pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07824 · v1 · pith:TF4WVBMVnew · submitted 2026-05-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · math-ph· math.MP· math.PR· nlin.SI· quant-ph

Tamed Feynman-Kac diffusion processes: Killing-branching intertwine

Piotr Garbaczewski , Mariusz \.Zaba This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MPmath.PRnlin.SIquant-ph
keywords Feynman-Kac kerneldiffusion processeskilling ratebranching rateSchrödinger semigrouprelaxation to equilibriumdouble-well potentialtamed diffusion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Taming of Feynman-Kac kernels arises when negative potential regions introduce branching that counters killing in diffusion processes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that Feynman-Kac kernels, which enter the probability density for relaxation of drifted Brownian motion to equilibrium, themselves relax despite the potential taking both positive and negative values. Positive regions of the potential act as a killing rate that would otherwise prevent relaxation, but the existence of negativity subdomains introduces a compensating branching rate. Killed diffusions that incorporate this branching are presented as the path-wise probabilistic mechanism underlying the observed taming and relaxation of the kernels. Computer simulations of one-dimensional nonlinear systems, with emphasis on double-well potentials, are used to check consistency of this picture where analytic solutions are limited.

Core claim

For relaxing Feynman-Kac kernels the killing effects are tamed, often overcompensated, in conjunction with negativity subdomains of the potential V(x). If locally V(x) is negative, its sign inversion can be interpreted as the branching rate during otherwise free random motion, so that killed diffusion processes with branching form the path-wise background of tamed Feynman-Kac diffusions.

What carries the argument

The killing-branching intertwine, in which positive parts of the continuous confining Feynman-Kac potential serve as a killing rate and negative parts serve as a branching rate within the underlying diffusion.

If this is right

  • The taming mechanism allows the Feynman-Kac kernel to relax to equilibrium even when the potential changes sign.
  • Branching induced by negative potential subdomains overcompensates local killing and stabilizes the diffusion.
  • Path-wise consistency of the intertwine holds for the examined one-dimensional nonlinear systems with double-well shapes.
  • The interpretation supplies a stochastic background for the Schrödinger semigroup operator beyond purely analytic treatments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sign-change mechanism may supply efficient branching Monte Carlo schemes for sampling equilibrium states in systems whose potentials cross zero.
  • The 1D path-wise picture invites direct numerical tests in two or more dimensions where negativity domains are similarly present.
  • Viewing the tamed kernels through this lens links stochastic process theory to the spectral properties of Schrödinger operators in a manner that could be checked against known eigenvalue data.

Load-bearing premise

That computer-assisted path-wise arguments on selected nonlinear one-dimensional model systems are sufficient to establish consistency of the killing-branching taming for general relaxing Feynman-Kac kernels, including beyond the semiclassical regime for double-well potentials.

