Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

ALPACA -- Adaptive Learning Pipeline for Comprehensive AI

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a single web-based AI pipeline, ALPACA, can carry novices and experts alike through every stage of building an AI system, from data collection to model evaluation, and that its modular cloud design is what makes…

desk verdict A detailed but unevaluated system description: the architecture is clearly laid out, but the paper's central claim that ALPACA works as a comprehensive pipeline rests on a demo with no reported results. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10950 v1 pith:SZSXYNSZ submitted 2024-12-14 cs.DC cs.AIcs.LGcs.SE

Simon Torka , Sahin Albayrak This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.DCcs.AIcs.LGcs.SE
keywords AIpipelineMLOpsuser-centereddesignLLM-assisteddevelopmentKubernetesCelerytaskqueuereproducibilityAndroidappsimilaritydetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

AI pipeline software today is either built for specialists or locked inside expensive cloud platforms, so most users never get past the data-collection step. This paper argues that the real barrier to AI adoption is not model quality but pipeline usability, and presents ALPACA, a web-based pipeline meant to be the single platform for all skill levels. ALPACA covers the whole lifecycle — data acquisition, preprocessing, model training, evaluation, and prediction — and lets each user group work at its own depth: experts tune models and prompts, domain specialists get guided interfaces, and novices follow tutorials and crowdsourced workflows. The claim is that a modular architecture of containerized Celery workers with a Redis backend, MongoDB storage, and Kubernetes scaling, combined with interfaces that are generated automatically from code metadata, yields a pipeline that is simultaneously usable, scalable, and reproducible, and therefore trustworthy. If the paper is right, a broad audience could build, inspect, and share AI systems on one platform instead of being locked into expert-only toolchains.

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. The first is a reflection-based plugin architecture: a developer adds a new preprocessing step or AI algorithm by subclassing provided base classes and interfaces, attaching a plain-language description and parameter metadata to each feature, and the graphical user interface is generated automatically from the class structure at runtime — so the system grows without any change to the existing frontend, and less experienced users see self-explanatory configuration forms. The second is a distributed execution stack: Celery as the task queue with an in-memory Redis backend, containerized workers for each pipeline component, MongoDB as the persistence layer for raw data, datasets, models, and user interactions, and Kubernetes for horizontal scaling and resource allocation. That stack provides the claimed scalability, lets interrupted extraction jobs resume, and, because every user action and generated artifact is logged and stored in compressed form, gives end-to-end reproducibility.

What would settle it

Take a few hundred Android APKs with known Play Store categories, run them through the described pipeline — crawler, AndroGuard analysis, feature extraction, preprocessing, and training a chosen model such as a variational autoencoder — then compare predictions to the real labels using the metrics Section 7.2 lists: accuracy, precision, recall, and F1. If classification accuracy sits at chance level across a broad set of categories, the demonstration that carries the paper's claims fails. A second check targets the usability claim: give a first-time user with no AI background one guided training run and observe whether the auto-generated interface suffices without expert assistance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the paper's own terms, is that no existing pipeline addresses AI experts, domain specialists, and laypeople equally while integrating LLM techniques and covering the full product lifecycle of an AI, and that ALPACA closes that gap. ALPACA realizes this through three pipeline stages: a scenario-specific data collection stage, demonstrated by a crawler that pulls Android APKs and Play Store metadata and uses AndroGuard to analyze the APKs and extract features such as APIs, permissions, intents, and sensors; a largely scenario-independent preprocessing stage where users select features, merge categories, split test and train sets, and apply configurable preprocessing algorithms; and an AI model stage where users pick a model class and algorithm, set hyperparameters, and then evaluate and visualize predictions. The Android app similarity detection demo is meant to show that a generic pipeline can be adapted to a concrete real-world task while remaining accessible to non-experts, with a crowdsourced app-category voting system helping to solve the labeling bottleneck. The paper also claims the system detects available hardware such as GPUs, uses it optimally, and can distinguish a training environment from a production environment so that finished solutions scale safely between them.

