Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 71 references

Room-temperature quantum emission from $\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$ defects in ZnS:Cu colloidal nanocrystals

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Copper-vacancy defects in ZnS nanocrystals emit antibunched photons at room temperature.

desk verdict First RT antibunching from CuZn-VS in ZnS:Cu NCs is real, but the per-NC defect count rests on dilution alone; still deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11812 v1 pith:SITAILKP submitted 2025-01-21 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph

Yossef E. Panfil , Sarah M. Thompson , Gary Chen , Jonah Ng , Cherie R. Kagan , Lee C. Bassett This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph
keywords CuZn-VSdefectZnS:Cunanocrystalsquantumemittersphotonantibunchingtime-gatedconfocalmicroscopysingle-photonsourcespolarizationvisibilitycolloidaldots
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the red emission from individual ZnS:Cu nanocrystals comes from a small number of copper-on-zinc adjacent to sulfur-vacancy ($\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$) defects that behave as quantum emitters at room temperature. The paper isolates single nanocrystals by serial dilution and time-gated confocal imaging, which separates the defects' microsecond-long red photoluminescence from the nanosecond substrate background. The paper observes blinking and photon antibunching, with a background-corrected $g^{(2)}(0) = 0.58\pm 0.14$ for the main spot, which through $g^{(2)}(0) = 1-1/N$ implies two to four defects per nanocrystal. Emission-polarization measurements match a $\sigma$-character optical dipole, supporting the $C_{3v}$-symmetric model of the defect. If these claims hold, colloidal nanocrystals become a bottom-up platform for quantum point defects, an alternative to ion implantation in bulk crystals, relevant to single-photon sources and eventually spin-photon interfaces.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$ defect, a copper atom on a zinc site adjacent to a sulfur vacancy, whose roughly 3 $\mu$s red photoluminescence is a temporal fingerprint far longer than the nanosecond-scale substrate and background emission. The experimental hinge is time-gated detection: an arbitrary waveform generator routes photon counts into early (<260 ns) and late (>260 ns) windows after each 405-nm pulse, so images and autocorrelation curves can be built from the defect channel alone. The argument for quantum emission is carried by the pulsed second-order correlation function $g^{(2)}(\tau)$, fit as periodic biexponential peaks plus a constant; a background- and dark-count-corrected deficit at zero delay indicates antibunching and, through $g^{(2)}(0)=1-1/N$, the number of emitters. For the polarization claim, the machinery is a simulation that integrates the electric field of randomly oriented $\pi$ and $\sigma$ dipole radiators over the objective's collection cone and compares the resulting visibility distributions with measurements from 44 spots.

