Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Reflection positivity in Euclidean formulations of relativistic quantum mechanics of particles

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Relaxing locality produces Euclidean relativistic quantum models with a Hilbert space, cluster properties, and a spectral condition, all without analytic continuation.

desk verdict The two-point construction is clean and the structural idea is interesting, but the connected four-point reflection-positivity proof has a genuine gap that needs fixing before the general claims hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20526 v1 pith:SZ2RIR3N submitted 2025-06-25 hep-th math-phmath.MPnucl-th

Gohin Shaikh Samad , W.N.Polyzou This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MPnucl-th
keywords reflectionpositivityquasi-SchwingerfunctionsEuclideancovarianceclusterpropertiesspectralconditionPoincarégeneratorsnonlocalrelativisticquantummechanicslinkedexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that relativistic quantum mechanics of a finite number of degrees of freedom can be cast in Euclidean form without assuming locality, the axiom that makes ordinary field-theoretic reflection positivity so restrictive. It proposes that the dynamical content be carried by reflection-positive Euclidean covariant distributions, called quasi-Schwinger functions, with one distribution for each split of an $N$-point function into initial and final variables rather than a single symmetric $N$-point Schwinger function. On the Hilbert space built from these distributions the Poincaré generators are self-adjoint, satisfy cluster properties, and have a Hamiltonian bounded below, so quantum calculations can be done directly in the Euclidean representation without analytic continuation. The price is that the spectral density behind the mass spectrum is an assumed input, not something the axioms determine.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the quasi-Schwinger function: a Euclidean covariant distribution indexed by separate initial and final Euclidean coordinates, replacing one symmetric Schwinger function. Connected quasi-Schwinger functions are built from the assumed intermediate-state form, a convolution of initial and final Euclidean-invariant vertex functions $S_{n,a}(X-x_i; p_e)$ around a propagator $D^s(p_e\cdot\sigma_e)/(p_e^2+m^2)$ with a non-negative spectral weight $\rho(m)$. Reflecting the initial Euclidean time turns the time integral into a contour integral whose only pole is at $p_e^0=-i\omega_m(p)$; after the residue is taken, the kernel becomes a positive matrix built from the spin-$s$ representation matrices $D^s(p_m\cdot\sigma_m)/2\omega_m(p)$, which are squares of Hermitian matrices. A one-variable Laplace-representation theorem [53] supplies the prototype for turning reflection positivity into a spectral representation, and a formal linked-cluster expansion converts sums of connected kernels into quasi-Schwinger functions with cluster properties.

What would settle it

Take any proposed non-negative spectral density and Euclidean-invariant vertex functions that are analytic in $p_e$ and decay in coordinate separations, evaluate the connected four-point kernel (92) on reflected-time test functions, and check numerically that the resulting inner-product matrix is positive semidefinite; a counterexample distribution that is reflection positive and Euclidean covariant but cannot be written in this convolution form would likewise show that the claimed general structure is not exhaustive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the $N$-point functions of a local Euclidean field theory, constrained by symmetry, can be replaced in the nonlocal setting by $N-1$ independent distributions with $m$ initial and $k=N-m$ final points, and that this split relaxes reflection positivity into a workable condition while preserving the structures needed for physics. The paper constructs connected versions of these quasi-Schwinger functions from intermediate-state propagators with positive spectral weight and Euclidean-invariant vertex functions, proves that they satisfy Euclidean covariance and reflection positivity, and assembles them through a linked-cluster expansion into distributions satisfying cluster properties. The resulting Hilbert-space inner product is non-negative by construction, and the Euclidean generators become self-adjoint Poincaré generators with a Hamiltonian that is bounded from below.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every connected quasi-Schwinger function can be written as the assumed intermediate-state convolution of Euclidean-invariant vertex functions around a positive propagator with a non-negative spectral weight, with the vertex functions analytic in the momentum variable and decaying in coordinate separations, and that an acceptable spectral density exists; the paper labels this structure as assumed rather than derived.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cluster-separable relativistic few-body models can be written directly in Euclidean space, bypassing the recursive unitary constructions needed in direct-interaction relativistic quantum mechanics.
  • Quantum-mechanical inner products and expectation values are computable from the Euclidean distributions themselves, so analytic continuation is not required for practical calculations.
  • Local Euclidean field theories fit inside the construction, since their symmetric Schwinger functions satisfy all of the reflection-positivity conditions imposed on quasi-Schwinger functions.
  • The dynamical problem separates from the structural one: any future dynamical principle that supplies an acceptable spectral density and vertex functions automatically yields a well-defined Euclidean representation with the required physical properties.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the vertex-function ansatz is in fact exhaustive, reflection positivity plus Euclidean covariance for connected distributions would reduce to a spectral condition, turning the construction into a classification scheme; the paper proves sufficiency in one direction but not this converse.
  • A natural next step, not taken in the paper, would be to generate quasi-Schwinger functions from an approximate dynamical input such as lattice data or truncated Euclidean integral equations; the paper fixes the structural constraints such an input would have to satisfy.
  • The same split of one N-point object into several initial-final distributions might soften reflection-positivity obstructions in other nonlocal Euclidean settings, such as effective hadronic models or open quantum systems, wherever locality is not available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Euclidean formulation of relativistic quantum mechanics for finite numbers of degrees of freedom by dropping the locality axiom and replacing a single N-point Schwinger function with N−1 quasi-Schwinger functions distinguished by the number of initial and final coordinates. The two-point functions are explicitly constructed from positive-mass, positive-energy irreducible representations of the Poincaré group, and the paper claims that connected multi-point functions built from an assumed intermediate-state ansatz satisfy Euclidean covariance and reflection positivity, thereby defining a physical Hilbert space inner product with self-adjoint Poincaré generators, cluster properties, and a spectral condition. Section VIII provides a cluster expansion using a formal linked-cluster generating functional. The conclusion acknowledges that the spectral density is an assumption rather than a derived dynamical input.