Load-bearing premise

The entire usability-and-trust argument rests on the assumption that the Android demo actually works — that the features AndroGuard extracts from APK files carry enough signal to tell app categories apart — yet the paper says performance was only 'tested in thought experiments' and lists evaluation metrics in Section 7.2 without presenting any results.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One deployment could let a layperson run a complete AI workflow, from uploading data to seeing interactive predictions, while the same instance lets an expert tune hyperparameters and add new algorithms.
  • New AI methods could be added to the platform by writing a metadata-bearing class, with the interface appearing automatically and no frontend programming, so the feature set could grow faster than the maintenance burden.
  • Reproducibility would be built in rather than bolted on: every user interaction, dataset version, and model is stored with its configuration, so results could be replicated and validated across users and sites.
  • The crowdsourced category-voting system implies that labeling and data curation, often the most expensive part of applied AI, could be distributed across the user community.
  • Because training and production systems are separated, a model developed in the training environment could be rolled out to a production system without re-engineering, with hardware detection deciding where the workload runs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: if the reflection-based auto-GUI mechanism works as described, it hints at a general pattern for domain-agnostic platforms — any tool that can be wrapped as a metadata-bearing class becomes usable by non-experts, so niche preprocessing methods could spread across user communities without dedicated frontend work.
  • Extension: the paper's own future-work section concedes that AndroGuard, the feature extractor behind the only demonstration, has had no stable release since 2019; a natural test is to rerun the similarity pipeline on a current APK corpus with an updated extractor to see whether app categories still separate.
  • Extension: since evaluation was only 'tested in thought experiments,' the architectural claims become empirical the moment someone runs the pipeline on a labeled APK set and reports the Section 7.2 metrics; the differentiating claim to test is really usability — whether the auto-generated interfaces let a novice complete a training run unassisted.
  • Extension: the paper keeps the system closed-source for legal reasons, which implies the democratization claim applies to using the platform, not to hosting or auditing it; independent verification of the promised internal reproducibility would require the authors' cooperation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper describes ALPACA, a web-based AI pipeline framework intended to support diverse user groups (AI experts, domain specialists, students, laypeople) through a modular architecture combining visual and code-based development. The system is built on Celery with a Redis backend, MongoDB for storage, Kubernetes for orchestration, and integrates LLM techniques. The authors claim ALPACA addresses a gap in existing AI pipelines by covering all key stages (data collection, preprocessing, training, evaluation, prediction) in a user-centric manner. The only concrete demonstration is an Android app similarity detection scenario using AndroGuard for feature extraction. The paper states that performance was 'tested in thought experiments' (Section 1) and Section 7.2 lists evaluation metrics but reports no actual results. The paper concludes with future plans for explainable AI, federated learning, and continuous learning.

