Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Serendipitous supersymmetric solution to the strong CP problem

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Forbidding the mu term with discrete R-symmetries accidentally produces a DFSZ axion that solves strong CP.

desk verdict A clean pedagogical note that the axion is automatic once you forbid mu with anomaly-free discrete R-symmetries and use Kim-Nilles; the symmetry argument is solid, novelty is modest, and the only real soft spot is the usual domain-wall cosmology. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07921 v1 pith:T6B6CBTB submitted 2026-07-08 hep-ph

Howard Baer , Vernon Barger , Dibyashree Sengupta This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 12.60.Jv14.80.Va11.30.Pb95.35.+d
keywords MSSMmuproblemdiscreteR-symmetryKim-NillesmechanismDFSZaxionstrongCPSUSYdarkmatterR-parityviolation
topics The Strong CP ProblemDark Matter
open problems The Strong CP Problem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model has three long-standing problems: the mu term should sit at the Planck scale rather than the weak scale, R-parity-violating operators allow rapid proton decay, and dangerous dimension-five proton-decay operators are allowed. Anomaly-free discrete R-symmetries of order 4–24, consistent with grand unification, forbid all three problems at once while still permitting the usual Yukawa couplings and neutrino see-saw. Once the mu term is absent, the theory automatically acquires an accidental global Peccei–Quinn symmetry. Coupling the Higgs bilinear to two gauge-singlet fields via a Kim–Nilles operator and then breaking supersymmetry generates intermediate-scale vacuum expectation values that both regenerate a weak-scale mu and break the Peccei–Quinn symmetry. The resulting pseudo-Goldstone boson is a supersymmetric DFSZ axion that dynamically relaxes the strong-CP angle to zero. In the same framework the axion itself is always a dark-matter candidate; whether a long-lived WIMP also survives depends on the order of residual R-parity-violating operators.

What carries the argument

The Kim–Nilles operator that couples the Higgs bilinear to two R- and PQ-charged gauge singlets X and Y; soft SUSY breaking forces those singlets to acquire intermediate-scale vevs, regenerating mu ~ m_weak while spontaneously breaking U(1)_PQ and yielding the DFSZ axion.

What would settle it

A laboratory or astrophysical measurement that either excludes the DFSZ axion-photon coupling (E/N = 2 after higgsino cancellation) over the intermediate-scale mass window, or a collider observation of prompt R-parity-violating decays that would be forbidden by the higher-dimensional operators allowed under the discrete R-symmetries.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Once an anomaly-free discrete Z_n^R symmetry forbids the mu term, the MSSM plus any of the four Kim–Nilles base models develops an accidental global U(1)_PQ. Soft supersymmetry breaking then drives intermediate-scale vacuum expectation values for the PQ-charged singlets, simultaneously regenerating a weak-scale mu, breaking the discrete R-symmetry, and producing a supersymmetric DFSZ axion that solves the strong CP problem.

Load-bearing premise

The Peccei–Quinn symmetry must be broken during inflation and never restored afterward, so that the domain walls expected for a domain-wall number of six are inflated away and do not overclose the universe.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that a proper construction of the MSSM using anomaly-free discrete Z_n^R symmetries (Table 1, consistent with SU(5)/SO(10)) forbids the mu term, RPV operators, and dangerous dimension-5 proton-decay operators. Once mu is forbidden, the MSSM plus any of the four Kim-Nilles base models (Table 2) admits an accidental global U(1)_PQ (Table 3). Soft SUSY breaking then generates intermediate-scale vevs for the singlets X,Y, regenerating a weak-scale mu while spontaneously breaking both Z_n^R and U(1)_PQ. The resulting pseudo-Goldstone boson is a SUSY DFSZ axion that solves the strong CP problem. Phenomenological consequences for dark matter (axion always present; WIMP optional depending on the order of induced RPV operators) and domain-wall cosmology are briefly discussed.

