled PL×T 3 L record lattice. The four-dimensional language, program/clock state, and scheduler are inputs; order and integer record volume are outputs on the absorbed support. (b) Linked scalar species propagate on those active edges. Their determinant, with no bare curvature term, induces the positive two-derivative TT … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Independent certificate for the composed limit. (a) Random-pair verification after vertex relabeling. (b) Macroscopic record-volume quadrature and linked scalar dispersion. (c) The subtracted determinant and its positive clatpb 2 ∗ limit. (d) Collapse of the rescaled TT covariance for three species numbers. Open downward markers in panel (a) denote zero observed errors plotted at half the aggregate detecti… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantum correlations with no causal order

    Ognyan Oreshkov, Fabio Costa, and ˇCaslav Brukner. Quantum correlations with no causal order. Nature Communications, 3(1):1092, 2012.arXiv:1105.4464,doi:10.1038/ncomms2076

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Theoretical framework for quantum networks.Physical Review A, 80:022339, 2009

    Giulio Chiribella, Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, and Paolo Perinotti. Theoretical framework for quantum networks.Physical Review A, 80:022339, 2009. arXiv:0904.4483, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.80.022339

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 48:119–130, 1976.doi:10.1007/BF01608499

    G¨ oran Lindblad. On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 48:119–130, 1976.doi:10.1007/BF01608499

    doi:10.1007/bf01608499 1976

  4. [4]

    Vittorio Gorini, Andrzej Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan. Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N -level systems.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 17:821–825, 1976. doi: 10.1063/1.522979

    doi:10.1063/1.522979 1976

  5. [5]

    T. E. Harris. Contact interactions on a lattice.The Annals of Probability, 2:969–988, 1974. doi:10.1214/aop/1176996493

    arXiv 1974

  6. [6]

    Liggett.Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes, volume 324 ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften

    Thomas M. Liggett.Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes, volume 324 ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, Berlin, 1999. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03990-8

    doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03990-8 1999

  7. [7]

    Gromov’s reconstruction theorem and measured Gromov– Hausdorff convergence in Lorentzian geometry, 2025

    Mathias Braun and Clemens S¨ amann. Gromov’s reconstruction theorem and measured Gromov– Hausdorff convergence in Lorentzian geometry, 2025. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506. 10852,arXiv:2506.10852,doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.10852

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.10852 2025

  8. [8]

    Spacetime reconstruction by order and number.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 43:045015, 2026

    Mathias Braun. Spacetime reconstruction by order and number.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 43:045015, 2026. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01907, arXiv:2507.01907, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae456c

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Bisognano and Eyvind H

    Joseph J. Bisognano and Eyvind H. Wichmann. On the duality condition for a hermitian scalar field.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 16:985–1007, 1975.doi:10.1063/1.522605

    doi:10.1063/1.522605 1975

  10. [10]

    Giudici, T

    G. Giudici, T. Mendes-Santos, P. Calabrese, and M. Dalmonte. Entanglement hamiltonians of lattice models via the Bisognano–Wichmann theorem.Physical Review B, 98:134403, 2018. arXiv:1807.01322,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.134403

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    A. D. Sakharov. Vacuum quantum fluctuations in curved space and the theory of gravitation. Sov. Phys. Dokl., 12:1040–1041, 1968

    1968

  12. [12]

    Stephen L. Adler. Einstein gravity as a symmetry-breaking effect in quantum field theory.Rev. Mod. Phys., 54:729–766, 1982.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.54.729

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.729 1982

  13. [13]

    Sakharov’s induced gravity: A modern perspective.Mod

    Matt Visser. Sakharov’s induced gravity: A modern perspective.Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 17:977–992, 2002.arXiv:gr-qc/0204062,doi:10.1142/S0217732302006886

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  14. [14]

    Rideout and Rafael D

    David P. Rideout and Rafael D. Sorkin. Classical sequential growth dynamics for causal sets.Physical Review D, 61:024002, 2000. arXiv:gr-qc/9904062, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 61.024002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  15. [15]

