REVIEW 2 cited by
Human-Centered Privacy Research in the Age of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Human-Centered Privacy Research in the Age of Large Language Models
read the original abstract
The emergence of large language models (LLMs), and their increased use in user-facing systems, has led to substantial privacy concerns. To date, research on these privacy concerns has been model-centered: exploring how LLMs lead to privacy risks like memorization, or can be used to infer personal characteristics about people from their content. We argue that there is a need for more research focusing on the human aspect of these privacy issues: e.g., research on how design paradigms for LLMs affect users' disclosure behaviors, users' mental models and preferences for privacy controls, and the design of tools, systems, and artifacts that empower end-users to reclaim ownership over their personal data. To build usable, efficient, and privacy-friendly systems powered by these models with imperfect privacy properties, our goal is to initiate discussions to outline an agenda for conducting human-centered research on privacy issues in LLM-powered systems. This Special Interest Group (SIG) aims to bring together researchers with backgrounds in usable security and privacy, human-AI collaboration, NLP, or any other related domains to share their perspectives and experiences on this problem, to help our community establish a collective understanding of the challenges, research opportunities, research methods, and strategies to collaborate with researchers outside of HCI.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DUET: Optimizing Training Data Mixtures via Feedback from Unseen Evaluation Tasks
DUET is a global-to-local method that optimizes LLM training data mixtures via Bayesian optimization guided by influence-based selection and feedback from unseen evaluation tasks, with a regret bound showing convergen...
-
Exploring the Interaction of Explanation Styles, Context, and Trust of AI Privacy Redaction in AI-mediated Interactions
Explanation preferences for AI privacy redaction vary systematically with domain and redaction amount; giving users their preferred styles raises trust over random or no explanations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.