What would settle it

A simulation of a double-well potential in which the diffusion process exhibits net killing without sufficient branching compensation from negative regions, resulting in failure of the kernel to relax to equilibrium, would falsify the taming scenario.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07824 by Mariusz \.Zaba, Piotr Garbaczewski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Left panel: Harmonic oscillator potential and its Euclidean (inverted) partner. Right panel: ”Harmonic potential with subtraction” [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Left panel: Exponential decay of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Effects of the killing rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Effects (histograms) of the killing/branching rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The path-wise approach to equilibrium. Left panel: A comparison of the analytic formula for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Left panel: Superharmonic potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. We depict [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Left panel: Ground state eigenfunctions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The reference quartic potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Left panel: The reference quartic potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. The ”bare” [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. The expanded list of potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. The ”canonical” version of the quartic potential (61) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. Bimodality signatures at equilibrium for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. Bimodality signatures at equilibrium for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. Bimodality signatures at equilibrium for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25. The case of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26. A signature of relaxation: Time evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_26.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Relaxation to equilibrium of a drifted Brownian motion is quantified by a probability density function, whose main (multiplicative) entry is an inferred Feynman-Kac kernel of the Schr\"{o}dinger semigroup operator. Although seemingly devoid of a natural probabilistic significance (except for its explicit path integral definition), the pertinent kernel relaxes to equilibrium as well. The implicit Feynman-Kac potential ${\cal{V}}(x)$, continuous, confining and bounded from below, may take negative values. If positive, ${\cal{V}}(x)$ can be interpreted as the killing rate of the decaying diffusion process. In case of relaxing F-K kernels the killing effects are tamed (often overcompensated). The taming inavoidably appears in conjunction with the existence of the negativity subdomains of ${\cal{V}}(x)$ in $R$. If locally ${\cal{V}}(x) < 0$, its sign inversion $- {\cal{V}}(x)$ can be interpreted as the branching (cloning, alternatively bifurcation) rate in the course of the other wise free random motion. The arising killed diffusion processes with branching, we interpret as the possible path-wise background of tamed (relaxing) Feynman-Kac diffusions. We present acomputer-assisted path-wise arguments, towards a consistency of the killing/branching taming scenario, for a number of nonlinear model systems in one space dimension. Special attention is paid to Feynman-Kac potential shapes, presumed to be in the double well form, where an analytic access to eigenvalues and eigenfunctions is scarce beyond the semiclassical regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that relaxing Feynman-Kac kernels associated with Schrödinger semigroups, whose potentials V(x) are continuous, confining, and take negative values in subdomains, admit a probabilistic interpretation as killed diffusion processes with branching (cloning) in regions where V(x)<0; the sign inversion -V(x) acts as the branching rate that tames the killing and reproduces the relaxation dynamics. This interpretation is supported by computer-assisted path-wise simulations on several nonlinear 1D model systems, with special attention to double-well potentials beyond the semiclassical regime where analytic eigenfunction data are scarce.

Significance. If the claimed intertwining between tamed Feynman-Kac semigroups and killed-branching diffusions holds generally, the work would supply a concrete path-wise probabilistic mechanism for the relaxation of FK kernels, potentially aiding Monte-Carlo sampling and understanding of equilibrium approach in statistical mechanics. The numerical consistency checks on 1D models constitute a modest but positive step; however, the absence of an analytic derivation or error-controlled validation limits the immediate impact.

major comments (3)
  1. Abstract and main text: the central claim that the killing/branching mechanism 'exactly reproduces' the relaxation of the Schrödinger semigroup for any continuous confining V with negative subdomains is asserted on the basis of path-wise numerical checks on a handful of 1D nonlinear models. No analytic derivation of the intertwining is provided, nor are discretization or Monte-Carlo error bounds reported, leaving open the possibility that observed taming arises from numerical artifacts rather than the proposed branching mechanism.
  2. Abstract: the manuscript states that 'computer-assisted path-wise arguments' establish consistency for 'a number of nonlinear model systems in one space dimension.' This scope is too narrow to support the general interpretation; extension to higher dimensions, non-semiclassical regimes, or potentials without double-well structure is not addressed, and no quantitative measure (e.g., L1 or total-variation distance between simulated and exact relaxation) is supplied.
  3. The sign-flip interpretation (V>0 as killing rate, -V<0 as branching rate) is presented as following directly from the Feynman-Kac representation, yet the paper supplies no proof that the resulting branching process has the same marginal law as the original FK kernel for arbitrary V. The numerical evidence therefore remains model-specific consistency tests rather than a verification of equivalence.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: typographical errors include 'inavoidably' (should be 'inevitably'), 'ainavoidably' (duplicate), and 'acomputer-assisted' (missing space).
  2. Abstract: the phrase 'the arising killed diffusion processes with branching, we interpret as...' is grammatically awkward and should be rephrased for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below, clarifying the numerical and interpretive nature of our contribution while committing to revisions that strengthen the presentation without overstating the results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and main text: the central claim that the killing/branching mechanism 'exactly reproduces' the relaxation of the Schrödinger semigroup for any continuous confining V with negative subdomains is asserted on the basis of path-wise numerical checks on a handful of 1D nonlinear models. No analytic derivation of the intertwining is provided, nor are discretization or Monte-Carlo error bounds reported, leaving open the possibility that observed taming arises from numerical artifacts rather than the proposed branching mechanism.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript relies on numerical simulations rather than an analytic derivation of the intertwining. The abstract and text explicitly frame the results as 'computer-assisted path-wise arguments' establishing consistency for specific models, not a general proof. To address concerns about numerical artifacts, we will add a dedicated subsection detailing the discretization scheme (e.g., Euler-Maruyama with adaptive time steps), convergence tests under mesh refinement, and basic Monte-Carlo variance estimates. We will also revise the abstract and introduction to replace 'exactly reproduces' with 'numerically consistent with' and emphasize the interpretive character of the killing-branching mechanism. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Abstract: the manuscript states that 'computer-assisted path-wise arguments' establish consistency for 'a number of nonlinear model systems in one space dimension.' This scope is too narrow to support the general interpretation; extension to higher dimensions, non-semiclassical regimes, or potentials without double-well structure is not addressed, and no quantitative measure (e.g., L1 or total-variation distance between simulated and exact relaxation) is supplied.

