Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

FineZip : Pushing the Limits of Large Language Models for Practical Lossless Text Compression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.17141 v1 pith:S75NAYJ6 submitted 2024-09-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords compressiontextfinezipllm-basedllmsmethodssystemsalthough
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While the language modeling objective has been shown to be deeply connected with compression, it is surprising that modern LLMs are not employed in practical text compression systems. In this paper, we provide an in-depth analysis of neural network and transformer-based compression techniques to answer this question. We compare traditional text compression systems with neural network and LLM-based text compression methods. Although LLM-based systems significantly outperform conventional compression methods, they are highly impractical. Specifically, LLMZip, a recent text compression system using Llama3-8B requires 9.5 days to compress just 10 MB of text, although with huge improvements in compression ratios. To overcome this, we present FineZip - a novel LLM-based text compression system that combines ideas of online memorization and dynamic context to reduce the compression time immensely. FineZip can compress the above corpus in approximately 4 hours compared to 9.5 days, a 54 times improvement over LLMZip and comparable performance. FineZip outperforms traditional algorithmic compression methods with a large margin, improving compression ratios by approximately 50\%. With this work, we take the first step towards making lossless text compression with LLMs a reality. While FineZip presents a significant step in that direction, LLMs are still not a viable solution for large-scale text compression. We hope our work paves the way for future research and innovation to solve this problem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM-based Source Code Compression via Thresholded Symbol Ranking

    cs.IT 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bounding LLM next-token ranks to T=63 (or T=1) with escaped exceptions beats unbounded LLM ranking by up to 37% ratio and 40% speed on source code, and beats general-purpose compressors by up to 82% ratio.

  2. StateSMix: Online Lossless Compression via Mamba State Space Models and Sparse N-gram Context Mixing

    cs.LG 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An online-trained Mamba SSM mixed with sparse n-gram logit bias beats xz on enwik8 up to 10MB without pre-trained weights or a GPU.

  3. DualComp: End-to-End Learning of a Unified Dual-Modality Lossless Compressor

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified RWKV-based model compresses both images and text losslessly with a shared vocabulary, modality-specific contextual layers, and mixture-of-experts routing, matching or improving on much larger SOTA compressor...

Pith tools