Significance. If correct, the result reframes the axion solution to strong CP as a derived consequence of solving the SUSY mu problem with discrete R-symmetries rather than an independent postulate. The central group-theoretic chain (Tables 1-3 plus the standard KN potential analysis) is internally consistent and standard. The paper usefully collects earlier results of the collaboration into a single narrative and highlights that the accidental PQ symmetry is not fundamental, thereby addressing the quality problem at the level of discrete R-symmetries. The observation is not entirely new (as the authors themselves note via Refs. [17,26,50]), but the pedagogical synthesis and the explicit linkage to dark-matter options are of interest to the SUSY/axion community.

major comments (2)
  1. Section 4 (phenomenological consequences): the viability of the N_DW=6 DFSZ axion as dark matter rests on the un-derived assumption that the PQ symmetry is broken during inflation and never restored (f_a ≳ max(T_R, H_I/2π)). This is stated without calculation or reference to a concrete inflationary model. Because domain-wall overclosure is a standard obstruction for N_DW>1, the manuscript should either (i) supply a short quantitative estimate of the required reheat temperature / Hubble scale or (ii) clearly flag the assumption as an external cosmological premise rather than a consequence of the symmetry construction.
  2. The claim that the accidental U(1)_PQ 'emerges' once mu is forbidden is correct for the operators listed in Tables 2-3, but the paper does not address whether higher-dimensional operators (already considered for RPV in Eq. (7)) can explicitly break the global PQ at a level that reintroduces a quality problem. A short discussion of the lowest-order PQ-violating operators allowed by each Z_n^R would strengthen the central claim that the construction automatically solves strong CP.
minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and Introduction: the phrase 'perhaps inadvertently' is informal for a journal abstract; a more precise formulation would better convey the logical status of the result.
  2. Table 1 caption: 'Derived MSSM field R charge assignments' should note that the charges are taken from Lee et al. [26] rather than re-derived here.
  3. Section 3: the normalization q(H_u,d)=-1 is stated but the corresponding normalization for the axion decay constant is not made explicit; a one-line clarification would help readers comparing to standard DFSZ literature.
  4. References: several recent experimental axion bounds (ADMX, etc.) are cited, but the theoretical discussion of the reduced aγγ coupling (E/N=6/3) would benefit from a brief comparison to the non-SUSY DFSZ value.
  5. Typographical: 'hyMSY', 'hyCCK/GSPQ' etc. in Table 2 are not expanded on first use; a parenthetical expansion or reference would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the accidental U(1)_PQ and DFSZ axion follow directly from the listed charge assignments and superpotential structure; self-citations supply only peripheral phenomenology.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 2 (paragraph after Table 2) and Sec. 4 (RPV discussion)]
    "In Ref. [35, 36], base model I is shown to develop a non-zero minimum... In Ref. [34,43], it is noted that higher dimensional operators of the form W_NR ⊃ X^p Y^q ΦΦΦ / m_P^{p+q} may be allowed, and have been tabulated in [34]."

    The radiative generation of intermediate-scale vevs and the classification of induced RPV operators are justified by citations whose author lists overlap with the present paper. These results are used for the soft-term analysis and for the optional WIMP-versus-axion DM discussion, but they are not required for the existence of the accidental PQ symmetry or the axion itself; the circularity is therefore peripheral only.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is group-theoretic and parameter-free: anomaly-free Z_n^R charges (Table 1, taken from external Lee et al.) forbid the mu term; any of the four Kim-Nilles base models (Table 2) is then added; the resulting superpotential admits an accidental global U(1)_PQ whose charges (Table 3) make every allowed term invariant by construction; soft SUSY breaking generates intermediate-scale vevs for the PQ-charged singlets X,Y, spontaneously breaking both the discrete R-symmetry and U(1)_PQ and thereby producing a SUSY DFSZ axion. This is an ordinary accidental-symmetry argument, not a self-definitional loop, a fit renamed as prediction, or a uniqueness theorem imported from the authors. Self-citations ([34,36,43] etc.) appear only for radiative-potential details, induced RPV operator orders, and domain-wall cosmology; none of them is required to establish the existence of the axion itself. The paper even notes that the observation may already be known to others. Hence the central claim is self-contained against the tables and standard KN analysis; residual self-citation is minor and non-load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard supersymmetry and discrete-gauge-anomaly cancellation, plus the four previously catalogued Kim-Nilles base models and the cosmological assumption that domain walls are inflated away. No free parameters are fitted; the intermediate scale is generated dynamically by soft terms of order the weak scale. The only invented entities are the two gauge singlets X and Y already present in the classic Kim-Nilles construction.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Anomaly-free discrete Z_n^R symmetries of order 4,6,8,12,24 with charges compatible with SU(5) or SO(10) exist and forbid the mu term, all RPV operators, and dimension-5 proton-decay operators while allowing Yukawa and seesaw terms.
    Taken from Lee et al. (2011) and used as the starting point of the construction (Table 1 and Sec. 2).
  • domain assumption Soft SUSY-breaking terms of order the weak scale generate intermediate-scale vacuum expectation values for the singlets X and Y via the Kim-Nilles operators.
    Standard result of the Kim-Nilles mechanism; radiative driving of soft masses is assumed without re-derivation (Sec. 2).
  • standard math Global continuous symmetries that are accidental consequences of the superpotential are broken by the same intermediate-scale vevs, producing a pseudo-Goldstone boson (the axion).
    Goldstone's theorem applied to the accidental U(1)_PQ (Sec. 3).
  • ad hoc to paper The PQ symmetry is broken during inflation and not restored afterwards, so N_DW=6 domain walls are inflated away.
    Stated as an assumption in the phenomenological section without derivation; required for cosmological viability of the DFSZ axion.
invented entities (1)
  • Gauge-singlet superfields X and Y of the four base models independent evidence
    purpose: Generate the mu term via non-renormalizable operators and break both the discrete R-symmetry and the accidental U(1)_PQ.
    These singlets are the standard Kim-Nilles fields; they are not newly postulated here but are essential to the construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Serendipitous supersymmetric solution to the strong CP problem." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T6B6CBTB