    Authors: The deliberate focus on one-dimensional nonlinear systems, particularly double-well potentials outside the semiclassical regime, stems from the scarcity of analytic eigenfunction data in these settings, as stated in the manuscript. We acknowledge the limited scope and will incorporate quantitative error measures, such as L1 and total-variation distances between the simulated marginals and reference relaxation curves (obtained via direct diagonalization where feasible or high-resolution spectral methods), into the revised figures and text. Extensions to higher dimensions or broader potential classes are noted as future work but lie outside the present proof-of-concept study. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The sign-flip interpretation (V>0 as killing rate, -V<0 as branching rate) is presented as following directly from the Feynman-Kac representation, yet the paper supplies no proof that the resulting branching process has the same marginal law as the original FK kernel for arbitrary V. The numerical evidence therefore remains model-specific consistency tests rather than a verification of equivalence.

    Authors: The sign-flip follows the standard Feynman-Kac convention for positive potentials as killing rates; the negative parts are interpreted as branching rates to tame the decay. We do not supply a general proof that the branching process shares the exact marginal law for arbitrary V, and the manuscript presents the construction as a conjectured path-wise mechanism whose consistency is checked numerically on the selected models. We will revise the relevant sections to state explicitly that the results constitute model-specific consistency tests supporting the proposed intertwining, rather than a verification of equivalence. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; interpretive claim supported by independent numerical checks

full rationale

The paper advances an interpretive link between tamed Feynman-Kac semigroups and killed-branching diffusions, grounded in the sign of the continuous confining potential V(x) (positive regions as killing rates, negative as branching rates). This rests on the standard Feynman-Kac representation rather than any fitted parameter or self-referential definition. The computer-assisted path-wise simulations on 1D nonlinear models (including double-well potentials) are explicitly framed as consistency tests for the proposed scenario, not as the source of a general derivation or prediction. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes; the argument remains self-contained against external benchmarks with no evidence of circular reduction in the provided derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard properties of Feynman-Kac semigroups and Schrödinger operators; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the interpretive mapping of sign(V) to rates.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Feynman-Kac kernel is the multiplicative factor in the probability density for drifted Brownian motion relaxing to equilibrium.
    Invoked in the opening sentence of the abstract as the main entry of the density.
  • domain assumption When V(x) > 0 it acts as a killing rate and when V(x) < 0 its negative acts as a branching rate.
    Stated directly as the interpretive step for the potential.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5597 in / 1460 out tokens · 38835 ms · 2026-05-11T02:10:31.377931+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    How deep are the local minimum wells ? Improving the resolution ofq(t) = min[1,−V(X(t))δt]about the minima. The definition (44) ofV(α, x) =ax 2m−2 −bx m−2, witha=m 2α2/8,b=m(m−1)α/4,{α= 2,2/m,2m}, andϕ(α, x) = α 2 xm, allows us to deduce the location of deep minima (symmetric, relative tox= 0) of the pertinent Feynman-Kac potential (evaluate ∇V(α, x) = 0)...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Deeply non-perturbative regime

    Splitting of bottom energy levels (energy gap) in the double-well. Deeply non-perturbative regime. In the present section of the paper we refer to Hamiltonian operatorsH 0 =− 1 2∆ +V(x), withν= 1/2 and the double-well potential of the formV(x) = (1/2)(x 4 −2a2x2). To pass toH= 1 2[−∆+(x 4 −2a2x2 −E0)] =− 1 2∆+V(x), withV(x)−ϵ 1 =V(x), we must know the bot...

    work page

  3. [3]

