Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Effective matter sectors from modified entropies

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that any modified black-hole entropy determines the spacetime metric through f(r)=1−4πM/S′(r), making entropy deformation an effective matter source.

desk verdict A useful catalog of effective fluids from modified entropies, but the global metric extension is a stipulated choice, not a derivation; worth refereeing with the caveats made explicit. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.04613 v3 pith:SSEEOIAB submitted 2025-11-06 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

Ankit Anand , Sahil Devdutt , Kimet Jusufi , Emmanuel N. Saridakis This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th MSC 83C5783C55 PACS 98.80.-k95.36.+x04.50.Kd
keywords modifiedentropyblackholethermodynamicsemergentgravitymetricfromanisotropiceffectivefluidenergyconditionsentropicforcefirstlawof
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that modifying the entropy of a black hole is not just a thermodynamic bookkeeping change: the entropy function itself can fix the spacetime metric. Starting from the first law dM=T dS and a static spherical line element, the authors derive a relation between the entropy derivative and the metric function, f(r)=1−4πM/S′(r). With this relation, Einstein's equations turn the entropy deformation into an explicit effective stress-energy tensor describing an anisotropic fluid, so deviations from the area law act as a matter source of entropic origin. The payoff is a unified procedure that takes any proposed entropy—Barrow, Tsallis-Cirto, Rényi, Kaniadakis, logarithmic, loop-quantum-gravity, exponential—and produces a concrete geometry and fluid, with the standard Schwarzschild vacuum recovered when S=πr². A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a direct way to test modified entropies through spacetime observables and connects entropy-based ideas of emergent gravity to ordinary Einstein equations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the entropy-derivative identity g(r)=4π/S′(r), promoted from the horizon to the whole spacetime. It turns the unspecified function g(r) in the metric ansatz f(r)=1−M g(r) into a quantity fixed by thermodynamics. The Einstein tensor of this metric then yields the effective fluid components in Eqs. (20)–(22): ρ=−M[rS″−S′]/(2r²S′²), p_r=−ρ, and a separate tangential pressure p_t. The identity does the work of converting thermodynamic information into geometric and material content.

What would settle it

Measure the black-hole shadow diameter of a candidate and compare it with the diameter predicted by Eq. (9) for a given modified entropy; if the measured value agrees with the Schwarzschild prediction while the entropy correction is large enough to shift the photon sphere, the claimed global correspondence is ruled out. Equivalently, derive the metric from the first law without the global promotion by imposing a separate matter model; if the resulting f(r) disagrees with Eq. (9), the correspondence fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the explicit correspondence encoded in Eq. (9): given any horizon entropy S(r), the metric function is f(r)=1−4πM/S′(r). The derivation starts from dM=T dS with the metric ansatz f(r)=1−M g(r), giving g(r+)=4π/S′(r+) at the horizon; the paper then promotes this local relation to every radius under stated assumptions. When S=πr², S′=2πr and f=1−2M/r, so Schwarzschild is recovered. For any other entropy, the Einstein tensor is nonzero and the implied stress-energy tensor has components ρ, p_r=−ρ, and a generally different tangential pressure—an anisotropic effective fluid of entropic origin. The paper applies this procedure to eight specific entropy models and reports thei

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the horizon relation g(r+)=4π/S′(r+) extends unchanged to every radius, and that identifying the mass parameter M as the ADM mass is consistent for the parameter ranges used.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every modified entropy in the paper yields a concrete metric; for example, Rényi entropy gives f_R(r)=1−2M(1+πλr²)/r, so the spacetime is no longer vacuum Schwarzschild.
  • In every case the effective matter is an anisotropic fluid with p_r=−ρ, so the radial pressure exactly cancels the energy density and the entropy signature appears mainly in the tangential pressure.
  • The Schwarzschild vacuum is recovered whenever the entropy reduces to the area law; each model's stress tensor vanishes in the corresponding limit (Δ→0, δ→1, λ→0, κ→0, etc.).
  • Energy conditions are model-dependent: Barrow's Δ>0 violates most conditions, Tsallis with δ<1 satisfies them, Rényi with λ>0 satisfies all, and several models violate the strong energy condition near the core, suggesting de Sitter-like interiors.
  • The same entropy correction can be read either as effective matter on the right-hand side of Einstein's equations or as modified gravity on the left-hand side, a duality the paper explicitly notes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The global extension g(r)=4π/S′(r) is the paper's choice, not a consequence of the first law alone; a different extension that shares the same horizon value would give a different metric and fluid, so the correspondence as stated is one member of a family.
  • Because p_r=−ρ appears in every model, the effective fluid always has a vacuum-like radial equation of state; the entropy deformation is therefore a natural way to generate dark-energy-type or regularizing cores without invoking scalar fields.
  • For parameter ranges where the metric is not asymptotically Schwarzschild (e.g., Rényi with λ≠0, Tsallis with δ<1/2, LQG with q>1), the identification of M with the ADM mass needs revision; treating M as a free mass parameter and reinterpreting the asymptotic structure would be a natural follow-up.
  • The closed-form metrics could be fed directly into geodesic and perturbation codes to predict shadows, photon rings, and quasinormal modes; comparing those with Schwarzschild predictions would give an observational test of each entropy model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a general formalism that starts from a modified black-hole entropy function S(r) and derives a static, spherically symmetric metric f(r)=1-4πM/S'(r) (Eq. 9) by promoting the horizon relation g(r_+)=4π/S'(r_+) to all r (assumption (i)) and identifying the parameter M with the ADM mass (assumption (ii)). Using Einstein's equations, the metric is reinterpreted as sourced by an anisotropic effective fluid with ρ=-p_r and a distinct tangential pressure (Eqs. 20-22). This recipe is applied to eight modified entropy models—Barrow, Tsallis-Cirto, Rényi, Kaniadakis, logarithmic, LQG, and exponential—yielding explicit metric functions, Einstein-tensor components, effective stress-energy tensors, gravitational-force modifications, and energy-condition analyses.

