REVIEW 6 cited by
High-redshift cosmography: auxiliary variables versus Pad\'e polynomials
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
High-redshift cosmography: auxiliary variables versus Pad\'e polynomials
abstract
Cosmography becomes non-predictive when cosmic data span beyond the red shift limit $z\simeq1 $. This leads to a \emph{strong convergence issue} that jeopardizes its viability. In this work, we critically compare the two main solutions of the convergence problem, i.e. the $y$-parametrizations of the redshift and the alternatives to Taylor expansions based on Pad\'e series. In particular, among several possibilities, we consider two widely adopted parametrizations, namely $y_1=1-a$ and $y_2=\arctan(a^{-1}-1)$, being $a$ the scale factor of the Universe. We find that the $y_2$-parametrization performs relatively better than the $y_1$-parametrization over the whole redshift domain. Even though $y_2$ overcomes the issues of $y_1$, we get that the most viable approximations of the luminosity distance $d_L(z)$ are given in terms of Pad\'e approximations. In order to check this result by means of cosmic data, we analyze the Pad\'e approximations up to the fifth order, and compare these series with the corresponding $y$-variables of the same orders. We investigate two distinct domains involving Monte Carlo analysis on the Pantheon Superovae Ia data, $H(z)$ and shift parameter measurements. We conclude that the (2,1) Pad\'e approximation is statistically the optimal approach to explain low and high-redshift data, together with the fifth-order $y_2$-parametrization. At high redshifts, the (3,2) Pad\'e approximation cannot be fully excluded, while the (2,2) Pad\'e one is essentially ruled out.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Cosmic microwave background temperature cosmography
Violations of the CMB temperature-redshift law are constrained to percent level by cosmography on SZ and spectroscopic data, with one non-standard parameter sufficient and no advantage from Padé or y-expansions.
-
BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension
Even after rescaling BAO data to prefer H0≈73 km/s/Mpc, none of six tested late-time dark-energy models can resolve the Hubble tension once unanchored SNeIa and CMB geometry are included.
-
Model-independent late-universe measurements of $H_0$ and $\Omega_K$ with the parametrization based on cosmic age-improved inverse distance ladder
A cosmic-age-based inverse distance ladder with DESI DR2, DESY5, SGL, CC and GRB data gives H0=71.59±0.94 km/s/Mpc and ΩK=0.001±0.038.
-
Investigating the cosmic distance duality relation with gamma-ray bursts
Combined gamma-ray burst and multi-probe data show no significant violation of the cosmic distance duality relation and prefer a Planck-like Hubble constant.
-
Kinematic Probes of Type-II MMG: Pad\'e Cosmographic Analysis of VCDM
Padé cosmographic analysis with MCMC constrains VCDM parameters using chronometers, DESI BAO, and supernova datasets, showing consistency with ΛCDM and no robust transition feature.
-
Mapping the redshift drift at various redshifts through cosmography
Cosmographic Taylor and Padé models fitted to Pantheon+SH0ES+GRB+DESI BAO data yield redshift drift predictions compatible with ΛCDM and ω0ω1CDM at 1-2σ, with mock drift data tightening q0 and j0 bounds.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.