Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Optimizing Chain-of-Thought Reasoners via Gradient Variance Minimization in Rejection Sampling and RL

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.02391 v1 pith:RY7NZG6C submitted 2025-05-05 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords gradientsamplingconvergencedynamicreasoningstochasticstrategyvariance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in large language models (LLMs) can be formalized as a latent variable problem, where the model needs to generate intermediate reasoning steps. While prior approaches such as iterative reward-ranked fine-tuning (RAFT) have relied on such formulations, they typically apply uniform inference budgets across prompts, which fails to account for variability in difficulty and convergence behavior. This work identifies the main bottleneck in CoT training as inefficient stochastic gradient estimation due to static sampling strategies. We propose GVM-RAFT, a prompt-specific Dynamic Sample Allocation Strategy designed to minimize stochastic gradient variance under a computational budget constraint. The method dynamically allocates computational resources by monitoring prompt acceptance rates and stochastic gradient norms, ensuring that the resulting gradient variance is minimized. Our theoretical analysis shows that the proposed dynamic sampling strategy leads to accelerated convergence guarantees under suitable conditions. Experiments on mathematical reasoning show that GVM-RAFT achieves a 2-4x speedup and considerable accuracy improvements over vanilla RAFT. The proposed dynamic sampling strategy is general and can be incorporated into other reinforcement learning algorithms, such as GRPO, leading to similar improvements in convergence and test accuracy. Our code is available at https://github.com/RLHFlow/GVM.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Task-Centric Theory for Iterative Self-Improvement with Easy-to-Hard Curricula

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Iterative self-improvement provably keeps improving only when initial performance lies in a moderate difficulty interval, and easy-to-hard curricula beat fixed mixtures under moderate difficulty separation and suffici...

  2. SIGMA: Refining Large Language Model Reasoning via Sibling-Guided Monte Carlo Augmentation

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sibling-guided critique and revision of MCTS reasoning traces yields a 30K-sample dataset that matches or beats 590K-sample baselines on the MATH benchmark for 7B models.

  3. Distill Where You Fail: Recovering Learning Signals of Negative RL-Groups from Adaptive Teacher Guidance

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    RSTG selectively distills a teacher on negative zero-variance prompts, with confidence weighting, token-level selection, and auxiliary SFT, improving math and code RL post-training over naive GRPO+OPD.

  4. Variance-Aware Baselines and Adaptive Learning Rates for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

    stat.ML 2025-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    OBLR-PO combines an SNR-based learning rate and a gradient-weighted baseline for RLVR, but the main theory is undermined by a flawed smoothness proof.

Pith tools