Significance. If taken as a model-building recipe, the framework offers a compact and unified way to translate a chosen entropy-area relation into a static spherical metric and an effective matter source. The algebraic derivation of the Einstein-tensor components (17)-(18) from the metric ansatz is correct, and the paper is transparent in stating that the global extension of the horizon relation is an assumption. The compilation of eight entropy models with explicit formulas is useful for future phenomenological studies. However, the central physical claim is weakened by two issues: the global extension is stipulated rather than derived, and the effective stress-energy tensor is by construction the Einstein tensor of the chosen metric, so the 'emergent matter' is a tautological rewording of the metric choice. The paper also contains several internal inconsistencies in the energy-condition and regularity statements for specific entropies. These issues are correctable, but they affect the interpretation of the results.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II A, Eq. (9)] The relation g(r_+)=4π/S'(r_+) is derived from the first law only at the horizon, and Eq. (9) extends it to all r by assumption (i). This extension is not unique: infinitely many functions g(r) satisfy g(r_+)=4π/S'(r_+) and are asymptotically Schwarzschild, and each gives a different metric and a different effective fluid. Thus the statement that an entropy function 'determines' a spacetime is not established. The paper should either derive the global extension from a stronger principle or explicitly label the construction as a model-building ansatz, not a consequence of the first law.
  2. [Secs. III B, III C, III F] Assumption (ii) requires the metric to be asymptotically Schwarzschild with ADM mass M. This is violated by several explicit models without parameter restrictions. For Rényi (Eq. 39), f_R=1-2M/r-2πλMr diverges as r→∞, so it is not asymptotically flat. For Tsallis (Eq. 31), δ≠1 gives f→1 for δ<1/2 and a divergent metric for δ>1/2, so the parameter M cannot be the ADM mass except at δ=1. For LQG (Eq. 59), q>1 produces an exponentially diverging metric, while q<1 gives f→1. These parameter regions are not excluded, and the ADM-mass identification is therefore invalid for them. The authors should restrict parameters or reinterpret M.
  3. [Secs. II B and III] The effective stress-energy tensor is defined as G_μν/8π for a metric that was itself fixed by Eq. (9). Consequently, every result (17)-(22) is an algebraic identity for the chosen g(r), not an independent prediction. The Abstract's claim that the formalism 'naturally leads to an emergent stress-energy tensor' and 'may resolve possible inconsistencies' overstates the content. The physical input is entirely the choice of the global extension in Eq. (9). This circularity should be acknowledged clearly, and the paper should be reframed as a constructive correspondence, not an emergent derivation.
  4. [Secs. III B, III F, III G] Several energy-condition and regularity statements are inconsistent with the displayed formulas. For Tsallis, the text concludes that all standard energy conditions hold for 0<δ<1, but the own formulas require δ≥1/2 for DEC and SEC; for δ<1/2, SEC and DEC are violated. For the LQG model, Eq. (63) gives ρ∝1/r, which diverges at r=0 for q>1, contradicting the claim of a regularized, de Sitter-like core. The exponential model's Eq. (70) likewise gives ρ∝1/r for generic η, yet the text says the density remains finite as r→0. These errors must be corrected and the parameter domains re-examined before the energy-condition conclusions can be trusted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II A, Eq. (16)] The displayed formula for the modified gravitational force contains an ambiguous '16' in the denominator; likely a typesetting or derivation error. Please clarify the expression.
  2. [Sec. III B, Eqs. (35)-(36)] Equations (35) and (36) are identical duplicated lines. Remove the redundant equation.
  3. [Sec. III D title] The section title reads 'Kandiakis Entropy'; should be 'Kaniadakis Entropy'.
  4. [Sec. II A] Typo: 'it has been is derived' should read 'it has been derived'.
  5. [Sec. IV] Minor language: 'There is well-known connection' should read 'There is a well-known connection'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Entropy-to-metric correspondence is stipulated by assumption (i); the 'emergent' matter sector is the Einstein tensor of that assumed metric by construction.

  1. self definitional [Sec. II A, after Eq. (8), assumption (i), leading to Eq. (9)]
    "(i) Extending the horizon relation, namely promoting the horizon relation g(r+) = 4π/S'(r+) to a global functional dependence, g(r) = 4π/S'(r), which uniquely reconstructs the metric function from the chosen entropy functional form. ... In summary, under the above assumptions, we can write f(r) = 1−4πM/S'(r)."

