Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Studying baryon number transport dynamics via hyperon-kaon correlations in $p + \mathrm{Au}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}}=20$, $39$ and $62$ GeV

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Hyperon–kaon correlations in p+Au collisions supply a no-junction baseline for baryon-number transport.

desk verdict Solid fragmentation-only baseline for hyperon–kaon Δy correlations in p+Au, quantified with a clean CBS + 1-D Wasserstein pipeline; useful for experiments, not a field-changer. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.02867 v1 pith:SOFO5Y4Y submitted 2026-07-03 hep-ph hep-exnucl-exnucl-th

Siyuan Ping , Xiaozhou Yu , Long Ma This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-exnucl-exnucl-th
keywords baryonnumbertransporthyperon-kaoncorrelationsgluonjunctionWassersteindistancep+Aucollisionsstrangenessconservationcombinatorialbackgroundsubtraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Positive net hyperon yields at mid-rapidity show that baryon number from beam nucleons can be carried across a large rapidity gap to hyperons built from newly made strange quarks. Strangeness conservation then forces those hyperons to be correlated with kaons. Using two transport models that create hyperons only by ordinary fragmentation (no baryon-junction mechanism), the authors isolate the genuine associated-production pairs by combinatorial background subtraction and quantify the resulting correlation strength and preferred rapidity offset with the Wasserstein distance. They find that hyperons emitted with the proton are a cleaner probe than those emitted with the gold nucleus, that a typical mid-rapidity detector cut largely erases that directional difference, and that the numbers they extract form a concrete baseline against which future data can test for junction-driven transport.

What carries the argument

The combinatorial-background-subtracted correlation C_CBS(Δy) (Eq. 25) and its Wasserstein (Earth-Mover’s) distance EMD together with the signed displacement EMDp, which isolate genuine associated-production pairs and measure how far and in which direction correlated kaons must be moved relative to the uncorrelated reference.

What would settle it

Measure C_CBS(Δy) and EMDp for proton-going versus gold-going Λ and Ξ in real p+Au data at the same energies under |η|<1.5; if the proton–gold separation is clearly larger than the models predict, the no-junction baseline is ruled out and junction dynamics are indicated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In AMPT and UrQMD simulations of p+Au collisions at 20, 39 and 62 GeV, hyperon–kaon pairs produced by ordinary fragmentation yield measurable combinatorial-background-subtracted correlations C_CBS(Δy) whose strength and signed rapidity offset, quantified by Wasserstein EMD and EMDp, differ systematically between proton-going and gold-going hyperons; these patterns furnish a quantitative no-junction baseline for experimental searches of the baryon-junction mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The algebraic isolation of associated-production pairs assumes equal rapidity distributions for pair-produced hyperons and anti-hyperons and perfect charge symmetry for uncorrelated kaons—assumptions not independently checked for the mid-rapidity multi-strange channels under study.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Future p+A measurements of C_CBS and EMDp can be compared directly with this baseline to search for junction-driven baryon stopping.
  • Proton-going hyperons should be preferred over gold-going ones for a cleaner baryon-number-transport signal.
  • Detector acceptances limited to |η|<1.5 will suppress the proton–gold asymmetry that full-acceptance simulations display.
  • Multi-strange hyperons retain a larger genuine associated-production fraction once combinatorial backgrounds are removed.
  • The opposing energy trends of EMDp (decreasing) and EMD (increasing) for proton-going hyperons give an extra handle for model discrimination.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If data show a larger mid-rapidity proton–gold EMDp separation than the models, that would favor junction transport over pure valence-quark stopping.
  • Applying the same subtraction-plus-Wasserstein pipeline to Ω–K pairs would give the cleanest junction test, since Ω carries no light valence quarks from the beam.
  • Once the p+A baseline is fixed, the method can be extended to A+A collisions to separate junction contributions from bulk medium effects.
  • Charge-symmetric mixed-event assumptions may need independent validation with identified anti-hyperon samples before sub-percent claims on a junction signal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies hyperon–kaon correlations as a probe of baryon-number transport (BNT) in p+Au collisions at √s_NN = 20, 39 and 62 GeV. Using AMPT (string-melting) and UrQMD (v4.0), both of which implement only conventional fragmentation (no baryon-junction dynamics), the authors construct same-event and mixed-event pair distributions in relative rapidity Δy (Eq. 1). They algebraically isolate the associated-production component P_same_HT K+_T via Eq. (22) under charge-symmetry and scenario-2 equality assumptions (Eqs. 11–13), define a combinatorial-background-subtracted correlation function C_CBS_HK+(Δy) (Eq. 25), and quantify its shape with one-dimensional Wasserstein distances EMD and directed EMDp (Eqs. 33–35). Results are presented for full acceptance and a detector cut |η|<1.5, for Λ and Ξ, and for proton-going versus Au-going hyperons. The central claim is that these observables furnish a quantitative, junction-free baseline for future experimental tests of the baryon-junction mechanism, with proton-going hyperons identified as the cleaner probe.

