Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 122 references

The paper claims that a 4d N=1 Kähler potential, plus the Integral Scaling Relation and the Emergent String Conjecture, fixes the light-tower spectrum at infinite distance — and every allowed arrangement (degree ≤ 7) is a slice of M-theory

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 06:57 UTC pith:SRFATRKX

load-bearing objection A strong, honest framework paper that reverses the Integral Scaling Relation into a screening test for Kähler potentials — the classification work is checkable and mostly solid, but the centerpiece G2-slice universality claim rests on an exhaustive enumeration that is asserted rather than demonstrated. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21700 v1 pith:SRFATRKX submitted 2026-07-23 hep-th

EFT (String) Tower Building

Alessandra Grieco , Ignacio Ruiz , Irene Valenzuela This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 11.25.Mj04.65.+e
keywords integral scaling relationemergent string conjectureEFT stringstower polytopesJoyce G2 manifoldsKähler potentialsinfinite-distance limitsstring universality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that the spectrum of light towers mandated at an infinite-distance limit of a four-dimensional N=1 supergravity is not free UV input but is fixed by the low-energy Kähler potential, once two quantum-gravity conditions are imposed. The first, the Integral Scaling Relation, links the mass scale of each tower to the tension of the EFT strings — BPS axionic strings whose backreaction drives saxions to infinity — through an integer weight w ≤ 3; the second, the Emergent String Conjecture, insists the leading tower is either a Kaluza-Klein tower or the oscillator modes of a critical string, recursively at every stage of decompactification. Running the resulting reconstruction algorithm over all Kähler potentials K ∼ −log P(s) with deg P ≤ 7, the paper finds that many seemingly harmless potentials admit no tower spectrum at all (a saxion of degree 5 is always forbidden), while the admissible ones yield at most two tower polytopes. The payoff is a precise match: every allowed polytope is exactly a 'good slice' of the tower polytope of M-theory on a Joyce G2 manifold, including its non-BPS string content. If this is right, the asymptotic boundaries of 4d N=1 moduli space are universal — their tower structure is a slice of a single M-theory construction.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the Integral Scaling Relation, when combined with the Emergent String Conjecture applied recursively, is powerful enough to fully determine the asymptotic tower spectrum from the Kähler potential. The algorithm computes the ζ-vectors of elementary EFT strings directly from K, forms the lattice they generate, and keeps only lattice points whose norm matches one of the eight exponential rates allowed for unwarped decompactification (|ζ| = sqrt((n+2)/2n) for n = 1,...,7, and 1/sqrt(2) for strings). Point (e) — a simplex's pericenter must sit at the rate of the bound state decompactifying the summed dimensions — then selects the globally consistent tower polytop

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the ζ-vector lattice: for a Kähler potential K ∼ −log P(s), each elementary EFT string (a BPS axionic string charged along a single saxionic direction, whose tension is computed from K through T = −(M²_Pl/2) ∂_s K) defines a vector ζ_Te, and the Integral Scaling Relation ζ∗·ζ_Te = w|ζ_Te|² with w ∈ Z≥0 forces every light-tower vector onto the lattice ΛK they generate. The Emergent String Conjecture refines the lattice by admitting only the eight norms allowed by KK or string-oscillator towers, and a recursion condition on bound states (the pericenter of any k-simplex must correspond to decompactifying n⋆ = Σ ni dimensions, or to a fundamental string for n⋆ = ∞) enf

Load-bearing premise

The classification collapses if the Integral Scaling Relation — an integer-weight pattern observed in known string examples, not a proven theorem — is not a universal condition with weights w ≤ 3, or if warped or running decompactifications allow exponential rates outside the eight values |ζ| = sqrt((n+2)/2n), n = 1,...,7,∞, because every allowed polytope and every exclusion (such as the ban on (s1)^5) is derived from those numbers.