    Rafael D. Sorkin. Quantum mechanics as quantum measure theory.Modern Physics Letters A, 9:3119–3128, 1994.arXiv:gr-qc/9401003,doi:10.1142/S021773239400294X. 130

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  16. [16]

    Long time derivation of the Boltzmann equation from hard sphere dynamics, 2024

    Yu Deng, Zaher Hani, and Xiao Ma. Long time derivation of the Boltzmann equation from hard sphere dynamics, 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07818, arXiv:2408.07818, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.07818

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.07818 2024

  17. [17]

    Hilbert’s sixth problem: derivation of fluid equations via Boltzmann’s kinetic theory, 2025

    Yu Deng, Zaher Hani, and Xiao Ma. Hilbert’s sixth problem: derivation of fluid equations via Boltzmann’s kinetic theory, 2025. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01800, arXiv: 2503.01800,doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.01800

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01800 2025

  18. [18]

    Man-Duen Choi and Edward G. Effros. The completely positive lifting problem for C∗-algebras. Annals of Mathematics, 104(3):585–609, 1976.doi:10.2307/1970968

    work page doi:10.2307/1970968 1976

  19. [19]

    Man-Duen Choi and Edward G. Effros. Injectivity and operator spaces.Journal of Functional Analysis, 24(2):156–209, 1977.doi:10.1016/0022-1236(77)90052-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-1236(77)90052-0 1977

  20. [20]

    American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008

    Alain Connes and Matilde Marcolli.Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields and Motives, volume 55 ofAmerican Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008. URL:https://bookstore.ams.org/coll-55

    2008

  21. [21]

    Chamseddine and Alain Connes

    Ali H. Chamseddine and Alain Connes. The spectral action principle.Communications in Math- ematical Physics, 186:731–750, 1997.arXiv:hep-th/9606001,doi:10.1007/s002200050126

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  22. [22]

    Lieb and Derek W

    Elliott H. Lieb and Derek W. Robinson. The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 28:251–257, 1972.doi:10.1007/BF01645779

    doi:10.1007/bf01645779 1972

  23. [23]

    Joshua M. Deutsch. Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system.Physical Review A, 43(4):2046–2049, 1991.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.43.2046

    doi:10.1103/physreva.43.2046 2046

  24. [24]

    Chaos and quantum thermalization.Physical Review E, 50(2):888–901, 1994

    Mark Srednicki. Chaos and quantum thermalization.Physical Review E, 50(2):888–901, 1994. arXiv:cond-mat/9403051,doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.50.888

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  25. [25]

    Microscopic derivation of quantum response kinetics from local unitary dynamics,

    Yipeng Xu. Microscopic derivation of quantum response kinetics from local unitary dynamics,

  26. [26]

    Metastable classical dynamics of noise-selected charge sectors, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. Metastable classical dynamics of noise-selected charge sectors, 2026. Companion manuscript

    2026

  27. [27]

    Stationary states of quantum dynamical semigroups.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 63:269–276, 1978.doi:10.1007/BF01196936

    Alberto Frigerio. Stationary states of quantum dynamical semigroups.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 63:269–276, 1978.doi:10.1007/BF01196936

    doi:10.1007/bf01196936 1978

  28. [28]

    Dynamical transition between classical records and non-abelian quantum memory,

    Yipeng Xu. Dynamical transition between classical records and non-abelian quantum memory,

  29. [29]

    Matthew Wampler and Nigel R. Cooper. Absorbing state phase transitions beyond directed percolation in dissipative quantum state preparation.Physical Review Research, 7:033053, 2025. arXiv:2410.00819,doi:10.1103/6pg7-3pxf

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Companion manuscript

  31. [31]

    Lorentzian curvature from sparse quantum-field correlations, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. Lorentzian curvature from sparse quantum-field correlations, 2026. Companion manuscript. 131

    2026

  32. [32]

    Causal order as a dissipative phase of local quantum channels, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. Causal order as a dissipative phase of local quantum channels, 2026. Companion manuscript

    2026

  33. [33]

    Rick Perche and Eduardo Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez

    T. Rick Perche and Eduardo Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez. Geometry of spacetime from quantum mea- surements.Physical Review D, 105:066011, 2022. arXiv:2111.12724, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 105.066011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Spacetime curvature in terms of scalar field propagators.Physical Review D, 93:045026, 2016