    Eq. (8) is the only consequence of the first law and the metric ansatz, and it holds only at the horizon. Eq. (9), the central correspondence claimed to follow from the first law, is exactly the global version imposed in assumption (i). Thus the metric is not derived from S(r); S(r) is used to define g(r) at every radius. Any other function matching g(r+)=4π/S'(r+) and the Schwarzschild limit would equally satisfy the horizon thermodynamics but would give a different metric and a different effective fluid.

  2. other [Sec. II B, Eqs. (17)-(22)]
    "Hence, from the field equations of general relativity G_μν = 8π T_μν, we conclude that we obtain a non-zero, effective stress-energy tensor of entropic origin."

    Once Eq. (9) is imposed, the components of G_μν are fixed, and the fluid variables ρ, pr, pt in Eqs. (20)-(22) are defined as those components divided by 8π. Therefore the 'emergent anisotropic fluid' is the Einstein tensor of the assumed metric repackaged in fluid language. It is not an independent prediction and cannot fail; it is a definitional translation of the input metric rather than a test of the entropy-geometry correspondence.

full rationale

The derivation chain contains one genuinely derived element: Eq. (8) follows from dM=T dS with the ansatz f(r)=1−M g(r), evaluated at the horizon. All nontrivial content beyond that resides in assumption (i), which the paper states openly: the horizon relation is promoted to the global relation g(r)=4π/S'(r). Eq. (9) is therefore an input, and the claimed 'correspondence between entropy derivative and metric function' is definitional. The matter sector in Sec. II B is then obtained by substituting this metric into Einstein's equations; the resulting anisotropic fluid is the Einstein tensor of the assumed metric by construction. This is a legitimate reformulation—given any S(r), one can define a metric and read off an effective source—but it is not a derivation from the first law and it has no independent predictive content beyond the stipulated extension. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present; the many citations to prior entropy/cosmology work are background. I separately note the consistency issue that assumption (ii) is violated by some examples (e.g., the Renyi metric (39) is not asymptotically Schwarzschild), but I do not count that as circularity. The score 7 reflects the central role of the stipulated global extension and the definitional character of the emergent fluid, while recognizing that the horizon-level relation itself is derived.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on two main inputs: the standard Einstein equations and the first law of black-hole thermodynamics, plus two stated assumptions. The first assumption - globalizing a horizon thermodynamical relation - is ad hoc and carries the entire framework. The second assumption, ADM mass identification, is silently violated in several worked examples. No data are fitted, and no new fundamental entity is required, but the 'effective fluid' is a derived label rather than an independent prediction.

free parameters (1)
  • Entropy deformation parameters (Delta, delta, lambda, kappa, q, eta)
    Each modified entropy carries a free deformation parameter imported from the literature. The framework does not determine or fit these values, yet the metric and effective fluid depend on them sensitively.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Static, spherically symmetric metric ansatz (Eq. 1)
    The entire formalism restricts to this symmetry class; no derivation from entropy alone is given.
  • domain assumption First law dM=TdS holds for modified entropies (Eq. 2)
    Used to derive the horizon relation Eq. (8); assumes modified entropies have a thermodynamic interpretation at black-hole horizons.
  • ad hoc to paper Global extension g(r)=4π/S'(r), assumption (i)
    The horizon-only relation is promoted to all radii with no derivation. This is the load-bearing stipulation that makes the metric and the effective matter sector well defined.
  • domain assumption M identified as ADM mass, assumption (ii)
    Requires asymptotically Schwarzschild behavior for S=πr², and more generally asymptotic flatness. Violated by the Renyi metric, Tsallis with δ<1/2, and LQG with q>1, without parameter restrictions.
  • standard math Einstein equations G=8πT interpreted as determining an effective matter sector (Eq. 19)
    Standard general relativity; used to define the effective stress-energy tensor from the constructed metric.
invented entities (1)
  • Anisotropic effective fluid of entropic origin
    purpose: Acts as the source in Einstein's equations for metrics built from modified entropies (Eqs. 20-22).
    This is not an independently measured component; it is defined as G/8π of a metric that was itself chosen from the entropy derivative. No falsifiable handle is provided outside the construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective matter sectors from modified entropies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SSEEOIAB

@misc{pith2026251104613,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective matter sectors from modified entropies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SSEEOIAB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.04613}
}
read the original abstract

We present a general formalism linking modified entropy functions directly to a modified spacetime metric and, subsequently, to an effective matter sector of entropic origin. In particular, within the framework of general relativity, starting from the first law of black-hole thermodynamics we establish an explicit correspondence between the entropy derivative and the metric function, which naturally leads to an emergent stress-energy tensor representing an anisotropic effective fluid. This backreaction effect of horizon entropy may resolve possible inconsistencies recently identified in black hole physics with modified entropies. As specific examples, we apply this procedure to a wide class of modified entropies, such as Barrow, Tsallis-Cirto, Renyi, Kaniadakis, logarithmic, power-law, loop-quantum-gravity, and exponential modifications, and we derive the associated effective matter sectors, analyzing their physical properties and energy conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Thermodynamic formulation of Cotton gravity in the Codazzi parametrization

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Horizon entropy in Cotton gravity is Bekenstein-Hawking plus a Codazzi correction whose sign diagnoses ordinary, vacuum, or phantom matter content.

