pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.07747 · v1 · pith:TAKYMGVPnew · submitted 2019-07-17 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Cylinder-Specific Model-Based Control of Combustion Phasing for Multiple-Cylinder Diesel Engines Operating with High Dilution and Boost Levels

Wenbo Sui , Carrie M. Hall , Gina Kapadia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 19:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords combustion phasing controlCA50diesel engine controladaptive controlfeedforward controlcylinder-specific modelingEGR modelinghigh dilution boost
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cylinder-specific models enable adaptive and feedforward controllers to bring CA50 to steady state within 10 cycles in six-cylinder diesel engines with errors below 0.1 and 1.3 CAD.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a nonlinear combustion phasing model that combines a knock integral, burn duration model, and Wiebe function to predict CA50, then integrates it with a cylinder-specific intake gas model that predicts EGR fraction along with pressure and temperature at intake valve closing for each cylinder. This combined model is simplified for controller design, validated, and used to create an adaptive closed-loop controller and a feedforward open-loop controller. Simulations across all six cylinders show both strategies reach steady-state CA50 conditions within 10 cycles. The adaptive approach limits steady-state errors to less than 0.1 CAD while the feedforward approach keeps them below 1.3 CAD. Accurate combustion phasing control matters because combustion timing strongly affects efficiency in diesel engines running at high dilution and boost levels.

Core claim

A nonlinear combustion phasing model using knock integral, burn duration, and Wiebe function, integrated with a cylinder-specific intake gas model that accounts for per-cylinder EGR, pressure, and temperature at IVC, is simplified for control and supports an adaptive closed-loop controller plus a feedforward open-loop controller that achieve steady-state CA50 within 10 cycles with steady-state errors below 0.1 CAD and 1.3 CAD respectively in six-cylinder diesel engine simulations.

What carries the argument

The simplified nonlinear combustion phasing model (knock integral plus burn duration plus Wiebe) coupled to the cylinder-specific intake gas model that supplies per-cylinder EGR fraction and IVC conditions.

If this is right

  • The adaptive controller maintains CA50 errors below 0.1 CAD across all cylinders once steady state is reached.
  • The feedforward controller achieves CA50 errors below 1.3 CAD without requiring sensor feedback.
  • Both controllers converge to the target CA50 for every cylinder in fewer than 10 engine cycles.
  • Cylinder-to-cylinder differences in intake conditions are explicitly handled in the model and therefore in the resulting control actions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The modeling approach could reduce the calibration effort needed when moving between different dilution or boost setpoints.
  • If the model predictions hold on hardware, the feedforward strategy might serve as a reliable backup when sensors are unavailable.
  • Similar cylinder-specific intake modeling might improve phasing control in other diluted combustion regimes such as low-temperature combustion.

Load-bearing premise

The nonlinear combustion phasing model and cylinder-specific intake gas model remain sufficiently accurate after simplification for controller design under the examined high-dilution and high-boost conditions.