@misc{pith2026260707921,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Serendipitous supersymmetric solution to the strong CP problem},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T6B6CBTB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07921}
}
read the original abstract

The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) has several problems: 1. its mu term must be forbidden, then regenerated at the weak scale, 2. it allows for R-parity violating superpotential terms which lead to rapid proton decay, 3. it allows for dimension-5 proton decay operators. The usual imposition of R- or matter parity P_M solves only the second of these, whereas anomaly-free discrete Z_n^R symmetries (consistent with grand unification) address all of them. Once the mu-term is forbidden, the MSSM develops an accidental global U(1)_{PQ} symmetry. By coupling the Higgs fields to PQ-charged gauge singlet fields X, Y (in the Kim-Nilles mechanism), and imposing SUSY breaking, one regenerates mu at the weak scale whilst breaking the discrete Z_n^R and the U(1)_{PQ}. The broken global U(1)_{PQ} develops a pseudo-Goldstone boson, the DFSZ axion, thus (perhaps inadvertently) solving the strong CP problem. In this setting, SUSY develops a dark matter candidate, the SUSY DFSZ axion, and possibly, though not necessarily, a WIMP dark matter candidate as well, depending on the order of the induced R-parity violating operators.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    The Cosmological Constant and the String Landscape

    J. Polchinski, The Cosmological Constant and the String Landscape, in: 23rd Solvay Conference in Physics: The Quantum Structure of Space and Time, 2006, pp. 216–236. arXiv:hep-th/0603249

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  2. [3]

    H. Baer, V. Barger, S. Salam, D. Sengupta, K. Sinha, Status of weak scale supersymmetry after LHC Run 2 and ton-scale noble liquid WIMP searches, Eur. Phys. J. ST 229 (21) (2020) 3085–3141.arXiv:2002.03013,doi:10.1140/epjst/e2020-000020-x

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1140/epjst/e2020-000020-x 2020

  3. [4]

    R. D. Peccei, H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.1440 1977

  4. [5]

    R. D. Peccei, H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791–1797.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1791

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.1791 1977

  5. [6]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223–226.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.40.223

    work page 1978

  6. [7]

    Wilczek, Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.279

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.279 1978

  7. [8]

    J. E. Kim, G. Carosi, Axions and the Strong CP Problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 557–602, [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 91, 049902 (2019)].arXiv:0807.3125,doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.82.557

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  8. [9]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, L. Visinelli, The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept. 870 (2020) 1–117.arXiv:2003.01100,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06. 002

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06 2020

Show all 49 references
  1. [10]

    Sikivie, Axion Cosmology, Lect

    P. Sikivie, Axion Cosmology, Lect. Notes Phys. 741 (2008) 19–50.arXiv:astro-ph/ 0610440,doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73518-2_2

    2008 doi

  2. [11]

    K. J. Bae, H. Baer, A. Lessa, H. Serce, Coupled Boltzmann computation of mixed axion neutralino dark matter in the SUSY DFSZ axion model, JCAP 10 (2014) 082.arXiv: 1406.4138,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/082

    2014 doi arXiv

  3. [12]

