Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Backreaction of near-AdS2 changes a scalar's two-point function in a mass-dependent way: massless fields couple to the dilaton, massive fields to the backreacted metric, with a Δ-dependent correction that matches BTZ.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-04 21:23 UTC pith:SB2TOX67

load-bearing objection Corrects a genuine error in the standard near-AdS2 matter-correlator prescription; the massive-field correction is new and the BTZ match is compelling, though the pure-gauge step has a boundary-term gap. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.08046 v1 pith:SB2TOX67 submitted 2025-09-09 hep-th gr-qc

The Effects of Near-AdS₂ Backreaction on Matter Fields

Alejandra Castro , Jildou Hollander , Pedro J. Martinez , Evita Verheijden This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords near-extremal black holesAdS2/CFT1dilaton gravityJT gravitybackreactionscalar two-point functionBTZ black holequasinormal modes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

A near-extremal black hole's throat is AdS2 slightly deformed by backreaction; this paper computes how that deformation changes the simplest probe, the two-point function of a scalar field, to first order in the deformation. The leading effect is a finite-temperature correction at tree level, and the paper pinpoints exactly which interaction produces it. For massless fields the correction is fixed by the dilaton and is universal; for massive fields the naive dilaton coupling is pure gauge, so the correction must come from the backreacted metric and depends on the model through V''(Φ0). For integer conformal dimensions the paper gives the full closed-form correction (3.39); it then shows that the same correction follows from the near-extremal BTZ black hole, confirming the effective theory and extending the formula to non-integer Δ. If correct, the result gives a universal low-temperature prediction for near-extremal black holes and removes two puzzles from earlier 4D and 5D studies.

Core claim

Central claim: in any 2D dilaton-gravity theory with an AdS2 vacuum, the leading tree-level backreaction on a scalar's two-point function comes from two different vertices. For massless scalars (Δ=1) the vertex is -λ0Yφ², controlled by the dilaton alone, so the correction is universal. For massive scalars (Δ>1) that vertex is pure gauge and the correction comes from the backreacted metric, through ν=-ℓ2²V''(Φ0), as -λmYφ∂²_ρφ. Evaluating these on the Euclidean AdS2 black hole yields, for positive integer Δ, ⟨OΔ(τ)OΔ(0)⟩/⟨OΔ(τ)OΔ(0)⟩free = 1 + cΔ[2 + Δπ(1-2τ/β)/tan(πτ/β) + SΔ(τ)] + O(ε²), with SΔ given in (3.38). The same ratio emerges from the low-temperature, low-frequency limit of the near

What carries the argument

The central object is the near-AdS2 cubic effective action in the Euclidean 'black hole gauge' (2.32). The dilaton fluctuation Y—the scalar controlling the horizon size—takes the static profile Y0 cosh(ρ/ℓ2), while the metric perturbation hab is sourced by Y through ν=-ℓ2²V''(Φ0). The key move is a diffeomorphism that removes the Yφ² vertex for massive scalars, leaving the vertex -(ϵν/6)Yφ∂²_ρφ; for massless scalars Yφ² is the only surviving term. This vertex, together with the scalar bulk-to-boundary propagator, carries the entire computation of the corrected two-point function.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation treats the Yφ² interaction as pure gauge for massive fields by discarding total derivatives that are assumed to vanish at the AdS2 boundary; if those boundary terms survive for integer Δ≥2, the effective vertex (2.39) and the corrected correlator (3.39) would be incomplete.