Significance. If the construction is correct, it offers an interesting route to non-local relativistic quantum mechanical models in which physical inner products and scattering calculations can be performed without analytic continuation. The explicit two-point construction in Section V is a clean demonstration of how Lorentz-covariant inner products emerge from reflection-positive Euclidean kernels, and the paper's honest statement that the spectral density is dynamical input is a useful clarification of the method's scope. The proposal to replace one N-point function by N−1 reflection-positive distributions with different initial/final splits is a genuinely new structural feature that could simplify positivity conditions in non-local models. However, the central existence claim for connected multi-point functions is not yet rigorously established because the reflection-positivity proof contains a load-bearing gap.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section VII, Eqs. (103)-(104)] The reflection-positivity proof uses the identity θ(xe1−xe2)·pe = ((xe1−xe2)·pe)*, which is false for real Euclidean momenta pe. The identity holds only at the pole p0 = −iωλ(p), and even there it requires a reality condition on the vertex function, such as S_2 being real for real Euclidean arguments, so that Euclidean invariance yields S_2(θx, p_e) = (S_2(x, p_e))*. No such reality condition is stated in the assumptions on S^{s1s2:s}_2 (Eqs. (92)-(93)) or on the general S_{n,a} (Eq. (106)). As written, the replacement of S*_2(θ(x1−x2), pe) by (S_2(x1−x2, pe))* in passing from (103) to (104) is unjustified, so the non-negativity of the quadratic form (102) is not established.
  2. [Section VII, after Eq. (106)] The paper asserts that the proof of Euclidean covariance and reflection positivity for the general connected quasi-Schwinger functions 'follows the proof in the four-point case.' Since the four-point proof has the gap described above, the reflection positivity of the general class in Eq. (106) is not proven. A repaired argument would need either an explicit reality/positive-definiteness condition on the vertex functions S_{n,a} or an alternative derivation that does not rely on the false identity.
  3. [Section VII, Eq. (92) versus Eqs. (103)-(105)] The intermediate-state mass is denoted m in Eq. (92) but λ in Eqs. (103)-(105), and the residue calculation in (105) uses ωλ(p). This inconsistency makes it unclear which mass parameter appears in the spectral decomposition and in the assumed ρ(m) of Eq. (107). The notation should be unified, and the role of ρ(m) in the connected four-point function should be made explicit.
  4. [Section VII, Eqs. (92) and (106)] The paper explicitly assumes that every connected quasi-Schwinger function has the intermediate-state convolution form (92)/(106), with Euclidean-invariant, p_e-analytic vertex functions that vanish at large coordinate separations. No proof is given that all reflection-positive Euclidean covariant distributions admit such a decomposition, so the claim to characterize the 'general structure' of such distributions is stronger than what is established. This is a scope limitation that should be clearly stated in the introduction and conclusion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section V, Eq. (105)] In the displayed expression after the residue integration, the spatial Fourier phases e^{±ip·x} appear to be missing inside the brackets, and the factor e^{−ω(x0_e1+x0_e2)} is placed outside the integral. This makes the expression ambiguous; please move the exponential inside the integral and include the spatial phases so that the Fourier transform structure is explicit.
  2. [Section IV, paragraph after Eq. (19)] There is a duplicated phrase 'are are' in the sentence beginning 'Dot superscripts are are used...'.
  3. [References] Reference [53] contains a typo: 'Succicient' should be 'Sufficient'. Also, the citation 'see of [53]' in Section III should give a specific page or theorem number.
  4. [Section VIII, first paragraph] The statement that 'reflection positivity is preserved under addition and tensor products' is standard but should be either proven in a line or accompanied by a reference, since it is a key ingredient in the cluster-expansion argument.
  5. [Section VII, Eq. (103)] The Clebsch-Gordan coefficient ⟨s1, µ1, s2, µ2|s, µ⟩ is real, but the transition from (103) to (104) applies a complex conjugate to this factor; the reality should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the quasi-Schwinger construction is a self-contained sufficiency construction; the reflection-positivity proof has a non-circular technical gap.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. The two-point quasi-Schwinger function in Eq. (71) is explicitly built from the known positive-energy irreducible representation, and its reflection positivity is verified by reducing the Euclidean bilinear form to the manifestly positive Lorentz-covariant inner product (78), which is a consistency check, not a circular reduction. The connected four-point and multi-point forms (92) and (106) are introduced as explicit 'assumed' ansätze, with the paper stating that the spectral density is 'dynamical information that should be calculated rather than assumed'; the existence claim is therefore a sufficiency construction, not a prediction extracted from data or from the target conclusion. No fitted parameters are used, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked. The citation to [5] for the Poincaré generators is a conditional construction that assumes distributions of the type constructed here, so it does not supply the existence claim; the present construction is what supplies it. The main mathematical concern is not circularity: the step between Eqs. (103) and (104) uses the identity θx·p = (x·p)*, which is false for real Euclidean p and needs an unstated reality condition or a pole-contour qualification; this is a correctness gap in the reflection-positivity proof, not a reduction of the conclusion to the inputs. The acknowledged assumptions about the vertex functions and spectral weight are explicit limitations, not circular inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction rests on standard theorems (Widder, direct integral decomposition, analyticity of Wigner functions) plus a specific intermediate-state ansatz that is assumed, not derived. No numerical parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are introduced; the main uncontrolled input is the spectral density.