Significance. If ALPACA were fully implemented and empirically validated, the paper's contribution would be relevant to the AI-pipeline and MLOps communities: it targets a real gap in user-centric pipeline design and proposes a modular, cloud-based architecture with attention to reproducibility and usability. The architecture description is detailed and covers data collection, preprocessing, training, evaluation, prediction, and legal/ethical considerations. However, the central claim that ALPACA is a 'comprehensive AI pipeline' that works for diverse user groups is not supported by any quantitative evaluation, user study, performance measurement, or even worked example with reported outputs. The only concrete evidence—the Android similarity detection demo—is unevaluated and relies on an outdated tool (AndroGuard). The paper provides no code, no data, and no reproducible artifacts, and it explicitly states that the system is not open source. As presented, the manuscript is a system description with aspirational claims; its scientific significance is therefore speculative.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 1 and Section 7.2] The central claim that ALPACA works as a comprehensive, usable, and scalable AI pipeline is unsupported because the paper reports no experimental results. Section 1 states that ALPACA's performance was 'tested in thought experiments,' and Section 7.2 lists metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1, TP/TN/FP/FN, t-SNE/PCA visualizations, k-means clustering) but gives no values, figures, or qualitative outcomes. The Android similarity detection demo is the only concrete instantiation, and without any results, the reader cannot assess whether the pipeline achieves its stated goals. This is a load-bearing omission that directly undermines the paper's main claim.
  2. [Section 10] The paper concedes that AndroGuard, the core feature-extraction tool for the demo scenario, is outdated: its last stable release was in February 2019, corresponding to Android 9 (API level 28). No evidence is provided that the features extracted by AndroGuard (APIs, manifest, strings, intents, permissions, features, sensors) are sufficient to discriminate among current Android app categories. If these features are not discriminative, the Android similarity detection demo—the only demonstration of ALPACA's utility—collapses. The paper's own admission in Section 10 therefore identifies a serious validity threat to the central claim.
  3. [Section 5.3] Two of the nine feature extractors described in Section 5.3, the Code Extractor and the Graph Generator, are disabled due to legal concerns. This reduces the feature set available for the demo scenario, but the paper does not discuss the impact of these missing features on the app similarity detection task. Given that no experimental results are reported, the reader cannot know whether the remaining features are sufficient. This further weakens the empirical basis of the paper's claims.
  4. [Section 8] Section 8 states that ALPACA cannot be offered as open source and that the source code can be 'passed on upon request and after clarifying the legal framework.' This limits independent verification of the system. In combination with the absence of any reported evaluation, this makes it impossible for reviewers or readers to validate the paper's central claims. While legal restrictions are understandable, the lack of any reproducibility artifact (code, data, or detailed results) is a significant shortcoming for a paper whose main contribution is a working system.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2] The sentence 'According to Hummer et al., this time-saving advantage can be further extended by using parallel computations, which can save up to 7/' (page 3) is incomplete and should be finished or the numerical claim should be removed.
  2. [Section 4.4] The heading 'Frontend Vizualisations' contains a typo; it should be 'Frontend Visualizations.'
  3. [Section 4.2] The word 'Selemium' in Section 4.2 is a typo; it should be 'Selenium.'
  4. [Section 6.3] The text 'data,erger' appears in Section 6.3; this seems to be a typo for 'Data Merger.'
  5. [Figure 8 caption] The caption 'Alpacas’ AI Algorithm Configuration' should be 'ALPACA’s AI Algorithm Configuration' for consistency with the system name.
  6. [References] Several references are incomplete or inconsistently formatted; for example, the Keras reference [1] lists 'Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., ...' but does not include the title of the software or a full author list. The paper should ensure all references follow a consistent citation style.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning: the paper is a system description without a derivation chain or predictions to reduce to inputs.

full rationale

ALPACA is presented as a software architecture and pipeline description, not as a result derived from assumptions. There are no equations, no fitted parameters that are later called predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations: the cited works are standard external references (e.g., Steidl et al. for a taxonomy, TensorFlow, Kubernetes, AndroGuard) and are not used to justify the paper's central claims by circular argument. The demo scenario (Android similarity detection) is described with a list of evaluation metrics in Section 7.2, but no results are reported, and Section 1 notes that performance was only 'tested in thought experiments.' This is an absence of empirical support rather than circularity: the claim that ALPACA is comprehensive and usable is unsupported but not derived from itself. The paper's own limitation statements (AndroGuard outdated, code extractor and graph generator disabled for legal reasons) further weaken the demonstration but do not constitute circular reasoning. No step in the paper defines, fits, or predicts a quantity in terms of the target conclusion, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on unverified assumptions about software scalability and the effectiveness of the demo classifier. No free parameters are fit, and the only invented entity is the ALPACA system itself, which lacks independent validation.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The Celery/Redis/Kubernetes architecture can handle the pipeline components at scale and remain usable for non-experts.
    Underlies the scalability and usability claims in Sections 4.2 and 4.4; no benchmarks.
  • domain assumption AndroGuard feature extraction from APKs is sufficient to detect functionally similar Android apps.
    The demo scenario in Section 5; no accuracy results are reported.
invented entities (1)
  • ALPACA platform
    purpose: AI pipeline framework linking visual and code-based development for diverse user groups
    No released code, data, or independent benchmark; the system is only described.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ALPACA -- Adaptive Learning Pipeline for Comprehensive AI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SZSXYNSZ

@misc{pith2026241210950,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ALPACA -- Adaptive Learning Pipeline for Comprehensive AI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SZSXYNSZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10950}
}
read the original abstract