What would settle it

Compute the on-shell cubic term (3.26) directly in the regulated AdS2 black hole gauge with a finite cutoff ρc, keeping all boundary contributions, and take ρc→∞. If boundary terms are nonzero for Δ=2, the pure-gauge reduction fails. Independently, numerically expand the exact BTZ retarded correlator (4.28) to first order in the near-extremality parameter ε at a non-integer Δ and compare the renormalised finite part with (4.50); a mismatch would break the paper's central extrapolation.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • For every integer conformal dimension Δ≥1, the correction has the closed form (3.39); for Δ=1 it reduces to the earlier result, while for Δ>1 it contains new Δ-dependent terms SΔ(τ).
  • Massive-field corrections cannot be obtained from JT gravity coupled to matter; the backreaction of the metric, controlled by V''(Φ0), is essential.
  • Massless-field corrections are model-independent: the coupling is fixed by the dilaton profile alone.
  • The near-extremal BTZ two-point function, after removing contact terms, matches the AdS2 effective calculation for integer Δ and predicts the non-integer-Δ formula (4.51).
  • The correction does not shift quasinormal-mode pole locations to order temperature squared—only the residues are affected—and this conclusion is universal across near-extremal black holes in the neutral s-wave sector.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the pure-gauge reduction survives beyond the setups considered here, earlier massive-field corrections computed from a Yφ² vertex in other dilaton-gravity models would change, while massless corrections would not.
  • Beyond the paper's check, a sharp low-temperature prediction is that quasinormal-mode frequencies of near-extremal black holes receive no order-T² shift, while their residues follow (6.3); this could be tested numerically in full gravity without invoking the 2D model.
  • The non-integer formula (4.51) is inferred from BTZ rather than derived directly from the AdS2 integrals; a direct evaluation for non-integer Δ would settle that extrapolation.
  • The analysis assumes neutral, s-wave scalars; charged or higher-partial-wave matter would introduce new vertices, and the no-pole-shift conclusion may not extend.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper considers a general class of two-dimensional dilaton-gravity theories with a scalar matter field, and studies the classical tree-level backreaction of a near-AdS2 geometry on two-point functions. For massless fields the backreaction is controlled by a direct Yφ² coupling; for massive fields the authors argue that Yφ² is pure gauge and that the relevant interaction comes from the metric backreaction, leading to the vertex (2.39). They compute the resulting finite-temperature correction for integer conformal dimensions, obtaining the explicit formula (3.39) after treating Δ=1 and Δ=2 in detail and then extending by a recurrence. The result is compared with the low-temperature, low-frequency limit of the BTZ two-point function, with a claimed match up to contact terms. The paper also gives a prediction for non-integer Δ inferred from BTZ, and applies the results to 4D N=2 supergravity and 5D rotating black holes, resolving puzzles in previous work [22, 23].

