Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 50 references

The intercalated La2NiO4 layer in superconducting La5Ni3O11 is electronically inert, leaving the La3Ni2O7 block to govern the low-energy electronic structure.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

In La5Ni3O11 the intercalated La2NiO4 layer is gapped and electronically inactive, so the low-energy electronic structure comes almost entirely from the La3Ni2O7 bilayer block.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection A useful minimal-model paper with a real but addressable U-sensitivity problem: the HSE06 leg is robust, the PBE leg depends on an assumed U = 3–4 eV. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26676 v1 pith:TBADEBVP submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Electronically Inactive Intercalated La₂NiO₄ Layer in Superconducting La₅Ni₃O₁₁

Tianyang Xie , Yuxin Wang , Zhan Wang , Kun Jiang , Jiangping Hu This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nickelate superconductivityRuddlesden–PopperLa5Ni3O11electronically inactive intercalationtwo-orbital tight-binding modelrotationally invariant slave-bosonFermi surfaceARPES prediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the La2NiO4 (214) layer sandwiched between La3Ni2O7 (327) blocks in the hybrid Ruddlesden–Popper nickelate La5Ni3O11 contributes to the low-energy electronic structure. By combining density functional theory, Wannier tight-binding models, and rotationally invariant slave-boson calculations, it argues that realistic parameters place the 214 layer in gapped insulating states—antiferromagnetic for the PBE functional and band-insulating for HSE06—rather than a paramagnetic metal. It further shows that realistic dz2–dz2 interlayer hybridization is too weak to generate 214-derived spectral weight at the Fermi level. The conclusion is that the low-energy physics of La5Ni3O11 is essentially that of the 327 block, with the 214 layer acting as an electronically inactive spacer that makes the system more two-dimensional. This matters because it simplifies the minimal model for superconductivity in this compound and unifies its description with the better-studied La3Ni2O7.

Core claim

The authors establish that the embedded La2NiO4 layer in La5Ni3O11 is removed from the low-energy metallic sector. In their isolated 214-layer model, the Jahn–Teller crystal-field splitting ΔJT extracted from PBE (0.557 eV) places the layer in the antiferromagnetic insulating region for U ≈ 3–4 eV, while the HSE06 value (2.534 eV) places it deep in the band-insulating region; both are gapped and non-metallic. In the minimal coupled 327+214 model, the interblock hopping t⊥zz = −0.0237 eV does not restore any appreciable 214-derived Fermi-level crossing. Thus the Fermi surface of La5Ni3O11 is governed almost entirely by the 327 block, and the 214 layer weakens coherent c-axis interblock hoppin

What carries the argument

The central tool is a two-orbital (Ni dx2−y2 and dz2) tight-binding model for the 214 layer, with the Jahn–Teller splitting ΔJT = εx − εz as the key parameter controlling orbital occupation. Electron correlations are included through a local Hubbard–Hund interaction (U, U′ = U − 2JH, JH/U = 0.1) treated at the saddle-point level of the rotationally invariant slave-boson (RISB) method, which yields a phase diagram in (U, ΔJT) separating paramagnetic metal, antiferromagnetic insulator, and band insulator. A minimal coupled 327+214 model with dz2–dz2 interblock hopping tests whether hybridization can reactivate the 214 layer. The RISB phase diagram and the two DFT parametrizations together carr

Load-bearing premise

The Hubbard U for the nickel eg orbitals is taken to be 3–4 eV with JH/U = 0.1 from earlier nickelate studies rather than computed for this compound; a smaller U at the PBE orbital splitting would move the 214 layer from the gapped antiferromagnetic region toward a metallic or semimetallic state and could place 214-derived states at the Fermi level.