What would settle it

Map the confocal late-count image onto a scanning-electron or super-resolution image of the same physical area and count the nanocrystals under each antibunching spot; if spots with $g^{(2)}(0)<1$ often contain more than one nanocrystal, the per-nanocrystal defect count and the inferred single-emitter statistics would not follow.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At its core, the paper reports that a single ZnS:Cu nanocrystal roughly 6.6 nm wide can host two to four $\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$ defects that emit red light with a roughly 3 $\mu$s lifetime and show the statistical markers of quantum emission: blinking and photon antibunching. The evidence is a pulsed Hanbury-Brown-Twiss measurement in which photons arriving more than 260 ns after each 405-nm pulse are counted separately; after correcting for dark counts and short-lived substrate emission, the central-peak deficit gives $g^{(2)}(0) = 0.58\pm 0.14$ for the main spot and values from 0.52 to 0.8 for other spots. Because $N$ independent emitters of equal intensity would give $g^{(2)}(0) = 1-1/N$, these values imply two to four defects per nanocrystal. The paper also reports that the defect emission is blue-shifted relative to ensemble spectra and shifts further under illumination, which it attributes to photochemical and charging effects, and that the polarization visibility of 44 dim spots follows the simulated distribution of $\sigma$ dipoles rather than $\pi$ dipoles, consistent with an $E\to A_1$ optical transition in $C_{3v}$ symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The argument that each dim spot is a single nanocrystal rests only on stepwise dilution; because the spots were not co-localized with electron microscopy, clusters of nanocrystals could also appear as dim spots with two to four emitters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Individual ZnS:Cu nanocrystals can act as room-temperature sources of antibunched photons, with the number of emitters per nanocrystal inferred directly from the corrected zero-delay autocorrelation.
  • Time-gated counting makes long-lived transition-metal defect emission measurable even when short-lived background and dark counts dominate, a method that transfers to other slow emitters.
  • The $\sigma$-dipole polarization signature supports the $C_{3v}$-symmetric energy-level model in which the optical excited state is $E$ and the ground state is $A_1$.
  • The illumination-induced blue shift points to charge-state or photochemical dynamics that must be controlled for stable single-emitter operation.
  • The results motivate spin-resolved experiments: predicted paramagnetic charge states of $\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$ could be addressed optically or magnetically, toward spin-photon interfaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-to-four per-nanocrystal count holds, then doping at 0.1% copper does not distribute defects randomly; the dopant and vacancy appear to form as a correlated pair during synthesis, which would make defect density tunable through precursor chemistry rather than implantation.
  • The time-gated isolation scheme is a general template: the same measurement could screen other transition-metal-vacancy pairs in ZnS, so the result may extend beyond copper.
  • A testable extension: if the blue-shifted state is a distinct, more stable charge configuration, then controlling the nanocrystal's electrochemical environment (ligands, applied bias) should shift single-defect spectra reversibly; the paper reports only illumination-driven shifts.
  • Resonant low-temperature excitation of these nanocrystals should resolve individual defect lines; if more than four lines appear in one 6.6 nm nanocrystal, the two-to-four emitter assignment would need revision.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports room-temperature, time-gated confocal spectroscopy of dilute ZnS:Cu colloidal nanocrystals. The authors isolate a red, ~2.8-microsecond-lifetime emission component, attribute it to Cu_Zn-V_S defects, and show that individual diffraction-limited spots exhibit blinking, photon antibunching with a background-corrected g(2)(0)=0.58±0.14 for the main spot, blue-shifted spectra relative to ensemble measurements, and polarization visibilities consistent with sigma-dipole emission. They conclude that individual ZnS:Cu nanocrystals contain two to four Cu_Zn-V_S quantum emitters, and they propose that these defects are promising building blocks for future quantum technologies.

Significance. If the single-spot-to-single-NC correspondence were firmly established, this would be a valuable demonstration of transition-metal-vacancy quantum emitters in colloidal nanocrystals at room temperature. The paper's careful treatment of background and dark-count corrections in pulsed g(2) analysis, including Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation, is a genuine strength, and the polarization-visibility simulation framework is useful. The authors are also appropriately cautious not to claim single-photon purity: the measured g(2)(0) is above 0.5 and the stated conclusion is explicitly few-emitter. However, the central interpretation as individual NCs relies on an unverified spot-to-NC correspondence, and the polarization modeling assumes the very emitter-number assignment it is meant to help determine.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.B and Fig. S2] The serial-dilution protocol shows that spot density decreases with dilution and therefore that the spots are sample-related, but it does not establish that each late-counts spot contains exactly one NC. All subsequent quantitative statements, including the N=2-4 emitter count from g(2)(0)=1-1/N and the per-spot polarization statistics, assume this correspondence. Small NC aggregates or clusters containing a few emitters would produce the same g(2), blinking, and polarization observations with a different total emitter count, so the title-level claim of individual NCs containing two to four defects is not yet supported. Please provide direct co-localization with electron microscopy or super-resolution imaging, or an equivalent statistical test such as intensity quantization or Poisson spot-occupancy analysis, to justify the one-NC-per-spot interpretation.
  2. [SI Sec. VII and Methods, polarization measurements] The simulations used to interpret the polarization-visibility distribution assume an average of two emitters per spot, based on the g(2) measurements. This makes the polarization analysis dependent on the very emitter-number assignment that the paper is trying to establish, and it does not independently validate the single-NC identification. Please show how the predicted visibility distributions depend on N=1-4 and on possible multi-NC spots, and state explicitly whether the 44-spot dataset can distinguish those cases, or present the polarization conclusion as conditional on the spot composition.
  3. [Section II.D] The stated mapping that g(2)(0) values ranging from 0.52 to 0.8 are consistent with spots containing two, three, or four emitters is arithmetically inconsistent, since g(2)(0)=1-1/N gives N=5 at g(2)(0)=0.8. With the reported uncertainties, the inferred N range is wider than two to four. Please report the inferred N values and their confidence intervals for each spot, or revise the wording to match the actual range.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (2)] The printed formula omits the square on (S_L+S_S+D) in the numerator; SI Eq. (15) contains the square and is the form that follows from the derivation in SI Sec. IV. Please make the two equations consistent.
  2. [Methods, confocal microscopy] The excitation repetition rate is stated as 10 kHz, while the main text and Fig. 2d report a 20.13 microsecond period corresponding to about 50 kHz. Please reconcile these values.
  3. [Methods, time-gated imaging] The time-gating threshold is given as <260 ns after excitation, whereas the main text and Fig. 1d describe an early window of about 200 ns. Please make these specifications consistent.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'olloidal' in the Introduction, 'DIULTION' in the SI section heading, and 'Zn:Cu NCs' in SI Sec. VII, which should read 'ZnS:Cu NCs'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the quantum-emission statistics, g(2)(0)=0.58, blinking, and polarization analysis are direct measurements or standard relations, with the same-group citations serving as external benchmarks rather than as construction inputs.