Significance. If correct, the paper identifies a previously missed mechanism: for massive fields, the leading near-AdS2 backreaction on matter correlators is not captured by JT gravity with a simple dilaton-matter coupling, but requires metric backreaction. The explicit Δ=1 and Δ=2 computations are clean, and the independent BTZ comparison in Sec. 4 is a strong check that no quantity has been fitted to the two-point function. The paper also corrects two earlier results [4, 23], which is a useful contribution. The derivation of cΔ from the model action rather than by fitting and the explicit comparison with BTZ are genuine strengths. However, the all-integer-Δ formula and the non-integer-Δ prediction rest on unproven steps that need to be addressed before the claims can be regarded as fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2.22)-(2.24); App. A] The massive-field interaction vertex (2.39) is obtained by discarding total derivatives when removing Yφ² and Y(∂φ)². Eq. (2.23) integrates by parts and drops boundary terms, but App. A verifies the vanishing of the Yφ² contribution only in Poincaré coordinates with analytic continuation, not in the cutoff black-hole gauge (2.32) used for the central computation (3.39). A non-contact boundary term in that gauge would change (2.39). The authors should either prove that the boundary terms vanish or are contact terms in the black-hole gauge, or explicitly compute them.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.35)] The all-integer-Δ momentum-space pattern (3.35) is stated as 'one finds' without a bulk evaluation for Δ≥3; App. B only propagates this assumed pattern via the recursion (B.3). The BTZ comparison in Sec. 4 provides independent support, but within the 2D model (3.35) is an unproven ansatz for Δ≥3. Please state clearly whether (3.35) is proven for all integer Δ and, if so, where the bulk integral is evaluated; otherwise the generalization from Δ=2 to Δ>2 should be labelled as conjectural.
  3. [Sec. 4.2 and Sec. 5.2, Eqs. (4.48)-(4.51), (5.66)] The non-integer-Δ correction is inferred from BTZ rather than derived from the 2D effective theory; the authors explicitly state 'We have not been able to reproduce this answer via the methods in Sec. 3.' This unproven formula is then used in Sec. 5.2 to make quantitative predictions for 5D rotating black holes with general q, where Δ is non-integer. This extrapolation should be clearly labelled as a conjecture, or the 5D discussion should be restricted to the integer case Δ=3 unless the non-integer derivation is completed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (3.38)] The elementary symmetric polynomial e_m is used in (3.38) but defined only later in (B.18); it should be defined in the main text for readability.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.43)-(4.47)] The word 'perfect agreement' in the abstract and Sec. 4 should be qualified: the comparison for integer Δ requires a δ→0 limit and the removal of analytic n² contact terms. This is legitimate but is a prescription; the text should state this explicitly in the summary as well.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.24)] The anomaly term in (3.24) is introduced after the counterterm discussion but the derivation of the log term in (3.19) is not fully shown; a brief comment in an appendix would make the renormalization more transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the central correction is derived from the model action (2.1) with no fitted parameters, and the BTZ comparison is an independent check.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The correction coefficients c_Δ in (3.33) are derived from the effective action (2.1) and the dilaton potential V(Φ), specifically λ_0 = ε/(2Φ_0 ℓ_2²) and λ_m = −ε ℓ_2² V''(Φ_0)/6; they are not fitted to any two-point function. The free correlator (3.5) is the standard AdS_2 result. The massive-field vertex (2.39) is obtained by solving the linearized Einstein equation (2.10) in the black-hole gauge and discarding total-derivative gauge terms, while App. A independently verifies that the Yφ² vertex vanishes for Δ>1 by a direct integral computation. The BTZ comparison in Sec. 4 is genuinely external: the two-dimensional parameters ν=−6/Φ_0, Y_0=ξ, and λ_m=ε/r_H are obtained from the Kaluza–Klein reduction of the BTZ metric, not from matching the correlator, and the AdS_3 two-point function is an independent exact expression. The match of the non-analytic (1−2|n|H_{|n|}) term is therefore nontrivial. The self-citations [22,23] refer to prior work that the paper corrects, and [31] is only cited as a caution about an extremal divergence that the paper explicitly resolves; none of these citations carries the derivation. The non-integer Δ formula is admittedly inferred from BTZ rather than derived by the Sec. 3 methods, but that is extrapolation from an independent computation, not circularity. The potential soft spot noted in the reader's take—possible boundary terms in removing Yφ² for massive fields—is a correctness risk, not circularity, because the paper's target result is not equivalent by construction to any fitted input or self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard AdS/CFT dictionary, linearized dilaton gravity, and the gauge argument for massive fields. The only model-level free parameter is ν from the dilaton potential, which is fixed by the higher-dimensional parent theories in the applications. No invented particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • ν (or -ℓ2² V''(Φ0)) = Model-dependent: BTZ ν=-6/Φ0; 4D SUGRA ν=12; 5D ν=6e^{2ψ0}(1+10q+8q²)/((1+2q)(1+12q))
    Controls the strength of the metric backreaction and the massive coupling λ_m = ε ν/6. It is an input from the dilaton potential in the general model, not fitted to the two-point function; in higher-dimensional applications it is derived from the parent theory.
axioms (5)
  • standard math AdS/CFT bulk-to-boundary dictionary: the two-point function is extracted from the on-shell action with Dirichlet boundary conditions at a cutoff ρ_c (Sec. 3.1, eqs (3.11)-(3.13)).
    Assumed standard result, cited to standard references.
  • domain assumption The near-AdS2 linearized dynamics: the dilaton Y satisfies the JT equation (2.8) and sources the metric perturbation h_ab via (2.10); this is the leading backreaction.
    Follows from [3,4] and the linearization of (2.1); not proven in this paper.
  • domain assumption Total derivatives can be dropped at the AdS2 boundary in the gauge argument for massive fields (Sec. 2.2, App. A).
    Needed to remove Yφ² terms; supported by an integral computation in Poincaré coordinates, but boundary contributions are not directly analyzed.
  • domain assumption The s-wave sector of the 3D scalar on BTZ is captured by the 2D reduction (Sec. 4.1).
    Standard Kaluza-Klein reduction; assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper The BTZ low-temperature correlation function can be used to infer the AdS2 backreaction for non-integer Δ (Sec. 4.2).
    Explicitly stated as an expectation, not derived: 'we have not been able to reproduce this answer via the methods in Sec. 3'.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Effects of Near-AdS$_2$ Backreaction on Matter Fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SB2TOX67

