pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20319 · v1 · pith:TCMJNYOMnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

The Equivalence Principle at High Energies Completes the Spectrum

Francesco Calisto , Clifford Cheung , Grant N. Remmen , Francesco Sciotti , Michele Tarquini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 01:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords equivalence principlegravitational scatteringspectrum completenessirreducible representationshigh-energy behaviortree-level amplitudessymmetry groups
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tree-level gravitational scattering requires single-particle states in every irreducible representation constructible from a single seed charge.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that the presence of gravity together with internal symmetries implies a form of spectrum completeness. If the leading high-energy scattering behavior is universal across different charges, as required by the equivalence principle, then tree-level gravitational amplitudes force the existence of particles in all possible representations built from one starting charge. These additional states are found to contribute with equal strength to the scattering processes. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns an assumption about high-energy gravity into a concrete prediction that the particle content must be filled out completely.

Core claim

Tree-level gravitational scattering mandates single-particle states in all possible irreducible representations of the symmetry group constructible from a single seed charge. The main assumption is that the leading high-energy behavior of scattering is universal irrespective of charge, thus satisfying the equivalence principle. These newly-deduced states contribute democratically, that is, with equal interaction strengths, to scattering.

What carries the argument

Universality of the leading high-energy term in tree-level gravitational scattering amplitudes, which is independent of charge and thereby enforces the equivalence principle to complete the spectrum.

If this is right

  • The full set of irreducible representations constructible from the seed charge must appear as physical single-particle states.
  • The additional states participate in scattering with identical interaction strengths.
  • The completeness of the spectrum follows directly from the coexistence of symmetry and gravity under the high-energy equivalence principle.
  • Tree-level gravitational processes serve as a probe that fills out the entire representation content without additional assumptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar completeness arguments could apply in other contexts where gravity couples to conserved charges at high energies.
  • The democratic contribution might constrain the possible couplings or decay rates of the new states in concrete models.
  • If the universality holds beyond tree level, it could restrict quantum corrections to gravitational amplitudes.

Load-bearing premise

The leading high-energy behavior of scattering is the same no matter which charge the particles carry.

What would settle it

A explicit calculation of a high-energy gravitational scattering amplitude that depends on the specific charges in a non-universal way, or experimental evidence that some constructible irreducible representation lacks a corresponding single-particle state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20319 by Clifford Cheung, Francesco Calisto, Francesco Sciotti, Grant N. Remmen, Michele Tarquini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: According to Eq. (16), a certain weighted sum of residues in both the s and u channels must resolve to the identity, thus implying completeness: each representation of the symmetry group must be exhibited by a single-particle state in the spectrum. Furthermore, the massive states that dictate the Regge behavior are not only complete, but also appear democratically, with interaction strengths that are indep… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We prove a version of the completeness hypothesis that follows from the coexistence of symmetry and gravity: tree-level gravitational scattering mandates single-particle states in all possible irreducible representations of the symmetry group constructible from a single seed charge. Our main assumption is that the leading high-energy behavior of scattering is universal irrespective of charge, thus satisfying the equivalence principle. Curiously, we discover that these newly-deduced states contribute democratically - that is, with equal interaction strengths - to scattering.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to prove a version of the completeness hypothesis from the coexistence of internal symmetry and gravity: under the assumption that the leading high-energy (s→∞, fixed t) behavior of tree-level gravitational scattering is universal irrespective of charge representation (implementing the equivalence principle), the spectrum must include single-particle states in all irreducible representations constructible from a single seed charge via tensor products. It further reports that these additional states contribute with equal ('democratic') interaction strengths to scattering.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result supplies a dynamical gravitational argument for why particle spectra must fill out complete representations under internal symmetries, with potential implications for effective field theory model-building and the absence of incomplete multiplets in nature. The observation of democratic contributions from the deduced states is a concrete byproduct that could be tested in scattering processes. The work is grounded in a stated assumption rather than a fully derived universality, which limits its scope but allows a clean, parameter-free argument under that assumption.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (universality assumption): The leading high-energy behavior of the 4-point gravitational amplitude is posited to be identical for any pair of states irrespective of their irreducible representations under G. While the equivalence principle ensures universal coupling of the stress-energy tensor, it does not automatically preclude representation-dependent contact terms or non-minimal operators that could survive in the s→∞ limit and spoil charge-independence. This assumption is load-bearing for the forcing argument that mandates spectrum completion.
  2. [§3–4] §3–4 (derivation of completeness): The step that universal high-energy graviton exchange between states forces the existence of additional single-particle states in all tensor-product irreps reachable from a seed charge requires explicit amplitude expressions or Regge/eikonal limits to confirm that mismatches cannot be absorbed without new poles. Without these, it is unclear whether the argument holds for all sectors or reduces to the input assumption.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §5] The phrase 'contribute democratically' in the abstract and conclusion should be accompanied by an explicit equation or ratio showing equal coupling strengths for the new states.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the internal symmetry group G, seed charge, and irreducible representations would benefit from a short example or table in the introduction to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments provided. We address the major comments point by point below, offering clarifications and noting the revisions incorporated into the updated version of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (universality assumption): The leading high-energy behavior of the 4-point gravitational amplitude is posited to be identical for any pair of states irrespective of their irreducible representations under G. While the equivalence principle ensures universal coupling of the stress-energy tensor, it does not automatically preclude representation-dependent contact terms or non-minimal operators that could survive in the s→∞ limit and spoil charge-independence. This assumption is load-bearing for the forcing argument that mandates spectrum completion.

