Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can Bayesian Neural Networks Explicitly Model Input Uncertainty?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.08285 v1 pith:SCBYUIDH submitted 2025-01-14 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords uncertaintybayesianinputneuralensemblesestimationflipoutinputs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Inputs to machine learning models can have associated noise or uncertainties, but they are often ignored and not modelled. It is unknown if Bayesian Neural Networks and their approximations are able to consider uncertainty in their inputs. In this paper we build a two input Bayesian Neural Network (mean and standard deviation) and evaluate its capabilities for input uncertainty estimation across different methods like Ensembles, MC-Dropout, and Flipout. Our results indicate that only some uncertainty estimation methods for approximate Bayesian NNs can model input uncertainty, in particular Ensembles and Flipout.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CNN-Derived Elemental Abundances of LAMOST DR10 Giants: Implications for Galactic Substructures

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A CNN transfers APOGEE abundance labels to 1.1 million LAMOST giants, producing a public catalog and a tentative chemical classification of the PG1 and PG2 substructures.

Pith tools