REVIEW 3 cited by
Comparing large language models and human programmers for generating programming code
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We systematically evaluated the performance of seven large language models in generating programming code using various prompt strategies, programming languages, and task difficulties. GPT-4 substantially outperforms other large language models, including Gemini Ultra and Claude 2. The coding performance of GPT-4 varies considerably with different prompt strategies. In most LeetCode and GeeksforGeeks coding contests evaluated in this study, GPT-4 employing the optimal prompt strategy outperforms 85 percent of human participants. Additionally, GPT-4 demonstrates strong capabilities in translating code between different programming languages and in learning from past errors. The computational efficiency of the code generated by GPT-4 is comparable to that of human programmers. These results suggest that GPT-4 has the potential to serve as a reliable assistant in programming code generation and software development.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Quantifying the benefits of code hints for refactoring deprecated Java APIs
Automated refactoring of deprecated Java APIs succeeds 71 to 82 percent of the time when Javadoc contains code hints, and at most 14 percent without them.
-
Chatting with Logs: An exploratory study on Finetuning LLMs for LogQL
A new 424-pair dataset, NL2LogQL, plus LoRA fine-tuning substantially improves LLM-generated LogQL queries for OpenSSH, OpenStack, and HDFS logs.
-
SmartLLMSentry: A Comprehensive LLM Based Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection Framework
A fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model generated static analysis detector conditions for five smart contract vulnerability classes with 92.1% exact match on a 38-sample test set.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.