@misc{pith2026250908046,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Effects of Near-AdS$_2$ Backreaction on Matter Fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SB2TOX67}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08046}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We quantify how the two-point function of a real scalar field is affected by the distortion caused by deforming AdS$_2$ to a near-AdS$_2$ background. At tree-level, the backreaction of the geometry induces a finite-temperature correction to the correlator that arises from interactions that the background generates. For a massive field, we show that this correction is not captured by JT gravity coupled to matter: it requires a backreaction of the metric field. For a massless field, the correction is controlled solely by the dilaton and hence is model-independent. We compare our findings with correlation functions on BTZ and find perfect agreement. We use our results to quantify the corrections for a class of correlators relevant to five- and four-dimensional black holes. We discuss how these corrections would enter in a holographic description of near-AdS$_2$; we also comment on how these corrections provide a universal prediction for quasinormal modes in higher dimensions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Approaching a dynamical extreme black hole horizon

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    Explicit JT-gravity solutions give closed-form descriptions of the late-time approach to dynamical extreme Reissner-Nordström black holes with persistent Aretakis instability.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Lower Dimensional Gravity,

    R. Jackiw, “Lower Dimensional Gravity,”Nucl. Phys.B252(1985) 343–356

    1985

  2. [2]

    Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,

    C. Teitelboim, “Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,” Phys. Lett.126B(1983) 41–45

    work page 1983

  3. [3]

    Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, “Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,”JHEP11 (2015) 014,arXiv:1402.6334 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,”PTEP2016no. 12, (2016) 12C104, arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    JT gravity as a matrix integral,

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “JT gravity as a matrix integral,” arXiv:1903.11115 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  6. [6]

    Near-$AdS_2$ perturbations and the connection with near-extreme Reissner-Nordstrom

    A. P. Porfyriadis, “Near-AdS 2 perturbations and the connection with near-extreme Reissner–Nordstrom,”Eur. Phys. J. C79no. 10, (2019) 841,arXiv:1806.07097 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Extreme Black Hole Anabasis,

    S. Hadar, A. Lupsasca, and A. P. Porfyriadis, “Extreme Black Hole Anabasis,”JHEP03 (2021) 223,arXiv:2012.06562 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Gravitational perturbations from NHEK to Kerr,

    A. Castro, V. Godet, J. Sim´ on, W. Song, and B. Yu, “Gravitational perturbations from NHEK to Kerr,”JHEP07(2021) 218,arXiv:2102.08060 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Gravitational dynamics of near-extreme Kerr (Anti-)de Sitter black holes,

    F. Mariani and C. Toldo, “Gravitational dynamics of near-extreme Kerr (Anti-)de Sitter black holes,”arXiv:2505.02674 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Near-extremal dynamics away from the horizon,

    A. Castro, R. Mancilla, and I. Papadimitriou, “Near-extremal dynamics away from the horizon,”arXiv:2507.01126 [hep-th]. 46

    arXiv

  11. [11]

    The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,

    L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci, “The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,”JHEP 05(2021) 145,arXiv:2003.02860 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Revisiting the logarithmic corrections to the black hole entropy,

    L. V. Iliesiu, S. Murthy, and G. J. Turiaci, “Revisiting the logarithmic corrections to the black hole entropy,”JHEP07(2025) 058,arXiv:2209.13608 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Logarithmic Corrections to Kerr Thermodynamics,

    D. Kapec, A. Sheta, A. Strominger, and C. Toldo, “Logarithmic Corrections to Kerr Thermodynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 2, (2024) 021601,arXiv:2310.00848 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Thermodynamics of the near-extremal Kerr spacetime,

    I. Rakic, M. Rangamani, and G. J. Turiaci, “Thermodynamics of the near-extremal Kerr spacetime,”JHEP06(2024) 011,arXiv:2310.04532 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Revisiting leading quantum corrections to near extremal black hole thermodynamics,