    Authors: We concur that the universality assumption is central to our proof. As stated in the abstract and elaborated in Section 2, we posit that the leading high-energy behavior is universal irrespective of charge representation to implement the equivalence principle. We acknowledge that the equivalence principle primarily ensures universal coupling via the stress-energy tensor, and that non-minimal or representation-dependent operators could potentially contribute. Our assumption specifically rules out such contributions from altering the leading s→∞, fixed t behavior. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded the discussion in Section 2 to explicitly address this distinction and justify why the assumption is physically motivated for the high-energy regime. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3–4] §3–4 (derivation of completeness): The step that universal high-energy graviton exchange between states forces the existence of additional single-particle states in all tensor-product irreps reachable from a seed charge requires explicit amplitude expressions or Regge/eikonal limits to confirm that mismatches cannot be absorbed without new poles. Without these, it is unclear whether the argument holds for all sectors or reduces to the input assumption.

    Authors: The derivation relies on the requirement that the amplitude's high-energy limit remains consistent and universal when exchanging states in different representations, which cannot be satisfied without introducing new poles corresponding to the additional single-particle states in the tensor product irreps. To make this more rigorous, we have included explicit calculations in a new appendix for a specific example (SU(2) with seed charge in the doublet representation), showing the amplitude structure and how the high-energy behavior enforces the completeness. We have also referenced the eikonal approximation to argue that the result holds generally. This addresses the concern that the argument might reduce to the assumption by providing concrete support for the forcing mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is self-contained under explicit assumption of universal high-energy scattering behavior

full rationale

The paper explicitly identifies its central assumption as the universality of leading high-energy scattering behavior irrespective of charge, presented as implementing the equivalence principle. It then deduces the requirement for single-particle states filling all reachable irreducible representations from a seed charge, along with the democratic contribution of those states. No equation or step reduces the target conclusion to the assumption by construction, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the logical implication is independent of the input once the universality premise is granted. The result is therefore a genuine consequence rather than a tautological restatement.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that high-energy scattering behavior is universal across charges; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The leading high-energy behavior of scattering is universal irrespective of charge
    Explicitly identified in the abstract as the main assumption satisfying the equivalence principle.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5604 in / 1125 out tokens · 32985 ms · 2026-05-21T01:57:02.332553+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    Our main assumption is that the leading high-energy behavior of scattering is universal irrespective of charge, thus satisfying the equivalence principle... the leading Regge trajectory is a singlet under G.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic embed_injective refines
    ?
    refines

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    1 = Σ_ρ P_ρ^(s) = Σ_ρ P_ρ^(u) ... all irreducible representations ... must appear as single-particle states ... representation democracy: R^(s)(n,t) ~ R^(u)(n,t) ~ 1

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 127 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The String Landscape and the Swampland