What would settle it

Engine test data on a six-cylinder diesel engine where the adaptive controller produces steady-state CA50 errors above 0.1 CAD or where either controller fails to reach steady state within 10 cycles would falsify the reported performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.07747 by Carrie M. Hall, Gina Kapadia, Wenbo Sui.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of diesel engine system While these technologies can improve the fuel efficiency and reduce the emissions of modern diesel engines, they also create a more complex system that requires more sophisticated control methodologies. Rule-based methodologies and look-up tables [1, 2] are now being replaced with model-based approaches and closed loop control strategies that rely on additional sensors. Mo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Figure2. Block diagram of CA50 prediction model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Model calibration procedure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of SOC prediction and simulation data: a) cylinder 1, b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of CA50 prediction and simulation data: a) cylinder 1, b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Structure of CA50 adaptive feedback control system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Structure of CA50 feedforward model-based control system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Adaptive Control Simulation Result for Case 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: PID Control Simulation Result for Case 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Average Intake Manifold Pressure for Case 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: SOI in Cylinder 1 for Case 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time [s] 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 Avergae Intake Manifold Pressure [bar] 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time [s] -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 SOI [CAD] Adaptive Control Feedforward Control [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Adaptive Control Simulation Result for Case 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Feedforward Control Simulation Result for Case 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Adaptive Control Simulation Result for Case 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Feedforward Control Simulation Result for Case 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Average Intake Manifold Pressure for Case 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Adaptive Control Simulation Result for Case 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Feedforward Control Simulation Result for Case 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Observed vs. Actual 𝑥ଵ in Cylinder 1 for Case 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Observed vs. Actual 𝑥ଶ in Cylinder 1 for Case 4 According to the simulation results, both control methods can track the reference CA50 quickly with a maximum steady state errors less than ±0.1 CAD for adaptive control, and x1 x2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Simulation Result of Error Response of Adaptive Control System in Cyl. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accurate control of combustion phasing is indispensable for diesel engines due to the strong impact of combustion timing on efficiency. In this work, a non-linear combustion phasing model is developed and integrated with a cylinder-specific model of intake gas. The combustion phasing model uses a knock integral model, a burn duration model and a Wiebe function to predict CA50 (the crank angle at which 50% of the mass of fuel has burned). Meanwhile, the intake gas property model predicts the EGR fraction and the in-cylinder pressure and temperature at intake valve closing (IVC) for different cylinders. As such, cylinder-to-cylinder variation of the pressure and temperature at intake valves closing is also considered in this model. This combined model is simplified for controller design and validated. Based on these models, two combustion phasing control strategies are explored. The first is an adaptive controller that is designed for closed-loop control and the second is a feedforward model-based control strategy for open-loop control. These two control approaches were tested in simulations for all six cylinders and the results demonstrate that the CA50 can reach steady state conditions within 10 cycles. In addition, the steady state errors are less than +/-0.1 crank angle degree (CAD) with the adaptive control approach, and less than +/-1.3 CAD with feedforward model-based control. The impact of errors on the control algorithms is also discussed in the paper.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper develops a nonlinear combustion phasing model (knock integral + burn duration + Wiebe function) to predict CA50, integrated with a cylinder-specific intake gas model that accounts for EGR fraction and IVC pressure/temperature variations across cylinders. The combined model is simplified for controller design. Two strategies are presented: an adaptive closed-loop controller and a feedforward model-based open-loop controller. Simulations on a six-cylinder diesel engine under high dilution/boost show CA50 reaching steady state within 10 cycles, with steady-state errors < ±0.1 CAD (adaptive) and < ±1.3 CAD (feedforward).

Significance. The integration of cylinder-specific intake modeling with combustion phasing control addresses a relevant problem for efficiency in multi-cylinder diesel engines. If the simplified model remains accurate under the examined conditions, the reported simulation performance would indicate practical utility for both closed- and open-loop strategies. However, the in-silico results against the design model itself provide limited evidence for robustness.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (results paragraph) and simulation results section] The central performance claims (steady-state within 10 cycles; errors <±0.1 CAD adaptive / <±1.3 CAD feedforward) are obtained exclusively from closed-loop simulations of the controllers against the identical nonlinear combustion + intake-gas model used for their derivation. This setup does not probe simplification-induced mismatch, cylinder-to-cylinder effects not captured in the model, or sensor/actuator dynamics that would appear on hardware.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive feedback. The manuscript presents a simulation-based study of cylinder-specific modeling and control for combustion phasing. We address the central concern regarding the simulation setup below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (results paragraph) and simulation results section] The central performance claims (steady-state within 10 cycles; errors <±0.1 CAD adaptive / <±1.3 CAD feedforward) are obtained exclusively from closed-loop simulations of the controllers against the identical nonlinear combustion + intake-gas model used for their derivation. This setup does not probe simplification-induced mismatch, cylinder-to-cylinder effects not captured in the model, or sensor/actuator dynamics that would appear on hardware.