The advancement of AI technologies has greatly increased the complexity of AI pipelines as they include many stages such as data collection, pre-processing, training, evaluation and visualisation. To provide effective and accessible AI solutions, it is important to design pipelines for different user groups such as experts, professionals from different fields and laypeople. Ease of use and trust play a central role in the acceptance of AI systems. The presented system, ALPACA (Adaptive Learning Pipeline for Advanced Comprehensive AI Analysis), offers a comprehensive AI pipeline that addresses the needs of diverse user groups. ALPACA integrates visual and code-based development and facilitates all key phases of the AI pipeline. Its architecture is based on Celery (with Redis backend) for efficient task management, MongoDB for seamless data storage and Kubernetes for cloud-based scalability and resource utilisation. Future versions of ALPACA will support modern techniques such as federated and continuous learning as well as explainable AI methods to further improve security, usability and trustworthiness. The application is demonstrated by an Android app for similarity recognition, which emphasises ALPACA's potential for use in everyday life.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10950 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Alpaca’s Dataflow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Voting System. • APK Upload: Users can upload single or multiple APKs along with their associated categories. This feature enables crowdsourcing data collection and allows different groups to participate in data collection. Torka et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 6 of 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. User Interface to Manage the Dataset Selection Process. These selections shape the resulting datasets, which are packaged and saved for future analysis. This component presents users with a set of options to configure the dataset generation process: 2This system is disabled due to legal concerns. 3This system is disabled due to legal concerns. Torka et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 9 of 18 [PITH_FULL_IMA… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: User Interface to Manage the Dataset Merger Process. The resulting datasets are stored as a compressed zip file in MongoDB. These datasets are structured to accommodate subsequent AI model training and evaluation. Torka et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 10 of…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: User Interface to Manage the Dataset Preprocessing Process. The selected preprocessing algorithms are executed on the dataset, resulting in a refined dataset that has undergone data cleaning, scaling, encoding, transformation, extraction, selection, combination, and ot…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: How to Select an Algorithm. 7.1. Model Training The model training component serves as the core of the AI model pipeline, orchestrating the training of AI models on the preprocessed datasets. Users can customize their model training by parametrizing the following: • Da…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Alpacas’ AI Algorithm Configuration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Learning Systems: Personalized Curriculum Design Using LLM-Powered Analytics

    cs.CY 2025-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper presents an LLM-powered personalized curriculum framework whose claimed improvements are unsupported by the unrelated datasets and missing evidence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems

    Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, Greg, S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Goodfellow, I., Harp, A., IrvingGeoffr ey, Isard, M., Jia, Y., Jozefowicz, R., Kaiser, L., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Mane, D., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D., Olah, C., Schuster, M., Shlens, J., Steiner, B., Sutskever, I...

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Ai-builder

    AI on Demand, 2023a. Ai-builder. URL:https://aiexp.ai4europe.eu/#/home

    work page

  3. [3]

    Ai-builder documentation

    AI on Demand, 2023b. Ai-builder documentation. URL: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipse/graphene/ tutorials

    work page

  4. [4]

    Amazon sagemaker

    Amazon Web Services, Inc., 2023. Amazon sagemaker. URL:https://aws.amazon.com/de/sagemaker/

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Introduction to celery

    Ask Solem & contributors, 2023. Introduction to celery. URL: https://docs.celeryq.dev/en/stable/ getting-started/introduction.html

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Tfx: A tensorflow-based production-scale machine learning platform, in: Matwin, S

    Baylor, D., Breck, E., Cheng, H.T., Fiedel, N., Foo, C.Y., Haque, Z., Haykal, S., Ispir, M., Jain, V., Koc, L., Koo, C.Y., Lew, L., Mewald, C., Modi, A.N., Polyzotis, N., Ramesh, S., Roy, S., Whang, S.E., Wicke, M., Wilkiewicz, J., Zhang, X., Zinkevich, M., 2017. Tfx: A tensorflow-based production-scale machine learning platform, in: Matwin, S. (Ed.), Pro...