    Jungman, M

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195–373.arXiv:hep-ph/9506380,doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00058-5

    1996 doi arXiv

  4. [13]

    H. Baer, X. Tata, Weak scale supersymmetry: From superfields to scattering events, Cam- bridge University Press, 2006

    2006

  5. [14]

    H. Baer, V. Barger, J. Bolich, K. Zhang, Implications of Higgs mass for hidden sector SUSY breaking, Phys. Rev. D 111 (9) (2025) 095019.arXiv:2412.15356,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.111.095019. 7

    2025 arXiv

  6. [15]

    H. K. Dreiner, An Introduction to explicit R-parity violation, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 21 (2010) 565–583.arXiv:hep-ph/9707435,doi:10.1142/9789814307505_ 0017

    2010 doi arXiv

  7. [16]

    K. J. Bae, H. Baer, V. Barger, D. Sengupta, Revisiting the SUSYµproblem and its solutions in the LHC era, Phys. Rev. D 99 (11) (2019) 115027.arXiv:1902.10748,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.115027

    2019 doi arXiv

  8. [17]

    J. E. Kim, H. P. Nilles, The mu Problem and the Strong CP Problem, Phys. Lett. B 138 (1984) 150–154.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91890-2

    1984 doi

  9. [18]

    G. F. Giudice, A. Masiero, A Natural Solution to the mu Problem in Supergravity Theories, Phys. Lett. B 206 (1988) 480–484.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91613-9

    1988 doi

  10. [19]

    Ellwanger, C

    U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, A. M. Teixeira, The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 496 (2010) 1–77.arXiv:0910.1785,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010. 07.001

    2010 doi arXiv

  11. [20]

    Hinchliffe, T

    I. Hinchliffe, T. Kaeding, B+L violating couplings in the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 279–284.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.279

    1993 doi

  12. [21]

    L. E. Ibanez, G. G. Ross, Discrete gauge symmetries and the origin of baryon and lepton number conservation in supersymmetric versions of the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 368 (1992) 3–37.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90195-H

    1992 doi

  13. [22]

    H. K. Dreiner, C. Luhn, M. Thormeier, What is the discrete gauge symmetry of the MSSM?, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 075007.arXiv:hep-ph/0512163,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.73.075007

    2006 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Buchmuller, K

    W. Buchmuller, K. Hamaguchi, O. Lebedev, M. Ratz, Local grand unification, in: GUS- TAVOFEST: Symposium in Honor of Gustavo C. Branco: CP Violation and the Flavor Puzzle, 2005, pp. 143–156.arXiv:hep-ph/0512326

    2005 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Ratz, Notes on Local Grand Unification, Soryushiron Kenkyu Electron

    M. Ratz, Notes on Local Grand Unification, Soryushiron Kenkyu Electron. 116 (2008) A56–A76.arXiv:0711.1582,doi:10.24532/soken.116.1_A56

    2008 doi arXiv

  16. [25]

    H. P. Nilles, S. Ramos-Sanchez, P. K. S. Vaudrevange, Local Grand Unification and String Theory, AIP Conf. Proc. 1200 (1) (2010) 226–234.arXiv:0909.3948,doi:10.1063/1. 3327561

    2010 doi arXiv

  17. [26]

    H. M. Lee, S. Raby, M. Ratz, G. G. Ross, R. Schieren, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, P. K. S. Vaudrevange, Discrete R symmetries for the MSSM and its singlet extensions, Nucl. Phys. B 850 (2011) 1–30.arXiv:1102.3595,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.04.009

    2011 doi arXiv

  18. [27]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory, Phys. Lett. B 149 (1984) 117–122.doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(84)91565-X. 8

    1984

  19. [28]

    S. P. Martin, A Supersymmetry primer, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 18 (1998) 1–98.arXiv:hep-ph/9709356,doi:10.1142/9789812839657_0001

    1998 doi arXiv

  20. [29]

    L. J. Hall, Y. Nomura, A. Pierce, R symmetry and the mu problem, Phys. Lett. B 538 (2002) 359–365.arXiv:hep-ph/0204062,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02043-9

    2002 doi arXiv

  21. [30]

    M.-C. Chen, M. Fallbacher, M. Ratz, Supersymmetric unification and R symmetries, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27 (2012) 1230044.arXiv:1211.6247,doi:10.1142/S0217732312300443

    2012 doi arXiv

  22. [31]