Significance. If the baseline holds, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable reference for experiments that can measure hyperon–kaon correlations with large rapidity coverage. The introduction of C_CBS together with EMD/EMDp is a useful methodological contribution: the Wasserstein quantification is standard optimal-transport practice, the statistical uncertainties are estimated with Poisson pseudo-experiments, and the proton-going versus Au-going and full-versus-detector-acceptance comparisons give clear experimental guidance. The paper does not claim to discover junctions; it correctly positions itself as a no-junction baseline. That is a legitimate and timely service to the BNT community.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. II C, Eqs. (11)–(13) and the isolation formula Eq. (22): the entire subtraction that yields P_same_HT K+_T rests on three unvalidated assumptions—(i) scenario-2 hyperons and anti-hyperons have identical rapidity distributions, (ii) uncorrelated K+ and K− are charge-symmetric, and (iii) mixed-event constructions fully capture all uncorrelated backgrounds. These are standard but are not checked inside the manuscript for the mid-rapidity multi-strange channels under study. Because Eq. (22) is load-bearing for every subsequent C_CBS, EMD and EMDp result, the authors should either (a) demonstrate the equalities hold to the required precision in their own AMPT/UrQMD samples (e.g., by direct comparison of the relevant single-particle and pair distributions) or (b) quantify the residual bias when the assumptions are mildly violated. Without such a check the claimed isolation of associated-p
  2. Sec. III B 2–3 and Figs. 9–10: the paper repeatedly contrasts the observed energy and species dependence of EMDp with the qualitative expectation under a baryon-junction scenario (slower hyperons, larger rapidity separation at higher energy). While the no-junction baseline itself is valuable, the manuscript never shows an actual junction-enabled calculation. The interpretive claim that an opposite trend “may be anticipated” is therefore untested. Either a short junction-model comparison (even a schematic one) or a clearer statement that the opposite-trend argument is purely qualitative should be added so that the experimental community knows how decisive a future measurement would be.
minor comments (5)
  1. Eq. (1) and the surrounding text: the definition of Δy with the step function θ(y_H) is correct but dense; a short sentence or schematic clarifying that positive Δy always means “kaon faster than hyperon” would help readers.
  2. Figs. 5–6: the normalization “by the integral of P_same_HK+” is stated, yet the vertical scales still make it hard to judge absolute pair yields; adding a secondary axis or a table of integrated pair numbers would improve readability.
  3. Sec. II E: the Monte-Carlo uncertainty procedure (5000 Poisson pseudo-experiments) is sound, but the text should note whether bin-to-bin correlations induced by the mixed-event normalization are neglected and, if so, whether that approximation has been checked.
  4. Typographical and notation consistency: “s−¯s” vs “s–s”, occasional missing spaces around √s_NN, and the dual use of “EMD” for both the distance and the library name should be cleaned up.
  5. References: the self-citation to Dong et al. (2024) is appropriate for the two-scenario language, but a brief pointer to earlier experimental hyperon–kaon correlation measurements (if any exist at these energies) would strengthen the experimental context.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Minor self-citation supplies two-scenario language but does not force the independent AMPT/UrQMD baseline or Wasserstein observables.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. I, paragraph on strange-hadron correlations; Ref. [17]]
    "Recently, in Au + Au collisions, correlations among strange hadrons have been proposed as a potential probe of baryon number transport (BNT) in momentum and rapidity phase space [17]."