  2. Entropy-geometry correspondence as effective nonlocal gravity

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Generalized entropies determine effective nonlocal operators and running Newton couplings, with the area law reproduced identically for any entropy function.

  3. A winding number analysis of Schwarzschild black hole stability in light of Planck-scale modified kinematics

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For the cubic entropy correction S=πr_h²−αr_h³ arising from a Planck-scale modified dispersion relation, all physically allowed Schwarzschild-like branches have winding number w=−1, so no stable phase appears.

  4. Chaotic imprints of dark matter in extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A toy model shows that adding a hand-made angle-dependent force to dark-matter spacetimes produces visual chaos and irregular numerical-Kludge waveforms, but the force is not a realistic dark-matter perturbation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 66 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,”Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333–2346

    1973

  2. [2]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,” Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220

    1975

  3. [3]

    Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,”Conf. Proc. C930308(1993) 284–296, arXiv:gr-qc/9310026

    arXiv 1993

  4. [4]

    The World as a hologram,

    L. Susskind, “The World as a hologram,”J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377–6396,arXiv:hep-th/9409089

    arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    Thermodynamical Aspects of Gravity: New insights,

    T. Padmanabhan, “Thermodynamical Aspects of Gravity: New insights,”Rept. Prog. Phys.73(2010) 046901,arXiv:0911.5004 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton,

    E. P. Verlinde, “On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton,”JHEP04(2011) 029,arXiv:1001.0785 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Logarithmic correction to the bekenstein-hawking entropy,

    R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar, “Logarithmic correction to the bekenstein-hawking entropy,”Phys. Rev. Lett.84 (2000) 5255

    2000

  8. [8]

    General logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy,

    S. Das, P. Majumdar, and R. K. Bhaduri, “General logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy,”Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 2355

    2002

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    Logarithmic Corrections to Schwarzschild and Other Non-extremal Black Hole Entropy in Different Dimensions,

    A. Sen, “Logarithmic Corrections to Schwarzschild and Other Non-extremal Black Hole Entropy in Different Dimensions,”JHEP04(2013) 156

    2013

  2. [10]

    Possible Generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs Statistics,

    C. Tsallis, “Possible Generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs Statistics,”J. Statist. Phys.52(1988) 479–487

    1988

  3. [11]

    On measures of entropy and information,

    A. R´ enyi, “On measures of entropy and information,” Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability1(1961) 547–561

    1961

  4. [12]

    The Area of a Rough Black Hole,

    J. D. Barrow, “The Area of a Rough Black Hole,”Phys. Lett. B808(2020) 135643,arXiv:2004.09444 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Thermodynamics of Black Holes with R´ enyi Entropy from Classical Gravity,

    R. Nakarachinda, C. Promsiri, L. Tannukij, and P. Wongjun, “Thermodynamics of Black Holes with R´ enyi Entropy from Classical Gravity,” arXiv:2211.05989 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  6. [15]

    Statistical mechanics in the context of special relativity,

    G. Kaniadakis, “Statistical mechanics in the context of special relativity,”Phys. Rev. E66(Nov, 2002) 056125. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.66.056125

    2002 doi

  7. [16]

    Statistical mechanics in the context of special relativity. ii

    G. Kaniadakis, “Statistical mechanics in the context of special relativity. ii.”Phys. Rev. E72(Sep, 2005) 036108.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.036108

    2005 doi

  8. [17]

    Tsallis-cirto entropy of black hole and black hole atom,

    G. E. Volovik, “Tsallis-cirto entropy of black hole and black hole atom,”arXiv:2409.15362 [physics.gen-ph]

    arXiv

  9. [18]

    Modified cosmology through nonextensive horizon thermodynamics,

    A. Lymperis and E. N. Saridakis, “Modified cosmology through nonextensive horizon thermodynamics,”Eur. Phys. J. C78no. 12, (2018) 993,arXiv:1806.04614 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Modified cosmology through spacetime thermodynamics and Barrow horizon entropy,

    E. N. Saridakis, “Modified cosmology through spacetime thermodynamics and Barrow horizon entropy,”JCAP 07(2020) 031,arXiv:2006.01105 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Thermodynamic approach to holographic dark energy and the R´ enyi entropy,

    H. Moradpour, S. A. Moosavi, I. P. Lobo, J. P. Morais Gra¸ ca, A. Jawad, and I. G. Salako, “Thermodynamic approach to holographic dark energy and the R´ enyi entropy,”Eur. Phys. J. C78no. 10, (2018) 829,arXiv:1803.02195 [physics.gen-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Modified cosmology from extended entropy with varying exponent,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and E. N. Saridakis, “Modified cosmology from extended entropy with varying exponent,”Eur. Phys. J. C79no. 3, (2019) 242,arXiv:1903.03098 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Tsallis and Kaniadakis statistics from a point of view of the holographic equipartition law,