    Mehdi Saravani, Siavash Aslanbeigi, and Achim Kempf. Spacetime curvature in terms of scalar field propagators.Physical Review D, 93:045026, 2016. arXiv:1510.02725, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.93.045026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Fixed-band modular-to-boost response in a critical quantum lattice, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. Fixed-band modular-to-boost response in a critical quantum lattice, 2026. Com- panion manuscript

    2026

  36. [36]

    Clough and Tim S

    James R. Clough and Tim S. Evans. Embedding graphs in lorentzian spacetime.PLoS ONE, 12(11):e0187301, 2017.arXiv:1602.03103,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187301

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Semiclassical unimodular gravity.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2010(08):015, 2010

    Bartomeu Fiol and Jaume Garriga. Semiclassical unimodular gravity.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2010(08):015, 2010. arXiv:0809.1371, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2010/08/015

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    Dynamical formation and controlled decay of charge superselection, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. Dynamical formation and controlled decay of charge superselection, 2026. Com- panion manuscript

    2026

  39. [39]

    Standard and split inclusions of von Neumann algebras

    Sergio Doplicher and Roberto Longo. Standard and split inclusions of von Neumann algebras. Inventiones Mathematicae, 75:493–536, 1984.doi:10.1007/BF01388641

    doi:10.1007/bf01388641 1984

  40. [40]

    Vacuum energy sequestering: The framework and its cosmological consequences.Physical Review D, 90(8):084023, 2014

    Nemanja Kaloper and Antonio Padilla. Vacuum energy sequestering: The framework and its cosmological consequences.Physical Review D, 90(8):084023, 2014. arXiv:1406.0711, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.084023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    Local unitary selection of a capacity-balanced area reference, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. Local unitary selection of a capacity-balanced area reference, 2026. Companion manuscript with Supplemental Material and reproducibility archive

    2026

  42. [42]

    Order–volume reconstruction and linearized einstein closure in a quantum null-wire lattice, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. Order–volume reconstruction and linearized einstein closure in a quantum null-wire lattice, 2026. Companion manuscript with Supplemental Material and reproducibility archive

    2026

  43. [43]

    The modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality for quantum spin systems: Classical and commuting nearest-neighbour interactions

    ´Angela Capel, Cambyse Rouz´ e, and Daniel Stilck Fran¸ ca. The modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality for quantum spin systems: Classical and commuting nearest-neighbour interactions. arXiv e-prints, 2020.arXiv:2009.11817

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Alexander M¨ uller-Hermes, Daniel Stilck Fran¸ ca, and Michael M. Wolf. Relative entropy convergence for depolarizing channels.J. Math. Phys., 57:022202, 2016. arXiv:1508.07021, doi:10.1063/1.4939560

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    Finite quantum-information remainders and nonlinear null focusing in a quantum record lattice, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. Finite quantum-information remainders and nonlinear null focusing in a quantum record lattice, 2026. Companion manuscript with Supplemental Material and reproducibility archive

    2026

  46. [46]

    Dimension-free approximate tensorization of quantum hypercontractivity for qudit depolarizing semigroups

    Yangjing Dong, Li Gao, Fengning Ou, Penghui Yao, and Haigang Zhou. Dimension-free approximate tensorization of quantum hypercontractivity for qudit depolarizing semigroups. arXiv e-prints, 2026.arXiv:2606.17729

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Canonical energy is quantum fisher information.J

    Nima Lashkari and Mark Van Raamsdonk. Canonical energy is quantum fisher information.J. High Energy Phys., 2016(4):153, 2016.arXiv:1508.00897,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)153

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Monotone metrics on matrix spaces.Linear Algebra Appl., 244:81–96, 1996

    D´ enes Petz. Monotone metrics on matrix spaces.Linear Algebra Appl., 244:81–96, 1996. doi:10.1016/0024-3795(94)00211-8. 132

    doi:10.1016/0024-3795(94)00211-8 1996

  49. [49]