    Authors: We agree that the reported performance metrics are obtained from closed-loop simulations against the same nonlinear model used for controller synthesis. This is a standard first step in model-based control development to verify that the designed laws achieve the intended behavior under the modeling assumptions. The manuscript already includes a discussion of the impact of model errors on the algorithms. However, we acknowledge that these in-silico results against the design model do not capture unmodeled dynamics, sensor/actuator effects, or additional cylinder-to-cylinder variations that would arise in hardware. We will revise the abstract and simulation results section to explicitly qualify the claims as nominal-model simulation results and to note the requirement for future experimental validation to assess robustness. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper assembles standard physical sub-models (knock integral, burn duration, Wiebe function for combustion phasing; cylinder-specific intake gas model for EGR, pressure and temperature at IVC) whose grounding is external to the paper. These are integrated, simplified for controller design, and used to test adaptive and feedforward controllers in simulation. No equations or steps reduce the claimed performance metrics (steady-state within 10 cycles, errors <±0.1 CAD adaptive / <±1.3 CAD feedforward) to self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains. The simulation results on the design model are standard for model-based control validation and do not force the outcomes by construction. No uniqueness theorems or ansatzes smuggled via self-citation appear in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no equations, parameter lists, or modeling assumptions are provided, so free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be identified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5793 in / 1149 out tokens · 27186 ms · 2026-05-24T19:59:57.480402+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Saito, T

    Kataoka, M., Terazawa, Y., Hayashibara, H. and Saito, T. Combustion control apparatus for an engine. U.S. Patent 6,964,256, issued November 15, 2005

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Combustion control apparatus of diesel engine

    Kataoka, M., Kobayashi, A., and Saito, T. Combustion control apparatus of diesel engine. U.S. Patent 6,725,829, issued April 27, 2004

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Heywood, J. B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. Indian Edition 2011. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, 2011, p. 390, 501 – 502, 586 – 592

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Introduction to Internal Combustion Engines

    Stone R. Introduction to Internal Combustion Engines. Third Edition. Warrendale: Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1999, p. 97, 424

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    M., Bohac S

    Ickes A. M., Bohac S. V., and Assanis D. N. Effect of Fuel Cetane Number on a Premixed Diesel Combustion Mode. International Journal of Engine Research, 2009, 10(4): 251-263

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    A Diesel Engine Combustion Phasing Optimization Using a Model Guided Extremum Seeking Approach

    Tan Q., Divekar P., Tan Y., et al. A Diesel Engine Combustion Phasing Optimization Using a Model Guided Extremum Seeking Approach. 35th Chinese Control Conference, Chengdu, China, 2837-2842, 2016, New York: IEEE Control Systems Society

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    and Stola, F., Instantaneous engine speed measurement and processing for MFB50 evaluation

    Ponti, F., Ravaglioli, V., Serra, G. and Stola, F., Instantaneous engine speed measurement and processing for MFB50 evaluation. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2(2), pp.235-244, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    and Serra, G

    Ponti, F., Ravaglioli, V., Moro, D. and Serra, G. MFB50 on-board estimation methodology for combustion control. Control Engineering Practice, 21(12), pp.1821-1829, 2013

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Relationship Between Ignition Processes and the Lift-Off Length of Diesel Fuel Jets

    Pickett, L., Siebers, D., and Idicheria, C. Relationship Between Ignition Processes and the Lift-Off Length of Diesel Fuel Jets. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3843, doi:10.4271/2005-01-3843

    work page doi:10.4271/2005-01-3843 2005

  10. [10]

    The Influence of Charge Dilution and Injection Timing on Low-Temperature Diesel Combustion and Emissions

    Kook, S., Bae, C., Miles, P., et al. The Influence of Charge Dilution and Injection Timing on Low-Temperature Diesel Combustion and Emissions. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3837, doi:10.4271/2005-01-3837

    work page doi:10.4271/2005-01-3837 2005

  11. [11]

    A Predictive Real Time NOx Model for Conventional and Partially Premixed Diesel Combustion

    Andersson, M., Johansson, B., Hultqvist, A., et al. A Predictive Real Time NOx Model for Conventional and Partially Premixed Diesel Combustion. SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3329, doi:10.4271/2006-01-3329

    work page doi:10.4271/2006-01-3329 2006

  12. [12]

    Direct Injection Diesel Engine Rate of Heat Release Prediction using Universal Load Correction 38 Factor in Double Wiebe Function for Performance Simulation

    Loganathan, S., Murali Manohar, R., Thamaraikannan, R., et al. Direct Injection Diesel Engine Rate of Heat Release Prediction using Universal Load Correction 38 Factor in Double Wiebe Function for Performance Simulation. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2456, doi:10.4271/2011-01-2456

    work page doi:10.4271/2011-01-2456 2011

  13. [13]