What would settle it

Angle-resolved photoemission on La5Ni3O11 that resolves an additional Fermi pocket beyond those of La3Ni2O7 would refute the central claim; equivalently, an ab initio calculation yielding an effective U below roughly 2 eV for the Ni eg orbitals at the PBE ΔJT would push the 214 layer out of the gapped regime.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The Fermi surface of La5Ni3O11 should closely resemble that of La3Ni2O7, with no additional 214-derived pockets; this is directly testable by angle-resolved photoemission on thin films.
  • The intercalated 214 layer weakens coherent interblock hopping along the c axis, making the 327-derived electronic structure more quasi-two-dimensional than in bulk La3Ni2O7.
  • Between the two insulating scenarios for the 214 layer, the band-insulating (orbital-polarized) solution is more compatible with the observed similarity between La5Ni3O11 and La3Ni2O7, since it avoids introducing an extra magnetic subsystem.
  • Both PBE and HSE06 parametrizations yield the same qualitative conclusion through different microscopic limits, so the electronic inactivity of the 214 layer is robust to the choice of exchange-correlation functional.
  • La5Ni3O11 can be viewed as a structurally modulated, more two-dimensional realization of the 327 electronic system rather than a distinct multiblock electronic material.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 214 layer is truly inert, the high-pressure superconducting phase of La5Ni3O11 likely shares the same pairing mechanism as La3Ni2O7, with the 214 layer acting mainly as a spacer; comparing pressure-dependent transition temperatures across the two compounds could test this.
  • The RISB phase diagram suggests a tuning route: strain or chemical pressure that reduces ΔJT or U of the 214 layer (for instance toward the low-spin antiferromagnetic semimetal window) could reactivate it, creating 214-derived Fermi pockets—an unexplored design direction.
  • The paper assumes U ≈ 3–4 eV and JH/U = 0.1 from earlier nickelate studies rather than computing them for the compressed 214 layer; a dedicated ab initio estimate (e.g., constrained RPA) would either strengthen or undermine the central conclusion.
  • The layer-resolved band picture could be extended to predict quantum-oscillation frequencies or optical conductivity, offering transport-based tests of whether the 214 layer contributes to low-energy carriers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper addresses a central question about the hybrid Ruddlesden–Popper nickelate La5Ni3O11: whether the intercalated La2NiO4 layer participates in the low-energy electronic structure. The authors construct a two-orbital tight-binding model for the isolated 214 layer with parameters from PBE and HSE06 DFT, and solve it with rotationally invariant slave-boson (RISB) theory. They obtain a phase diagram as a function of Hubbard U and Jahn–Teller splitting ΔJT, and argue that realistic parameters (U ≈ 3–4 eV) place the PBE-derived ΔJT = 0.5571 eV in an antiferromagnetic insulating state and the HSE06-derived ΔJT = 2.5341 eV in a band-insulating state. A minimal coupled 327+214 model with a single dz2-dz2 interlayer hopping is then solved, showing no 214-derived Fermi-level spectral weight. The authors conclude that the 214 layer is electronically inactive and that La5Ni3O11 is essentially a more two-dimensional version of La3Ni2O7.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a clear and minimal low-energy description of a newly discovered superconductor, explaining the similarity in pressure-tuned phase diagrams with La3Ni2O7 and the quasi-2D transport anisotropy. It is a strength that the authors use two DFT functionals and explicitly span a range of ΔJT, and that their prediction—absence of 214-derived Fermi pockets—is testable and already consistent with recent ARPES. The RISB analysis is careful and the phase-diagram logic is internally consistent; there is no circular parameter fitting to the target conclusion. However, the central claim rests on an assumed U range and on a coarse classification of the AFM sector, and the coupled-layer calculation is minimal. These issues do not invalidate the approach but require additional analysis.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II, Fig. 2; Appendix B] The main text treats the entire AFM region as 'gapped,' but Appendix B (Fig. 7d) shows the LS-AFM solution is semimetallic, with bands touching near E_F. For the PBE value ΔJT = 0.5571 eV, the paper places the system in the AFM region for U = 3–4 eV, yet it does not show the HS-AFM/LS-AFM boundary at this ΔJT. Fig. 7d uses U = 1 eV to obtain the LS-AFM state; if the true U for the 214 Ni eg orbitals is below the HS-AFM boundary, the PBE leg of the central claim would fail because LS-AFM contributes low-energy states. Since U is adopted from prior nickelate literature rather than computed for this compound, the 'realistic parameters' conclusion is not yet robust. The coupled-layer calculation (Sec. II, Eqs. 5–6; Appendix C) fixes U327 = U214 = 4 eV and does not report the 214 gap or occupancy as a function of U, so it does not resolve this sensitivity. Please map the HS-AFM/LS-AFM and PM
