Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Primal Dual Interpretation of the Proximal Stochastic Gradient Langevin Algorithm

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.09270 v2 pith:SFDLKR3M submitted 2020-06-16 stat.ML cs.LGmath.OC

Primal Dual Interpretation of the Proximal Stochastic Gradient Langevin Algorithm

classification stat.ML cs.LGmath.OC
keywords algorithmconvexdistributionlangevincomplexitypartpotentialpsgla
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the task of sampling with respect to a log concave probability distribution. The potential of the target distribution is assumed to be composite, \textit{i.e.}, written as the sum of a smooth convex term, and a nonsmooth convex term possibly taking infinite values. The target distribution can be seen as a minimizer of the Kullback-Leibler divergence defined on the Wasserstein space (\textit{i.e.}, the space of probability measures). In the first part of this paper, we establish a strong duality result for this minimization problem. In the second part of this paper, we use the duality gap arising from the first part to study the complexity of the Proximal Stochastic Gradient Langevin Algorithm (PSGLA), which can be seen as a generalization of the Projected Langevin Algorithm. Our approach relies on viewing PSGLA as a primal dual algorithm and covers many cases where the target distribution is not fully supported. In particular, we show that if the potential is strongly convex, the complexity of PSGLA is $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$ in terms of the 2-Wasserstein distance. In contrast, the complexity of the Projected Langevin Algorithm is $O(1/\varepsilon^{12})$ in terms of total variation when the potential is convex.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.