    E. M. C. Abreu, J. A. Neto, A. C. R. Mendes, and A. Bonilla, “Tsallis and Kaniadakis statistics from a point of view of the holographic equipartition law,”EPL 121no. 4, (2018) 45002,arXiv:1711.06513 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Tsallis, Renyi and Sharma–Mittal holographic dark energy models in DGP brane-world,

    A. Iqbal and A. Jawad, “Tsallis, Renyi and Sharma–Mittal holographic dark energy models in DGP brane-world,”Phys. Dark Univ.26(2019) 100349

    2019

  15. [24]

    Correspondence of cosmology from non-extensive thermodynamics with fluids of 11 generalized equation of state,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, E. N. Saridakis, and R. Myrzakulov, “Correspondence of cosmology from non-extensive thermodynamics with fluids of 11 generalized equation of state,”Nucl. Phys. B950 (2020) 114850,arXiv:1911.03606 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Tsallis, R´ enyi and Sharma-Mittal holographic and new agegraphic dark energy models in D-dimensional fractal universe,

    S. Maity and U. Debnath, “Tsallis, R´ enyi and Sharma-Mittal holographic and new agegraphic dark energy models in D-dimensional fractal universe,”Eur. Phys. J. Plus134no. 10, (2019) 514

    2019

  17. [26]

    Modified Cosmology Models from Thermodynamical Approach,

    C.-Q. Geng, Y.-T. Hsu, J.-R. Lu, and L. Yin, “Modified Cosmology Models from Thermodynamical Approach,” Eur. Phys. J. C80no. 1, (2020) 21,arXiv:1911.06046 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Modified cosmology through Kaniadakis horizon entropy,

    A. Lymperis, S. Basilakos, and E. N. Saridakis, “Modified cosmology through Kaniadakis horizon entropy,”Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 11, (2021) 1037, arXiv:2108.12366 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Tsallis holographic dark energy for inflation,

    A. Mohammadi, T. Golanbari, K. Bamba, and I. P. Lobo, “Tsallis holographic dark energy for inflation,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 8, (2021) 083505, arXiv:2101.06378 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Power-law holographic dark energy and cosmology,

    E. C. Telali and E. N. Saridakis, “Power-law holographic dark energy and cosmology,”Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 5, (2022) 466,arXiv:2112.06821 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Observational constraints and dynamical analysis of Kaniadakis horizon-entropy cosmology,

    A. Hern´ andez-Almada, G. Leon, J. Maga˜ na, M. A. Garc ´ ıa-Aspeitia, V. Motta, E. N. Saridakis, K. Yesmakhanova, and A. D. Millano, “Observational constraints and dynamical analysis of Kaniadakis horizon-entropy cosmology,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.512no. 4, (2022) 5122–513...

    2022 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Entropic corrections to Friedmann equations and bouncing universe due to the zero-point length,

    K. Jusufi and A. Sheykhi, “Entropic corrections to Friedmann equations and bouncing universe due to the zero-point length,”Phys. Lett. B836(2023) 137621, arXiv:2210.01584 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Horizon thermodynamics and cosmological equations: a holographic-like connection between thermostatistical quantities on a cosmological horizon and in the bulk,

    N. Komatsu, “Horizon thermodynamics and cosmological equations: a holographic-like connection between thermostatistical quantities on a cosmological horizon and in the bulk,”Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 8, (2023) 690,arXiv:2212.05822 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Thermodynamically consistent entropic late-time cosmological acceleration,

    D. J. Zamora and C. Tsallis, “Thermodynamically consistent entropic late-time cosmological acceleration,” Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 8, (2022) 689, arXiv:2201.03385 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Kaniadakis holographic dark energy and cosmology,

    N. Drepanou, A. Lymperis, E. N. Saridakis, and K. Yesmakhanova, “Kaniadakis holographic dark energy and cosmology,”Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 5, (2022) 449, arXiv:2109.09181 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Baryogenesis in non-extensive Tsallis Cosmology,

    G. G. Luciano and J. Gine, “Baryogenesis in non-extensive Tsallis Cosmology,”Phys. Lett. B833 (2022) 137352,arXiv:2204.02723 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Constraints on Barrow Entropy from M87* and S2 Star Observations,

    K. Jusufi, M. Azreg-A ¨ ınou, M. Jamil, and E. N. Saridakis, “Constraints on Barrow Entropy from M87* and S2 Star Observations,”Universe8no. 2, (2022) 102,arXiv:2110.07258 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Early and late universe holographic cosmology from a new generalized entropy,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and T. Paul, “Early and late universe holographic cosmology from a new generalized entropy,”Phys. Lett. B831(2022) 137189, arXiv:2205.08876 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Modified Friedmann equations from Kaniadakis entropy and cosmological implications on baryogenesis and 7Li-abundance,

    G. G. Luciano, “Modified Friedmann equations from Kaniadakis entropy and cosmological implications on baryogenesis and 7Li-abundance,”Eur. Phys. J. C82 no. 4, (2022) 314

    2022

  30. [39]

    Tsallis cosmology and its applications in dark matter physics with focus on IceCube high-energy neutrino data,

