REVIEW 1 cited by
Predicting Media Memorability: Comparing Visual, Textual and Auditory Features
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper describes our approach to the Predicting Media Memorability task in MediaEval 2021, which aims to address the question of media memorability by setting the task of automatically predicting video memorability. This year we tackle the task from a comparative standpoint, looking to gain deeper insights into each of three explored modalities, and using our results from last year's submission (2020) as a point of reference. Our best performing short-term memorability model (0.132) tested on the TRECVid2019 dataset -- just like last year -- was a frame based CNN that was not trained on any TRECVid data, and our best short-term memorability model (0.524) tested on the Memento10k dataset, was a Bayesian Ride Regressor fit with DenseNet121 visual features.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Generative Outpainting To Enhance the Memorability of Short-Form Videos
Applying M3DDM and MOTIA outpainting to short videos shifts AI-predicted memorability scores, generally helping low-memorability videos and hurting high-memorability ones, but the effects are small and not statistical...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.