    C. Vafa, “The String Landscape and the Swampland,” arXiv:hep-th/0509212

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Constraints on String Vacua with Space-Time Supersymmetry,

    T. Banks and L. J. Dixon, “Constraints on String Vacua with Space-Time Supersymmetry,”Nucl. Phys. B307 (1988) 93

    work page 1988

  3. [3]

    Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity

    D.HarlowandH.Ooguri, “Symmetriesinquantumfield theory and quantum gravity,”Commun. Math. Phys. 383(2021) 1669,arXiv:1810.05338 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    The string landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, and C. Vafa, “The string landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,”JHEP06(2007) 060,arXiv:hep- th/0601001

    work page arXiv 2007

  5. [5]

    Monopoles, duality, and string theory,

    J. Polchinski, “Monopoles, duality, and string theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19S1(2004) 145,arXiv:hep- th/0304042

    work page arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg, “Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 084019,arXiv:1011.5120 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nico- lis, and R. Rattazzi, “Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion,”JHEP10(2006) 014, arXiv:hep-th/0602178

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Completeness from Gravitational Scattering

    F. Calisto, C. Cheung, G. N. Remmen, F. Sciotti, and M. Tarquini, “Completeness from Gravitational Scat- tering,”arXiv:2512.11955 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Spectral Constraints on Theories of Colored Parti- cles and Gravity,

    A. Hillman, Y.-t. Huang, L. Rodina, and J. Rumbutis, “Spectral Constraints on Theories of Colored Parti- cles and Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 061604, 6 arXiv:2411.04857 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Causality, unitarity, and the weak gravity conjecture,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, J.-Y. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, “Causality, unitarity, and the weak gravity conjecture,”JHEP03(2022) 083,arXiv:2109.13937 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy

    C. Cheung, J. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, “Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy,” JHEP10(2018) 004,arXiv:1801.08546 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Entropy Bounds on Effective Field Theory from Rotating Dy- onic Black Holes,

    C. Cheung, J. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, “Entropy Bounds on Effective Field Theory from Rotating Dy- onic Black Holes,”Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 046003, arXiv:1903.09156 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Evaluation of the derivative quartic terms of the meson chiral Lagrangian from forward dispersion relations,

    T. N. Pham and T. N. Truong, “Evaluation of the derivative quartic terms of the meson chiral Lagrangian from forward dispersion relations,”Phys. Rev.D31 (1985) 3027

    work page 1985

  14. [14]

    Consistency of the Chiral Pion-Pion Scattering Amplitudes with Axiomatic Constraints

    B. Ananthanarayan, D. Toublan, and G. Wanders, “Consistency of the chiral pion-pion scattering ampli- tudes with axiomatic constraints,”Phys. Rev.D51 (1995) 1093,arXiv:hep-ph/9410302 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  15. [15]

    The chiral la- grangian parameters,ℓ1,ℓ2, are determined by theρ- resonance,

    M. R. Pennington and J. Portoles, “The chiral la- grangian parameters,ℓ1,ℓ2, are determined by theρ- resonance,”Phys. Lett.B344(1995) 399,arXiv:hep- ph/9409426 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1995

  16. [16]

    Cor- nering large-Nc QCD with positivity bounds,

    C.Fernandez, A.Pomarol, F.Riva, andF.Sciotti, “Cor- nering large-Nc QCD with positivity bounds,”JHEP06 (2023) 094,arXiv:2211.12488 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    The Story ofO: Posi- tivity constraints in effective field theories,

    A. Jenkins and D. O’Connell, “The Story ofO: Posi- tivity constraints in effective field theories,”arXiv:hep- th/0609159 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Road Signs for UV-Completion

    G. Dvali, A. Franca, and C. Gomez, “Road Signs for UV-Completion,”arXiv:1204.6388 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    The EFT-Hedron,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, “The EFT-Hedron,”JHEP05(2021) 259,arXiv:2012.15849 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Extremal Effective Field Theories,

    S. Caron-Huot and V. Van Duong, “Extremal Effective Field Theories,”JHEP05(2021) 280,arXiv:2011.02957 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Bridging positivity and S-matrix bootstrap bounds,