What would settle it

Find one genuine 4d N=1 string or M-theory vacuum whose asymptotic Kähler potential has an excluded monomial — e.g., (s1)^5 or (s1)^3(s2)^2 — as leading term in a growth sector and whose light-tower spectrum is nevertheless consistent; or construct a tower polytope satisfying the Integral Scaling Relation and the recursive Emergent String Conjecture for deg P ≤ 7 that is provably not a good slice of the T^7/(Z2⊕Z2⊕Z2) Joyce polytope. Either result would settle the paper's central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For any 4d N=1 theory with K ∼ −log P(s) of degree at most 7 satisfying the two conjectures, the asymptotic tower data is determined by the Kähler potential alone; no further UV input is needed.
  • Kähler potentials that look perfectly fine by themselves are excluded — for instance every monomial containing (s1)^5, and any two-saxion degree-5 polynomial with more than one term — giving a concrete test of where the quantum-gravity constraints bite.
  • The Integral Scaling Relation is strictly stronger than the previously proposed taxonomy rules for towers: roughly half of the taxonomy solutions for two and three saxions admit no Kähler realization within degree ≤ 7.
  • The same Kähler potential can support at most two distinct tower arrangements, and exactly when there are two, the difference is the presence of a single KK-1 tower — matching the known heterotic/type IIA versus type I/F-theory split.
  • Every allowed arrangement, including its non-BPS string content, is realized by a slice of M-theory on a Joyce G2 manifold, giving evidence for a string-universality statement about the boundaries of 4d N=1 moduli space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the matching extends beyond degree 7, the Joyce G2 polytope would function as a master polytope for 4d N=1 boundaries: the complete catalogue of asymptotic tower structures would reduce to the slice geometry of one compactification.
  • The excluded monomials are sharp predictions of the framework: a genuine 4d N=1 vacuum exhibiting (s1)^5 as a leading term in some growth sector, with a valid tower spectrum, would refute the universality of the Integral Scaling Relation — so the w ≤ 3 bound is the part of the paper most worth attacking.
  • The unwarped-decompactification assumption is the paper's principal caveat, and it is testable: if running or warped limits allow exponential rates outside the eight values used here, the lattice filter changes and some excluded potentials could become consistent; checking the Integral Scaling Relation in warped settings is the most direct next step.
  • Because the ζ-vectors are computed from the Kähler metric, the reconstruction effectively converts the question 'which towers exist?' into a differential-geometric question about the moduli-space metric at infinity, which may be accessible to purely geometric techniques (curvature bounds, positivity of the metric) without any string input.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a bottom-up algorithm to reconstruct the asymptotic spectrum of light towers in 4d N=1 EFTs from the Kähler potential K∼−log P(s). The input assumptions are the Integral Scaling Relation (3.1) with integer weights w∈{0,1,2,3}, the recursive Emergent String Conjecture, and unwarped Minkowski decompactifications with rates (3.3)–(3.4). From these, the algorithm computes EFT-string ζ-vectors, forms the lattice ΛK (3.13), selects points with ESC-compatible norms (3.14), and assembles tower polytopes subject to pericenter consistency conditions (step e). The algorithm is shown to reproduce known string/M-theory duality frames for representative Kähler potentials, and the authors then classify all monomials of degree ≤7 with up to seven saxions (Tables 1–8), claiming that certain monomials such as (s1)^5 are excluded. For general polynomials, additional gluing constraints are imposed across growth sectors. The central result is the claimed exact bijection between the tower polytopes allowed by the reconstruction and the 'good slices' of the M-theory-on-Joyce-G2 polytope of Table 8, including non-BPS string content. This is offered as evidence for a form of string universality at asymptotic boundaries.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a concrete, falsifiable criterion for asymptotic Kähler potentials and a striking structural statement: within the degree-≤7 monomial class, the tower data allowed by the ISR+ESC axioms coincide exactly with slices of a single Joyce G2 polytope. The ζ-vector formalism in §2 and Appendix A is coherent, the Diophantine conditions (4.2)–(4.4) are explicit and checkable, and the single-modulus exclusions in Table 1 can be verified by hand. The paper also sharpens the relation between the ISR and the taxonomy rules of [65], showing that only a subset of taxonomy solutions admit a Kähler-potential embedding. These are real strengths. The main limitations are that the exhaustive enumeration underlying the central bijection is asserted rather than demonstrated, and that the input assumptions—ISR with w≤3, the rate set (3.3)–(3.4), and the degree bound p≤7—are empirical or top-down inputs, as the paper itself acknowledges. The claimed universality is therefore conditional on these axioms, though the internal logic is largely sound.