    The two-scenario (associated vs. pair production) framing and the claim that hyperon–kaon correlations probe BNT are introduced via a citation whose author list overlaps the present paper. The citation is not load-bearing for the actual baseline numbers or the Wasserstein quantification, which are new independent model runs; it only supplies language. Hence only a minor, non-forcing circularity of kind 3.

full rationale

The paper's central product is a quantitative baseline (CCBS(Δy) via combinatorial subtraction plus EMD/EMDp) computed from fragmentation-only AMPT and UrQMD simulations of p+Au at three energies, with and without |η|<1.5 acceptance. No parameters are fitted to data and then re-predicted; the models are used as black-box generators of pair distributions. The algebraic isolation of associated-production pairs (Eq. 22) rests on stated symmetry assumptions (Eqs. 11–13) that are standard but unvalidated inside the manuscript; those are modeling assumptions, not circular reductions of a claimed derivation. The sole self-citation of note is to Dong et al. (2024) [17] (overlapping authors), which supplies the two-scenario language and the prior Au+Au proposal. That citation is not load-bearing for the numerical results, the proton-going recommendation, or the acceptance study; the present observables and scan are independent computations. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of a known empirical pattern occurs. Score 1 reflects only the minor, non-forcing self-citation; the derivation chain is otherwise self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The claim is a model baseline, so load-bearing content is (i) standard QCD conservation laws, (ii) the two-scenario decomposition and symmetry assumptions that let Eq. (22) isolate associated production, (iii) the statement that AMPT-SM and UrQMD implement fragmentation without baryon junctions, and (iv) the operational definitions of CCBS and EMD/EMDp. No free parameters are fitted to data in this work; model defaults are inherited. Invented entities are the analysis constructs, not new physical particles.

free parameters (3)
  • AMPT string-melting / ZPC / ART default parameters
    Inherited generator settings (parton cross sections, coalescence, hadronic cross sections) control absolute yields and residual correlations; not re-tuned here but the baseline inherits their values.
  • UrQMD 4.0 default cross sections and string fragmentation parameters
    Same role as AMPT defaults: the reported EMD/EMDp inherit the model’s built-in stopping and strangeness production without a dedicated sensitivity scan.
  • Detector acceptance cut |η|<1.5
    Chosen to match typical STAR-like coverage; shapes the restricted Δy range (−3,1.5) and reduces proton–gold asymmetry—an analysis choice, not a fit, but it conditions the experimental baseline.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Baryon number and strangeness are conserved in strong interactions, so net mid-rapidity hyperons imply transport of baryon number from beam rapidity and s–s̄ pair production.
    Stated in Introduction and Sec. II A; standard SM/QCD input.
  • domain assumption Hyperon production decomposes into general associated production (scenario 1, carries BNT) and general pair production (scenario 2, no BNT), with kaon multiplicities as in Table 1.
    Sec. II A and Table 1; taken from prior framework (Dong et al. 2024) and used to motivate the subtraction.
  • ad hoc to paper Scenario-2 hyperons and anti-hyperons have equal rapidity distributions; uncorrelated K+ and K− are charge-symmetric (Eqs. 11–13).
    Required for the algebraic isolation of P_same_HT K+_T in Eq. (22); not independently demonstrated for the channels and acceptances used.
  • domain assumption AMPT string-melting and UrQMD implement hyperon–kaon pairs via fragmentation/coalescence without an explicit baryon-junction degree of freedom.
    Sec. II B and abstract; this is why the results are labeled a no-junction baseline.
  • domain assumption Mixed-event pair distributions, after pair-count normalization, represent the uncorrelated reference including combinatorial backgrounds.
    Sec. II C–D; standard event-mixing assumption.
  • standard math One-dimensional Wasserstein (EMD) distance between positive and negative regions of CCBS quantifies correlation strength; signed EMDp quantifies preferred Δy direction.
    Sec. II E; optimal-transport definitions with POT library.
invented entities (2)
  • CCBS_HK+(Δy) combinatorial-background-subtracted correlation function
    purpose: Isolate genuine associated-production hyperon–kaon correlations after removing scenario-2 and uncorrelated pairs.
    Defined in Eq. (25) with unit-area positive/negative normalization; analysis construct, not a new physical field.
  • EMD and EMDp observables on CCBS(Δy)
    purpose: Scalar measures of correlation strength and signed rapidity displacement for model–data comparison.
    Eqs. (33)–(35); standard OT applied to this correlation; falsifiable by experiment but not independently measured yet.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Studying baryon number transport dynamics via hyperon-kaon correlations in $p + \mathrm{Au}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}}=20$, $39$ and $62$ GeV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SOFO5Y4Y