    N. Banerjee and M. Saha, “Revisiting leading quantum corrections to near extremal black hole thermodynamics,”JHEP07(2023) 010,arXiv:2303.12415 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Quasinormal corrections to near-extremal black hole thermodynamics,

    D. Kapec, Y. T. A. Law, and C. Toldo, “Quasinormal corrections to near-extremal black hole thermodynamics,”JHEP06(2025) 069,arXiv:2409.14928 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Looking at extremal black holes from very far away,

    M. Kolanowski, D. Marolf, I. Rakic, M. Rangamani, and G. J. Turiaci, “Looking at extremal black holes from very far away,”JHEP04(2025) 020,arXiv:2409.16248 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    One-Loop Corrections to Near-Extremal Kerr Thermodynamics from Semiclassical Virasoro Blocks,

    P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, and A. Tanzini, “One-Loop Corrections to Near-Extremal Kerr Thermodynamics from Semiclassical Virasoro Blocks,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134no. 25, (2025) 251401,arXiv:2412.16057 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    AdS 2 holographic dictionary,

    M. Cvetic and I. Papadimitriou, “AdS 2 holographic dictionary,”JHEP12(2016) 008, arXiv:1608.07018 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP01,120(2017)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    A nAttractor Mechanism for nAdS(2)/nCFT(1) Holography

    F. Larsen, “A nAttractor mechanism for nAdS 2/nCFT1 holography,”JHEP04(2019) 055, arXiv:1806.06330 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    5D Rotating Black Holes and the nAdS$_2$/nCFT$_1$ Correspondence

    A. Castro, F. Larsen, and I. Papadimitriou, “5D rotating black holes and the nAdS 2/nCFT1 correspondence,”JHEP10(2018) 042,arXiv:1807.06988 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Near-AdS$_2$ Spectroscopy: classifying the spectrum of operators and interactions in $\mathcal{N} = 2$ 4D supergravity

    A. Castro and E. Verheijden, “Near-AdS2 Spectroscopy: Classifying the Spectrum of Operators and Interactions inN=2 4D Supergravity,”Universe7no. 12, (2021) 475, arXiv:2110.04208 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Rotating 5D Black Holes: Interactions and deformations near extremality

    A. Castro, J. F. Pedraza, C. Toldo, and E. Verheijden, “Rotating 5D Black Holes: Interactions and deformations near extremality,”SciPost Phys.11(2021) 102,arXiv:2106.00649 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    A one-loop test of the near-AdS 2/near-CFT1 correspondence,

    A. M. Charles and F. Larsen, “A one-loop test of the near-AdS 2/near-CFT1 correspondence,” JHEP07no. 07, (2020) 186,arXiv:1908.03575 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Quantum cross-section of near-extremal black holes,

    R. Emparan, “Quantum cross-section of near-extremal black holes,”JHEP04(2025) 122, arXiv:2501.17470 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Near-extremal quantum cross-section for charged fields and superradiance,

    P. Betzios, O. Papadoulaki, and Y. Zhou, “Near-extremal quantum cross-section for charged fields and superradiance,”arXiv:2507.13896 [hep-th]. 47

    arXiv

  27. [27]

    The evaporation of charged black holes,

    A. R. Brown, L. V. Iliesiu, G. Penington, and M. Usatyuk, “The evaporation of charged black holes,”arXiv:2411.03447 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Following the state of an evaporating charged black hole into the quantum gravity regime,

    A. Biggs, “Following the state of an evaporating charged black hole into the quantum gravity regime,”arXiv:2503.02051 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,

    T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, “Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,”Living Rev. Rel.26no. 1, (2023) 4,arXiv:2210.10846 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Conformal Symmetry Breaking and Thermodynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes,

    A. Almheiri and B. Kang, “Conformal Symmetry Breaking and Thermodynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes,”JHEP10(2016) 052,arXiv:1606.04108 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Revisiting extremal couplings in AdS/CFT,

    A. Castro and P. J. Martinez, “Revisiting extremal couplings in AdS/CFT,”JHEP12(2024) 157,arXiv:2409.15410 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Mueck,Studies on the AdS / CFT correspondence

