Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

System Message Generation for User Preferences using Open-Source Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11330 v2 pith:T5LNG53O submitted 2025-02-17 cs.CL cs.AI

System Message Generation for User Preferences using Open-Source Models

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords systemmessagesusermodelsalignconversationsdatasetsinstructions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

System messages play a crucial role in interactions with large language models (LLMs), often serving as prompts to initiate conversations. Through system messages, users can assign specific roles, perform intended tasks, incorporate background information, and specify various output formats and communication styles. Despite such versatility, publicly available datasets often lack system messages and are subject to strict license constraints in industrial applications. Moreover, manually annotating system messages that align with user instructions is resource-intensive. In light of these challenges, we introduce SysGen, a pipeline for generating system messages that better align assistant responses with user instructions using existing supervised fine-tuning datasets that lack system messages. Training open-source models on SysGen data yields substantial improvements in both single-turn (Multifacet) and multi-turn (SysBench) conversation benchmarks. Notably, our method shows strong gains in shorter conversations, suggesting that it enhances early-stage interaction effectiveness. Our qualitative analysis further emphasizes the value of diverse and structured system messages in improving LLM adaptability across varied user scenarios.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Specification and Detection of LLM Code Smells

    cs.SE 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    A catalog of five LLM code smells and a static detection tool find that 60.5% of 200 open-source LLM-using Python projects exhibit at least one smell.

  2. Prompt Governance? On Governing Technologies Governed by Natural Language

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Literature on system prompts for AI shows fragmented and contradictory claims that complicate policy efforts to use them as reliable governance mechanisms.