full rationale

The central results are directly measured observables: the late-counts images, blinking time traces, photon-emission autocorrelation, spectra, and polarization visibility. The emitter-count inference uses the standard relation g(2)(0)=1-1/N applied to the background-corrected central peak, e.g. "For N emitters of equal intensity, we expect g(2)(0)=1-1/N, hence this measurement is consistent with the presence of two or three emitters." No parameter is fitted to the claimed emitter count and then relabeled as a prediction. The background/dark-count correction in main-text Eq. 2 and SI Eq. 15 is an algebraic propagation of separately measured count rates S_L, S_S, and D; it does not define the target result by construction. The polarization argument compares measured visibilities with dipole simulations; the simulation's assumption of "an average of two emitters per spot, based on g(2) measurements" is an input from an independent measurement channel, not a parameter fitted to the polarization data, so the σ-dipole conclusion is not forced by its own input. Self-citations are present, most notably Ref. 33 from the same group, which provides the 2.8-μs red CuZn-VS lifetime and spectral assignment. This is load-bearing as background identification, but it is an externally falsifiable prior ensemble characterization and is corroborated by independent literature (Refs. 34, 38, 47-51); it does not contain the single-emitter statistics claimed here. The weakest assumption, that serial dilution yields one NC per diffraction-limited spot, is an evidentiary or correctness risk rather than circularity: dilution rules out substrate artifacts but does not co-localize spots with electron microscopy, so small aggregates could mimic the same statistics. That is missing support, not a reduction of the output to the input. No circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the prior ensemble assignment of the 2.8 µs red PL to CuZn-VS defects, on the dilution-based inference that each spot is one NC, on a Poissonian background model in the g(2) correction, on random NC orientation in the polarization simulations, and on the standard N-emitter formula g(2)(0)=1-1/N. None of these are established inside this paper, but all are reasonable and partially supported by cited work.

free parameters (2)
  • Component count rates S_L, S_S, D = Not tabulated; extracted per spot from time-resolved g(2) fits
    The long, short, and dark-count rates are used in Eq. (2) and SI Eq. (15) to correct the central g(2)(0) value; uncertainties are propagated by Monte Carlo.
  • g(2) peak fit lifetimes and amplitudes = tau1=5±1 ns, tau2=3.5±0.11 µs for the Figure 2 spot
    Five periodic biexponential peaks with common lifetimes and free amplitudes are fitted to extract integrated peak intensities; the corrected g(2)(0) depends on these fitted values.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The 2.8 µs red PL component is the CuZn-VS defect emission characterized in prior ensemble work (Ref. 33).
    Single-spot spectra and lifetimes are matched to this assignment; no atomistic identification is performed here.
  • domain assumption Each late-count spot contains one ZnS:Cu NC after three 1:10 dilution steps.
    Dilution reduces spot density and intensity, but no structural verification of single-NC occupancy is provided.
  • domain assumption The g(2) correction assumes independent Poissonian dark counts and a short-lifetime background uncorrelated with defect emission.
    Used in SI Eqs. (3)-(15); reasonable but not independently validated.
  • domain assumption NC orientations are spherically uniform in the polarization simulations.
    Spin-coated hexagonal plates may have preferred orientation; this is not tested, and the sigma-dipole conclusion depends on comparing to random-orientation simulations.
  • standard math The number N of emitters relates to g(2)(0) as g(2)(0)=1-1/N for equal-intensity emitters.
    Standard result for N independent emitters; used to convert 0.58 to two or three emitters.
  • domain assumption The electronic structure model with A1 ground and E excited states, giving a sigma dipole, applies to CuZn-VS in these NCs.
    Taken from Refs. 33 and 34; the polarization measurements are interpreted as consistent with this model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Room-temperature quantum emission from $\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$ defects in ZnS:Cu colloidal nanocrystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SITAILKP

