Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 6 cited by

A 10 Megahertz Spatial Light Modulator

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A frequency-encoded light array creates a spatial light modulator that reconfigures arbitrary 2D spot patterns at over 10 million frames per second.

desk verdict Strong proof-of-concept for a fast 2D frequency-domain SLM, but the headline 10 MHz arbitrary-frame rate is extrapolated from a single-spot edge, not demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.08906 v2 pith:RZJFYU54 submitted 2026-01-13 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics

Xin Wei , Zeyang Li , Abhishek V. Karve , Adam L. Shaw , David I. Schuster , Jonathan Simon This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords spatiallightmodulatorRe-ImagingPhasedArrayfrequency-to-positionmappingMHzframerateelectro-opticmodulation2Dspectrometeropticaltrappingneutral-atomquantumcomputing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims to close a long-standing gap in light shaping: no prior device offered both a two-dimensional pixel-like geometry and megahertz refresh rates. The authors introduce the Re-Imaging Phased Array (RIPA), a spectrometer that encodes spatial positions in optical frequency bins and converts them back into a pattern of diffraction-limited spots. They show that driving a broadband electro-optic modulator with multiple radio-frequency tones produces arbitrary, reconfigurable 2D images at frame rates above 10 million per second, with 44-nanosecond rise times and independent motion of multiple spots. If correct, this would replace mechanical and liquid-crystal switching in applications from neutral-atom quantum computation to high-speed microscopy.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Re-Imaging Phased Array (RIPA), a folded, self-imaging optical cavity. A microlens array inside each round trip re-images the beam onto itself despite a net transverse displacement, keeping the spatial mode stable while the optical path length accumulates a large, frequency-dependent phase. Two cascaded RIPAs with very different round-trip lengths (9.4 cm and 231 cm) create an N_x by N_y phased array whose phase profile is i*phi_x + j*phi_y; focusing this array maps each optical frequency to a specific focal-plane location. The first RIPA sets the y‑coordinate and the second sets x, producing a raster pattern akin to a cathode-ray tube.

What would settle it

Turn off or detune the path-length lock of the second RIPA (the 231 cm round trip) and measure the focused spot: a drift of even a small fraction of a wavelength should cause the spot to blur, shift, or break into multiple lobes, directly testing the coherence assumption. Alternatively, pulse a single frequency tone and inspect the focal plane during the 44 ns transient: if higher-order spatial modes (suppression factors as low as 10.7 in the current setup) are excited, a secondary spot or a halo should appear that is not predicted by the ideal single-mode interference model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a frequency-to-position mapping can make a spatial light modulator that is both two-dimensionally arbitrary and MHz-fast. The device takes a single optical carrier, phase-modulates it into many controlled frequency tones, and passes the beam through two cascaded RIPA stages arranged orthogonally. Each RIPA duplicates the beam over many round trips, adding a frequency-dependent phase between adjacent beams while a microlens array keeps all beams on a common spatial mode. When focused, the phased array produces a single interference spot whose position depends on frequency; sweeping frequency rasters the spot through a 2D Brillouin zone, while injecting multiple tones