free parameters (2)
  • spectral density ρ(m) = unspecified nonnegative measure
    Used to build superpositions of intermediate-state masses in connected quasi-Schwinger functions (Eqs. 106-107). The Conclusion admits this is dynamical input that should be calculated, not assumed.
  • intermediate-state mass λ and spin (s,0) = arbitrary
    The prototype four-point connected function is built from a single intermediate state with mass λ (Eq. 92); the value is not fixed by the theory.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Widder's theorem: continuous reflection-positive kernels k(t) have the Laplace representation k(t)=∫ e^{-λ t} dρ(λ)
    Used in Section III as the prototype for reflection-positive distributions and to motivate the spectral structure.
  • standard math Unitary representations of the Poincaré group decompose into direct integrals of positive-mass positive-energy irreducible representations
    Invoked in Section V to reduce the general structure to irreducible building blocks.
  • standard math Wigner D functions are entire functions of rotation angles, so their SL(2,C) extension is analytic and Clebsch-Gordan decompositions persist
    Used to factor Wigner rotations and to prove Euclidean covariance of connected functions (Eqs. 45-47, 99-100).
  • ad hoc to paper The general connected quasi-Schwinger function has the assumed intermediate-state ansatz (Eqs. 92, 106) with Euclidean invariant, p_e-analytic vertex functions S_{n,a}
    This is the load-bearing structural assumption; no proof that every reflection-positive distribution has this form is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper An acceptable spectral density ρ(m) exists and is part of the dynamical input
    The Conclusion states this is assumed and should be calculated by a future dynamical principle.
  • domain assumption Self-adjointness and cluster properties of the Poincaré generators on the constructed Hilbert space follow from prior work [5]
    The paper cites [5] for explicit generators and self-adjointness rather than re-deriving them.
  • domain assumption Test functions have Euclidean time support, enabling residue-theorem evaluation of Euclidean momentum integrals
    Used throughout Sections V and VII; this is the standard Osterwalder-Schrader time-support condition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reflection positivity in Euclidean formulations of relativistic quantum mechanics of particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SZ2RIR3N