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.3; Tables 3–8] The claimed bijection between the bottom-up list and the 'good slices' of the Joyce G2 polytope is the central new result, but both directions are asserted rather than demonstrated. §4.3 states that 'performing all possible combinations of co-scaling and freezing of saxions … the only combinations that yield good slices are exactly the ones listed', and §4.1.1 states that 'we ran all possible monomials of degree ≤7 through the reconstruction algorithm'. No pseudocode, code, or complete derivation is given for step (e) of §3.1 (pericenter-distance check and recursive ESC consistency on k-simplices, Eqs. (3.13)–(3.14)). For seven saxions ΛK has 127 points and many candidate simplices; a missed monomial, a missed polytope, or a 'good slice' whose projected tower content differs from Tables 1–8 would break the universality statement. Please supply a reproducibility package or a computer-veri
  2. [§3.1 Assumptions 1–3; §4.1.1; §5] The exclusions are conditional on three inputs that are not derived but assumed or top-down calibrated: ISR with integer w∈{0,1,2,3} (Assumption 1, Eq. (3.1)), the rate set (3.3)–(3.4) obtained from n∈{1,…,7,∞} unwarped Minkowski decompactifications (Assumption 3), and the degree bound p≤7, which §4.1.1 explicitly calls 'a top-down input'. The paper acknowledges this in §4.1.1 and §5, but the abstract and conclusions present the Joyce-slice result without the caveat. Since the exclusion of (s1)^5 in Table 1 is a consequence of the Diophantine equations (4.3)–(4.4) for exactly this rate set, any warped/running limit with different rates or any w>3 tower would alter the classification. The theorem should be stated in fully conditional form, e.g., 'under Assumptions 1–3 and p≤7, …'.
  3. [§4.3, 'good slice' definition] The definition of a 'good slice' appears calibrated to the same conditions that the reconstruction algorithm imposes. A good slice is defined as one 'where the corresponding tower polytope is generated by leading towers or bounded states contained in such slice', guaranteeing consistency with the taxonomy rules; this is essentially step (e) of §3.1 applied to the projected Joyce polytope. The Joyce polytope for K∼−log(s1⋯s7) is itself obtained as the unique output of the algorithm (Table 8), so the two sides of the claimed match are not independent. The geometric discussion of radii interlinking and the s_i∼s_j example leading to n=4/3 is welcome and provides an independent criterion, but it is not generalized into a formal definition. Please either define 'good slice' geometrically via radii identifications and prove the match with Tables 1–8, or present the slice claim as an a posterio
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2; §4.1.1] There are sign typos: 'K∼log[s0(s1)^3]' and similar expressions should read 'K∼−log[…]' (the minus sign is missing in several places in the running text).
  2. [§4.1.1] Typo: 'later glueto discuss' should be 'later glue to discuss'.
  3. [Tables 1, 3–8] The captions refer to non-BPS strings 'colored in blue'. If the paper is printed in monochrome or the arXiv PDF color scheme is not used, the distinction is lost; consider adding symbols or a legend.
  4. [Appendix A, (A.14)] The lower bound w_i ≥ ⌈√p_i⌉ is derived but never used in the reconstruction algorithm. Either state why it is not needed for the classification or use it in step (c) of §3.1.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Partial circularity: the reconstruction input was inferred from the same examples it 'recovers,' and the 'good slice' notion is defined by the same consistency rule the algorithm imposes.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [§1 and §2.1 (Assumption 1, eq. (3.1)); cf. §3.2]
    "In previous work [15], we tested this relation further in top-down string constructions and found that it is satisfied not only by the leading tower along a given asymptotic trajectory, but also by subleading towers that become dominant in other directions. /// In this paper, we are going to reverse the story. Rather than performing a top-down analysis to check (2.15) (as done in [15]), we are going to assume (2.15) (or equivalently, (2.14)) as a universal principle of quantum gravity, and derive the possible UV structures of towers consistent with that relation from a bottom-up perspective."