    Modeling of Diesel Engine Components for Model-Based Control (Second Report): Prediction of Combustion with High Speed Calculation Diesel Combustion Model

    Suzuki, Y., Kusaka, J., Ogawa, M., et al. Modeling of Diesel Engine Components for Model-Based Control (Second Report): Prediction of Combustion with High Speed Calculation Diesel Combustion Model. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01- 2044, doi:10.4271/2011-01-2044

    work page doi:10.4271/2011-01-2044 2011

  14. [14]

    M., et al

    Hernandez JJ., Sanz-Argent J., Carot J. M., et al. Ignition Delay Time Correlations for a Diesel Fuel with Application to Engine Combustion Modelling. International Journal of Engine Research, 2010, 11(3):199-206

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Modeling of HCCI engine combustion for control analysis

    Bengtsson J., Gafvert M., Strandh P. Modeling of HCCI engine combustion for control analysis. In: 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlantis, Paradise Island, Bahamas, 2004, 2: 1682 - 1687, 2004, New York: IEEE

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    Correlation of Autoignition Phenomena in Internal Combustion Engines and Rapid Compression Machines

    Livengood JC., and Wu PC. Correlation of Autoignition Phenomena in Internal Combustion Engines and Rapid Compression Machines. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1955, 5(1): 347 – 356

    work page 1955

  17. [17]

    Combustion Control of Diesel Engines Using Injection Timing

    Hillion, M., Buhlbuck, H., Chauvin, J., et al. Combustion Control of Diesel Engines Using Injection Timing. SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0367, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0367

    work page doi:10.4271/2009-01-0367 2009

  18. [18]

    Development and Application of a 0D D.I

    Lafossas, F., Marbaix, M., and Menegazzi, P. Development and Application of a 0D D.I. Diesel combustion model for Emissions Prediction. SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1841, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1841

    work page doi:10.4271/2007-01-1841 2007

  19. [19]

    Multi-Zone Predictive Modeling of Common Rail Multi-Injection Diesel Engines

    Arsie, I., Di Genova, F., Mogavero, A., et al. Multi-Zone Predictive Modeling of Common Rail Multi-Injection Diesel Engines. SAE Technical Paper 2006-01- 1384, doi:10.4271/2006-01-1384

    work page doi:10.4271/2006-01-1384 2006

  20. [20]

    Modeling and Experimental Study of an HCCI Engine for Combustion Timing Control

    Shahbakhti M. Modeling and Experimental Study of an HCCI Engine for Combustion Timing Control. PhD dissertation, University of Alberta, Canada, 2009

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Thermodynamic based modeling for nonlinear control of combustion

    Bettis J.B. Thermodynamic based modeling for nonlinear control of combustion. Master Thesis, Missouri University of Science and Technology, MO, USA, 2010

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    Wenbo Sui, and Carrie M. Hall. Combustion phasing modeling and control for compression ignition engines with high dilution and boost levels. Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2018

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Analysis and Control of Compression-Ignition and Spark-Ignited Engines Operations with Dual-Fuel Combustion Strategy

    Kassa M. Analysis and Control of Compression-Ignition and Spark-Ignited Engines Operations with Dual-Fuel Combustion Strategy. PhD dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology, IL, USA, 2017. 39

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    A Model-Based Estimator of Engine Cylinder Pressure Imbalance for Combustion Feedback Control Applications

    Al-Durra A., Fiorentini L., Canova M., and Yurkovich S. A Model-Based Estimator of Engine Cylinder Pressure Imbalance for Combustion Feedback Control Applications. American Control Conference (ACC), 2011, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2011

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Model-Order Reduction for Prediction of Pressure Wave Propagation Dynamics in the IC Engine Air Path System

    Stockar S., Canova M., and Guezennec Y. Model-Order Reduction for Prediction of Pressure Wave Propagation Dynamics in the IC Engine Air Path System. American Control Conference (ACC), 2013, Washington, DC, USA, 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Extended Kalman Filter Based In-Cylinder Temperature Estimation for Diesel Engine with Thermocouple Lag Compensation