@misc{pith2026250620526,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reflection positivity in Euclidean formulations of relativistic quantum mechanics of particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SZ2RIR3N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20526}
}
read the original abstract

This paper discusses the general structure of reflection positive Euclidean covariant distributions that can be used to construct Euclidean representations of relativistic quantum mechanical models of systems of a finite number of degrees of freedom. Because quantum systems of a finite number of degrees of freedom are not local, reflection positivity is not as restrictive as it is in a local field theory. The motivation for the Euclidean approach is that it is straightforward to construct exactly Poincar\'e invariant quantum models of finite number of degrees of freedom systems that satisfy cluster properties and a spectral condition. In addition the quantum mechanical inner product can be computed without requiring an analytic continuation. Whether these distributions can be generated by a dynamical principle remains to be determined, but understanding the general structure of the Euclidean covariant distributions is an important first step.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    intermediate states

    The connected four point function can be replaced by a square matrix of m + n-point connected distributions with the same “intermediate states”

    work page

  2. [2]

    The spinors of rank ( s, 0) can be replaced by spinors of rank ( sr, sl) or direct sums of rank ( s, 0) ⊕ (0, s)

    work page

  3. [3]

    intermediate state

    A single “intermediate state” of mass, λ >0, and spin ( sr, sl) can be replaced by linear superpositions of states with different λ’s and spins with a positive weight

    work page

  4. [4]

    It isstraightforward to construct Sn,a with these properties

    The initial and final distributions S s1s2:s 2 ( 1 2 (y1 − y2), pe)⟨s1, ν1, s2, ν2|s, ν,⟩ are replaced sums of products of invariant distributions and constant coupling coefficients of the form X a S (sr1,sl1)···(srn,sln);(sr,sl) n,a (Xe − xe1 · · ·Xe − xen−1; pc e)C (sr1,sl1),···(srn,sln);(srsl) (µr1,µl1)···(µrn,µln);(µr,µl)(a) (106) where X = 1 n (xe1 +...

    work page

  5. [5]

    G. S. Samad and W. N. Polyzou, Euclidean formulation of relativistic quantum mechanics of n particles, Phys. Rev. C 103, 025203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Kopp and W

    P. Kopp and W. N. Polyzou, A Euclidean formulation of relativistic quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D85, 016004 (2012), arXiv:1106.4086 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    W. N. Polyzou, Scattering and reflection positivity in relativistic Euclidean quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D89, 076008 (2014), arXiv:1312.3585 [math-ph]

    arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    W. N. Polyzou, Representations of relativistic particles of arbitrary spin in Poincar´ e, Lorentz, and Euclidean covariant formulations of relativistic quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. C99, 025202 (2019), arXiv:1809.09717 [math-ph]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    G. J. Aiello and W. N. Polyzou, Scattering asymptotic conditions in Euclidean relativistic quantum theory, Phys. Rev. D93, 056003 (2016), arXiv:1512.03651 [hep-th]. 21

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Bakamjian and L

    B. Bakamjian and L. H. Thomas, Relativistic particle dynamics. 2, Phys. Rev. 92, 1300 (1953)

    1953

  3. [11]

    R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman, PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That (Princeton Landmarks in Physics, 1980) pp. 168–170

    1980

  4. [12]

    Haag and D

    R. Haag and D. Kastler, An Algebraic approach to quantum field theory, J. Math. Phys. 5, 848 (1964)

    1964

  5. [13]

    Osterwalder and R

    K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader, Axioms for Euclidean Green’s functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 83 (1973)

    1973

  6. [14]

    Osterwalder and R

    K. Osterwalder and R. Schrader, Axioms for Euclidean Green’s Functions II, Commun. Math. Phys. 42, 281 (1975)

    1975

  7. [15]

    Glockle, T

    W. Glockle, T. S. H. Lee, and F. Coester, Relativistic effects in three-body bound states, Phys. Rev. C33, 709 (1986)

    1986

  8. [16]

    Coester, Scattering theory for relativistic particles, Helv

    F. Coester, Scattering theory for relativistic particles, Helv. Phys. Acta 38, 7 (1965)

    1965

  9. [17]

    B. L. G. Bakker, L. A. Kondratyuk, and M. V. Terentev, ON THE FORMULATION OF TWO-BODY AND THREE- BODY RELATIVISTIC EQUATIONS EMPLOYING LIGHT FRONT DYNAMICS, Nucl. Phys. B158, 497 (1979)

    1979

  10. [18]

    S. N. Sokolov, Relativistic Addition of Direct Interactions in the Point Form of Dynamics, Theor. Math. Phys. 36, 682 (1979)

    1979

  11. [19]

    rotationless

    [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42]. These phenomenological models can be constructed so they satisfy most of the axioms of a quantum field theory, however they are not local, since they are formula...