    The Integral Scaling Relation, with its w=1,2,3 weights and lattice structure, was observed and tested in [8,15] on the same string/M-theory compactifications that Section 3.2 then 'precisely reproduces'. Thus the reproductions of K~-log[s0(s1)^3], K~-log[s0(s1)^2 s2], etc. are in-sample checks rather than independent predictions: the target arrangements were part of the dataset from which the assumed rule was inferred. This does not invalidate the later classification of new monomials, but it weakens the claim that known arrangements are independently recovered.

  2. self definitional [§4.3 (definition of 'good slice' and claimed match)]
    "A good slice is then defined as a slice of the higher-dimensional moduli space where the corresponding tower polytope is generated by leading towers or bounded states contained in such slice. This guarantees that the new arrangement is consistent with the taxonomy rules, and therefore their length is that expected for a KK or string oscillator tower. ... We obtain that, from this top-down point of view, the only combinations that yield 'good' slices are exactly the ones that are listed as allowed monomials in Tables 1 and 3 to 7."

    The bottom-up allowed monomials are selected by reconstruction algorithm step (e), which requires each k-simplex's pericenter to sit at distance sqrt((2+n*)/(2n*)) with n*=sum n_i, i.e. exactly the ESC/taxonomy consistency condition. The 'good slice' is then defined in §4.3 by the same condition ('consistent with the taxonomy rules'). The claimed bijection between allowed monomials and good slices is therefore partly fixed by construction: both sets are defined by the same consistency rule. The concrete Joyce-polytope computation adds content, but the selection criterion is shared rather than independently derived.

full rationale

The paper is transparent about its main assumptions: the Integral Scaling Relation, the recursive Emergent String Conjecture, the restriction to unwarped Minkowski decompactifications, and the degree bound p<=7 are all stated explicitly as inputs. Given those assumptions, the Diophantine analysis in Section 4.1.1 (e.g. Table 2) is a genuine derivation, and the exclusion of monomials such as (s1)^5 is real content. The circularity is moderate and located in the validation and the framing: (i) the ISR was inferred from the same string examples that Section 3.2 then 'recovers', so those recoveries are not out-of-sample predictions; (ii) the 'good slice' notion used for the M-theory match is defined by the same taxonomy/ESC consistency condition that the reconstruction algorithm imposes, making the exact match partially definitional. The paper itself flags the possible 'string lamppost' effect of its assumptions in §4.3, and acknowledges that deg P<=7 is mostly a top-down input. These caveats prevent a high circularity score, while the shared input-output structure prevents a score of zero. The remaining Joyce-slice computations and the claimed exhaustive enumeration are not checked here; that is a verifiability/correctness issue rather than an additional circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper postulates no new physical entities: its outputs are arrangements and exclusion criteria for known tower types (KK towers, oscillator towers, BPS/non-BPS fundamental strings). The free parameters and axioms listed are the calibrated inputs (weight range, degree bound, dimension bound, rate set) imported from the known string/M-theory landscape; the 'derivations' in the paper are conditional on these.

