Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Human-Like Reasoning Framework for Multi-Phases Planning Task with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.18208 v1 pith:SIYMUPYU submitted 2024-05-28 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords planningframeworkagentsblockinformationmulti-phasesreasoningtask
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recent studies have highlighted their proficiency in some simple tasks like writing and coding through various reasoning strategies. However, LLM agents still struggle with tasks that require comprehensive planning, a process that challenges current models and remains a critical research issue. In this study, we concentrate on travel planning, a Multi-Phases planning problem, that involves multiple interconnected stages, such as outlining, information gathering, and planning, often characterized by the need to manage various constraints and uncertainties. Existing reasoning approaches have struggled to effectively address this complex task. Our research aims to address this challenge by developing a human-like planning framework for LLM agents, i.e., guiding the LLM agent to simulate various steps that humans take when solving Multi-Phases problems. Specifically, we implement several strategies to enable LLM agents to generate a coherent outline for each travel query, mirroring human planning patterns. Additionally, we integrate Strategy Block and Knowledge Block into our framework: Strategy Block facilitates information collection, while Knowledge Block provides essential information for detailed planning. Through our extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our framework significantly improves the planning capabilities of LLM agents, enabling them to tackle the travel planning task with improved efficiency and effectiveness. Our experimental results showcase the exceptional performance of the proposed framework; when combined with GPT-4-Turbo, it attains $10\times$ the performance gains in comparison to the baseline framework deployed on GPT-4-Turbo.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RETAIL: Towards Real-world Travel Planning for Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new travel-planning benchmark and multi-agent system that still mostly fails, with the best system passing only 2.72% of test cases.

  2. Refining Over Resampling: Test-Time Self-Correction for LLM Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sampling multiple reasoning paths, refining each with self-critique and self-correction, then majority voting improves math reasoning accuracy over width-only or verifier-based test-time scaling on several open-weight LLMs.

  3. Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey of LLM planning methods, benchmarks, and interpretability work, organized around a three-way taxonomy.

Pith tools