  12. [20]

    Coester and W

    F. Coester and W. N. Polyzou, Relativistic quantum mechanics of particles with direct interactions, Phys. Rev. D26, 1348 (1982)

    1982

  13. [21]

    P. L. Chung, F. Coester, and W. N. Polyzou, Charge Form-Factors of Quark Model Pions, Phys. Lett. B205, 545 (1988)

    1988

  14. [22]

    P. L. Chung, W. N. Polyzou, F. Coester, and B. D. Keister, Hamiltonian Light Front Dynamics of Elastic electron Deuteron Scattering, Phys. Rev. C37, 2000 (1988)

    1988

  15. [23]

    B. D. Keister, Front-form Hamiltonian dynamics of deuteron electrodisintegration, Phys. Rev. C37, 1765 (1988)

    1988

  16. [24]

    W. N. Polyzou, Relativistic Two-Body Models, Ann. Phys. 193, 367 (1989)

    1989

  17. [25]

    P. L. Chung and F. Coester, Relativistic constituent quark model of nucleon form-factors, Phys. Rev. D44, 229 (1991)

    1991

  18. [26]

    B. D. Keister and W. N. Polyzou, Relativistic Hamiltonian dynamics in nuclear and particle physics, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 20, 225 (1991)

    1991

  19. [27]

    Cardarelli, E

    F. Cardarelli, E. Pace, G. Salme, and S. Simula, Nucleon and pion electromagnetic form-factors in a light front constituent quark model, Phys. Lett. B357, 267 (1995), arXiv:nucl-th/9507037

    1995 arXiv

  20. [28]

    W. H. Klink and W. N. Polyzou, Relativistic N-body models, Phys. Rev. C54, 1189 (1996)

    1996

  21. [29]

    W. N. Polyzou and W. Gl¨ ockle, Scaling for deuteron structure functions in a relativistic light front model, Phys. Rev.C53, 3111 (1996)

    1996

  22. [30]

    A. F. Krutov, Electroweak properties of light mesons in the relativistic model of constituent quarks, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 60, 1305 (1997)

    1997

  23. [31]

    Coester and D

    F. Coester and D. O. Riska, Poincare covariant quark models of baryon form-factors, Few Body Syst. 25, 29 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9707388 [hep-ph]

    1998 arXiv

  24. [32]

    T. W. Allen, W. H. Klink, and W. N. Polyzou, Point-Form Analysis of Elastic Deuteron Form Factors, Phys. Rev. C63, 034002 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0005050

    2001 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Julia-Diaz, D

    B. Julia-Diaz, D. O. Riska, and F. Coester, Baryon Form Factors of Relativistic Constituent-Quark Models, Phys. Rev. C69, 035212 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0312169

    2004 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Coester and W

    F. Coester and W. N. Polyzou, Charge form factors of quark-model pions, Phys. Rev. C71, 028202 (2005)

    2005

  27. [35]

    T. Lin, C. Elster, W. N. Polyzou, and W. Glockle, Relativistic Effects in Exclusive pd Breakup Scattering at Intermediate Energies, Phys. Lett. B660, 345 (2008), arXiv:0710.4056 [nucl-th]

    2008 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J. P. B. C. de Melo, T. Frederico, E. Pace, S. Pisano, and G. Salme, Time- and Spacelike Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors beyond Relativistic Constituent Quark Models, Phys. Lett. B671, 153 (2009), arXiv:0804.1511 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  29. [37]

    T. Lin, C. Elster, W. N. Polyzou, H. Witala, and W. Glockle, Poincar´ e Invariant Three-Body Scattering at Intermediate Energies, Phys. Rev. C78, 024002 (2008), arXiv:0801.3210 [nucl-th]

    2008 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Witala et al

    H. Witala et al. , Relativity and the low energy nd Ay puzzle, Phys. Rev. C77, 034004 (2008), arXiv:0801.0367 [nucl-th]

    2008 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Witala et al

    H. Witala et al. , Relativistic effects in 3N reactions, Mod. Phys. Lett. A24, 871 (2009)

    2009

  32. [40]