    P. Jizba and G. Lambiase, “Tsallis cosmology and its applications in dark matter physics with focus on IceCube high-energy neutrino data,”Eur. Phys. J. C 82no. 12, (2022) 1123,arXiv:2206.12910 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Barrow holographic dark energy in Brane world cosmology,

    A. Chanda, A. K. Mitra, S. Ghose, S. Dey, and B. C. Paul, “Barrow holographic dark energy in Brane world cosmology,”Class. Quant. Grav.41no. 3, (2024) 035004,arXiv:2209.05749 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Emergence of cosmic space in Tsallis modified gravity from equilibrium and non-equilibrium thermodynamic perspective,

    M. Dheepika, H. B. V. T., and T. K. Mathew, “Emergence of cosmic space in Tsallis modified gravity from equilibrium and non-equilibrium thermodynamic perspective,”Phys. Scripta99no. 1, (2024) 015014, arXiv:2211.14039 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Interacting and non-interacting R´ enyi holographic dark energy models in DGP braneworld,

    A. Saha, A. Chanda, S. Dey, S. Ghose, and B. C. Paul, “Interacting and non-interacting R´ enyi holographic dark energy models in DGP braneworld,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A 38no. 02, (2023) 2350024,arXiv:2202.06813 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [43]

    From the emergence of cosmic space to horizon thermodynamics in Barrow entropy-based Cosmology,

    G. G. Luciano, “From the emergence of cosmic space to horizon thermodynamics in Barrow entropy-based Cosmology,”Phys. Lett. B838(2023) 137721

    2023

  35. [44]

    Black hole geometrothermodynamics and critical phenomena: A look from Tsallis entropy-based perspective,

    G. G. Luciano and A. Sheykhi, “Black hole geometrothermodynamics and critical phenomena: A look from Tsallis entropy-based perspective,”Phys. Dark Univ.42(2023) 101319,arXiv:2304.11006 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Inflation based on the Tsallis entropy,

    Z. Teimoori, K. Rezazadeh, and A. Rostami, “Inflation based on the Tsallis entropy,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 1, (2024) 80,arXiv:2307.11437 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Accelerating universe via entropic models,

    M. Naeem and A. Bibi, “Accelerating universe via entropic models,”Eur. Phys. J. Plus138no. 5, (2023) 442

    2023

  38. [47]

    Modified cosmology from quantum deformed entropy,

    S. Jalalzadeh, H. Moradpour, and P. V. Moniz, “Modified cosmology from quantum deformed entropy,” Phys. Dark Univ.42(2023) 101320,arXiv:2308.12089 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Alleviating bothH 0 andσ 8 tensions in Tsallis cosmology,

    S. Basilakos, A. Lymperis, M. Petronikolou, and E. N. Saridakis, “Alleviating bothH 0 andσ 8 tensions in Tsallis cosmology,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 3, (2024) 297,arXiv:2308.01200 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Correction to the Friedmann equation with Sharma–Mittal entropy: A new perspective on cosmology,

    M. Naeem and A. Bibi, “Correction to the Friedmann equation with Sharma–Mittal entropy: A new perspective on cosmology,”Annals Phys.462(2024) 169618,arXiv:2308.02936 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Modified Friedmann equations from fractional entropy,

    Z. C ¸ oker,¨O. ¨Okc¨ u, and E. Aydiner, “Modified Friedmann equations from fractional entropy,”EPL 143no. 5, (2023) 59001,arXiv:2308.10212 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Holographic dark energy through Loop Quantum Gravity inspired entropy,

    A. Lymperis, “Holographic dark energy through Loop Quantum Gravity inspired entropy,”arXiv:2310.01050 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  43. [52]

    Unified first law of thermodynamics in Gauss–Bonnet gravity on an FLR W background,

    J. Saavedra and F. Tello-Ortiz, “Unified first law of thermodynamics in Gauss–Bonnet gravity on an FLR W background,”Eur. Phys. J. Plus139no. 7, (2024) 657, arXiv:2310.08781 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [53]

    R´ enyi Holographic Dark Energy,

    R. Nakarachinda, C. Pongkitivanichkul, D. Samart, L. Tannukij, and P. Wongjun, “R´ enyi Holographic Dark Energy,”Fortsch. Phys.72no. 7-8, (2024) 2400073, arXiv:2312.16901 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Constraints on Tsallis Cosmology from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and the Relic Abundance of Cold Dark Matter Particles,

    P. Jizba and G. Lambiase, “Constraints on Tsallis Cosmology from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and the Relic Abundance of Cold Dark Matter Particles,” Entropy25no. 11, (2023) 1495,arXiv:2310.19045 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Investigation of generalised uncertainty principle effects on FR W cosmology,

    ¨O. ¨Okc¨ u, “Investigation of generalised uncertainty principle effects on FR W cosmology,”Nucl. Phys. B 1004(2024) 116551,arXiv:2401.09477 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Friedmann equations of the fractal apparent horizon,

    R. Jalalzadeh, S. Jalalzadeh, A. S. Jahromi, and H. Moradpour, “Friedmann equations of the fractal apparent horizon,”Phys. Dark Univ.44(2024) 101498, 12 arXiv:2404.06986 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Interacting Barrow holographic dark energy in non-flat universe,