free parameters (3)
  • degree bound p ≤ 7 (monomial power budget) = p ≤ 7
    §4.1.1: 'the motivation for p≤7 remains mostly a top-down input'; the exclusions (e.g., a single saxion with power 5) and the G2 matching hold only within this bound.
  • ISR scaling weight w = w ∈ {1,2,3}
    Assumed empirical bound (§1, (1.1)-(1.2); §3.1 Assumption 1). The finite lattice filter and Table 1 exclusions depend on w≤3; a w=4 tower would change the classification.
  • number of decompactifying dimensions n = n ∈ {1,...,7,∞}
    Assumption 3 (§3.1) plus the 10/11d cap: rates (3.3)-(3.4) are the only allowed ones; the Diophantine solutions (Table 2) and the (s1)^5 exclusion follow from this restricted rate set. Warped limits of [64,80] would enlarge it.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption Integral Scaling Relation: m⋆² ~ (T_e/M_Pl²)^w, w∈{1,2,3} for all towers generating the convex hull
    §3.1 Assumption 1; observed in string examples [8,15], assumed universal here.
  • domain assumption Emergent String Conjecture, applied recursively upon decompactification
    §3.1 Assumption 2; conjectural [39,71].
  • domain assumption Decompactifications are to unwarped higher-dimensional Minkowski vacua (warping diluted)
    §3.1 Assumption 3; excludes warped/running limits [64,80] whose rates are non-universal.
  • ad hoc to paper EFT string with w=1 is a BPS fundamental string, and vice versa
    §3.1, 'We will take the above as an assumption for our bottom-up analysis'; needed to identify oscillator towers with EFT strings.
  • standard math KK and oscillator rates |ζ_KK,n| = sqrt((n+2)/2n), |ζ_osc| = 1/sqrt(2)
    Standard KK reduction in d=4, cited to [65,67]; used in algorithm step (d).
  • standard math Facts A.3, A.5, A.10 (ζ_Te ∝ e; |ζ_e|² = 1/(2 deg_σ P); lattice identity)
    Proven in Appendix A for homogeneous K; internal lemmas.
  • standard math Lorentzian-polynomial conditions (ultra-log-concavity, no internal zeroes) are sufficient for positive-definite metric
    Brändén–Huh [100, Thm 2.25]; used in §4.1.2 gluing; sufficient, not necessary (acknowledged).
  • standard math Hodge index theorem gives det κ1 ≤ 0 for CY volumes
    §4.1.2 eq. (4.11); cited [95].

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 52690 in / 22204 out tokens · 192303 ms · 2026-08-01T06:57:26.896416+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop a bottom-up framework to reconstruct the asymptotic spectrum of light towers in four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=1$ effective field theories directly from their K\"ahler potential. Our construction uses the Integral Scaling Relation, which relates the mass scales of towers becoming light at infinite distance to the tensions of EFT strings, together with the Emergent String Conjecture applied recursively upon decompactification. These conditions organize the tower scaling vectors into a lattice generated by the EFT-string vectors and select the globally consistent tower polytopes. When applied to K\"ahler potentials arising from string compactifications, our algorithm precisely reproduces the known arrangements of towers and duality frames. We then classify the admissible polytopes for asymptotic K\"ahler potentials $K\sim-\log P(s)$, with $P(s)$ a homogeneous polynomial of degree at most seven, and show that certain apparently consistent K\"ahler potentials are incompatible with the assumed quantum-gravity constraints. For general polynomials, additional restrictions arise from gluing the tower arrangements across different growth sectors. Remarkably, every tower polytope allowed by our reconstruction can be obtained as a concrete slice of the polytope associated with M-theory on a Joyce $G_2$-manifold. This provides evidence for a form of string universality in which EFT strings act as the fundamental building blocks of the UV tower structure in the EFT perturbative regimes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 99 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Brennan, F

    T.D. Brennan, F. Carta and C. Vafa,The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner,PoST ASI2017(2017) 015 [1711.00864]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1 [2102.01111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Gra˜ na and A

    M. Gra˜ na and A. Herr´ aez,The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics,Universe7(2021) 273 [2107.00087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Harlow, B