    G. G. Batrouni. Plaquette formulation and the Bianchi identity for lattice gauge theories.Nucl. Phys. B, 208:467–483, 1982.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90231-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90231-0 1982

  50. [50]

    Quantitative ward–bianchi completion on finite lorentzian record lattices, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. Quantitative ward–bianchi completion on finite lorentzian record lattices, 2026. Companion manuscript with Supplemental Material and reproducibility archive

    2026

  51. [51]

    Discrete field theory: Symmetries and conservation laws.Math

    Mikhail Skopenkov. Discrete field theory: Symmetries and conservation laws.Math. Phys. Anal. Geom., 26:20, 2023.arXiv:1709.04788,doi:10.1007/s11040-023-09459-4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Hamber and Geoff Kagel

    Herbert W. Hamber and Geoff Kagel. Exact Bianchi identity in Regge gravity.Class. Quantum Grav., 21:5915–5948, 2004.arXiv:gr-qc/0107031,doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/24/013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  53. [53]

    (broken) gauge symmetries and constraints in Regge cal- culus.Class

    Benjamin Bahr and Bianca Dittrich. (broken) gauge symmetries and constraints in Regge cal- culus.Class. Quantum Grav., 26:225011, 2009. arXiv:0905.1670, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/ 26/22/225011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Gauge-invariance in cellular automata

    Pablo Arrighi, Giuseppe Di Molfetta, and Nathana¨ el Eon. Gauge-invariance in cellular automata. Nat. Comput., 22:331–342, 2023.arXiv:2004.03656,doi:10.1007/s11047-022-09879-1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    An intrinsic order–volume bridge from quantum response to lorentzian metric– measure geometry, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. An intrinsic order–volume bridge from quantum response to lorentzian metric– measure geometry, 2026. Companion manuscript with Supplemental Material, editable vector figures, and reproducibility archive

    2026

  56. [56]

    Same-update quantum response and einstein–matter ward closure on finite lattices, 2026

    Yipeng Xu. Same-update quantum response and einstein–matter ward closure on finite lattices, 2026. Companion manuscript with Supplemental Material, editable vector figure, and reproducibility archive

    2026

  57. [57]

    A unified operational continuum limit for lorentzian geometry and einstein response

    Yipeng Xu. A unified operational continuum limit for lorentzian geometry and einstein response. Companion manuscript and reproducibility archive, 2026

    2026

  58. [58]

    On the uniqueness of embeddings of causal sets, 2026

    Nathan Madsen. On the uniqueness of embeddings of causal sets, 2026. URL: https://arxiv. org/abs/2607.05840,arXiv:2607.05840

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Thermodynamics of spacetime: The Einstein equation of state.Physical Review Letters, 75(7):1260–1263, 1995.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260

    Ted Jacobson. Thermodynamics of spacetime: The Einstein equation of state.Physical Review Letters, 75(7):1260–1263, 1995.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.1260 1995

  60. [60]

    Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras.Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 11(3):809–833, 1975.doi:10.2977/prims/1195191148

    Huzihiro Araki. Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras.Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 11(3):809–833, 1975.doi:10.2977/prims/1195191148

    arXiv 1975

  61. [61]

    The cosmological constant problem.Reviews of Modern Physics, 61(1):1–23, 1989.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1

    Steven Weinberg. The cosmological constant problem.Reviews of Modern Physics, 61(1):1–23, 1989.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.61.1 1989

  62. [62]

    Entanglement equilibrium and the Einstein equation.Physical Review Letters, 116(20):201101, 2016.arXiv:1505.04753,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.201101

    Ted Jacobson. Entanglement equilibrium and the Einstein equation.Physical Review Letters, 116(20):201101, 2016.arXiv:1505.04753,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.201101

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Theory of dark matter superfluidity.Physical Review D, 92(10):103510, 2015.arXiv:1507.01019,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.103510

    Lasha Berezhiani and Justin Khoury. Theory of dark matter superfluidity.Physical Review D, 92(10):103510, 2015.arXiv:1507.01019,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.103510. 133