Load-bearing premise

The mapping from frequency to spot position assumes that after many round trips in both RIPAs, all beams remain mutually coherent and share a common spatial mode, so their interference is a single clean spot whose location is determined only by optical frequency.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Neutral-atom quantum processors could gain local gate control and atom rearrangement at rates set by MHz electronics rather than by mirror inertia or acoustic transit times.
  • Microscopy and neuro-imaging could use random-access, microsecond-resolved illumination of many small regions, instead of scanning a single beam.
  • If scaled to a 100x100 array with round-trip loss below 1%, the architecture would provide over ten thousand independent, diffraction-limited spots at MHz update rates.
  • Because the frequency bins are independent, the scheme supports parallel, asynchronous control (motion, splitting, merging) of many spots from a single RF drive line.
  • The same frequency-to-position mapping can be run in reverse, making the RIPA a high-resolution spectrometer usable for precision spectroscopy and frequency multiplexing in quantum networks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper demonstrates an 8x9 array, but the authors project scaling to 100x100 by cutting round-trip loss below 1%. If that scaling holds, the RIPA could become a general-purpose fast 'light-field display' whose pixel count is set by available modulation bandwidth (tens of GHz), not by the optical footprint.
  • The suppression of acoustic lensing relative to AODs (a factor 0.027 here) suggests a testable extension: continuously chirped frequency ramps could steer optical tweezers through large focal-plane displacements with minimal axial focal shift, which would directly benefit atom transport.
  • The power-efficiency/linewidth tradeoff, calibrated for the current device, implies that a user could choose a high out-coupling ratio to maximize brightness and still retain a near-diffraction-limited spot; this is important for photon-starved applications like single-atom imaging, but the paper only gives simulated curves for this tradeoff.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Re-Imaging Phased Array (RIPA), a frequency-domain spatial light modulator architecture. Optical tones generated by a broadband EOM are mapped to 2D positions through two cascaded re-imaging spectrometers that produce an Nx×Ny phased beam array; the interference spot position is controlled by optical frequency. Static characterization shows an 11-spot arbitrary 'S' pattern, 2.6% peak-intensity uniformity, ~3% waist uniformity, and power-law crosstalk matching a theoretical model. Dynamic measurements show a 44(1) ns 10–90% rise/fall time for a single-spot 1 μs pulse, random-access addressing across a four-site registry with 200 ns switching, independent two-spot continuous motion, and splitting/merging of spots. The authors claim this corresponds to frame rates exceeding 10 MHz and project scaling to 100×100 arrays.

Significance. If the headline claim held in full, this would be a significant advance: it would provide MHz-rate, arbitrary, reconfigurable 2D optical addressing with diffraction-limited spots, overcoming the speed/geometry dichotomy between LCoS/DMD devices and AODs. The paper's strengths include a clean Fourier-optics derivation (Eqs. S1–S2), reproducible open-source simulation codes (Refs. 56–57), and internally consistent static characterization data. The crosstalk model uses measured round-trip losses as inputs rather than fitting to the claimed outcome, and the measured 44 ns rise time, 2.6% uniformity, and 3.7% total efficiency are credible. The main weakness is that the headline frame-rate claim is extrapolated from a single-spot amplitude edge rather than from full-frame pattern reconfiguration; the only retargeting measurement shows 200 ns switching (5 MHz).

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Fig. 4(c); Outlook] The central claim 'frame rates exceeding 10 million frames per second' is not directly supported. Fig. 4(c) measures the 44(1) ns 10–90% rise/fall of a single optical pulse at one fixed position, which demonstrates fast amplitude modulation of an already-addressed spot, not replacement of an entire arbitrary multi-spot frame. The random-access four-site registry (Fig. 4(b)) reports a 200 ns switching time (5 MHz), and the two-spot and splitting/merging demonstrations (Fig. 4(d,e)) run over 200 ns. Because the RIPA is a dispersive filter with an impulse-response memory of approximately N_x L_rt2/c ≈ 62 ns (f_res = 16 MHz), a frequency hop that moves the spot involves decay of the old interference pattern and growth of the new one; the 44 ns edge at a stationary spot does not bound the full-frame reconfiguration time. Please either add a direct measurement of switching between two differen
  2. [Methods §3, 'Tolerance to misalignment'] The architecture relies on all beams in the phased array sharing a common fundamental spatial mode. The reported suppression factor S = ∫|E00|²/∫|E01|² ranges from 10.7 to 249 (average 66.4) for the lowest-order odd mode. At S=10.7, roughly 9% of the integrated power resides in the |01⟩ mode, which has a different Gouy phase and therefore focuses at different transverse/axial positions. This could broaden or distort the interference spot and affect the crosstalk and uniformity numbers in Fig. 3, especially near the edges of the Brillouin zone. Please report the mode purity (or an equivalent Strehl ratio) over the full operating range and quantify how residual higher-order content affects addressing accuracy and crosstalk. The active path-length lock is described (Ext. Data Fig. 1), but no stability numbers (e.g., residual phase noise or drift) are given; those would also help support the
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods, 'Frequency tone generation'] The waveform expression 'V(t) = 1PN k=1 Ak PN k=1 Ak cos...' is garbled; the intended normalization is missing. Please correct the equation.
  2. [Fig. 4(b)] Please define '200 ns switching time' operationally. Is it the interval between successive site activations, the 10–90% intensity transition at each site, or the settling time? Reconcile this value with the 44 ns rise/fall time in Fig. 4(c) and with the stated f_res = 16 MHz resolution.
  3. [Methods §2, 'Crosstalk'] The crosstalk definition ('Gaussian-weighted optical power encircled within a waist w'_0') should state the exact integration region and weighting. Also, explain how the statement that the second-largest interference peak maintains ~4.5% intensity regardless of N is consistent with the measured crosstalk at separations near one waist.
  4. [Outlook; Fig. 3(e)] The 100×100 projection assumes round-trip loss below 1%, whereas the measured internal losses are 2.2(1.1)% (first RIPA) and 3.3(2.2)% plus 9.7(9)% locking loss (second RIPA). Please label the red curve in Fig. 3(e) explicitly as an extrapolation based on an assumed loss budget, not a measured scaling law.
  5. [Data Availability] The statement that data are available only 'upon request, due to proprietary file formats' limits reproducibility. Consider depositing the raw data in a public repository in an open format, consistent with the open-source code already provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's predictions are conditional on independently measured inputs, not fitted to their own outcomes.