@misc{pith2026250111812,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Room-temperature quantum emission from $\mathrmCu_Zn$-$\mathrmV_S$ defects in ZnS:Cu colloidal nanocrystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SITAILKP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11812}
}
abstract

We report room-temperature observations of $\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$ quantum emitters in individual ZnS:Cu nanocrystals (NCs). Using time-gated imaging, we isolate the distinct, $\sim$3-$\mu$s-long, red photoluminescence (PL) emission of $\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$ defects, enabling their precise identification and statistical characterization. The emitters exhibit distinct blinking and photon antibunching, consistent with individual NCs containing two to four $\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$ defects. The quantum emitters' PL spectra show a pronounced blue shift compared to NC dispersions, likely due to photochemical and charging effects. Emission polarization measurements of quantum emitters are consistent with a $\sigma$-character optical dipole transition and the symmetry of the $\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$ defect. These observations motivate further investigation of $\mathrm{Cu_{Zn}}$-$\mathrm{V_{S}}$ defects in ZnS NCs for use in quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11812 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. f shows the discretized g (2) function for the long-lifetime component only, corrected for the contri￾butions from background and dark counts; see Methods and Supporting Information for details on the correction. We obtain a corrected value from the central peak of g (2)(0) = 0.58 ± 0.14. For N emitters of equal intensity, we expect g (2)(0) = 1 − 1/N, hence this measurement is consistent with the presence of two or… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: b presents emission polarization data for a rep￾resentative quantum emitter as a function of the λ/2 waveplate angle, together with a sinusoidal fit. From the fit, we determine the polarization visibility, P = Imax − Imin Imax + Imin , (1) in terms of the maximum (Imax…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    All chemicals are used with- out further purification

    Synthesis of colloidal ZnS:Cu NCs Zinc diethyldithiocarbamate (Zn(Ddtc) 2), copper (II) acetate monohydrate (Cu(CH 3COO)2·H2O), oleic acid (OA, 90% purity), oleylamine (OM, 70% purity) are pur- chased from Sigma-Aldrich. All chemicals are used with- out further purification. A 10 mL solution of 5 mM Cu(CH3COO)2·H2O dissolved in deionized water is pre- par...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The diluted dispersion is then spin-coated onto a cleaned glass coverslip at 4,000 rpm for 60 s

    Sample preparation The ZnS:Cu NC dispersion (10 mg/mL) is diluted in a 3 wt% PMMA in toluene solution. The diluted dispersion is then spin-coated onto a cleaned glass coverslip at 4,000 rpm for 60 s. The coverslip is subsequently mounted on an inverted microscope for optical characterization

    work page

  3. [3]

    A pulsed 405 nm laser (pulse duration: 100 ps, repetition rate: 10 kHz) is used to excite the sample

    Confocal microscopy The PL properties of the ZnS:Cu NCs are studied us- ing a custom-built time-gated confocal microscopy setup. A pulsed 405 nm laser (pulse duration: 100 ps, repetition rate: 10 kHz) is used to excite the sample. The excita- tion and emission light are focused and collected using a 100x oil immersion objective (NA = 1.4). The emission is...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The TCSPC sys- tem records a histogram of the time difference between excitation pulses and photon detection

    PL lifetime measurements For lifetime measurements, photon detection signals from the SPAD are directed to a Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting (TCSPC) system. The TCSPC sys- tem records a histogram of the time difference between excitation pulses and photon detection

    work page

  5. [5]

    An arbitrary waveform generator (AWG), controls both the excitation laser pulses and the switching of the detection system

    Time-gated imaging Time-gated imaging is implemented by routing the electronic photon detection signals through a series of rf switches and then into a set of counters. An arbitrary waveform generator (AWG), controls both the excitation laser pulses and the switching of the detection system. As described in the main text, photon detection events are separ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The auto- correlation function is subsequently calculated from the full dataset, along with the averaged emission intensity as a function of time [41]