  2. [Sec. II, Eq. (6); Appendix C] The coupled-layer model includes only the dz2-dz2 interblock hopping tzz⊥. The text calls this the 'dominant interblock coupling' but provides no Wannier-derived estimate of other inter-block hoppings (e.g., dz2–dx2−y2 or indirect apical-oxygen-mediated terms). If any of these are comparable to tzz⊥, the conclusion that realistic hybridization fails to reactivate the 214 layer would need re-examination. Please report the full set of interblock hoppings or justify the truncation quantitatively.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III] Typo: 'HES06' should be 'HSE06'.
  2. [Main text and Appendix B] The main text's use of 'AFM phase' to mean 'gapped insulating state' is inconsistent with the appendix's LS-AFM semimetallic state. Please revise the wording so the main-text classification matches the refined Appendix B analysis.
  3. [Appendix C heading] Typo: 'La3Ni2O7lock' should be 'La3Ni2O7 block'.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption states that the vertical extent of the boxes corresponds to U∼3–4 eV, but the text does not clearly define how the boxes are drawn. Please clarify the construction of the red and blue boxes.
  5. [Appendix C] The restriction of the 327 block to the paramagnetic sector is stated but not justified. A sentence explaining why this is sufficient for the coupled-layer conclusion would be helpful.
  6. [Eq. (6)] The prefactor 4 cos(kx/2)cos(ky/2) and its relation to the lattice structure should be defined, along with the sign convention for tzz⊥.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central claim is an output of DFT-derived tight-binding parameters plus general interaction parameters, with the ARPES agreement cited after calculation rather than used for fitting.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (1) PBE and HSE06 DFT plus Wannierization produce the 214-layer tight-binding parameters in Table II; (2) the RISB phase diagram (Fig. 2) is computed from the standard two-orbital Hubbard-Hund model with U and J_H/U=0.1 taken from prior nickelate literature, not fitted to the target 'electronically inactive 214 layer' conclusion; (3) the realistic points are placed on the phase diagram using the computed ΔJT values, giving a high-spin AFM insulator for the PBE point and a band insulator for the HSE06 point; (4) the coupled 327+214 calculation uses the same interaction parameters and the DFT-derived interlayer hopping t_zz^⊥=-0.0237 eV, so the absence of 214 Fermi-level weight is an output, not an input; (5) the ARPES comparison appears only after the calculation as a consistency check. Appendix B does add nuance that some AFM solutions (LS-AFM) are semimetallic at smaller U, but at the stated realistic U=4 eV the PBE point is the gapped HS-AFM state, so this is a parameter-robustness caveat rather than a circular step. The U sensitivity identified by the skeptic concerns whether the chosen U range is correct for this compound; that is a physical assumption, but it is not a case of defining the prediction in terms of the fit, renaming an input as a prediction, or importing an unverified uniqueness/ansatz result from the authors' own work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model has four tunable or assumed inputs: U, JH/U, U327, and tzz_perp. None is derived from the target result, so circularity is low, but the conclusion is conditional on the U range and on the single hybridization channel. No new particles or fields are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • U (214-layer Hubbard interaction) = U ≈ 3–4 eV; U = 4.0 eV in coupled calculation
    Adopted from prior nickelate literature [25,41,42]; not computed. The phase diagram (Fig. 2) is such that U below ~2 eV would leave the 214 layer metallic or semimetallic, overturning the central conclusion.
  • JH/U (Hund coupling ratio) = 0.1
    Fixed convention used for nickelate models [26,39]; sets the balance between AFM and BI phases.
  • U327 (327-block Hubbard interaction) = 4.0 eV
    Set equal to the 214-layer U 'for consistency' (Appendix C); the 327 sector is restricted to the paramagnetic solution.
  • tzz_perp (interlayer dz2-dz2 hopping) = -0.0237 eV
    Only interblock coupling channel included (Eq. 6); stated without a derivation table.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption RISB saddle-point (Gutzwiller) approximation faithfully describes the correlated ground states of the two-orbital model.
    Used for all phase boundaries and band structures; no benchmark against exact diagonalization or DMFT is provided.
  • domain assumption The 214-layer low-energy physics can be represented by Ni eg (dx2-y2, dz2) orbitals with local Hubbard-Hund interactions; oxygen p and other states are folded into the TB parameters.
    Standard for nickelate modeling but not justified for the embedded 214 layer beyond the DFT fit.
  • domain assumption Interblock coupling in La5Ni3O11 is dominated by dz2-dz2 hopping of the form of Eq. (6); all other interlayer channels are negligible.
    Central to the coupled-layer calculation; no numerical test of other channels is reported.
  • domain assumption The 327 block can be treated in the paramagnetic sector for the coupled calculation.
    A magnetic or orbitally ordered 327 solution could alter hybridization; the paper does not explore this (Appendix C).
  • domain assumption DFT (PBE and HSE06) plus Wannier projection provides a realistic bracket of crystal-field splittings and hoppings for the embedded 214 layer.
    The PBE/HSE06 spread in ΔJT (0.56 vs 2.53 eV) is used as the uncertainty range.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electronically Inactive Intercalated La$_2$NiO$_4$ Layer in Superconducting La$_5$Ni$_3$O$_{11}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TBADEBVP

