Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

E Pluribus Unum Ex Machina: Learning from Many Collider Events at Once

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.07263 v3 pith:T4KRAR2C submitted 2021-01-18 physics.data-an hep-exhep-phstat.ML

classification physics.data-anhep-exhep-phstat.ML
keywords classifierscollidermulti-eventsingle-eventcaseseventsclassifierlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

There have been a number of recent proposals to enhance the performance of machine learning strategies for collider physics by combining many distinct events into a single ensemble feature. To evaluate the efficacy of these proposals, we study the connection between single-event classifiers and multi-event classifiers under the assumption that collider events are independent and identically distributed (IID). We show how one can build optimal multi-event classifiers from single-event classifiers, and we also show how to construct multi-event classifiers such that they produce optimal single-event classifiers. This is illustrated for a Gaussian example as well as for classification tasks relevant for searches and measurements at the Large Hadron Collider. We extend our discussion to regression tasks by showing how they can be phrased in terms of parametrized classifiers. Empirically, we find that training a single-event (per-instance) classifier is more effective than training a multi-event (per-ensemble) classifier, as least for the cases we studied, and we relate this fact to properties of the loss function gradient in the two cases. While we did not identify a clear benefit from using multi-event classifiers in the collider context, we speculate on the potential value of these methods in cases involving only approximate independence, as relevant for jet substructure studies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higgs Signal Strength Estimation with Machine Learning under Systematic Uncertainties

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAGE, a dual-branch GNN trained under nuisance fluctuations, estimates the Higgs signal strength with near-nominal coverage (0.662-0.683) but wider intervals than the top FAIR-HUC leaderboard methods.

  2. High-Dimensional Unfolding in Large Backgrounds

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    OmniFold-HI, an ML unfolding algorithm that handles large backgrounds and high-dimensional auxiliary observables, is derived, shown equivalent to iterative Bayesian unfolding, and demonstrated to improve jet-substruct...

  3. Mono-X Signal Characterization from Two-component Dark Matter Using a Convolutional Neural Network

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 1D multi-channel CNN trained on normalized histograms of simulated mono-jet and mono-Z events can partially classify one- versus two-component dark matter and regress masses, but only in a background-free, model-spe...

Pith tools