    W. Mueck,Studies on the AdS / CFT correspondence. Phd thesis, Simon Fraser University, 1999

    work page 1999

  33. [33]

    Interacting fields in real-time AdS/CFT

    M. Botta-Cantcheff, P. J. Mart ´ ınez, and G. A. Silva, “Interacting fields in real-time AdS/CFT,” JHEP03(2017) 148,arXiv:1703.02384 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence,

    S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin, and K. Skenderis, “Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence,”Commun. Math. Phys.217(2001) 595–622,arXiv:hep-th/0002230 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  35. [35]

    Lectures on Holographic Renormalization,

    I. Papadimitriou, “Lectures on Holographic Renormalization,”Springer Proc. Phys.176(2016) 131–181

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,

    K. Skenderis, “Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,”Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849–5876,arXiv:hep-th/0209067

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  37. [37]

    Relating black holes in two and three dimensions,

    A. Achucarro and M. E. Ortiz, “Relating black holes in two and three dimensions,”Physical Review D48no. 8, (1993) 3600,arXiv:hep-th/9304068 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  38. [38]

    A universal Schwarzian sector in two-dimensional conformal field theories,

    A. Ghosh, H. Maxfield, and G. J. Turiaci, “A universal Schwarzian sector in two-dimensional conformal field theories,”JHEP05(2020) 104,arXiv:1912.07654 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time,

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, “The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time,” Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 1849–1851,arXiv:hep-th/9204099

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  40. [40]

    Conformal field theory interpretation of black hole quasinormal modes,

    D. Birmingham, I. Sachs, and S. N. Solodukhin, “Conformal field theory interpretation of black hole quasinormal modes,”Physical review letters88no. 15, (2002) 151301, arXiv:hep-th/0112055 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  41. [41]

    Minkowski-space correlators in AdS/CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications,

    D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Minkowski-space correlators in AdS/CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications,”Journal of High Energy Physics2002no. 09, (2002) 042, arXiv:hep-th/0205051 [hep-th]. 48

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  42. [42]

    Thermalization of the spectral function in strongly coupled two dimensional conformal field theories

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, B. Craps, V. Ker¨ anen, E. Keski-Vakkuri, B. M¨ uller, L. Thorlacius, and J. Vanhoof, “Thermalization of the spectral function in strongly coupled two dimensional conformal field theories,”Journal of High Energy Physics2013no. 4, (2013) 1–52,arXiv:1212.6066 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [43]

    E(7) Symmetric Area of the Black Hole Horizon

    R. Kallosh and B. Kol, “E(7) symmetric area of the black hole horizon,”Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) R5344–R5348,arXiv:hep-th/9602014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  44. [44]

    String triality, black hole entropy and Cayley's hyperdeterminant

    M. J. Duff, “String triality, black hole entropy and Cayley’s hyperdeterminant,”Phys. Rev. D 76(2007) 025017,arXiv:hep-th/0601134

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  45. [45]

    Black holes inN=8 supergravity from SO(4,4) hidden symmetries,

    D. D. K. Chow and G. Comp` ere, “Black holes inN=8 supergravity from SO(4,4) hidden symmetries,”Phys. Rev.D90no. 2, (2014) 025029,arXiv:1404.2602 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    Extremal correlators in the AdS / CFT correspondence,

    E. D’Hoker, D. Z. Freedman, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis, and L. Rastelli, “Extremal correlators in the AdS / CFT correspondence,”arXiv:hep-th/9908160

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    AdS2 holography and the SYK model,

    G. S´ arosi, “AdS2 holography and the SYK model,”PoSModave2017(2018) 001, arXiv:1711.08482 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, “Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,”Phys. Rev. D94 no. 10, (2016) 106002,arXiv:1604.07818 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, “Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,”Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 163001,arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Correlation functions in the CFT(d) / AdS(d+1) correspondence,

    D. Z. Freedman, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis, and L. Rastelli, “Correlation functions in the CFT(d) / AdS(d+1) correspondence,”Nucl. Phys. B546(1999) 96–118, arXiv:hep-th/9804058. 49

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.