    D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Weak gravity conjecture,Rev. Mod. Phys.95(2023) 035003 [2201.08380]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Agmon, A

    N.B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M.J. Kang and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,2212.06187

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,The EFT stringy viewpoint on large distances,JHEP09(2021) 197 [2104.05726]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,Large Field Distances from EFT strings,PoSCORFU2021(2022) 169 [2205.04532]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Grimm, S

    T.W. Grimm, S. Lanza and C. Li,Tameness, Strings, and the Distance Conjecture,JHEP09 (2022) 149 [2206.00697]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Wiesner,Light strings and strong coupling in F-theory,JHEP04(2023) 088 [2210.14238]

    M. Wiesner,Light strings and strong coupling in F-theory,JHEP04(2023) 088 [2210.14238]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Marchesano, L

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti and L. Paoloni,On the moduli space curvature at infinity,JHEP02 (2024) 103 [2311.07979]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Marchesano, L

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti and M. Wiesner,Asymptotic curvature divergences and non-gravitational theories,JHEP02(2025) 151 [2409.02991]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Hassfeld, J

    B. Hassfeld, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Emergent strings in Type IIB Calabi-Yau compactifications,JHEP01(2026) 140 [2504.01066]

    arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Grieco, I

    A. Grieco, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,EFT strings and dualities in 4dN= 1,JHEP06(2026) 129 [2504.16984]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Monnee, T

    J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Physics and geometry of complex structure limits in type IIB Calabi-Yau compactifications,JHEP03(2026) 063 [2509.07056]

    arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Kaufmann, T

    L. Kaufmann, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,On Quantum Obstructions in Type IIA Orientifolds,2604.25988

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Kaufmann, J

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions forN= 1 infinite distance limits – Part II: K¨ ahler obstructions,2603.13470

    arXiv

  19. [19]

    Marchesano and M

    F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner,4d strings at strong coupling,JHEP08(2022) 004 [2202.10466]. – 63 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Martucci, N

    L. Martucci, N. Risso and T. Weigand,Quantum gravity bounds onN= 1 effective theories in four dimensions,JHEP03(2023) 197 [2210.10797]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    C.F. Cota, A. Mininno, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,The asymptotic Weak Gravity Conjecture for open strings,JHEP11(2022) 058 [2208.00009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Marchesano and L

    F. Marchesano and L. Melotti,EFT strings and emergence,JHEP02(2023) 112 [2211.01409]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Martucci, N

    L. Martucci, N. Risso, A. Valenti and L. Vecchi,Wormholes in the axiverse, and the species scale,JHEP07(2024) 240 [2404.14489]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Licciardello and L

    D. Licciardello and L. Martucci,Non-invertible symmetries in the axiverse, and the imaginary wormholes,2606.26004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  26. [26]

    Baume and E

    F. Baume and E. Palti,Backreacted Axion Field Ranges in String Theory,JHEP08(2016) 043 [1602.06517]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    Klaewer and E

    D. Klaewer and E. Palti,Super-Planckian Spatial Field Variations and Quantum Gravity, JHEP01(2017) 088 [1610.00010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Blumenhagen, I

    R. Blumenhagen, I. Valenzuela and F. Wolf,The Swampland Conjecture and F-term Axion Monodromy Inflation,JHEP07(2017) 145 [1703.05776]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Grimm, E

    T.W. Grimm, E. Palti and I. Valenzuela,Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,JHEP08(2018) 143 [1802.08264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Emergence of Weak Coupling at Large Distance in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 051601 [1802.08698]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Blumenhagen, D

    R. Blumenhagen, D. Kl¨ awer, L. Schlechter and F. Wolf,The Refined Swampland Distance Conjecture in Calabi-Yau Moduli Spaces,JHEP06(2018) 052 [1803.04989]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Grimm, C

    T.W. Grimm, C. Li and E. Palti,Infinite Distance Networks in Field Space and Charge Orbits,JHEP03(2019) 016 [1811.02571]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Buratti, J