    E. P. Biernat, W. Schweiger, K. Fuchsberger, and W. H. Klink, Electromagnetic meson form factor from a relativistic coupled-channel approach, Phys. Rev. C79, 055203 (2009), arXiv:0902.2348 [nucl-th]

    2009 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Desplanques, RQM description of the charge form factor of the pion and its asymptotic behavior, Eur

    B. Desplanques, RQM description of the charge form factor of the pion and its asymptotic behavior, Eur. Phys. J. A42, 219 (2009), arXiv:0906.1889 [nucl-th]

    2009 arXiv

  34. [42]

    M. G. Fuda and F. Bulut, Three-particle model of the pion-nucleon system, Phys. Rev. C80, 024002 (2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    Witala, J

    H. Witala, J. Golak, R. Skibinski, W. Glockle, H. Kamada, and W. N. Polyzou, Three-nucleon force in relativis- tic three-nucleon Faddeev calculations, Phys. Rev. C83, 044001 (2011), [Erratum: Phys. Rev.C88,no.6,069904(2013)], arXiv:1101.4053 [nucl-th]

    2011 arXiv

  36. [44]

    M. G. Fuda, Relativistic quantum mechanics and the quark-pair creation model, Phys. Rev. C86, 055205 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    M. R. Hadizadeh, C. Elster, and W. N. Polyzou, Relativistic three-body bound state in a 3D formulation, Phys. Rev. C90, 054002 (2014), arXiv:1409.1650 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    S. K. Kunhammed and W. N. Polyzou, Simple relativistic quark models, Phys. Rev. C 102, 065209 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Grassi, J

    A. Grassi, J. Golak, W. N. Polyzou, R. Skibi´ nski, H. Wita la, and H. Kamada, Electron and neutrino scattering off the deuteron in a relativistic framework, Phys. Rev. C 107, 024617 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    S. N. Sokolov, , Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 233, 575 (1977)

    1977

  41. [49]

    Gilmm and A

    J. Gilmm and A. Jaffe, Quantum Physics - A functional Integral Point of View (Springer, 1981)

    1981

  42. [50]

    Schwinger, On Angular Momentum (Dover, NY, 2015)

    J. Schwinger, On Angular Momentum (Dover, NY, 2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    N. N. Bogoliubov and D. V. Shirkov, Introduction to the theory of quantized fields (Wiley-Interscience, 1959) p. 150. 22

    1959

  44. [52]

    Epstein and V

    H. Epstein and V. Glaser, The Role of locality in perturbation theory, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare A Phys. Theor. 19, 211 (1973)

    1973

  45. [53]

    Grang´ e, J.-F

    P. Grang´ e, J.-F. Mathiot, B. Mutet, and E. Werner, Taylor-lagrange renormalization scheme: Application to light-front dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 80, 105012 (2009)

    2009

  46. [54]

    Scharf, Quantum gauge theories: A true ghost story (Wiley, New York, USA, 2001)

    G. Scharf, Quantum gauge theories: A true ghost story (Wiley, New York, USA, 2001)

    2001

  47. [55]

    Brenig and R

    W. Brenig and R. Haag, General quantum theory of collision processes, Fort. der Physik 7, 183 (1959)

    1959

  48. [56]

    Ruelle, , Helv

    D. Ruelle, , Helv. Phys. Acta. 35, 147 (1962)

    1962

  49. [57]

    Haag, Quantum field theories with composite particles and asymptotic conditions, Phys

    R. Haag, Quantum field theories with composite particles and asymptotic conditions, Phys. Rev. 112, 669 (1958)

    1958

  50. [58]

    D. V. Widder, Necessary and Succicient conditions for the representation of a function by a doubly infinite laplace integral, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 40, 321 (1934)

    1934

  51. [59]

    E. P. Wigner, On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group, Annals Math. 40, 149 (1939)

    1939

  52. [60]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern mathematical Physics , Vol. III Scattering Theory (Academic Press, 1979) p. 317

    1979

  53. [61]

    Carleman, Les fonctions quasi analytiques, Collection de Monographies sur la Th´ eorie des Fonctions (Gauthier–Villars, Paris, 1926)

    T. Carleman, Les fonctions quasi analytiques, Collection de Monographies sur la Th´ eorie des Fonctions (Gauthier–Villars, Paris, 1926)

    1926

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.