Fine-Tune an SLM or Prompt an LLM? The Case of Generating Low-Code Workflows
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4o can handle a wide range of complex tasks with the right prompt. As per token costs are reduced, the advantages of fine-tuning Small Language Models (SLMs) for real-world applications -- faster inference, lower costs -- may no longer be clear. In this work, we present evidence that, for domain-specific tasks that require structured outputs, SLMs still have a quality advantage. We compare fine-tuning an SLM against prompting LLMs on the task of generating low-code workflows in JSON form. We observe that while a good prompt can yield reasonable results, fine-tuning improves quality by 10% on average. We also perform systematic error analysis to reveal model limitations.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quantifying Prior Dominance in RAG Systems
Introduces NCU metric using token log-probabilities and finds small language models match or outperform larger ones in strict factual RAG extraction, while commercial APIs show high prior dominance and negative transfer.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.