full rationale

The RIPA's frequency-to-position mapping is derived from the Fourier transform of a phased array (Methods Eq. S1/S2) with spot position set by round-trip phases, and the measured spot positions confirm rather than define those phases. The crosstalk model is not circular: it takes independently measured round-trip losses (A1, A2) as inputs and then reproduces the measured crosstalk; the advertised 100x100 projection is explicitly conditional on an assumed 1% round-trip loss, so it is a scaling calculation rather than a post-diction of the demonstrated 8x9 result. The rise-time agreement is similarly self-contained, being dominated by the independently known 7.7 ns round-trip time and 50 MHz photodetector bandwidth, with no parameter fitted to the measured 44(1) ns edge. Self-citations (the optical filter [41], simulation codes [56,57], and phase-calibration method [58]) are component-level or methodological references and do not carry the central derivation. Any gap between the measured single-spot edge and the asserted full-frame 10 MHz reconfiguration rate is an evidentiary extrapolation, not a definitional or self-citation circularity. Thus the circularity burden is low and no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated. RIPA is an engineered optical architecture, not an unexplained entity; its performance is the result being reported, so it is listed as the invention, not as an invented theoretical term.

free parameters (6)
  • Round-trip loss A1 (first RIPA) = 5.1(9)%
    Extracted by fitting exponential decay of the output beam array; used in crosstalk model and efficiency analysis (Ext. Data Table I).
  • Round-trip loss A2 (second RIPA) = 19.8(1.8)%
    Extracted from exponential decay; dominates effective number of interfering beams and is used to match measured crosstalk.
  • Out-coupling ratio kappa1 = 2.9(7)%
    Measured per-round-trip outcoupling in first RIPA; sets power efficiency and linewidth broadening tradeoff.
  • Out-coupling ratio kappa2 = 6.8(7)%
    Measured per-round-trip outcoupling in second RIPA; used in the tradeoff analysis (Ext. Data Fig. 5).
  • Crosstalk power-law exponent = -3.1
    Empirically fit to measured azimuthally averaged crosstalk (Fig. 3e); used to characterize tails and extrapolate scaling.
  • Assumed 100x100 round-trip loss = 1%
    Not measured; projected from two-mirror geometry and micro-mirror arrays; underpins the 100x100 crosstalk and scalability claims.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Fourier transform by a lens maps the phased-array field to the focal plane (Eq. S1/S2).
    Standard paraxial Fourier optics; invoked in Methods section 3.
  • domain assumption The lens-guide operates in the 'half confocal' regime (Lrt = 2f), giving a stable eigenmode and pi/2 Gouy phase per round trip.
    Used to claim mode stability and low clipping loss; assumes the ABCD model holds with no significant aberrations beyond static correction.
  • domain assumption Round-trip path lengths, especially Lrt,2 ~ 231 cm, are actively stabilized to a small fraction of an optical wavelength.
    Active 785 nm lock and piezo mirror; if drift occurs, frequency-to-phase mapping fails. Methods and Ext. Data Fig. 1.
  • domain assumption The static SLM phase mask compensates all wavefront aberrations and remains valid over the 3 GHz operating bandwidth.
    Calibration performed at one frequency; methods state chromatic dispersion is negligible (Methods section 1).
  • domain assumption Modulation tones are independent and linear: no intermodulation or four-wave mixing degrades the frequency-to-spot mapping.
    The synthesis treats each tone as an independent phased-array component; any nonlinearity would create ghost spots.
  • ad hoc to paper Projected scaling: internal round-trip loss can be reduced below 1% using two-mirror geometry, micro-mirror arrays, and nano-textured optics.
    This is a design projection, not a demonstrated result; the 100x100 crosstalk and bandwidth calculations depend on it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A 10 Megahertz Spatial Light Modulator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RZJFYU54