@misc{pith2026260702867,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Studying baryon number transport dynamics via hyperon-kaon correlations in $p + \mathrmAu$ collisions at $\sqrts__\rm NN=20$, $39$ and $62$ GeV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SOFO5Y4Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.02867}
}
abstract

The observation of positive net hyperon baryon numbers at mid-rapidity in heavy-ion collisions indicates that baryon numbers from incident nucleons can be transported across a large rapidity gap to hyperons where strange quarks of $s-\bar{s}$ are pair-produced. Consequently, hyperons and kaons are expected to be correlated, providing a sensitive probe of both baryon number transport mechanism and strange quark pair correlation. Such correlation may be used to test the gluon-junction interaction mechanism where a $Y$-shaped gluonic field may carry the baryon number and be responsible for the baryon number transport to hyperons over a large rapidity gap. We present hyperon-kaon correlations as a function of their relative rapidity in $p + \mathrm{Au}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 20$, $39$, and $62$ GeV using a multiphase transport ($\texttt{AMPT}$) model and Ultra-relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics ($\texttt{UrQMD}$) models where hyperon-kaon pairs are originated from fragmentation scheme. We quantify the correlation function using the Wasserstein distance method and systematically investigate the correlation dependence on the beam energy, hyperon emission direction and detector acceptance. Our simulation results provide a baseline without the baryon junction mechanism for future experimental measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02867 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of proton fragmentation into (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of two production mechanisms. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic decomposition of the same-event distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The AMPT and UrQMD results for ΛK and ΞK pair distributions in p + Au collisions at √sNN = 20, 39, and 62 GeV in full acceptance (|η| < ∞). All distributions are normalized by the integral of P same HK+ in each subfigure. The same-event distributions are shown as data …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The AMPT and UrQMD results for ΛK and ΞK pair distributions in p + Au collisions at √sNN = 20, 39, and 62 GeV within detector acceptance (|η| < 1.5). All distributions are normalized by the integral of P same HK+ in each subfigure. The same-event distributions are show…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The AMPT and UrQMD result for C CBS ΛK+ (∆y) and C CBS ΞK+ (∆y) in p + Au collisions at √sNN = 20, 39 and 62 GeV in full acceptance (|η| < ∞). The subscript y > 0 denotes hyperons with positive rapidity, corresponding to the initial proton-going direction, while y < 0 …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The AMPT and UrQMD results for C CBS ΛK+ (∆y) and C CBS ΞK+ (∆y) in p + Au collisions at √sNN = 20, 39 and 62 GeV within detector acceptance (|η| < 1.5). Other notations are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The AMPT and UrQMD results for the EMDp and EMD in C CBS ΛK+ (∆y), C CBS ΞK+ (∆y) in p + Au collisions at √sNN = 20, 39 and 62 GeV in full acceptance (|η| < ∞). The subscripts y > 0 and y < 0 have the same meaning as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Energy dependence As shown in Fig. 9, in full acceptance, a common energy dependence is observed forC CBS Λy>0K+(∆y)and CCBS Ξy>0K+(∆y)in both cases, theEMDpvalues decrease con- sistently with increasing collision energy. This behavior in- dicates that hyperons carrying baryon number from the inci- dent proton tend to be correlated with relatively slower ...