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    Sergio Doplicher and John E. Roberts. Why there is a field algebra with a compact gauge group describing the superselection structure in particle physics.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 131(1):51–107, 1990.doi:10.1007/BF02097680

    doi:10.1007/bf02097680 1990

  65. [65]

    Spirakis

    Othon Michail and Paul G. Spirakis. Simple and efficient local codes for distributed stable network construction.Distrib. Comput., 29:207–237, 2016. arXiv:1309.6978, doi:10.1007/ s00446-015-0257-4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [66]

    From relational order–volume records to induced quantum gravity on the same links

    Yipeng Xu. From relational order–volume records to induced quantum gravity on the same links. Companion manuscript and reproducibility archive, 2026

    2026

  67. [67]

    Richard P. Feynman. Quantum mechanical computers.Opt. News, 11(2):11–20, 1985. doi: 10.1364/ON.11.2.000011

    doi:10.1364/on.11.2.000011 1985

  68. [68]

    Forrest Stinespring

    W. Forrest Stinespring. Positive functions on C∗-algebras.Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 6:211–216, 1955.doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1955-0069403-4

    doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1955-0069403-4 1955

  69. [69]

    D. V. Vassilevich. Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual.Phys. Rep., 388:279–360, 2003. arXiv:hep-th/0306138,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2003.09.002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  70. [70]

    Page and William K

    Don N. Page and William K. Wootters. Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables.Phys. Rev. D, 27:2885–2892, 1983.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2885

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.2885 1983

  71. [71]

    Relational time and autonomous order–volume growth in a closed quantum network

    Yipeng Xu. Relational time and autonomous order–volume growth in a closed quantum network. Companion manuscript and reproducibility archive, 2026

    2026

  72. [72]

    Axioms for euclidean green’s functions.Commun

    Konrad Osterwalder and Robert Schrader. Axioms for euclidean green’s functions.Commun. Math. Phys., 31:83–112, 1973.doi:10.1007/BF01645738

    doi:10.1007/bf01645738 1973

  73. [73]

    Spectral balance and a regulator-independent induced newton coupling

    Yipeng Xu. Spectral balance and a regulator-independent induced newton coupling. Companion manuscript and reproducibility archive, 2026

    2026

  74. [74]

    Constraint-complete quantum einstein response from an induced transverse–traceless coefficient

    Yipeng Xu. Constraint-complete quantum einstein response from an induced transverse–traceless coefficient. Companion manuscript and reproducibility archive, 2026

    2026

  75. [75]

    Exact lattice supersymmetry: The two-dimensional \ = 2 wess–zumino model.Physical Review D, 65:094501, 2002

    Simon Catterall and Sergey Karamov. Exact lattice supersymmetry: The two-dimensional \ = 2 wess–zumino model.Physical Review D, 65:094501, 2002. arXiv:hep-lat/0108024, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.094501

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  76. [76]

    A positive-hilbert origin for spectral balance in induced gravity

    Yipeng Xu. A positive-hilbert origin for spectral balance in induced gravity. Companion manuscript and reproducibility archive, 2026

    2026

  77. [77]

    Itoyama and Nobuhito Maru

    H. Itoyama and Nobuhito Maru. Mass sum rule of the effective action on vacua with broken rigid \ = 1 supersymmetry.Nuclear Physics B, 893:332–357, 2015. arXiv:1411.1192, doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.02.010

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    Supersymmetric lattice theories on curved space.arXiv e-prints, 2025.arXiv:2509.08885

    David Berenstein and Simon Catterall. Supersymmetric lattice theories on curved space.arXiv e-prints, 2025.arXiv:2509.08885

    arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Selective ladder ward protection and positive dynamics of finite quantum geometries

    Yu Deng. Selective ladder ward protection and positive dynamics of finite quantum geometries. Companion manuscript and reproducibility archive, 2026

    2026

  80. [80]

    D3-brane model building and the supertrace rule.Physical Review Letters, 116:141601, 2016

    Iosif Bena, Mariana Gra˜ na, Stanislav Kuperstein, Praxitelis Ntokos, and Michela Petrini. D3-brane model building and the supertrace rule.Physical Review Letters, 116:141601, 2016. arXiv:1510.07039,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.141601

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.