Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.00066 v1 pith:SSFNYQHM submitted 2021-08-31 cs.CR cs.AI

Informing Autonomous Deception Systems with Cyber Expert Performance Data

classification cs.CR cs.AI
keywords cyberdataautonomousactionsdeceptiondefenseperformancerealism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The performance of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in practice depends on the realism and correctness of the data, models, and feedback (labels or rewards) provided to the algorithm. This paper discusses methods for improving the realism and ecological validity of AI used for autonomous cyber defense by exploring the potential to use Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) to gain insight into attacker actions, utilities of those actions, and ultimately decision points which cyber deception could thwart. The Tularosa study, as one example, provides experimental data of real-world techniques and tools commonly used by attackers, from which core data vectors can be leveraged to inform an autonomous cyber defense system.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.