  2. [2]

    9, indicating con- sistency between the two models

    Model dependence Although the maximum ofC CBS Λy>0K+(∆y)inUrQMDis shifted toward larger∆yvalues compared toAMPTwithin full acceptance, around∆y≈1, the difference in the correspondingEMDpvalues remains smaller than the as- sociated uncertainties as showed in Fig. 9, indicating con- sistency between the two models. In contrast, theEMDp ofC CBS Λy<0K+(∆y)sho...

  3. [3]

    Bearden, D

    I.G. Bearden, D. Beavis, C. Besliu, et al., Nuclear Stopping in Au+Au Collisions at s N N = 200 GeV. Physical Review Let- ters93, 102301 (2004). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.102301

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.102301 2004

  4. [4]

    Collaboration, J

    STAR. Collaboration, J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, et al., Strange hadron production in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s { {\mathrm{NN}}}}$ = 7.7, 11.5, 19.6, 27, and 39 GeV. Physical Review C102, 034909 (2020). arXiv:1906.03732, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034909

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.034909 2020

  5. [5]

    Anticic, B

    T. Anticic, B. Baatar, D. Barna, et al.,ΛandΛ¯Pro- duction in Central Pb-Pb Collisions at 40, 80, and 158 A G e V. Physical Review Letters93, 022302 (2004). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.022302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.022302 2004

  6. [6]

    Abelev, M.M

    B.I. Abelev, M.M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, et al., ForwardΛ production and nuclear stopping power in d + Au collisions at s NN = 200 GeV. Physical Review C76, 064904 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.064904

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.76.064904 2007

  7. [7]

    C. Alt, T. Anticic, B. Baatar, et al., Omega and An- tiomega production in central Pb+Pb collisions at 40 and 158 AGeV. Physical Review Letters94, 192301 (2005). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.192301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.192301 2005

  8. [8]

    C. Alt, T. Anticic, B. Baatar, et al., Energy dependence ofΛ andΞproduction in central Pb + Pb collisions at 20 A , 30 A , 40 A , 80 A , and 158 A GeV measured at the CERN Su- per Proton Synchrotron. Physical Review C78, 034918 (2008). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.78.034918

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.034918 2008

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Anticic, B

    T. Anticic, B. Baatar, D. Barna, et al., System-size depen- dence ofΛandΞproduction in nucleus-nucleus collisions at 40 A and 158 A GeV measured at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron. Physical Review C80, 034906 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.034906

    2009 doi

  2. [10]

    Antinori, P

    F. Antinori, P. Bacon, A. Badal `a, et al., Energy de- pendence of hyperon production in nucleus–nucleus col- lisions at SPS. Physics Letters B595, 68–74 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.05.025

    2004 doi

  3. [11]

    Collaboration, F

    N. Collaboration, F. Antinori, P. Bacon, et al., Enhancement of hyperon production at central rapidity in 158AGeV/cPb–Pb collisions. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 32, 427–441 (2006). doi:10.1088/0954-3899/32/4/003

    2006 doi

  4. [12]

    Adams, M.M

    J. Adams, M.M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, et al., Scaling Prop- erties of Hyperon Production in Au + Au Collisions at s N N = 200 GeV. Physical Review Letters98, 062301 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.062301

    2007 doi

  5. [13]

    Lewis, W

    N. Lewis, W. Lv, M.A. Ross, et al., Search for baryon junctions in photonuclear processes and isobar collisions at RHIC. The European Physical Journal C84, 590 (2024). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12834-2