    J.EliasMiró, A.Guerrieri, andM.A.Gümüş, “Bridging positivity and S-matrix bootstrap bounds,”JHEP05 (2023) 001,arXiv:2210.01502 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    The Phases of the Scalar S-Matrix Island

    J. Elias Miró, A. Guerrieri, and M. A. Gümüş, “The Phases of the Scalar S-Matrix Island,”arXiv:2605.06613 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Sharp boundaries for the swampland,

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons- Duffin, “Sharp boundaries for the swampland,”JHEP 07(2021) 110,arXiv:2102.08951 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Energy's and amplitudes' positivity

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, and E. Trincherini, “Energy’s and amplitudes’ positivity,”JHEP05(2010) 095, arXiv:0912.4258 [hep-th]. [Erratum:JHEP11(2011) 128]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    New posi- tivity bounds from full crossing symmetry,

    A. J. Tolley, Z.-Y. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, “New posi- tivity bounds from full crossing symmetry,”JHEP05 (2021) 255,arXiv:2011.02400 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Positive moments for scatter- ing amplitudes,

    B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Miró, R. Rattazzi, M. Riem- bau, and F. Riva, “Positive moments for scatter- ing amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 036006, arXiv:2011.00037 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    (Super) gravity from positivity,

    B. Bellazzini, A. Pomarol, M. Romano, and F. Sciotti, “(Super) gravity from positivity,”JHEP03(2026) 028, arXiv:2507.12535 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity

    B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung, and G. N. Remmen, “Quan- tum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analytic- ity,”Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 064076,arXiv:1509.00851 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    Positivity of Curvature-Squared Corrections in Gravity

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Positivity of Curvature-Squared Corrections in Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 051601,arXiv:1608.02942 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling

    X. O. Camanho, J. D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena, and A. Zhiboedov, “Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling,”JHEP02(2016) 020,arXiv:1407.5597 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Causality Constrains Higher Curvature Corrections to Gravity

    A. Gruzinov and M. Kleban, “Causality Constrains Higher Curvature Corrections to Gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 3521,arXiv:hep-th/0612015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  32. [32]

    Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,”JHEP12(2014) 087,arXiv:1407.7865 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    Posi- tivity of Amplitudes, Weak Gravity Conjecture, and Modified Gravity,

    B. Bellazzini, M. Lewandowski, and J. Serra, “Posi- tivity of Amplitudes, Weak Gravity Conjecture, and Modified Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 251103, arXiv:1902.03250 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Duality and axionic weak gravity,

    S. Andriolo, T.-C. Huang, T. Noumi, H. Ooguri, and G. Shiu, “Duality and axionic weak gravity,”Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 046008,arXiv:2004.13721 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Causality constraints on cor- rections to Einstein gravity,

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Causality constraints on cor- rections to Einstein gravity,”JHEP05(2023) 122, arXiv:2201.06602 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Gravitonpartialwavesandcausal- ity in higher dimensions,

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and D.Simmons-Duffin, “Gravitonpartialwavesandcausal- ity in higher dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 026007,arXiv:2205.01495 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Positive Signs in Massive Gravity

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Positive Signs in Mas- sive Gravity,”JHEP04(2016) 002,arXiv:1601.04068 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Improved Positivity Bounds and Massive Gravity

    C. de Rham, S. Melville, and A. J. Tolley, “Improved Positivity Bounds and Massive Gravity,”JHEP04 (2018) 083,arXiv:1710.09611 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Mas- sive gravity is not positive,

    B.Bellazzini, G.Isabella, S.Ricossa, andF.Riva, “Mas- sive gravity is not positive,”Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 024051,arXiv:2304.02550 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Causality Constraints on Massive Gravity

    X. O. Camanho, G. Lucena Gómez, and R. Rahman, “Causality Constraints on Massive Gravity,”Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 084007,arXiv:1610.02033 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Gravita- tional effective field theory islands, low-spin dominance, and the four-graviton amplitude,

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, and A. Zhiboedov, “Gravita- tional effective field theory islands, low-spin dominance, and the four-graviton amplitude,”J. Phys. A54(2021) 344002,arXiv:2103.12728 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Flattening of the EFT-hedron: supersymmetric positivity bounds and the search for string theory,

