REVIEW 5 cited by
TwoStep: Multi-agent Task Planning using Classical Planners and Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Classical planning formulations like the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) admit action sequences guaranteed to achieve a goal state given an initial state if any are possible. However, reasoning problems defined in PDDL do not capture temporal aspects of action taking, such as concurrent actions between two agents when there are no conflicting conditions, without significant modification and definition to existing PDDL domains. A human expert aware of such constraints can decompose a goal into subgoals, each reachable through single agent planning, to take advantage of simultaneous actions. In contrast to classical planning, large language models (LLMs) directly used for inferring plan steps rarely guarantee execution success, but are capable of leveraging commonsense reasoning to assemble action sequences. We combine the strengths of both classical planning and LLMs by approximating human intuitions for multi-agent planning goal decomposition. We demonstrate that LLM-based goal decomposition leads to faster planning times than solving multi-agent PDDL problems directly while simultaneously achieving fewer plan execution steps than a single agent plan alone, as well as most multiagent plans, while guaranteeing execution success. Additionally, we find that LLM-based approximations of subgoals result in similar multi-agent execution lengths to those specified by human experts. Website and resources at https://glamor-usc.github.io/twostep
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Mosaic: Runtime-Efficient Multi-Agent Embodied Planning
Mosaic delivers 27-32% faster multi-agent embodied execution and 4-10 point higher success via agent-centric relative memory plus per-step ILP action allocation.
-
IndoorR2X: Indoor Robot-to-Everything Coordination with LLM-Driven Planning
Fusing IoT/CCTV into a shared semantic state lets LLM multi-robot planners keep high success while cutting path length, actions, and tokens versus robot-only sharing under partial observability.
-
From Multi-Agent Systems and the Semantic Web to Agentic AI: A Unified Narrative of the Web of Agents
The paper organizes Multi-Agent Systems, the Semantic Web, and LLM-based agents into one narrative in which the location of semantic effort migrated from platform, to data, to model.
-
HiBerNAC: Hierarchical Brain-emulated Robotic Neural Agent Collective for Disentangling Complex Manipulation
HiBerNAC, a multi-agent 'brain-inspired' planner layered on a reactive VLA, is claimed to cut long-horizon task time by 23% and reach 12-31% success where VLA baselines fail, but the supporting data are inconsistent.
-
COALESCE: Economic and Security Dynamics of Skill-Based Task Outsourcing Among Team of Autonomous LLM Agents
COALESCE, a framework for skill-based task outsourcing among LLM agents, claims 41.8% simulated and 20.3% real cost reductions, but the validation contains internal contradictions.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.