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Dataversioncontrol(dvc):Open-sourceversioncontrolsystemformachinelearningprojects

    DataVersionControl,2023. Dataversioncontrol(dvc):Open-sourceversioncontrolsystemformachinelearningprojects. URL: https://dvc.org/

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    The databricks data intelligence platform

    Databricks, 2023. The databricks data intelligence platform. URL:https://www.databricks.com/

    work page 2023

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Datarobot ai platform: One unified platform for generative and predictive ai

    DataRobot, Inc., 2023. Datarobot ai platform: One unified platform for generative and predictive ai. URL:https: //www.datarobot.com/

    2023

  2. [10]

    Androguard github page

    Desnos, A., 2023. Androguard github page. URL:https://github.com/androguard/androguard/releases

    2023

  3. [11]

    Androguard documentation

    Desnos, A., Gueguen, G., Bachmann, S., 2018. Androguard documentation. URL: https://androguard. readthedocs.io/en/latest/

    2018

  4. [12]

    Django: The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

    Django Software Foundation, 2023. Django: The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. URL:https: //www.djangoproject.com/

    2023

  5. [13]

    European Commission, 2023a. Ai4eu. URL:https://ai-watch.ec.europa.eu/collaborations/ai4eu_en

  6. [14]

    Ai4eu: A european ai on demand platform and ecosystem

    European Commission, 2023b. Ai4eu: A european ai on demand platform and ecosystem. URL:https://cordis. europa.eu/project/id/825619/results/de

  7. [15]

    Artificial intelligence pipeline to bridge the gap between bench researchers and clinical researchers in precision medicine

    Frey, L.J., Talbert, D.A., 2020. Artificial intelligence pipeline to bridge the gap between bench researchers and clinical researchers in precision medicine. Med one 5. URL:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC7839064/, doi:10.20900/mo20200001

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    Koopaml,amachinelearningplatform for medical data analysis

    García-Holgado, A., Vázquez-Ingelmo, A., Alonso-Sánchez, J., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Therón, R., Sampedro-Gómez, J., Sánchez-Puente,A.,Vicente-Palacios,V.,Dorado-Díaz,P.I.,Sánchez,P.L.,2022. Koopaml,amachinelearningplatform for medical data analysis. Journal on Interactive Syste...

    2022

  9. [17]

    Einführung in vertex ai

    google, 2023. Einführung in vertex ai. URL: https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/docs/start/ introduction-unified-platform?hl=de

    2023

  10. [18]

    H2o.ai | the fastest, most accurate ai cloud platform: Open source software for data science and machine learning

    H2O.ai, 2023. H2o.ai | the fastest, most accurate ai cloud platform: Open source software for data science and machine learning. URL: https://h2o.ai/

    2023

  11. [19]

    Modelops:Cloud-based lifecycle management for reliable and trusted ai, in: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ

    Hummer,W.,Muthusamy,V.,Rausch,T.,Dube,P.,ElMaghraoui,K.,Murthi,A.,Oum,P.,2019. Modelops:Cloud-based lifecycle management for reliable and trusted ai, in: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ. pp. 113–120. doi:10.1109/IC2E.2019.00025

    2019

  12. [20]

    Ibm watson studio - übersicht

    IBM, 2022. Ibm watson studio - übersicht. URL:https://www.ibm.com/de-de/cloud/watson-studio

    2022

  13. [21]

    Datastructures for statistical computing inpython: Pandas

    McKinney, W., etal., 2010. Datastructures for statistical computing inpython: Pandas. Proceedings ofthe 9th Python in Science Conference 445, 51–56. URL:https://pandas.pydata.org/

    2010

  14. [22]

    Azure machine learning: Machine-learning-as-a-service | microsoft azure

    Microsoft, 2023. Azure machine learning: Machine-learning-as-a-service | microsoft azure. URL:https://azure. microsoft.com/de-de/products/machine-learning/

    2023

  15. [23]

    Mlflow: An open-source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle

    MLflow Project, 2023. Mlflow: An open-source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle. URL: https://mlflow.org/

    2023

  16. [24]

    MongoDB, Inc., 2023. Mongodb. URL:https://www.mongodb.com

    2023

  17. [25]

    Movsisyan,M.,2023.Flower—flower2.0.0documentation.URL: https://flower.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

    2023

  18. [26]

    Mozilla geckodriver github page

    Mozilla, 2023. Mozilla geckodriver github page. URL:https://github.com/mozilla/geckodriver/releases

    2023

  19. [27]

    Scikit-learn:Machinelearninginpython

    Pedregosa,F.andVaroquaux,G.andGramfort,A.andMichel,V.,2023. Scikit-learn:Machinelearninginpython. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 2825–2830. URL:https://scikit-learn.org/stable/

    2023

  20. [28]