@misc{pith2026260726676,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electronically Inactive Intercalated La$_2$NiO$_4$ Layer in Superconducting La$_5$Ni$_3$O$_11$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TBADEBVP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26676}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The recent discovery of superconductivity in La$_5$Ni$_3$O$_{11}$ extends the family of superconducting Ruddlesden--Popper nickelates beyond La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$. Unlike conventional members of a single Ruddlesden--Popper series, La$_5$Ni$_3$O$_{11}$ contains an intercalated La$_2$NiO$_4$ layer between La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ blocks, raising the question of whether this additional layer participates in the low-energy electronic structure. Here, we combine density functional theory, Wannier-based tight-binding modeling, and rotationally invariant slave-boson calculations to investigate the electronic role of the intercalated layer. We find that realistic electronic parameters place the La$_2$NiO$_4$ layer in gapped insulating regimes rather than a paramagnetic metallic state. Furthermore, realistic interlayer hybridization fails to generate any appreciable La$_2$NiO$_4$-derived spectral weight at the Fermi level. Our results demonstrate that the low-energy electronic structure of La$_5$Ni$_3$O$_{11}$ is governed primarily by the La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ block, with the intercalated La$_2$NiO$_4$ layer remaining electronically inactive. This establishes a minimal low-energy description of La$_5$Ni$_3$O$_{11}$ and provides a unified framework for understanding superconductivity in intercalated Ruddlesden--Popper nickelates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26676 by Jiangping Hu, Kun Jiang, Tianyang Xie, Yuxin Wang, Zhan Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of La [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Phase diagram of the isolated La [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Layer-resolved energy bands of the minimal 327+214 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of the orbital-resolved electron occupation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Evolution of the orbital-resolved electron occupation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Representative band structures of the isolated La [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    4, we focus on the parameter windowU= 2–3eV and∆ JT = 0.755–0.955eV in order to resolve the fine struc- ture of the magnetic sector

    Phase diagram near the phase-transition boundary In Fig. 4, we focus on the parameter windowU= 2–3eV and∆ JT = 0.755–0.955eV in order to resolve the fine struc- ture of the magnetic sector. A key feature of this phase dia- gram is that the AFM region can be further divided into two distinct parts, namely the high-spin antiferromagnetic (HS- AFM) state and...