    Autocorrelation measurements In autocorrelation measurements, collected photons are split by a 50:50 fiber beamsplitter into two SPADs, and the photon detection signals are directed to a TC- SPC system operating in time-tagged mode, such that the arrival time of each photon is recorded. The auto- correlation function is subsequently calculated from the fu...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Polarization measurements For emission polarization measurements, the collected photons are directed through a λ/2 plate and PBS into two SPADs; see Fig. 4. The 405 nm excitation laser is prepared with circular polarization, and the time-gating method is used to isolate the long-lifetime red emission from the Cu Zn-VS defects. The intrinsic birefringence ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    9 STEM images are taken using a JEOL NEOARM elec- tron microscope with Cold-FEG emission source oper- ated at 200 kV

    Tools and Instrumentation To collect STEM images, 1 mg/mL NC dispersions in hexane are drop-cast onto carbon-coated copper grids. 9 STEM images are taken using a JEOL NEOARM elec- tron microscope with Cold-FEG emission source oper- ated at 200 kV. STEM images are analyzed using Fiji [60]. To collect XRD patterns, synthesized NCs are drop- cast on test-gra...

    work page

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Bruchez, M

    M. Bruchez, M. Moronne, P. Gin, S. Weiss, and A. P. Alivisatos, Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent bi- ological labels, Science 281, 2013 (1998)

    1998

  2. [10]

    C. B. Murray, D. J. Norris, and M. G. Bawendi, Synthe- sis and characterization of nearly monodisperse cde (e = sulfur, selenium, tellurium) semiconductor nanocrys- tallites, Journal of the American Chemical Society 115, 8706 (1993)

    1993

  3. [11]

    P. F. Garc´ ıa de Arquer, D. V. Talapin, V. I. Klimov, Y. Arakawa, M. Bayer, and E. H. Sargent, Semiconductor quantum dots: Technological progress and future chal- lenges, Science 373, eaaz8541 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    L. E. Brus, Electron–electron and electron-hole interac- tions in small semiconductor crystallites: The size depen- dence of the lowest excited electronic state, The Journal of Chemical Physics 80, 4403 (1984)

    1984

  5. [13]

    M. A. Hines and P. Guyot-Sionnest, Synthesis and char- acterization of strongly luminescing zns-capped cdse nanocrystals, The Journal of Physical Chemistry 100, 468 (1996)

    1996

  6. [14]

    X. Peng, M. C. Schlamp, A. V. Kadavanich, and A. P. Alivisatos, Epitaxial growth of highly luminescent cdse/cds core/shell nanocrystals with photostability and electronic accessibility, Journal of the American Chemi- cal Society 119, 7019 (1997)

    1997

  7. [15]

    Carbone, C

    L. Carbone, C. Nobile, M. De Giorgi, F. D. Sala, G. Morello, P. Pompa, M. Hytch, E. Snoeck, A. Fiore, I. R. Franchini, M. Nadasan, A. F. Silvestre, L. Chiodo, S. Kudera, R. Cingolani, R. Krahne, and L. Manna, Synthesis and micrometer-scale assembly of colloidal cdse/cds nanoro...

    2007

  8. [16]

    D. V. Talapin, R. Koeppe, S. G¨ otzinger, A. Kornowski, J. M. Lupton, A. L. Rogach, O. Benson, J. Feldmann, and H. Weller, Highly emissive colloidal cdse/cds het- erostructures of mixed dimensionality, Nano Letters 3, 1677 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    Pu and X