@misc{pith2026260108906,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A 10 Megahertz Spatial Light Modulator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RZJFYU54}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.08906}
}
read the original abstract

Rapid and programmable shaping of light fields is central to modern microscopy, display technologies, optical communications and sensing, quantum engineering, and quantum information processing. Current wavefront shaping technologies face a fundamental dichotomy: liquid-crystal-on-silicon spatial light modulators (LCoS-SLMs) offer high pixel count but suffer from low refresh rates, while acousto-optic deflectors (AODs) provide moderate speed with restricted optical beam geometries. Though recent advances in photonic integrated circuits achieve fast switching, there is currently no tool that provides MHz-rate, continuous motion, and arbitrarily reconfigurable control over a set of diffraction-limited spots. Here we introduce a new class of spatial light modulator that provides both 2D pixel geometry and high speed. The device operates by encoding spatial information in frequency bins via a broadband optical phase modulator, and decoding them via a first-of-its-kind, high-resolution 2D spectrometer. The spectrometer, based on the architecture which we call the Re-Imaging Phased Array (RIPA), achieves its sensitivity through long path-lengths, enabled by intra-spectrometer re-imaging lens-guides. We demonstrate site-resolved optical pulsing with a 44(1)~ns rise time, corresponding to frame rates exceeding 10 million frames per second, as well as arbitrary, reconfigurable 2D addressing and multi-site operations, including asynchronous, independent beam motion, splitting, and recombination. Leveraging these tools opens new horizons in rapid optical manipulation of matter across science, from fast, scalable control that approaches the inertial and radiation limits of atoms in quantum processors, to dynamically programmable, microsecond-resolved illumination in microscopy and neuro-biological imaging.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.08906 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Pfaffian quantum Hall state of ultracold bosons

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Experimental preparation of a bosonic Pfaffian quantum Hall state in ultracold atoms via Floquet engineering, with correlation measurements confirming pairing.

  2. Fast single-atom preparation in optical tweezers via Rydberg blockade

    physics.atom-ph 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Demonstrates intra-tweezer Rydberg blockade for microsecond-scale single-atom preparation in 171Yb, reducing multi-atom probability to 1% in 64.8 μs with 58% retention or 75% filling fraction.

  3. An Algorithm for Fast Assembling Large-Scale Defect-Free Atom Arrays

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A graph neural network path planner and phase-aware Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm enable defect-free assembly of 10,000-atom arrays in under 6 ms, faster than typical atom loss times.

  4. 2D Optical Beam Scanning using Integrated Acousto-Optics and a Frequency Comb

    physics.optics 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Integrated acousto-optic deflection combined with frequency comb dispersion achieves 2D beam scanning from one aperture, with a demonstrated 18.2 by 4.3 degree field of view using 11 comb lines.

  5. High-fidelity entangling gates and nonlocal circuits with neutral atoms

    quant-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Neutral-atom system delivers state-of-the-art CZ gate fidelity of 99.854% (99.941% postselected) and demonstrates coherent rearrangement for nonlocal quantum circuits.

  6. Operational criteria for quantum advantage in latency-constrained nonlocal games

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A framework with operational criteria and a trapped-atom hardware proposal for achieving statistically significant quantum advantage in latency-constrained nonlocal games.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    on” state (top), during the transient (middle), and in the “off

    Scaling to a100×100array (red curve) predicts crosstalk levels below10 −4 at moderate separations.Inset: Crosstalk is calculated through azimuthal averaging (along the dashed circle) the integrated intensity within one beam waist radius (solid circle).f–hSystem-wide uniformity maps across the first Brillouin zone illustratingf, peak intensity andg,h, fitt...

  2. [2]

    The azimuthal average of this crosstalk reaches as low as2.8×10 −3 at a separation ofd/w ′ 0 = 6.1

    Due to the multi-beam interference nature of the spots, they exhibit power-law tails measured to be c(d)∼ d w′ 0 −3.1 at large distances, rather than the ex- ponential decayc(d)∼exp − d2 w′ 0 2 of a Gaussian beam. The azimuthal average of this crosstalk reaches as low as2.8×10 −3 at a separation ofd/w ′ 0 = 6.1. These re- sults agree well with our theoret...