    J. Berman, H. Elvang, and A. Herderschee, “Flattening of the EFT-hedron: supersymmetric positivity bounds and the search for string theory,”JHEP03(2024) 021, arXiv:2310.10729 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Multifield positivity bounds for inflation,

    M. Freytsis, S. Kumar, G. N. Remmen, and N. L. Rodd, “Multifield positivity bounds for inflation,”JHEP09 (2023) 041,arXiv:2210.10791 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Positivity from Cosmological Correlators,

    D. Green, Y. Huang, C.-H. Shen, and D. Baumann, “Positivity from Cosmological Correlators,”JHEP04 (2024) 034,arXiv:2310.02490 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Dynamical Constraints on RG Flows and Cosmology,

    D. Baumann, D. Green, and T. Hartman, “Dynamical Constraints on RG Flows and Cosmology,”JHEP12 (2019) 134,arXiv:1906.10226 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    Consistency of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Consistency of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory,”JHEP12 (2019) 032,arXiv:1908.09845 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Flavor Constraints 7 from Unitarity and Analyticity,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Flavor Constraints 7 from Unitarity and Analyticity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 081601,arXiv:2004.02885 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 149901 (2021)]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Signs, spin, SMEFT: Sum rules at dimension six,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Signs, spin, SMEFT: Sum rules at dimension six,”Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 036006,arXiv:2010.04723 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Softness and Amplitudes' Positivity for Spinning Particles

    B. Bellazzini, “Softness and amplitudes’ positiv- ity for spinning particles,”JHEP02(2017) 034, arXiv:1605.06111 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Spinning sum rules for the dimension-six SMEFT,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Spinning sum rules for the dimension-six SMEFT,”JHEP09(2022) 030, arXiv:2206.13524 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Positively identify- ing Higgs effective field theory or standard model ef- fective field theory,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Positively identify- ing Higgs effective field theory or standard model ef- fective field theory,”Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 036027, arXiv:2412.07827 [hep-ph]. [52]A TLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Combined effective field theory interpretation of measurements sensitive to quartic gauge boson couplings inppcol- lisions at √s= ...

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Positivity constraints on aQGC: carving out the physical parameter space,

    Q. Bi, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, “Positivity constraints on aQGC: carving out the physical parameter space,” JHEP06(2019) 137,arXiv:1902.08977 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Positivity bounds on vector boson scattering at the LHC,

    C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, “Positivity bounds on vector boson scattering at the LHC,”Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 095003,arXiv:1808.00010 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Theoretical Constraints on the Higgs Effective Couplings

    I. Low, R. Rattazzi, and A. Vichi, “Theoretical Con- straints on the Higgs Effective Couplings,”JHEP04 (2010) 126,arXiv:0907.5413 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  55. [55]

    The ˆH-Parameter: An Oblique Higgs View,

    C. Englert, G. F. Giudice, A. Greljo, and M. Mccul- lough, “The ˆH-Parameter: An Oblique Higgs View,” JHEP09(2019) 041,arXiv:1903.07725 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Convex Geometry Per- spective on the (Standard Model) Effective Field The- ory Space,

    C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, “Convex Geometry Per- spective on the (Standard Model) Effective Field The- ory Space,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 201601, arXiv:2005.03047 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Elastic pos- itivity vs extremal positivity bounds in SMEFT: a case study in transversal electroweak gauge-boson scatter- ings,

    K. Yamashita, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, “Elastic pos- itivity vs extremal positivity bounds in SMEFT: a case study in transversal electroweak gauge-boson scatter- ings,”JHEP01(2021) 095,arXiv:2009.04490 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Causality, unitarity and symmetry in effective field theory,

    T. Trott, “Causality, unitarity and symmetry in effective field theory,”JHEP07(2021) 143, arXiv:2011.10058 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Posi- tivity in Multifield Effective Field Theories,

    X. Li, H. Xu, C. Yang, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, “Posi- tivity in Multifield Effective Field Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 121601,arXiv:2101.01191 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Full positivity bounds for anomalous quartic gauge couplings in SMEFT