    G. Buratti, J. Calder´ on and A.M. Uranga,Transplanckian axion monodromy!?,JHEP05 (2019) 176 [1812.05016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Corvilain, T.W

    P. Corvilain, T.W. Grimm and I. Valenzuela,The Swampland Distance Conjecture for K¨ ahler moduli,JHEP08(2019) 075 [1812.07548]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Joshi and A

    A. Joshi and A. Klemm,Swampland Distance Conjecture for One-Parameter Calabi-Yau Threefolds,JHEP08(2019) 086 [1903.00596]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Erkinger and J

    D. Erkinger and J. Knapp,Refined swampland distance conjecture and exotic hybrid Calabi-Yaus,JHEP07(2019) 029 [1905.05225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Marchesano and M

    F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner,Instantons and infinite distances,JHEP08(2019) 088 [1904.04848]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    A. Font, A. Herr´ aez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,The Swampland Distance Conjecture and Towers of Tensionless Branes,JHEP08(2019) 044 [1904.05379]. – 64 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,JHEP02 (2022) 190 [1910.01135]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Gendler and I

    N. Gendler and I. Valenzuela,Merging the weak gravity and distance conjectures using BPS extremal black holes,JHEP01(2021) 176 [2004.10768]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,Swampland Conjectures for Strings and Membranes,JHEP02(2021) 006 [2006.15154]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Klaewer, S.-J

    D. Klaewer, S.-J. Lee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum corrections in 4dN= 1 infinite distance limits and the weak gravity conjecture,JHEP03(2021) 252 [2011.00024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Lee and T

    S.-J. Lee and T. Weigand,Elliptic K3 surfaces at infinite complex structure and their refined Kulikov models,JHEP09(2022) 143 [2112.07682]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Physics of infinite complex structure limits in eight dimensions,JHEP06(2022) 042 [2112.08385]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    ´Alvarez-Garc ´ ıa, S.-J

    R. ´Alvarez-Garc ´ ıa, S.-J. Lee and T. Weigand,Non-minimal elliptic threefolds at infinite distance. Part I. Log Calabi-Yau resolutions,JHEP08(2024) 240 [2310.07761]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    ´Alvarez-Garc ´ ıa, S.-J

    R. ´Alvarez-Garc ´ ıa, S.-J. Lee and T. Weigand,Non-minimal Elliptic Threefolds at Infinite Distance II: Asymptotic Physics,2312.11611

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Rudelius,Revisiting the Refined Distance Conjecture,2303.12103

    T. Rudelius,Revisiting the Refined Distance Conjecture,2303.12103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Aoufia, I

    C. Aoufia, I. Basile and G. Leone,Species scale, worldsheet CFTs and emergent geometry, 2405.03683

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Monnee, T

    J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,K points and type IIB/heterotic duality with NS5-branes,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 066002 [2510.02435]

    arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Baume and J

    F. Baume and J. Calder´ on Infante,Tackling the SDC in AdS with CFTs,JHEP08(2021) 057 [2011.03583]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Perlmutter, L

    E. Perlmutter, L. Rastelli, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela,A CFT distance conjecture,JHEP10 (2021) 070 [2011.10040]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Baume and J

    F. Baume and J. Calder´ on-Infante,On Higher-Spin Points and Infinite Distances in Conformal Manifolds,2305.05693

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Ooguri and Y

    H. Ooguri and Y. Wang,Universal Bounds on CFT Distance Conjecture,2405.00674

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Calder´ on-Infante and I

    J. Calder´ on-Infante and I. Valenzuela,Tensionless string limits in 4d conformal manifolds, JHEP08(2025) 165 [2410.07309]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Calder´ on-Infante and A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante and A. Mohseni,The CFT distance conjecture and tensionless string limits inN= 2 quiver gauge theories,JHEP04(2026) 105 [2601.08909]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Mantegazza, E

