REVIEW 1 cited by
Aportes para el cumplimiento del Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 en rob\'otica y sistemas aut\'onomos
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Aportes para el cumplimiento del Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 en rob\'otica y sistemas aut\'onomos
read the original abstract
Cybersecurity in robotics stands out as a key aspect within Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, also known as the Artificial Intelligence Act, which establishes specific guidelines for intelligent and automated systems. A fundamental distinction in this regulatory framework is the difference between robots with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and those that operate through automation systems without AI, since the former are subject to stricter security requirements due to their learning and autonomy capabilities. This work analyzes cybersecurity tools applicable to advanced robotic systems, with special emphasis on the protection of knowledge bases in cognitive architectures. Furthermore, a list of basic tools is proposed to guarantee the security, integrity, and resilience of these systems, and a practical case is presented, focused on the analysis of robot knowledge management, where ten evaluation criteria are defined to ensure compliance with the regulation and reduce risks in human-robot interaction (HRI) environments.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cumplimiento del Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 en rob\'otica y sistemas aut\'onomos: una revisi\'on sistem\'atica de la literatura
A PRISMA review claims robotics research only partially meets EU AI Act requirements, with big gaps in transparency, human oversight, and traceability.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.