  3. [3]

    Hell, S. W. Far-field optical nanoscopy.Science316, 1153–1158 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    Vettenburg, T.et al.Light-sheet microscopy using an airy beam.Nature Methods11, 541–544 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    O., Simon, P

    Fahrbach, F. O., Simon, P. & Rohrbach, A. Microscopy with self-reconstructing beams.Nature photonics4, 780– 785 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    & Kobayashi, S

    Takeda, M., Ina, H. & Kobayashi, S. Fourier-transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based to- pography and interferometry.Journal of the optical so- ciety of America72, 156–160 (1982)

    1982

  7. [7]

    J., Fini, J

    Richardson, D. J., Fini, J. M. & Nelson, L. E. Space- division multiplexing in optical fibres.Nature photonics 7, 354–362 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    Bozinovic, N.et al.Terabit-scale orbital angular momen- tum mode division multiplexing in fibers.science340, 1545–1548 (2013)

    2013

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Observation of quantum hawking radi- ation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole

    Steinhauer, J. Observation of quantum hawking radi- ation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole. Nature Physics12, 959–965 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    W., Gaj, A., Feng, L

    Clark, L. W., Gaj, A., Feng, L. & Chin, C. Collective emission of matter-wave jets from driven bose–einstein condensates.Nature551, 356–359 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    S., Ji, G., Mazurenko, A., Greif, D

    Chiu, C. S., Ji, G., Mazurenko, A., Greif, D. & Greiner, M. Quantum state engineering of a hubbard system with ultracold fermions.Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 243201 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Yan, Z.et al.Superradiant and subradiant cavity scatter- ing by atom arrays.Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 253603 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    & Takahashi, Y

    Yamazaki, R., Taie, S., Sugawa, S. & Takahashi, Y. Sub- micron spatial modulation of an interatomic interaction in a bose-einstein condensate.Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 050405 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    & Simon, J

    Baum, C., Jaffe, M., Palm, L., Kumar, A. & Simon, J. Optical mode conversion via spatiotemporally modulated atomic susceptibility.Optics Express31, 528–535 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Orsi, F.et al.Cavity microscope for micrometer-scale control of atom-photon interactions.PRX Quantum5, 040333 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    P.et al.Multimode cavity qed ising spin glass

    Marsh, B. P.et al.Multimode cavity qed ising spin glass. Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 160403 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Graham, T.et al.Multi-qubit entanglement and algo- rithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer.Nature 604, 457–462 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Radnaev, A.et al.Universal neutral-atom quantum com- puter with individual optical addressing and nondestruc- tive readout.PRX Quantum6, 030334 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    J.et al.A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits.Nature647, 60—-67 (2025)

    Manetsch, H. J.et al.A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits.Nature647, 60—-67 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Endres, M.et al.Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays.Science354, 1024– 1027 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    R.et al.Demonstration of quantum brachis- tochrones between distant states of an atom.Phys

    Lam, M. R.et al.Demonstration of quantum brachis- tochrones between distant states of an atom.Phys. Rev. X11, 011035 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Chiu, N.-C.et al.Continuous operation of a coherent 3,000-qubit system.Nature646, 1075––1080 (2025). 8

    2025

  15. [23]

    & Thompson, J

    Li, Y., Bao, Y., Peper, M., Li, C. & Thompson, J. D. Fast, continuousandcoherentatomreplacementinaneu- tral atom qubit array (2025). 2506.15633

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Chow, M. N. H.et al.Circuit-based leakage-to-erasure conversion in a neutral-atom quantum processor.PRX Quantum5, 040343 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Bluvstein, D.et al.Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays.Nature626, 58–65 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    & Lucas, A

    Guo, J., Hong, Y., Kaufman, A. & Lucas, A. Toward self-correcting quantum codes for neutral atom arrays. PRX Quantum7, 010301 (2026)

    2026

  19. [27]