    Chen S., and Yan F. Extended Kalman Filter Based In-Cylinder Temperature Estimation for Diesel Engine with Thermocouple Lag Compensation. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 2014, 136(5): 051010, doi: 10.1115/1.4027170

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4027170 2014

  27. [27]

    Cylinder Pressure-Based Control in Heavy-Duty EGR Diesel Engines Using a Virtual Heat Release and Emission Sensor

    Willems, F., Doosje, E., Engels, F., et al. Cylinder Pressure-Based Control in Heavy-Duty EGR Diesel Engines Using a Virtual Heat Release and Emission Sensor. SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0564, doi: 10.4271/2010-01-0564

    work page doi:10.4271/2010-01-0564 2010

  28. [28]

    Development of engine control using the in-cylinder pressure signal in a high speed direct injection diesel engine

    Yu S., Choi H., Cho S., et al. Development of engine control using the in-cylinder pressure signal in a high speed direct injection diesel engine. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2013, 14(2): 175-182

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Closed-loop diesel engine combustion phasing control based on crankshaft torque measurements

    Thor M., Egardt B., McKelvey T., et al. Closed-loop diesel engine combustion phasing control based on crankshaft torque measurements. Control Engineering Practice, 2014, 33: 115-124

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Fuzzy Logic Control of Diesel Combustion Phasing Using Ion Current Signal

    Badawy T., Khaled N., and Henein N. Fuzzy Logic Control of Diesel Combustion Phasing Using Ion Current Signal. ASME 2012 Internal Combustion Engine Division Spring Technical Conference, Torino, Piemonte, Italy, 645-658, 2012, New York: ASME

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    A method for combustion phasing control using cylinder pressure measurement in a CRDI diesel engine

    Yoon M., Lee K., and Sunwoo M. A method for combustion phasing control using cylinder pressure measurement in a CRDI diesel engine. Mechatronics, 2007, 17(9): 469-479

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    Finesso and E

    R. Finesso and E. Spessa, A Feed-Forward Approach for the Real-Time Estimation and Control of MFB50 and SOI In Diesel Engines. SAE International Journal of Engines, 7(1), pp.528-549, 2014

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Adaptive Control of a Recompression Four-Cylinder HCCI engine

    Larimore J., Jade S., Hellstrom E., et al. Adaptive Control of a Recompression Four-Cylinder HCCI engine. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2015, 23(6): 2144-2154. 40

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    M., Shaver G

    Hall C. M., Shaver G. M., Chauvin J., et al. Combustion phasing model for control of a gasoline-ethanol fueled SI engine with variable valve timing. American Control Conference (ACC), 2012, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2012

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    K., Shahbakhti M., Bharath A

    Sadabadi K. K., Shahbakhti M., Bharath A. N. et al. Modeling of combustion phasing of a reactivity-controlled compression ignition engine for control applications. International Journal of Engine Research, 2016, 17(4): 421-435

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Engine and Powertrain Control, Simulation, and Modeling

    Lyle Kocher, Carrie Hall, Karla Stricker, David Fain, Dan Van Alstine, and Gregory M. Shaver, Robust Oxygen Fraction Estimation for Conventional land Premixed Charge Compression Ignition Engines with Variable Valve Actuation, IFAC Control Engineering Practice for a Special Issue Entitled: “Engine and Powertrain Control, Simulation, and Modeling”, vol. 29,...

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Air fraction estimation for multiple combustion mode diesel engines with dual-loop EGR systems

    Junmin Wang, "Air fraction estimation for multiple combustion mode diesel engines with dual-loop EGR systems", Control Engineering Practice, vol. 16, pp. 1479, 2008

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    Modeling the Impact of Natural Gas Variation on Combustion in a Dual-Fuel Engine Master Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, IL, USA, 2017

    Hulbert M. Modeling the Impact of Natural Gas Variation on Combustion in a Dual-Fuel Engine Master Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, IL, USA, 2017

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    A., and Gallestey E

    Hokayem P. A., and Gallestey E. Lecture Notes on Nonlinear Systems and Control. http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~apnoco/Lectures2018/NLSC_lecture_notes_2018.pdf (2018, accessed 17 August 2018) 41 Appendix: Proof of Adaptive Control System Stability The stability of the adaptive control system is proved by the Lyapunov direct method. Since the purpose of the cont...

    work page 2018