Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bayesian Optimization in Materials Science: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.00002 v1 pith:RYDCNEQ4 submitted 2021-07-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.LGphysics.comp-ph

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scics.LGphysics.comp-ph
keywords optimizationbayesianmaterialssciencedesignevaluationsexpensivelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bayesian optimization is used in many areas of AI for the optimization of black-box processes and has achieved impressive improvements of the state of the art for a lot of applications. It intelligently explores large and complex design spaces while minimizing the number of evaluations of the expensive underlying process to be optimized. Materials science considers the problem of optimizing materials' properties given a large design space that defines how to synthesize or process them, with evaluations requiring expensive experiments or simulations -- a very similar setting. While Bayesian optimization is also a popular approach to tackle such problems, there is almost no overlap between the two communities that are investigating the same concepts. We present a survey of Bayesian optimization approaches in materials science to increase cross-fertilization and avoid duplication of work. We highlight common challenges and opportunities for joint research efforts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Active Learning Guided Design Space Refinement for Scalable Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization in Materials Discovery

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Active-learning guided refinement shrinks the design space by 45-50% while retaining over 99% of the Pareto-relevant hypervolume, and warm-started multi-objective Bayesian optimization finds high-value candidates faster.

Pith tools