    C. Pu and X. Peng, To battle surface traps on cdse/cds core/shell nanocrystals: Shell isolation versus surface treatment, Journal of the American Chemical Society 138, 8134 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    C. R. Kagan, L. C. Bassett, C. B. Murray, and S. M. Thompson, Colloidal quantum dots as platforms for quantum information science, Chemical Reviews 121, 3186 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    C. R. Kagan, E. Lifshitz, E. H. Sargent, and D. V. Ta- lapin, Building devices from colloidal quantum dots, Sci- ence 353, aac5523 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Y. E. Panfil, M. Oded, N. Waiskopf, and U. Banin, Ma- terial challenges for colloidal quantum nanostructures in next generation displays, AsiaChem Magazine 1, 26 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Y. E. Panfil, M. Oded, and U. Banin, Colloidal quan- tum nanostructures: Emerging materials for display ap- plications, Angewandte Chemie International Edition57, 4274 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Y. Shu, X. Lin, H. Qin, Z. Hu, Y. Jin, and X. Peng, Quan- tum dots for display applications, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 59, 22312 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    I. J. Kramer and E. H. Sargent, Colloidal quantum dot photovoltaics: A path forward, ACS Nano5, 8506 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    J. Tang, L. Brzozowski, D. A. R. Barkhouse, X. Wang, R. Debnath, R. Wolowiec, E. Palmiano, L. Levina, A. G. Pattantyus-Abraham, D. Jamakosmanovic, and E. H. Sargent, Quantum dot photovoltaics in the extreme quantum confinement regime: the surface-chemical ori- 10 gins of excep...

    2010

  17. [25]

    Nelson, S

    D. Nelson, S. Byun, J. Bullock, K. B. Crozier, and S. Kim, Colloidal quantum dots as single photon sources, J. Mater. Chem. C 12, 5684 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Utzat, W

    H. Utzat, W. Sun, A. E. K. Kaplan, F. Krieg, M. Gin- terseder, B. Spokoyny, N. D. Klein, K. E. Shulen- berger, C. F. Perkinson, M. V. Kovalenko, and M. G. Bawendi, Coherent single-photon emission from colloidal lead halide perovskite quantum dots, Science 363, 1068 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    G. G. Guymon, D. Sharp, T. A. Cohen, S. L. Gibbs, A. Manna, E. Tzanetopoulos, D. R. Gamelin, A. Ma- jumdar, and J. D. MacKenzie, Electrohydrodynamic printing-based heterointegration of quantum dots on sus- pended nanophotonic cavities, Advanced Materials Tech- nologies 9, 2301...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Wolfowicz, F

    G. Wolfowicz, F. J. Heremans, C. P. Anderson, S. Kanai, H. Seo, A. Gali, G. Galli, and D. D. Awschalom, Quan- tum guidelines for solid-state spin defects, Nature Re- views Materials 6, 906 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Atat¨ ure, D

    M. Atat¨ ure, D. Englund, N. Vamivakas, S.-Y. Lee, and J. Wrachtrup, Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies, Nature Reviews Materials 3, 38 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    L. C. Bassett, A. Alkauskas, A. L. Exarhos, and K.-M. C. Fu, Quantum defects by design, Nanophotonics 8, 1867 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Bar-Gill, L

    N. Bar-Gill, L. Pham, A. Jarmola, D. Budker, and R. Walsworth, Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second, Nature Communications4, 1743 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    M. H. Abobeih, J. Cramer, M. A. Bakker, N. Kalb, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, One- second coherence for a single electron spin coupled to a multi-qubit nuclear-spin environment, Nature Communi- cations 9, 2552 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    At the red-marked position, in contrast, we observe an additional 2.8µs lifetime com- ponent, consistent with Cu Zn-VS emission [33, 38]

    and substrate emission. At the red-marked position, in contrast, we observe an additional 2.8µs lifetime com- ponent, consistent with Cu Zn-VS emission [33, 38]. We apply a time-resolved detection method (Fig. 1d) that separates photon counts into early (blue; detected within∼...

  26. [34]

    B. B. Buckley, G. D. Fuchs, L. C. Bassett, and D. D. Awschalom, Spin-light coherence for single-spin measure- ment and control in diamond, Science 330, 1212 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    A. V. Krasheninnikov and K. Nordlund, Ion and electron irradiation-induced effects in nanostructured materials, Journal of Applied Physics 107, 071301 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    H. A. Nguyen, D. Sharp, J. E. Fr¨ och, Y.-Y. Cai, S. Wu, M. Monahan, C. Munley, A. Manna, A. Majumdar, C. R. Kagan, and B. M. Cossairt, Deterministic quantum light arrays from giant silica-shelled quantum dots, ACS Ap- plied Materials & Interfaces 15, 4294 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Saboktakin, X

    M. Saboktakin, X. Ye, U. Chettiar, N. Engheta, C. Mur- ray, and C. Kagan, Plasmonic enhancement of nanophos- phor upconversion luminescence in Au nanohole arrays, ACS Nano 7, 10.1021/nn402598e (2013)

    2013 doi

  30. [38]