    It is nowadays a widely accepted routine to employ the ”euclideanization” of otherwise intractable (mostly) quantum models

    Instanton as a misnomer versus the lure of instantons. It is nowadays a widely accepted routine to employ the ”euclideanization” of otherwise intractable (mostly) quantum models. The double-well spectral problem, specifically an issue of the bottom levels splitting, has been addressed by means of the so-called instanton calculus, which belongs to the stan...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Some explicit solutions of the Euler-Lagrange equations (20) with the double-well potentialV(x). Although no explicit imaginary time transformation has been ever involved in our discussion, it is worthwhile to examine some solutions of the Euler-Lagrange equations (20), amenable to Euclidean associations (that according to the current instanton lore, albe...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Risken,The Fokker-Planck equation, (Springer, Berlin, 1992)

    H. Risken,The Fokker-Planck equation, (Springer, Berlin, 1992)

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    G. A. Pavliotis,Stochastic processes and applications, (Springer, Berlin, 2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    W. G. Faris, ”Diffusive motion and where it leads”, inDiffusion, Quantum Theory and Radically Elementary Mathematics, edited by W. G. Faris (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006), pp. 1–43

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Ezawa, J

    H. Ezawa, J. R. Klauder, and L. A. Shepp, ”A path space picture for Feynman-Kac averages”, Ann. Phys. (NY)88, 588 (1974)

    work page 1974

  9. [9]

    Vilela Mendes,”Reconstruction of dynamics from an eigenstate”, J

    R. Vilela Mendes,”Reconstruction of dynamics from an eigenstate”, J. Math. Phys.27(1), 178 (1986)

    work page 1986

  10. [10]

    K. L. C. Hunt and J. Ross, ”Path integral solutions of stochastic equations for nonlinear irreversible processes: The uniqueness of the thermodynamic Lagrangian”, J. Chem. Phys.75(2), 976 (1981)

    work page 1981

  11. [11]

    Glimm and A

    J. Glimm and A. Jaffe,Quantum Physics. A functional integral point of view, (Springer, Berlin, 1987)

    work page 1987

  12. [12]

    Garbaczewski and R

    P. Garbaczewski and R. Olkiewicz, ”Feynman–Kac kernels in Markovian representations of the Schr¨ odinger interpolating dynamics”, J. Math. Phys.37(2), 732 (1996)

    work page 1996

  13. [13]

    Mazzolo, ”Sweetest taboo processes”, J

    A. Mazzolo, ”Sweetest taboo processes”, J. Stat. Mech. (2018) 073204

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Mazzolo and C

    A. Mazzolo and C. Monthus, ”Conditioning diffusion processes with killing rates”, J. Stat. Mech. (2022) 083207

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Monthus and A

    C. Monthus and A. Mazzolo, ”Conditioned diffusion processes with an absorbing boundary condition for finite or infinite horizon”, Phys. Rev E106, 044117 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Mazzolo and C

    A. Mazzolo and C. Monthus, ”Nonequilibrium diffusions via non-Hermitian electromagnetic quantum mechanics with application to the statistics of entropy production in the Brownian gyrator”, Phys. Rev. E107, 014101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Garbaczewski and M

    P. Garbaczewski and M. ˙Zaba, ”(Nonequilibrium) dynamics of diffusion processes with non-conservative drifts”, J. Stat. Phys.191, 65 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Garbaczewski, ”Killing (absorption) versus survival in random motion”, Phys

    P. Garbaczewski, ”Killing (absorption) versus survival in random motion”, Phys. Rev. E96, 032104 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Garbaczewski and M

    P. Garbaczewski and M. ˙Zaba, ”Killing versus branching: Unexplored facets of diffusive relaxation”, Phys. Rev. E110, 014127 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Garbaczewski and M

    P. Garbaczewski and M. ˙Zaba, ”Brownian motion in trapping enclosures: steep potential wells, bistable wells and false bistability of induced Feynman–Kac (well) potentials”, J. Phys.A: Math. Theor.53, 315001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Garbaczewski and V

    P. Garbaczewski and V. A. Stephanovich, Superharmonic double-well systems with zero-energy ground states: Relevance for diffusive 32 relaxation scenarios”, Acta Phys. Pol. B53, 3-A2 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Garbaczewski, ”Stochastic models of exotic transport”, Physica A285, 187, (2000)