    & Regal, C

    Brown, M., Thiele, T., Kiehl, C., Hsu, T.-W. & Regal, C. Gray-molasses optical-tweezer loading: controlling colli- sions for scaling atom-array assembly.Physical Review X 9, 011057 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Bluvstein, D.et al.A quantum processor based on co- herent transport of entangled atom arrays.Nature604, 451–456 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Zhao, M.et al.An integrated photonics platform for high-speed, ultrahigh-extinction, many-channel quantum control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09920(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Katona, G.et al.Fast two-photon in vivo imaging with three-dimensional random-access scanning in large tissue volumes.Nature methods9, 201–208 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Yamaguchi, A.et al.Multi-neuronal recording in un- restrained animals with all acousto-optic random-access line-scanning two-photon microscopy.Frontiers in Neu- roscience17, 1135457 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    & Knill, E

    Eastin, B. & Knill, E. Restrictions on transversal en- coded quantum gate sets.Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 110502 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    Pogorelov, I.et al.Experimental fault-tolerant code switching.Nature Physics21, 298–303 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Bravyi, S.et al.High-threshold and low-overhead fault- tolerant quantum memory.Nature627, 778–782 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    & Thompson, J

    Zhang, B., Peng, P., Paul, A. & Thompson, J. D. Scaled localgatecontrollerforopticallyaddressedqubits.Optica 11, 227–233 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Dickson, L. D. Optical considerations for an acoustooptic deflector.Applied Optics11, 2196–2202 (1972)

    1972

  29. [37]

    2506.13724

    Zhang, B.et al.Leveraging erasure errors in logical qubits with metastable171yb atoms (2025). 2506.13724

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Large angular dispersion by a virtually imaged phased array and its application to a wavelength demultiplexer.Optics Letters21, 366–368 (1996)

    Shirasaki, M. Large angular dispersion by a virtually imaged phased array and its application to a wavelength demultiplexer.Optics Letters21, 366–368 (1996)

    1996

  31. [39]

    & Ford, J

    Chan, T., Myslivets, E. & Ford, J. E. 2-dimensional beamsteering using dispersive deflectors and wavelength tuning.Optics Express16, 14617–14628 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    & Van Helden, J.-P

    Sadiek, I., Lang, N. & Van Helden, J.-P. H. Air-spaced virtually imaged phased array with 94 mhz resolution for precision spectroscopy.Optics Express32, 46511–46521 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Jaffe, M.et al.Understanding and suppressing backscat- ter in optical resonators.Optica9, 878–885 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Science Advances11, eads8171 (2025)

    Shadmany, D.et al.Cavity qed in a high na resonator. Science Advances11, eads8171 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    V., Wei, X

    Li, Z., Karve, A. V., Wei, X. & Simon, J. A second-order optical butterworth fabry-pérot filter (2025). 2510.15032

    2025

  36. [44]

    Li, B.et al.Mega-fps low light camera.Optics Express 33, 31096–31106 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Hong, Y., Marinelli, M., Kaufman, A. M. & Lucas, A. Long-range-enhanced surface codes.Phys. Rev. A110, 022607 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Sahay, K., Jin, J., Claes, J., Thompson, J. D. & Puri, S. High-threshold codes for neutral-atom qubits with biased erasure errors.Phys. Rev. X13, 041013 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    2510.11451

    Lu, Y.-H.et al.Astigmatism-free 3d optical tweezer con- trol for rapid atom rearrangement (2025). 2510.11451

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Guo, Z., van Herk, R. A. H., Vredenbregt, E. J. D. & Kokkelmans, S. J. J. M. F. Acousto-optic lens for 3d shuttling of atoms in a neutral atom quantum computer (2025). 2510.09398

    2025

  41. [49]

    Picard, L. R. B. & Endres, M. A three-dimensional acousto-optic deflector (2025). 2510.07633

    2025

  42. [50]

    Nugent-Glandorf, L.et al.Mid-infrared virtually imaged phased array spectrometer for rapid and broadband trace gas detection.Optics letters37, 3285–3287 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    Liang, Q., Bisht, A., Scheck, A., Schunemann, P. G. & Ye, J. Modulated ringdown comb interferometry for sens- ing of highly complex gases.Nature638, 941–948 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    K., Steinlechner, F., Hübel, H

