Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

PASS: Presentation Automation for Slide Generation and Speech

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.06497 v2 pith:SPA5FU4A submitted 2025-01-11 cs.CL cs.AI

PASS: Presentation Automation for Slide Generation and Speech

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords passpresentationslidespresentationsresearchautomationavailablebeyond
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In today's fast-paced world, effective presentations have become an essential tool for communication in both online and offline meetings. The crafting of a compelling presentation requires significant time and effort, from gathering key insights to designing slides that convey information clearly and concisely. However, despite the wealth of resources available, people often find themselves manually extracting crucial points, analyzing data, and organizing content in a way that ensures clarity and impact. Furthermore, a successful presentation goes beyond just the slides; it demands rehearsal and the ability to weave a captivating narrative to fully engage the audience. Although there has been some exploration of automating document-to-slide generation, existing research is largely centered on converting research papers. In addition, automation of the delivery of these presentations has yet to be addressed. We introduce PASS, a pipeline used to generate slides from general Word documents, going beyond just research papers, which also automates the oral delivery of the generated slides. PASS analyzes user documents to create a dynamic, engaging presentation with an AI-generated voice. Additionally, we developed an LLM-based evaluation metric to assess our pipeline across three critical dimensions of presentations: relevance, coherence, and redundancy. The data and codes are available at https://github.com/AggarwalTushar/PASS.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DeepSlide: From Artifacts to Presentation Delivery

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DeepSlide introduces a multi-agent system for full presentation preparation that matches baselines on slide quality but improves narrative flow, pacing, and script synergy via a new dual-scoreboard benchmark.

  2. Lect\=uraAgents: A Multi-Agent Framework for Adaptive Personalized AI-Assisted Learning and Embodied Teaching

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LectūraAgents proposes a hierarchical multi-agent system with adaptive embodied teaching and the TASA algorithm for personalized AI-assisted learning, reporting gains in content quality, teaching actions, and personal...

  3. AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper delivers a stage-by-stage roadmap for AI in research, showing reliable assistance in retrieval and tool tasks but fragility in novelty and judgment, advocating human-governed collaboration.

  4. AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0

    AI can generate research artifacts faster than it can verify them, so across all eight lifecycle stages the credible deployment mode is human-governed collaboration rather than full autonomy.

  5. AI-Generated Slides: Are They Good? Can Students Tell?

    cs.AI 2026-05 accept novelty 4.0

    Coding-assistant AI tools generate slides that educators judge accurate and pedagogically sound, students rate them equal to instructor slides, and cannot reliably identify them as AI-generated.