    H. J. Shulevitz, T.-Y. Huang, J. Xu, S. J. Neuhaus, R. N. Patel, Y. C. Choi, L. C. Bassett, and C. R. Kagan, Template-assisted self-assembly of fluorescent nanodia- monds for scalable quantum technologies, ACS Nano 16, 1847 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    C. B. Murray, C. R. Kagan, and M. G. Bawendi, Self-organization of cdse nanocrystallites into three- dimensional quantum dot superlattices, Science 270, 1335 (1995)

    1995

  32. [40]

    Goryca, M

    M. Goryca, M. Koperski, P. Wojnar, T. Smole´ nski, T. Kazimierczuk, A. Golnik, and P. Kossacki, Coherent precession of an individual 5 /2 spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 227202 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    J. Wong, M. Onizhuk, J. Nagura, A. S. Thind, J. K. Bindra, C. Wicker, G. D. Grant, Y. Zhang, J. Niklas, O. G. Poluektov, R. F. Klie, J. Zhang, G. Galli, F. J. Heremans, D. D. Awschalom, and A. P. Alivisatos, Co- herent erbium spin defects in colloidal nanocrystal hosts, ACS Na...

    2024

  34. [42]

    S. M. Thompson, C. S ¸ahin, S. Yang, M. E. Flatt´ e, C. B. Murray, L. C. Bassett, and C. R. Kagan, Red emission from copper-vacancy color centers in zinc sulfide colloidal nanocrystals, ACS Nano 17, 5963 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Shionoya, K

    S. Shionoya, K. Urabe, T. Koda, K. Era, and H. Fujiwara, Nature of the red-copper luminescence centre in ZnS crystals as elucidated by plolarization measurements, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 27, 865 (1966)

    1966

  36. [44]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Xu, and Q. Wang, Ultrathin single crys- tal ZnS nanowires, Chemical Communications 46, 8941 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Xu, and Q. Wang, Ultrathin single crystal zns nanowires, Chem. Commun. 46, 8941 (2010)

    2010

  38. [46]

    Braam, A

    D. Braam, A. M¨ olleken, G. M. Prinz, C. Notthoff, M. Geller, and A. Lorke, Role of the ligand layer for pho- toluminescence spectral diffusion of cdse/zns nanoparti- cles, Phys. Rev. B 88, 125302 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    W. M. W. M. Yen, S. Shionoya, and H. Yamamoto,Phos- phor handbook. (CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, 2007) p. 1051

    2007

  40. [48]

    W. F. Koehl, B. Diler, S. J. Whiteley, A. Bourassa, N. T. Son, E. Janz´ en, and D. D. Awschalom, Resonant optical spectroscopy and coherent control of Cr4+ spin ensembles in sic and gan, Phys. Rev. B 95, 035207 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Nirmal, B

    M. Nirmal, B. O. B. Dabbousi, M. G. Bawendi, J. J. Macklin, J. K. Trautman, T. D. Harris, and L. E. Brus, Fluorescence intermittency in single cadmium selenide nanocrystals, Nature 383, 10.1038/383802a0 (1996)

    1996 doi

  42. [50]

    R. E. Fishman, R. N. Patel, D. A. Hopper, T.-Y. Huang, and L. C. Bassett, Photon-emission-correlation spec- troscopy as an analytical tool for solid-state quantum defects, PRX Quantum 4, 010202 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Krivenkov, P

    V. Krivenkov, P. Samokhvalov, M. Zvaigzne, I. Mar- tynov, A. Chistyakov, and I. Nabiev, Ligand-mediated photobrightening and photodarkening of cdse/zns quan- tum dot ensembles, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 122, 15761 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    V. I. Klimov, A. A. Mikhailovsky, D. W. McBranch, C. A. Leatherdale, and M. G. Bawendi, Quantization of multi- particle auger rates in semiconductor quantum dots, Sci- ence 287, 1011 (2000)

    2000

  45. [53]

    J. J. Li, Y. A. Wang, W. Guo, J. C. Keay, T. D. Mishima, M. B. Johnson, and X. Peng, Large-scale synthesis of nearly monodisperse cdse/cds core/shell nanocrystals us- ing air-stable reagents via successive ion layer adsorption and reaction, Journal of the American Chemical Soc...