    Wengerowsky, S., Joshi, S. K., Steinlechner, F., Hübel, H. & Ursin, R. An entanglement-based wavelength- multiplexed quantum communication network.Nature 564, 225–228 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Komza, L.et al.Multiplexed color centers in a silicon photonic cavity array.Optica12, 1400–1405 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Sinclair, N.et al.Spectral multiplexing for scalable quan- tum photonics using an atomic frequency comb quantum memory and feed-forward control.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 053603 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Pu, Y.et al.Experimental realization of a multiplexed quantum memory with 225 individually accessible mem- ory cells.Nature communications8, 15359 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    High-performanceoptical beam steering with nanophotonics.Nanophotonics11, 2617–2638 (2022)

    Lin, S., Chen, Y.&Wong, Z.J. High-performanceoptical beam steering with nanophotonics.Nanophotonics11, 2617–2638 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    U., Michaeli, L

    Hail, C. U., Michaeli, L. & Atwater, H. A. Ultrafast, reconfigurable all-optical beam steering and spatial light modulation (2025). 2511.03860

    2025

  50. [58]

    Wei, X. optable. URLhttps://github.com/tim4431/ optable

  51. [59]

    vipa focus simulation

    Wei, X. vipa focus simulation. URLhttps://github. com/tim4431/vipa_focus_simulation

  52. [60]

    Zupancic, P.et al.Ultra-precise holographic beam shap- ing for microscopic quantum control.Optics express24, 13881–13893 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    The OpenCV Library.Dr

    Bradski, G. The OpenCV Library.Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools(2000)

    2000

  54. [62]

    & Simon, J

    Sommer, A. & Simon, J. Engineering photonic floquet hamiltonians through fabry–pérot resonators.New Jour- nal of Physics18, 035008 (2016). Data Availability The experimental data presented in this manuscript are available from the corresponding author upon re- quest, due to th...

    2016

  55. [63]

    A comprehensive schematic of the layout is provided in Ext

    Description of the experiment Here we describe the architecture of the experimen- tal system, focusing on frequency tone generation, the geometry of the RIPA system, and wavefront correction via a SLM. A comprehensive schematic of the layout is provided in Ext. Data Fig. 1. Fr...

  56. [64]

    3, static, dataacquiredwithacamera), anditstime-domain dynamics (Fig

    Characterization of RIPA Here we present the methods used to characterize the RIPA in terms of its frequency-domain response (Fig. 3, static, dataacquiredwithacamera), anditstime-domain dynamics (Fig. 4, transient, data acquired with a scan- ning photodetector). Frequency-doma...

  57. [65]

    We image the RIPA SLM focal plane using a Basler camera (a2A5060-15umBAS), which blocks the 785 nm locking-path light by a 780 nm MaxLine filter (Semrock, LL01-780)

    A careful choice ofR= FSR 1/FSR2 =N=N x =N y and νmod k=(i,j) = (i+j/N)· 1 1+1/R2 ·FSR 2 will generate an or- thogonal square gridd x =d y ∼w ′ 0, achieving the op- timal frequency-to-spatial mapping for 2D site-resolved addressing (see Supplementary Information). We image the...

  58. [66]

    dis- tributed

    Properties of RIPA output Electric field in the focal plane The electric field in the RIPA focal plane is expressed as: Efocal (kx, ky) =F[E array(r)] =F  G(r, w0)⊛ Nx−1,Ny−1X i=0,j=0 ei(iφx+jφy)δ(r−p(ie x +je y))   =F[G(r, w0)]·e −iϕ0 · sin Nx 2 (kxp−φ x) sin 1 2 (kxp−φ x...

  59. [67]

    Owing to their parity, the|10⟩or|01⟩modes exhibit vanishing intensity at the center of the Brillouin zone

    arctan z zR , they focus at different transverse posi- tions relative to the|00⟩mode in the focal plane. Owing to their parity, the|10⟩or|01⟩modes exhibit vanishing intensity at the center of the Brillouin zone. To quantify this suppression, we integrate the field intensity ov...

  60. [68]

    Data Table 4

    Scaling up the RIPA Power efficiency and loss budget Analysis of power efficiencies are detailed in Ext. Data Table 4. The round-trip lossesA1 andA 2 are extracted by fitting the intensity distribution of the output 2D beam array to an exponential decay model. These losses com...

  61. [69]

    Half confocal

    Lens-guide mode waist and stability region “Half confocal” lens-guide mode The round-trip dynamics of a beam within the RIPA lens-guide comprises propagation over a distanceLrt/2, a lens with focal lengthf, and another propagation over Lrt/2. In terms of the ABCD Matrix, we ha...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.