    F. Mantegazza, E. Marchetto, E. Pomoni, T. Skrzypek and T. Weigand,Multiplet recombination and the CFT Distance Conjecture,JHEP06(2026) 204 [2603.02304]

    arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Baume and F

    F. Baume and F. Mantegazza,Group Theory and the CFT Distance Conjecture:N= 2 Tensionless Strings Have No (Co)Weight,2607.12014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A.M

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A.M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela,The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Tensionless String Limits in 4d SCFTs,2607.12019. – 65 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture, Nucl. Phys. B938(2019) 321 [1810.05169]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Gonzalo and L.E

    E. Gonzalo and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,A Strong Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture and Some Implications,JHEP08(2019) 118 [1903.08878]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Dall’Agata and M

    G. Dall’Agata and M. Morittu,Covariant formulation of BPS black holes and the scalar weak gravity conjecture,JHEP03(2020) 192 [2001.10542]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Andriot, N

    D. Andriot, N. Cribiori and D. Erkinger,The web of swampland conjectures and the TCC bound,JHEP07(2020) 162 [2004.00030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Benakli, C

    K. Benakli, C. Branchina and G. Lafforgue-Marmet,Revisiting the scalar weak gravity conjecture,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 742 [2004.12476]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conjecture,JHEP12(2023) 182 [2306.16440]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Taxonomy of Infinite Distance Limits,2405.20332

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A.M

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A.M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela,The Convex Hull Swampland Distance Conjecture and Bounds on Non-geodesics,JHEP03(2021) 299 [2012.00034]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in Diverse Dimensions,2206.04063

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,Entropy bounds and the species scale distance conjecture,JHEP01(2024) 039 [2306.16450]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich and T. Rudelius,A Distance Conjecture for branes,JHEP09 (2025) 155 [2407.20316]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Etheredge,Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,JHEP10(2025) 200 [2505.10615]

    M. Etheredge,Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,JHEP10(2025) 200 [2505.10615]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Emergent strings, duality and weak coupling limits for two-form fields,JHEP02(2022) 096 [1904.06344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Greene, A.D

    B.R. Greene, A.D. Shapere, C. Vafa and S.-T. Yau,Stringy Cosmic Strings and Noncompact Calabi-Yau Manifolds,Nucl. Phys. B337(1990) 1

    1990

  73. [73]

    Freedman and A

    D.Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen,Supergravity, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK (5, 2012), 10.1017/CBO9781139026833

    doi:10.1017/cbo9781139026833 2012

  74. [74]

    Strominger,SPECIAL GEOMETRY,Commun

    A. Strominger,SPECIAL GEOMETRY,Commun. Math. Phys.133(1990) 163

    1990

  75. [75]

    de Wit, M

    B. de Wit, M. Rocek and S. Vandoren,Hypermultiplets, hyperKahler cones and quaternion Kahler geometry,JHEP02(2001) 039 [hep-th/0101161]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  76. [76]

    Cort´ es, A

    V. Cort´ es, A. Saha and D. Thung,Symmetries of quaternionic k¨ ahler manifolds with s 1-symmetry,Transactions of the London Mathematical Society8(2021) 95

    2021

  77. [77]

    Alexandrov, J

    S. Alexandrov, J. Manschot, D. Persson and B. Pioline,Quantum hypermultiplet moduli spaces in N=2 string vacua: a review,Proc. Symp. Pure Math.90(2015) 181 [1304.0766]. – 66 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    Castellano, I

    A. Castellano, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Stringy Evidence for a Universal Pattern at Infinite Distance,2311.01536

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    ´Alvarez-Garc ´ ıa, D

    R. ´Alvarez-Garc ´ ıa, D. Kl¨ awer and T. Weigand,Membrane limits in quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 066024 [2112.09136]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Raucci, I

    S. Raucci, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Alice in Warpland: KK modes, Warped Compactifications and the Swampland,2603.11163

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.