    P. Adhikary and S. Das, “Interacting Barrow holographic dark energy in non-flat universe,”JCAP04 (2025) 027,arXiv:2412.05577 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Analyzing inflationary parameters and swampland conjectures of modified cosmology according to various entropies,

    A. Jawad, S. Maqsood, N. Azhar, and M. M. Alam, “Analyzing inflationary parameters and swampland conjectures of modified cosmology according to various entropies,”Phys. Dark Univ.46(2024) 101680

    2024

  50. [59]

    Barrow cosmology and big-bang nucleosynthesis,

    A. Sheykhi and A. Shahbazi Sooraki, “Barrow cosmology and big-bang nucleosynthesis,”Phys. Rev. D 111no. 4, (2025) 043518,arXiv:2411.06075 [gr-qc]

    2025

  51. [60]

    Imprints of Barrow–Tsallis cosmology in primordial gravitational waves,

    P. Jizba, G. Lambiase, G. G. Luciano, and L. Mastrototaro, “Imprints of Barrow–Tsallis cosmology in primordial gravitational waves,”Eur. Phys. J. C84 no. 10, (2024) 1076,arXiv:2403.09797 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Constant-roll inflation and primordial black holes within Barrow entropic framework,

    Q. Huang, L.-Y. Chen, H. Huang, B. Xu, and K. Zhang, “Constant-roll inflation and primordial black holes within Barrow entropic framework,”Phys. Dark Univ. 50(2025) 102072,arXiv:2401.15451 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Ghost dark energy in Tsallis and Barrow cosmology,

    E. Ebrahimi and A. Sheykhi, “Ghost dark energy in Tsallis and Barrow cosmology,”Phys. Dark Univ.45 (2024) 101518,arXiv:2405.13096 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Fractional holographic dark energy,

    O. Trivedi, A. Bidlan, and P. Moniz, “Fractional holographic dark energy,”Phys. Lett. B858(2024) 139074,arXiv:2407.16685 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Alleviating the Hubble tension using the Barrow holographic dark energy cosmology with Granda–Oliveros IR cut-off,

    M. Yarahmadi and A. Salehi, “Alleviating the Hubble tension using the Barrow holographic dark energy cosmology with Granda–Oliveros IR cut-off,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.534no. 4, (2024) 3055–3067

    2024

  56. [65]

    Alleviating bothH 0 andσ 8 tensions through Tsallis entropy,

    M. Petronikolou, S. Basilakos, A. Lymperis, and E. Saridakis, “Alleviating bothH 0 andσ 8 tensions through Tsallis entropy,”PoSCORFU2023(2024) 174

    2024

  57. [66]

    Barrow entropic cosmology with exponential potential field,

    M. F. Karabat, “Barrow entropic cosmology with exponential potential field,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A39 no. 23n24, (2024) 2450109

    2024

  58. [67]

    Barrow holographic dark energy: a path to reconstructing f(R, T) gravity,

    P. S. Ens and A. F. Santos, “Barrow holographic dark energy: a path to reconstructing f(R, T) gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 12, (2024) 1338,arXiv:2412.09189 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Topological dark energy from black-hole formations and mergers through the gravity-thermodynamics approach,

    S. A. Tsilioukas, N. Petropoulos, and E. N. Saridakis, “Topological dark energy from black-hole formations and mergers through the gravity-thermodynamics approach,”arXiv:2412.21146 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  60. [69]

    Holographic reconstruction of k-essence model with Tsallis and the most generalized Nojiri-Odintsov version of holographic dark energy,

    U. Ualikhanova, A. Altaibayeva, and S. Chattopadhyay, “Holographic reconstruction of k-essence model with Tsallis and the most generalized Nojiri-Odintsov version of holographic dark energy,”Indian J. Phys.99no. 11, (2025) 4433–4441,arXiv:2501.04028 [physics.gen-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  61. [70]

    ΛCDM model against gravity-thermodynamics conjecture: observational constraints after DESI 2024,

    N. Shahhoseini, M. Malekjani, and A. Khodam-Mohammadi, “ΛCDM model against gravity-thermodynamics conjecture: observational constraints after DESI 2024,”Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 1, (2025) 53,arXiv:2501.03655 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Correspondence between MyrzakulovF(R, Q) gravity and Tsallis cosmology,

    A. Lymperis, G. Nugmanova, and A. Sergazina, “Correspondence between MyrzakulovF(R, Q) gravity and Tsallis cosmology,”arXiv:2502.04462 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  63. [72]

    Modified gravity as entropic cosmology,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, T. Paul, and S. SenGupta, “Modified gravity as entropic cosmology,” arXiv:2503.19056 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  64. [73]

    Constraints on Barrow and Tsallis holographic dark energy from DESI DR2 BAO data,

    G. G. Luciano, A. Paliathanasis, and E. N. Saridakis, “Constraints on Barrow and Tsallis holographic dark energy from DESI DR2 BAO data,”JHEAp49(2026) 100427,arXiv:2506.03019 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Barrow and Tsallis entropies after the DESI DR2 BAO data,