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    W. Lv, Y . Li, Z. Li, et al., Correlations of baryon and charge stopping in heavy ion collisions*. Chinese Physics C48, 044001 (2024). doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad243f

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Rossi, G

    G. Rossi, G. Veneziano, A possible description of baryon dy- namics in dual and gauge theories. Nuclear Physics B123, 507–545 (1977). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90178-X

    1977 doi

  8. [16]

    Kharzeev, Can gluons trace baryon number? Physics Letters B378, 238–246 (1996)

    D. Kharzeev, Can gluons trace baryon number? Physics Letters B378, 238–246 (1996). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00435-2

    1996 doi

  9. [17]

    Rossi, G

    G. Rossi, G. Veneziano, I. Theoretical aspects of bary- onium physics. Physics Reports63, 153–200 (1980). doi:10.1016/0370-1573(80)90162-3

    1980 doi

  10. [18]

    Takahashi, H

    T.T. Takahashi, H. Matsufuru, Y . Nemoto, et al., Three-Quark Potential in SU(3) Lattice QCD. Physical Review Letters86, 18–21 (2001). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.18

    2001 doi

  11. [19]

    Dong, X.Z

    W.J. Dong, X.Z. Yu, S.Y . Ping, et al., Study of baryon number transport dynamics and strangeness conservation effects using $$\Omega$$-hadron correlations. Nuclear Science and Tech- niques35, 120 (2024). doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01464-8

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    R. Seto (Ed.),Heavy Ion Physics from Bevalac to RHIC: Pro- ceedings of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Symposium, APS Cen- tennial Meeting ’99: Georgia World Congress Center , Atlanta, USA, March 1999, (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd, Singapore, 1999)

    1999

  13. [21]

    Collaboration, Proton fragmentation, baryon transport and hyperon production

    H.Z.H.F.T.E. Collaboration, Proton fragmentation, baryon transport and hyperon production. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics28, 1667–1674 (2002). doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/7/318

    2002 doi

  14. [22]

    Z.W. Lin, L. Zheng, Further developments of a multi-phase transport model for relativistic nuclear collisions. Nuclear Sci- ence and Techniques32, 113 (2021). doi:10.1007/s41365-021- 00944-5

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Lin, C.M

    Z.W. Lin, C.M. Ko, B.A. Li, et al., Multiphase transport model for relativistic heavy ion collisions. Physical Review C72, 064901 (2005). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.72.064901

    2005 doi

  16. [24]

    Lin, C.M

    Z.w. Lin, C.M. Ko, Partonic effects on the elliptic flow at rel- ativistic heavy ion collisions. Physical Review C65, 034904 (2002). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.65.034904

    2002 doi

  17. [25]

    Lin, C.M

    Z.w. Lin, C.M. Ko, S. Pal, Partonic Effects on Pion Interferometry at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Col- lider. Physical Review Letters89, 152301 (2002). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.152301

    2002 doi

  18. [26]

    S.A. Bass, M. Belkacem, M. Bleicher, et al., Microscopic -11 Siyuan Ping, Xiaozhou Yu and Long Ma Nucl. Sci. Tech. , () Models for Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics41, 255–369 (1998). arXiv:nucl- th/9803035, doi:10.1016/S0146-6410...

    1998 doi

  19. [27]

    Bleicher, E

    M. Bleicher, E. Zabrodin, C. Spieles, et al., Relativistic hadron- hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum molecu- lar dynamics model. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics25, 1859–1896 (1999). doi:10.1088/0954- 3899/25/9/308

    1999 doi

  20. [28]

    Zhang, Y .J

    J.Y . Zhang, Y .J. Song, L. Ma, et al., Effect of initial ge- ometry fluctuations on the heavy flavor flow using a mul- tiphase transport model. Phys. Rev. C112, 044901 (2025). doi:10.1103/2xt8-bh6x