    H. Baer, V. Barger, D. Sengupta, Gravity safe, electroweak natural axionic solution to strongCPand SUSYµproblems, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 58–63.arXiv:1810.03713, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.01.007

    2019 doi arXiv

  23. [32]

    P. N. Bhattiprolu, S. P. Martin, High-quality axions in solutions to theµproblem, Phys. Rev. D 104 (5) (2021) 055014.arXiv:2106.14964,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.055014

    2021 doi arXiv

  24. [33]

    K. S. Babu, I. Gogoladze, K. Wang, Stabilizing the axion by discrete gauge sym- metries, Phys. Lett. B 560 (2003) 214–222.arXiv:hep-ph/0212339,doi:10.1016/ S0370-2693(03)00411-8

    2003 arXiv

  25. [34]

    H. Baer, V. Barger, J. Bolich, D. Sengupta, K. Zhang, Aspects of the WIMP quality problem and R-parity violation in natural supersymmetry with all axion dark matter, JCAP 10 (2025) 072.arXiv:2505.09785,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/10/072

    2025 doi arXiv

  26. [35]

    Murayama, H

    H. Murayama, H. Suzuki, T. Yanagida, Radiative breaking of Peccei-Quinn symme- try at the intermediate mass scale, Phys. Lett. B 291 (1992) 418–425.doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(92)91397-R

    1992

  27. [36]

    K. J. Bae, H. Baer, H. Serce, Natural little hierarchy for SUSY from radiative breaking of the Peccei-Quinn symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 91 (1) (2015) 015003.arXiv:1410.7500, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.015003

    2015 doi arXiv

  28. [37]

    L. M. Krauss, F. Wilczek, Discrete Gauge Symmetry in Continuum Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 1221.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1221

    1989 doi

  29. [38]

    Banks, N

    T. Banks, N. Seiberg, Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 084019.arXiv:1011.5120,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.084019

    2011 doi arXiv

  30. [39]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, M. Srednicki, A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 199–202.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81) 90590-6

    1981 doi

  31. [40]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260

    1980

  32. [41]

    Grilli di Cortona, E

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega, G. Villadoro, The QCD axion, precisely, JHEP 01 (2016) 034.arXiv:1511.02867,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)034. 9

    2016 doi arXiv

  33. [42]

    Sikivie, Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Universe, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1156–1159.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1156

    1982 doi

  34. [43]

    H. Baer, V. Barger, D. Sengupta, K. Zhang, All axion dark matter from supersymmet- ric models, Phys. Rev. D 111 (11) (2025) L111702.arXiv:2502.06955,doi:10.1103/ 1n3m-g69m

    2025 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Aalbers, et al., Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys

    J. Aalbers, et al., Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (1) (2025) 011802.arXiv:2410. 17036,doi:10.1103/4dyc-z8zf

    2025 doi

  36. [45]

    D. S. Akerib, et al., Searches for Light Dark Matter and Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering of Solar Neutrinos with the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment (12 2025).arXiv:2512.08065

    2025

  37. [46]

    K. J. Bae, H. Baer, H. Serce, Prospects for axion detection in natural SUSY with mixed axion-higgsino dark matter: back to invisible?, JCAP 06 (2017) 024.arXiv:1705.01134, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/024

    2017 doi arXiv

  38. [47]

    Bartram, et al., Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter in the 3.3–4.2µeV Mass Range, Phys

    C. Bartram, et al., Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter in the 3.3–4.2µeV Mass Range, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (26) (2021) 261803.arXiv:2110.06096,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 127.261803

    2021 doi arXiv

  39. [48]

    Goodman, et al., ADMX Axion Dark Matter Bounds around 3.3µeV with Dine- Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky Discovery Ability, Phys

    C. Goodman, et al., ADMX Axion Dark Matter Bounds around 3.3µeV with Dine- Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky Discovery Ability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (11) (2025) 111002. arXiv:2408.15227,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.111002

    2025 doi arXiv

  40. [49]

    Baryakhtar, L

    M. Baryakhtar, L. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, Searching for the QCD Dark Matter Axion (4 2025).arXiv:2504.10607

    2025 arXiv

  41. [50]

    S. P. Martin, Collider signals from slow decays in supersymmetric models with an in- termediate scale solution to the mu problem, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 095008.arXiv: hep-ph/0005116,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.095008. 10

    2000 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.