Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Survey of Visual Question Answering: Datasets and Techniques

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.03865 v2 pith:RYW4LGQG submitted 2017-05-10 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords modelssurveydatasetslearningansweringapproachesattentiondeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual question answering (or VQA) is a new and exciting problem that combines natural language processing and computer vision techniques. We present a survey of the various datasets and models that have been used to tackle this task. The first part of the survey details the various datasets for VQA and compares them along some common factors. The second part of this survey details the different approaches for VQA, classified into four types: non-deep learning models, deep learning models without attention, deep learning models with attention, and other models which do not fit into the first three. Finally, we compare the performances of these approaches and provide some directions for future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DragNUWA: Fine-grained Control in Video Generation by Integrating Text, Image, and Trajectory

    cs.CV 2023-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    DragNUWA integrates text, image, and trajectory controls into a diffusion video model using a Trajectory Sampler, Multiscale Fusion, and Adaptive Training to enable fine-grained open-domain video generation.

  2. VisionTrap: Unanswerable Questions On Visual Data

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    VisionTrap shows that GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, Gemini Flash 2.5, and LLaVA tend to answer unanswerable visual questions rather than abstain, especially when given multiple-choice options.

Pith tools