Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Dual Contrastive Learning: Text Classification via Label-Aware Data Augmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.08702 v1 pith:SWX5ZLX5 submitted 2022-01-21 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords learningcontrastivesamplesclassificationdualclaugmentedclassifiersdual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Contrastive learning has achieved remarkable success in representation learning via self-supervision in unsupervised settings. However, effectively adapting contrastive learning to supervised learning tasks remains as a challenge in practice. In this work, we introduce a dual contrastive learning (DualCL) framework that simultaneously learns the features of input samples and the parameters of classifiers in the same space. Specifically, DualCL regards the parameters of the classifiers as augmented samples associating to different labels and then exploits the contrastive learning between the input samples and the augmented samples. Empirical studies on five benchmark text classification datasets and their low-resource version demonstrate the improvement in classification accuracy and confirm the capability of learning discriminative representations of DualCL.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Bias to Behavior: Learning Bull-Bear Market Dynamics with Contrastive Modeling

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A contrastive model, B4, jointly learns price and news representations split into bullish and bearish camps, claiming better trend prediction and interpretable bias dynamics.

  2. Measuring Human Involvement in AI-Generated Text: A Case Study on Academic Writing

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Human involvement in AI-generated academic text can be estimated continuously by training a RoBERTa regressor on BERTScore-derived labels, outperforming binary detectors on a new synthetic dataset.

  3. Domain Lexical Knowledge-based Word Embedding Learning for Text Classification under Small Data

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A lexical-knowledge projection of BERT word embeddings, trained with center loss, improves small-data text classification accuracy across six datasets.

  4. Emotion-aware Dual Cross-Attentive Neural Network with Label Fusion for Stance Detection in Misinformative Social Media Content

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SPLAENet claims state-of-the-art stance detection on RumourEval, SemEval, and P-Stance, but the reported 'average gains' are over the mean of all baselines, not the best baseline.

Pith tools