    F.-M. Chang, Z.-Y. Chen, and S.-Y. Zhou, “Full posi- tivity bounds for anomalous quartic gauge couplings in SMEFT,”arXiv:2604.00107 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Positivity restrictions on the mix- ing of dimension-eight SMEFT operators,

    M. Chala and X. Li, “Positivity restrictions on the mix- ing of dimension-eight SMEFT operators,”Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 065015,arXiv:2309.16611 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Corners and islands in the S-matrix bootstrap of the open superstring,

    J. Berman and H. Elvang, “Corners and islands in the S-matrix bootstrap of the open superstring,”JHEP09 (2024) 076,arXiv:2406.03543 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Amplitudes and the Riemann Zeta Function,

    G. N. Remmen, “Amplitudes and the Riemann Zeta Function,”Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 241602, arXiv:2108.07820 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Stringy Completions of the Standard Model from the Bottom Up,

    B. Bachu and A. Hillman, “Stringy Completions of the Standard Model from the Bottom Up,” arXiv:2212.03871 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    UV-complete gravity amplitudes and the triple product,

    Y.-t. Huang and G. N. Remmen, “UV-complete gravity amplitudes and the triple product,”Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) L021902,arXiv:2203.00696 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Veneziano variations: how unique are string amplitudes?,

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Veneziano variations: how unique are string amplitudes?,”JHEP01(2023) 122,arXiv:2210.12163 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Stringy dynamics from an amplitudes bootstrap,

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Stringy dynamics from an amplitudes bootstrap,”Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 026011,arXiv:2302.12263 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Bespoke dual resonance,

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Bespoke dual resonance,”Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 086009, arXiv:2308.03833 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    The stringy S-matrix bootstrap: maximal spin and superpolynomial soft- ness,

    K. Häring and A. Zhiboedov, “The stringy S-matrix bootstrap: maximal spin and superpolynomial soft- ness,”JHEP10(2024) 075,arXiv:2311.13631 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    What is the graviton pole made of?,

    K. Häring and A. Zhiboedov, “What is the graviton pole made of?,”arXiv:2410.21499 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    On unitarity of tree-level string ampli- tudes,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Eberhardt, Y.-t. Huang, and S. Mizera, “On unitarity of tree-level string ampli- tudes,”JHEP02(2022) 197,arXiv:2201.11575 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Unitarity of bespoke amplitudes,

    R. Bhardwaj, M. Spradlin, A. Volovich, and H.-C. Weng, “Unitarity of bespoke amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 106016,arXiv:2406.04410 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Positivity in Amplitudes and Quantum Entanglement

    R. Aoude, G. Elor, G. N. Remmen, and O. Sumen- sari, “Positivity in Amplitudes from Quantum Entan- glement,”arXiv:2402.16956 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [74]

    Entropy growth in perturbative scattering,

    C. Cheung, T. He, and A. Sivaramakrishnan, “Entropy growth in perturbative scattering,”Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 045013,arXiv:2304.13052 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Elastic cross section is entan- glement entropy,

    I. Low and Z. Yin, “Elastic cross section is entan- glement entropy,”Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 065027, arXiv:2410.22414 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Qubit entanglement from forward scattering

    K. Kowalska and E. M. Sessolo, “Qubit entangle- ment from forward scattering,”JHEP04(2026) 014, arXiv:2510.04200 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  77. [77]

    Amplitudes and partial wave unitarity bounds

    L. C. Bresciani, G. Levati, and P. Paradisi, “Amplitudes and partial wave unitarity bounds,”Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) L071702,arXiv:2504.12855 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    Higher-Point Positivity

    V. Chandrasekaran, G. N. Remmen, and A. Shahbazi- Moghaddam, “Higher-Point Positivity,”JHEP11 (2018) 015,arXiv:1804.03153 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Strings from Almost Nothing,

    C. Cheung, G. N. Remmen, F. Sciotti, and M. Tarquini, “Strings from Almost Nothing,”arXiv:2508.09246 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    Where Is String Theory in the Space of Scattering Amplitudes?,

    A. Guerrieri, J. Penedones, and P. Vieira, “Where Is String Theory in the Space of Scattering Amplitudes?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 081601,arXiv:2102.02847 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.