  2. [2]

    Order parameters along representative∆ J Tcuts This subsection examines the evolution of representative or- der parameters across the phase transitions in order to fur- ther characterize the phases identified in Fig. 4. We focus on the orbital-resolved electron occupationNand the local magnetic momentM. For AFM solutions, the local mo- ments on the two su...

  3. [3]

    4, we show in Fig

    Representative band structures To further clarify the low-energy electronic character of the phases identified in Fig. 4, we show in Fig. 7 the representa- tive band structures of four typical states: BI, HS-AFM, PM, and LS-AFM. The corresponding parameter sets are chosen as follows:U= 3.0,J H /U= 0.1, and∆ JT = 0.9571eV for the BI state;U= 3.0,J H /U= 0....

    2060

  4. [4]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y . Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80K in a nicke- late under high pressure, Nature621, 493 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Zhang, D

    Y . Zhang, D. Su, Y . Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y . Xu, Y . Su, R. Li, M. Smidman, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour inLa 3Ni2O7−δ, Nature Physics20, 1269 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    J. Li, D. Peng, P. Ma, H. Zhang, Z. Xing, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D. Hu, Z. Dong, X. Chen, T. Xie, H. Dong, H. Sun, Q. Zeng, H.-k. Mao, and M. Wang, Identification of supercon- ductivity in bilayer nickelateLa 3Ni2O7 under high pressure up to 100 GPa, National Science Review12, nwaf220 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Y . Zhu, D. Peng, E. Zhang, B. Pan, X. Chen, L. Chen, H. Ren, F. Liu, Y . Hao, N. Li, Z. Xing, F. Lan, J. Han, J. Wang, D. Jia, H. Wo, Y . Gu, Y . Gu, L. Ji, W. Wang, H. Gou, Y . Shen, T. Ying, X. Chen, W. Yang, H. Cao, C. Zheng, Q. Zeng, J.- g. Guo, and J. Zhao, Superconductivity in pressurized trilayer La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals, Nature631, 531 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Pei, D. Peng, X. Du, W. Hu, Y . Cao, Q. Wang, J. Wu, Y . Li, H. Liu, C. Wen, J. Song, Y . Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, S. Zhu, Q. Zhang, N. Yu, P. Cheng, L. Zhang, Z. Li, J. Zhao, Y . Chen, C. Jin, H. Guo, C. Wu, F. Yang, Q. Zeng, S. Yan, L. Yang, and Y . Qi, Superconductivity in trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10 under pressure, Phys. Rev. X15, 021005 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Li, Y .-J

    Q. Li, Y .-J. Zhang, Z.-N. Xiang, Y . Zhang, X. Zhu, and H.-H. Wen, Signature of superconductivity in pressurized La4Ni3O10, Chinese Physics Letters41, 017401 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    M. Shi, D. Peng, K. Fan, Z. Xing, S. Yang, Y . Wang, H. Li, R. Wu, M. Du, B. Ge, Z. Zeng, Q. Zeng, J. Ying, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Pressure induced superconductivity in hybrid Rud- dlesden–PopperLa 5Ni3O11 single crystals, Nature Physics21, 1780 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, J. Yang, Y . Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y . Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y . Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Nagasaki, K. Kitagawa, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y . Uwatoko, and J. Cheng, Bulk high-temperature su- perconductivity in pressurized tetragonalLa ...

    2024

  12. [12]

    F. Li, Z. Xing, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, Y . Zhang, L. Wang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, T. Chang, Y .-S. Chen, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Y . Wang, Y . Liu, T. Luo, N. Hirao, T. Mat- suoka, H. Kadobayashi, Z. Zeng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Bulk superconductivity up to 96 K in pressurized nickelate single crystals, Nature649, 871 (2026)

    2026

  13. [13]

