Generative AI Text Classification using Ensemble LLM Approaches
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance across a variety of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and natural language processing tasks, such as content creation, report generation, etc. However, unregulated malign application of these models can create undesirable consequences such as generation of fake news, plagiarism, etc. As a result, accurate detection of AI-generated language can be crucial in responsible usage of LLMs. In this work, we explore 1) whether a certain body of text is AI generated or written by human, and 2) attribution of a specific language model in generating a body of text. Texts in both English and Spanish are considered. The datasets used in this study are provided as part of the Automated Text Identification (AuTexTification) shared task. For each of the research objectives stated above, we propose an ensemble neural model that generates probabilities from different pre-trained LLMs which are used as features to a Traditional Machine Learning (TML) classifier following it. For the first task of distinguishing between AI and human generated text, our model ranked in fifth and thirteenth place (with macro $F1$ scores of 0.733 and 0.649) for English and Spanish texts, respectively. For the second task on model attribution, our model ranked in first place with macro $F1$ scores of 0.625 and 0.653 for English and Spanish texts, respectively.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Paraphrasing Attack Resilience of Various AI-Generated Text Detection Methods
Binoculars-inclusive ensembles detect AI text best overall but suffer the largest performance drops under paraphrasing attacks.
-
Automating Categorization of Scientific Texts with In-Context Learning and Prompt-Chaining in Large Language Models
Prompt chaining with off-the-shelf LLMs outperforms in-context learning and BERT for 1st- and 2nd-level classification on the ORKG taxonomy using the FORC dataset, but struggles at the 3rd level.
-
Ensembles of Large Language Models for Identifying EQ-5D Studies in PubMed Based on Their Abstracts
An ensemble of three Google LLMs achieves a 0.74 weighted F1-score for detecting EQ-5D reporting in 200 PubMed abstracts, marginally outperforming individual models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.