    2003

  46. [54]

    A. J. Nozik, M. C. Beard, J. M. Luther, M. Law, R. J. Ellingson, and J. C. Johnson, Semiconductor quantum dots and quantum dot arrays and applications of multiple exciton generation to third-generation photovoltaic solar cells, Chemical Reviews 110, 6873 (2010). 11

    2010

  47. [55]

    Nair and M

    G. Nair and M. G. Bawendi, Carrier multiplication yields of CdSe and CdTe nanocrystals by transient photolumi- nescence spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 76, 081304 (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    Shionoya, T

    S. Shionoya, T. Koda, K. Era, and H. Fujiwara, Nature of the Luminescence Transitions in ZnS Crystals, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 19, 1157 (1964)

    1964

  49. [57]

    Sugimoto and T

    H. Sugimoto and T. Maruyama, Charge transfers in the red-copper luminescent zns phosphors investigated by electron spin resonance method, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 23, 44 (1967)

    1967

  50. [58]

    Bowers and N

    R. Bowers and N. T. Melamed, Luminescent centers in zns: Cu: Cl phosphors, Phys. Rev. 99, 1781 (1955)

    1955

  51. [59]

    M. H. Aven and R. M. Potter, The luminescence of self- coactivated zns:cu, Journal of The Electrochemical Soci- ety 105, 134 (1958)

    1958

  52. [60]

    A. A. Bol, J. Ferwerda, J. A. Bergwerff, and A. Meijerink, Luminescence of nanocrystalline ZnS:Cu2+, Journal of Luminescence 99, 325 (2002)

    2002

  53. [61]

    N. R. Jungwirth, H.-S. Chang, M. Jiang, and G. D. Fuchs, Polarization spectroscopy of defect-based single photon sources in zno, ACS Nano 10, 1210 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Gordon, A

    L. Gordon, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van de Walle, Defects as qubits in 3c− and 4h−SiC, Phys. Rev. B 92, 045208 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    Davidsson, V

    J. Davidsson, V. Iv´ ady, R. Armiento, N. T. Son, A. Gali, and I. A. Abrikosov, First principles predictions of magneto-optical data for semiconductor point defect identification: the case of divacancy defects in 4h–sic, New Journal of Physics 20, 023035 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    K. C. Miao, A. Bourassa, C. P. Anderson, S. J. Whiteley, A. L. Crook, S. L. Bayliss, G. Wolfowicz, G. Thiering, P. Udvarhelyi, V. Iv´ ady, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, ´Ad´ am Gali, and D. D. Awschalom, Electrically driven optical interferometry with spins in silicon carbide, Science A...

    2019

  57. [65]

    Astner, P

    T. Astner, P. Koller, C. M. Gilardoni, J. Hendriks, N. T. Son, I. G. Ivanov, J. U. Hassan, C. H. van der Wal, and M. Trupke, Vanadium in silicon carbide: telecom-ready spin centres with long relaxation lifetimes and hyperfine- resolved optical transitions, Quantum Science and ...

    2024

  58. [66]

    E. Poem, S. Gupta, I. Morris, K. Klink, L. Singh, T. Zhong, S. Nicley, J. Becker, and O. Firstenberg, Tran- sition metal ion ensembles in crystals as solid-state co- herent spin-photon interfaces: The case of nickel in mag- nesium oxide, PRX Quantum 4, 030329 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    J. Cui, Y. E. Panfil, S. Koley, D. Shamalia, N. Waiskopf, S. Remennik, I. Popov, M. Oded, and U. Banin, Col- loidal quantum dot molecules manifesting quantum cou- pling at room temperature, Nature Communications 10, 5401 (2019)

    2019

  60. [68]

    J. T. Fourkas, Rapid determination of the three- dimensional orientation of single molecules, Opt. Lett. 26, 211 (2001)

    2001

  61. [69]

    Schindelin, I

    J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.-y. Tinevez, D. J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, and A. Car- dona, Fiji : an open-source platform for biological-image analys...

    2019 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Brouri, A

    R. Brouri, A. Beveratos, J.-P. Poizat, and P. Grangier, Photon antibunching in the fluorescence of individual color centers in diamond, Opt. Lett. 25, 1294 (2000)

    2000

  63. [71]

    J. T. Fourkas, Rapid determination of the three-dimensional orientation of single molecules, Opt. Lett. 26, 211 (2001). 18

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.