    F. Li, N. Guo, Q. Zheng, Y . Shen, S. Wang, Q. Cui, C. Liu, S. Wang, X. Tao, G.-M. Zhang, and J. Zhang, Design and syn- thesis of three-dimensional hybrid Ruddlesden-Popper nicke- late single crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 053401 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Y . Wang, K. Jiang, J. Ying, T. Wu, J. Cheng, J. Hu, and X. Chen, Recent progress in nickelate superconductors, National Science Review12, nwaf373 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y . D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y . Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.-Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y . Uwatoko, and J.-G. Cheng, Pressure-induced superconduc- tivity in polycrystallineLa 3Ni2O7−δ, Phys. Rev. X14, 011040 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y . Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, S. Okamoto, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Electronic structure, and magnetic and super- conducting pairing tendencies of the alternating single layer– bilayer stacking nickelateLa 5Ni3O11 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B112, 094515 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Zhang, C.-Q

    M. Zhang, C.-Q. Chen, D.-X. Yao, and F. Yang, Pairing mecha- nism and superconductivity in pressurizedLa5Ni3O11, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy69, 257411 (2026). 11

    2026

  18. [18]

    LaBollita and A

    H. LaBollita and A. S. Botana, Correlated electronic struc- ture of the alternating monolayer-bilayer nickelateLa 5Ni3O11 (2026), arXiv:2505.07394 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    I. V . Leonov, Electronic structure, quasiparticle renormaliza- tions, and magnetic correlations in the alternating single-layer bilayer nickelateLa 5Ni3O11 (2026), arXiv:2604.26627 [cond- mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Ouyang, R.-Q

    Z. Ouyang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y . Lu, Phase diagrams and two key factors to superconductivity of Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates, Phys. Rev. B112, 045127 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Rodriguez-Carvajal, M

    J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, M. T. Fernandez-Diaz, and J. L. Mar- tinez, Neutron diffraction study on structural and magnetic properties ofLa 2NiO4, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 3, 3215 (1991)

    1991

  22. [22]

    Aeppli and D

    G. Aeppli and D. J. Buttrey, Magnetic correlations in La2NiO4+δ, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 203 (1988)

    1988

  23. [23]

    Yamada, T

    K. Yamada, T. Omata, K. Nakajima, S. Hosoya, T. Sumida, and Y . Endoh, Magnetic structure and weak ferromagnetism of La2NiO4+δ, Physica C: Superconductivity191, 15 (1992)

    1992

  24. [24]

    X. L. Wang, C. Stassis, D. C. Johnston, T. C. Leung, J. Ye, B. N. Harmon, G. H. Lander, A. J. Schultz, C.-K. Loong, and J. M. Honig, The antiferromagnetic form factor ofLa 2NiO4, Journal of Applied Physics69, 4860 (1991)

    1991

  25. [25]

    A. N. Petsch, N. S. Headings, D. Prabhakaran, A. I. Kolesnikov, C. D. Frost, A. T. Boothroyd, R. Coldea, and S. M. Hayden, High-energy spin waves in the spin-1 square-lattice antiferro- magnetLa 2NiO4, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033113 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Wang, S.-H

    H.-Y . Wang, S.-H. Tang, X.-T. Huang, Y .-M. Quan, X. Wang, Y .-L. Li, D.-Y . Liu, H. Q. Lin, Z. Zeng, and L.-J. Zou, Pres- sure and doping control of magnetic order and metallization in Ruddlesden-PopperLa 2NiO4 (2026), arXiv:2507.03277 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. W ´u, and D.-X. Yao, Bilayer two- orbital model ofLa 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    J. Yang, H. Sun, X. Hu, Y . Xie, T. Miao, H. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, G. Qu, C.-Q. Chen, M. Huo, Y . Huang, S. Zhang, F. Zhang, F. Yang, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Xu, T. Qian, D.-X. Yao, M. Wang, L. Zhao, and X. J. Zhou, Orbital-dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7, Nature Communications15, 4373 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Sakakibara, N

    H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Possible highT c superconductivity inLa 3Ni2O7 under high pressure through manifestation of a nearly half-filled bilayer hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 106002 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Lechermann, A

    F. Lechermann, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, and O. Parcollet, Ro- tationally invariant slave-boson formalism and momentum de- pendence of the quasiparticle weight, Phys. Rev. B76, 155102 (2007)