    Dash documentation & user guide | plotly

    Plotly Technologies Inc., 2023. Dash documentation & user guide | plotly. URL:https://dash.plotly.com/

    2023

  21. [29]

    Prefect: Modern workflow orchestration for data and ml engineers

    Prefect Technologies, Inc., 2023. Prefect: Modern workflow orchestration for data and ml engineers. URL:https: //www.prefect.io/

    2023

  22. [30]

    Python language reference

    Python Software Foundation, 2023. Python language reference. URL:https://www.python.org/

    2023

  23. [31]

    Review of the state of the art in autonomous artificial intelligence

    Radanliev, P., de Roure, D., 2023. Review of the state of the art in autonomous artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics 3, 497–504. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-022-00176-2, doi:10. 1007/s43681-022-00176-2

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    Redis documentation

    Redis Ltd., 2023. Redis documentation. URL:https://redis.io/documentation

    2023

  25. [33]

    Gitlargefilestorage:Anopensourcegitextensionforversioninglargefiles

    SoftwareFreedomConservancy,2023. Gitlargefilestorage:Anopensourcegitextensionforversioninglargefiles. URL: https://git-lfs.com/

    2023

  26. [34]

    The pipeline for the continuous development of artificial intelligence models—current state of research and practice

    Steidl, M., Felderer, M., Ramler, R., 2023. The pipeline for the continuous development of artificial intelligence models—current state of research and practice. Journal of Systems and Software 199, 111615. URL:https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S01641212230001...

    2023

  27. [35]

    Apache hadoop: A framework for distributed storage and processing of large data sets

    The Apache Software Foundation, 2022. Apache hadoop: A framework for distributed storage and processing of large data sets. URL:https://hadoop.apache.org/

    2022

  28. [36]

    Apacheairflow:Anopen-sourceplatformtoprogrammaticallyauthor,schedule, and monitor workflows

    TheApacheSoftwareFoundation,2023a. Apacheairflow:Anopen-sourceplatformtoprogrammaticallyauthor,schedule, and monitor workflows. URL:https://airflow.apache.org/

  29. [37]

    Apache flink: Stateful computations over data streams

    The Apache Software Foundation, 2023b. Apache flink: Stateful computations over data streams. URL: https: //flink.apache.org/

  30. [38]

    Apachenifi:Anintegrateddatalogisticsplatformforautomatingthemovement of data between disparate systems

    TheApacheSoftwareFoundation,2023c. Apachenifi:Anintegrateddatalogisticsplatformforautomatingthemovement of data between disparate systems. URL:https://nifi.apache.org/

  31. [39]

    Apache spark: Unified engine for large-scale data analytics

    The Apache Software Foundation, 2023d. Apache spark: Unified engine for large-scale data analytics. URL:https: //spark.apache.org/

  32. [40]

    Flux cd: Continuous delivery for kubernetes

    The Flux authors, 2023. Flux cd: Continuous delivery for kubernetes. URL:https://fluxcd.io/. Torka et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 17 of 18 Adaptive Learning Pipeline for Comprehensive AI Analysis

    2023

  33. [41]

    Kubeflow:Themachinelearningtoolkitforkubernetes

    TheKubeflowAuthors,2023. Kubeflow:Themachinelearningtoolkitforkubernetes. URL: https://www.kubeflow. org/

    2023

  34. [42]

    Kubernetes

    The Kubernetes Authors, 2023. Kubernetes. URL:https://kubernetes.io/

    2023

  35. [43]

    Luigi: A python-based open-source framework for building complex data pipelines

    The Luigi Authors, 2021. Luigi: A python-based open-source framework for building complex data pipelines. URL: https://luigi.readthedocs.io/en/stable/#

    2021

  36. [44]

    Selenium with python — selenium python bindings 2 documentation

    Thoughtworks, Inc., 2023. Selenium with python — selenium python bindings 2 documentation. URL: https: //selenium-python.readthedocs.io/

    2023

  37. [45]

    Ai4eu: The ai4eu vision for artificial intelligence in europe

    Zillner, S., Milano, M., Saffiotti, A., 2020. Ai4eu: The ai4eu vision for artificial intelligence in europe. URL:https: //ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/ai4eu_-_visionpublicdocument.pdf. Torka et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 18 of 18

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.