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    Y .G. Ma, L. Ma, J.H. Chen, et al., Study of the momentum cor- relation of nucleons in 4496ru + 4496ru and 4096zr + 4096zr collisions at snn=7.7 and 200 gev from a multiphase trans- port model. Nuclear Science and Techniques36, 228 (2025). doi:10.1007/s41365-025-01826-w

    2025 doi

  22. [30]

    L. Ma, G.L. Ma, Y .G. Ma, Parton collisional effect on the conversion of geometry eccentricities into mo- mentum anisotropies in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C103, 014908 (2021). arXiv:2102.01872, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.014908

    2021 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    Wang, Role of multiple minijets in high-energy hadronic reactions

    X.N. Wang, Role of multiple minijets in high-energy hadronic reactions. Physical Review D43, 104–112 (1991). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.104

    1991 doi

  24. [32]

    X.N. Wang, M. Gyulassy, Hijing: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in pp , pA , and AA collisions. Physical Review D44, 3501–3516 (1991). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3501

    1991 doi

  25. [33]

    X.N. Wang, M. Gyulassy, Systematic study of particle produc- tion in p + p ( p¯) collisions via the HIJING model. Physical Review D45, 844–856 (1992). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.844

    1992 doi

  26. [34]

    X.N. Wang, M. Gyulassy, HIJING 1.0: A Monte Carlo Program for Parton and Particle Production in High En- ergy Hadronic and Nuclear Collisions. Computer Physics Communications83, 307–331 (1994). arXiv:nucl-th/9502021, doi:10.1016/0010-4655(94)90057-4

    1994 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    Zhang, ZPC 1.0.1: A parton cascade for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions

    B. Zhang, ZPC 1.0.1: A parton cascade for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Computer Physics Communications109, 193–206 (1998). doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00010-1

    1998 doi

  28. [36]

    B.A. Li, C.M. Ko, Formation of superdense hadronic matter in high energy heavy-ion collisions. Physical Re- view C52, 2037–2063 (1995). arXiv:nucl-th/9505016, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.52.2037

    doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    M. Shao, O. Barannikova, X. Dong, et al., Extensive Parti- cle Identification with TPC and TOF at the STAR Experi- ment. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associ- ated Equipment558, 419–429 (2006). arXiv:n...

    2006 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    Collaboration, T.C.C

    T.S. Collaboration, T.C.C. eTOF Group, Physics Pro- gram for the STAR/CBM eTOF Upgrade. (Sep. 2016). arXiv:1609.05102, doi:10.48550/arXiv.1609.05102

    2016 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Drijard, H

    D. Drijard, H. Fischer, T. Nakada, Study of event mixing and its application to the extraction of resonance signals. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research225, 367–377 (1984). doi:10.1016/0167-5087(84)90275-8

    1984 doi

  32. [40]

    Villani,Optimal Transport: Old and New, no

    C. Villani,Optimal Transport: Old and New, no. 338 in Grundlehren Der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, (Springer, Berlin, 2009)

    2009

  33. [41]

    V .N.L. Duy, I. Takeuchi, Exact statistical inference for the Wasserstein distance by selective inference: Selec- tive Inference for the Wasserstein Distance. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics75, 127–157 (2023). doi:10.1007/s10463-022-00837-3

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Rubner, C

    Y . Rubner, C. Tomasi, L.J. Guibas, The Earth Mover’s Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval. Interna- tional Journal of Computer Vision40, 99–121 (2000). doi:10.1023/A:1026543900054

    2000 doi

  35. [43]

    Komiske, E.M

    P.T. Komiske, E.M. Metodiev, J. Thaler, The hidden geometry of particle collisions. Journal of High Energy Physics2020, 6 (2020). doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2020)006

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Flamary, N

    R. Flamary, N. Courty, A. Gramfort, et al., Pot: Python opti- mal transport. Journal of Machine Learning Research22, 1–8 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Flamary, C

    R. Flamary, C. Vincent-Cuaz, N. Courty, et al., Pot python optimal transport (version 0.9.5). (2024) https://github.com/PythonOT/POT -12

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.