    2007

  31. [31]

    Isidori and M

    A. Isidori and M. Capone, Rotationally invariant slave bosons for strongly correlated superconductors, Phys. Rev. B80, 115120 (2009)

    2009

  32. [32]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  33. [33]

    A. D. Becke, Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange, The Journal of chemical physics98, 5648 (1993)

    1993

  34. [34]

    A. V . Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the perfor- mance of screened hybrid functionals, The Journal of chemical physics125(2006)

    2006

  35. [35]

    Takegahara and T

    K. Takegahara and T. Kasuya, Electronic band structure of para- magnetic and antiferromagnetic La 2NiO4, Solid state commu- nications70, 641 (1989)

    1989

  36. [36]

    Rivero, I

    P. Rivero, I. d. P. Moreira, G. E. Scuseria, and F. Illas, Description of magnetic interactions in strongly correlated solids via range-separated hybrid functionals, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics79, 245129 (2009)

    2009

  37. [37]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm ¨uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  38. [38]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  39. [39]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y .-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally- localised Wannier functions, Computer physics communica- tions178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  40. [40]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vander- bilt, Maximally localized wannier functions: Theory and appli- cations, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419 (2012)

    2012

  41. [41]

    Eisaki, S

    H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, T. Mizokawa, H. Namatame, A. Fuji- mori, T. Sasagawa, K. Kishio, K. Kitazawa, H. Kojima, and S. Tanaka, Electronic structure ofLa 2−xSrxNiO4 studied by photoemission and inverse-photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B45, 12513 (1992)

    1992

  42. [42]

    W. W ´u, Z. Luo, D.-X. Yao, and M. Wang, Superexchange and charge transfer in the nickelate superconductorLa 3Ni2O7 un- der pressure, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 67, 117402 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Kotliar and A

    G. Kotliar and A. E. Ruckenstein, New functional integral ap- proach to strongly correlated fermi systems: The gutzwiller ap- proximation as a saddle point, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 1362 (1986)

    1986

  44. [44]

    Y . Li, X. Du, Y . Cao, C. Pei, M. Zhang, W. Zhao, K. Zhai, R. Xu, Z. Liu, Z. Li, J. Zhao, G. Li, Y . Qi, H. Guo, Y . Chen, and L. Yang, Electronic correlation and pseudogap-like behavior of high-temperature superconductorLa 3Ni2O7, Chinese Physics Letters41, 087402 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    S. Ryee, N. Witt, and T. O. Wehling, Quenched pair break- ing by interlayer correlations as a key to superconductivity in La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096002 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y . Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Electronic struc- ture, dimer physics, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate superconductorLa 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B108, L180510 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Burrard-Lucas, D

    M. Burrard-Lucas, D. G. Free, S. J. Sedlmaier, J. D. Wright, S. J. Cassidy, Y . Hara, A. J. Corkett, T. Lancaster, P. J. Baker, S. J. Blundell, and S. J. Clarke, Enhancement of the super- conducting transition temperature of fese by intercalation of a molecular spacer layer, Nature Materials12, 15 (2013)

    2013

  48. [48]

    J. Guo, S. Jin, G. Wang, S. Wang, K. Zhu, T. Zhou, M. He, and X. Chen, Superconductivity at 30 k in the vicinity of the insu- lating phase inK xFe2−ySe2, Phys. Rev. B82, 180520 (2010)

    2010

  49. [49]

    Z. Nie, Y . Li, W. Lv, L. Xu, Z. Jiang, P. Fu, G. Zhou, W. Song, Y . Chen, H. Wang, H. Huang, J. Lin, J.-F. Jia, D. Shen, P. Li, Q.- K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Superconductivity and electronic struc- tures of nickelate thin film superstructures, Nature652, 628 (2026)

    2026

  50. [50]

    LaBollita and A

    H. LaBollita and A. S. Botana, Electronic structure and magnetic properties of higher-order layered nickelates: Lan+1NinO2n+2(n= 4−6), Phys. Rev. B104, 035148 (2021)

    2021

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.