    G. G. Luciano, A. Paliathanasis, and E. N. Saridakis, “Barrow and Tsallis entropies after the DESI DR2 BAO data,”JCAP09(2025) 013,arXiv:2504.12205 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Apparent dark matter inspired by the Einstein equation of state,

    K. Jusufi and A. Sheykhi, “Apparent dark matter inspired by the Einstein equation of state,”EPL147 no. 1, (2024) 19001,arXiv:2402.00785 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [76]

    Look Beyond Additivity and Extensivity of Entropy for Black Hole and Cosmological Horizons,

    M. P. Dabrowski, “Look Beyond Additivity and Extensivity of Entropy for Black Hole and Cosmological Horizons,”Entropy26no. 10, (2024) 814, arXiv:2409.00802 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Apparent dark matter as a non-local manifestation of emergent gravity,

    K. Jusufi, A. Sheykhi, and S. Capozziello, “Apparent dark matter as a non-local manifestation of emergent gravity,”Phys. Dark Univ.42(2023) 101270, arXiv:2303.14127 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Signatures of modified gravity from the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect,

    K. Jusufi, A. Yasser, E. Battista, and N. Inan, “Signatures of modified gravity from the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect,”JCAP05(2025) 089, arXiv:2502.07613 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Modified cosmology though spacetime thermodynamics and generalized mass-to-horizon entropy,

    S. Basilakos, A. Lymperis, M. Petronikolou, and E. N. Saridakis, “Modified cosmology though spacetime thermodynamics and generalized mass-to-horizon entropy,”arXiv:2503.24355 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  71. [80]

    Parameter constraints and cosmographic analysis of Barrow agegraphic and new Barrow agegraphic dark energy models,

    A. Kotal, S. Maity, U. Debnath, and A. Pradhan, “Parameter constraints and cosmographic analysis of Barrow agegraphic and new Barrow agegraphic dark energy models,”Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 5, (2025) 565

    2025

  72. [81]

    The correspondence of generalised entropic cosmology theory with F(T) and F(Q) modified gravity and gravitational waves,

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “The correspondence of generalised entropic cosmology theory with F(T) and F(Q) modified gravity and gravitational waves,”Phys. Dark Univ.48(2025) 101899,arXiv:2502.15272 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Barrow entropies in black hole thermodynamics,

    S. Capozziello and M. Shokri, “Barrow entropies in black hole thermodynamics,”Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 2, (2025) 200,arXiv:2501.12987 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [83]

    Modified Friedmann equations and dark energy analysis with a variable barrow black hole parameter,

    E. M. C. Abreu and A. C. R. Mendes, “Modified Friedmann equations and dark energy analysis with a variable barrow black hole parameter,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A40no. 34, (2025) 2550162

    2025

  75. [84]

    Baryogenesis constraints on generalized mass-to-horizon entropy,

    G. G. Luciano and E. N. Saridakis, “Baryogenesis constraints on generalized mass-to-horizon entropy,” arXiv:2511.01693 [gr-qc]

  76. [85]

    Logarithmic corrections to rotating extremal black hole entropy in four and five dimensions,

    A. Sen, “Logarithmic corrections to rotating extremal black hole entropy in four and five dimensions,”JHEP 04(2013) 156

    2013

  77. [86]

    Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the cardy formula,

    S. Carlip, “Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the cardy formula,”Class. Quant. Grav. 17(2000) 4175

    2000

  78. [87]

    A brief commentary on black hole entropy,

    A. J. M. Medved, “A brief commentary on black hole entropy,”Class. Quant. Grav.22(2005) 133

    2005

  79. [88]

    Modified gravity and its reconstruction from the universe expansion history,

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Modified gravity and its reconstruction from the universe expansion history,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.4(2007) 115

    2007

  80. [89]

    Thermal fluctuations in a charged ads black hole,

    B. Pourhassan and M. Faizal, “Thermal fluctuations in a charged ads black hole,”Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 96

    2017

  81. [90]

    Exponential Corrections to Black Hole Entropy,

    A. Chatterjee and A. Ghosh, “Exponential Corrections to Black Hole Entropy,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125no. 4, (2020) 041302,arXiv:2007.15401 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [91]

    Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state,

    T. Jacobson, “Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state,”Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 1260–1263,arXiv:gr-qc/9504004 [gr-qc]

    1995 arXiv

  83. [92]

    H. B. Callen,Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics. John Wiley & Sons, 2nd ed., 1985. 13

    1985

  84. [93]

    New Entropies, Black Holes, and Holographic Dark Energy,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. Faraoni, “New Entropies, Black Holes, and Holographic Dark Energy,” Astrophysics65no. 4, (2022) 534–551, arXiv:2208.10235 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Black Hole Thermodynamics and Generalised Non-Extensive Entropy,

    E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, “Black Hole Thermodynamics and Generalised Non-Extensive Entropy,”Universe11no. 2, (2025) 60, arXiv:2502.05801 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  86. [95]

    R´ enyi Entropy and the Thermodynamic Stability of Black Holes,

    V. G. Czinner and H. Iguchi, “R´ enyi Entropy and the Thermodynamic Stability of Black Holes,”Phys. Lett. B752(2016) 306–310,arXiv:1511.06963 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.