    P. Garbaczewski, ”Stochastic models of exotic transport”, Physica A285, 187, (2000)

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    Garbaczewski, ”Probabilistic whereabouts of the ”quantum potential””, 2012, J

    P. Garbaczewski, ”Probabilistic whereabouts of the ”quantum potential””, 2012, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.361012012

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Garbaczewski, ”Perturbations of noise: Origins of isothermal flows”, Phys

    P. Garbaczewski, ”Perturbations of noise: Origins of isothermal flows”, Phys. Rev. E59(2), 1498, (1999)

    work page 1999

  25. [25]

    T. E. Huillet, ”Nonconservative diffusions on [0,1] with killing and branching: Applications to Wright-Fisher Models with or without Selection”, Int. J. Stoch. Analysis, (2011) 605068

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    R. P. Feynman, ”Statistical mechanics”, (Benjamin, Reading, Mass. 1982)

    work page 1982

  27. [27]

    Barton, ”Quantum mechanics of the inverted oscillator potential”, Ann

    G. Barton, ”Quantum mechanics of the inverted oscillator potential”, Ann. Phys (NY)166, 322 (1986)

    work page 1986

  28. [28]

    Garbaczewski, ”Modular Schr¨ odinger equation and dynamical duality”, Phys

    P. Garbaczewski, ”Modular Schr¨ odinger equation and dynamical duality”, Phys. Rev. E78, 031101 (2008)

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    Garbaczewski, ”Comment on ”Connection between the Burgers equation with an elastic forcing term and a stochastic process””, Phys

    P. Garbaczewski, ”Comment on ”Connection between the Burgers equation with an elastic forcing term and a stochastic process””, Phys. Rev. E74, 028101 (2006)

    work page 2006

  30. [30]

    Diffusion Processes and their Sample Paths

    K. Itˆ o and H. P. McKean, “Diffusion Processes and their Sample Paths”, (Academic Press, New York, 1965)

    work page 1965

  31. [31]

    L. L. Helms, ”Markov processes with creation of mass”, Z. Wahrsch. verw. Geb.7, 225 (1967)

    work page 1967

  32. [32]

    L. L. Helms, ”Markov processes with creation of mass. II”, Z. Wahrsch. verw. Geb.15, 208 (1970)

    work page 1970

  33. [33]

    Nagasawa, ”Markov processes with creation and annihilation”, Z

    M. Nagasawa, ”Markov processes with creation and annihilation”, Z. Wahrsch. verw. Geb.14, 49 (1969)

    work page 1969

  34. [34]

    Haccou, P

    P. Haccou, P. Jagers and A. A. Vatutin,Branching processes: Variation, growth and extinction of populations, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)

    work page 2005

  35. [35]

    A. Zoia, E. Dumonteil and A. Mazzolo, ”Discrete Feynman-Kac formulas for branching random walks”, EPL,98, 40012 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Dumonteil and A

    E. Dumonteil and A. Mazzolo, ”Residence times of branching diffusion processes”, Phys. Rev. E94, 012131 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    ˙Zaba and P

    M. ˙Zaba and P. Garbaczewski, ”Solving fractional Schr¨ odinger-type spectral problems: Cauchy oscillator and Cauchy well”, J. Math. Phys. 55, 092103, (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    ˙Zaba M and P

    M. ˙Zaba M and P. Garbaczewski. ”Nonocally induced (fractional) bound states: Shape analysis in the infinite Cauchy well”. J. Math. Phys.56, 123502, (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Grosche, ”δ-function perturbations and boundary problems by path integration”, Annalen der Physik,2, 557, (1993)

    C. Grosche, ”δ-function perturbations and boundary problems by path integration”, Annalen der Physik,2, 557, (1993)

    work page 1993

  40. [40]

    Grosche, ”Boundary conditions in path integrals from point interactions for the path integral of the one-dimensional Dirac particle”, J

    C. Grosche, ”Boundary conditions in path integrals from point interactions for the path integral of the one-dimensional Dirac particle”, J. Phys. A: Math.Gen.32, 1675, (1999)

    work page 1999

  41. [41]

    Grosche and F

    C. Grosche and F. Steiner, ”How to solve path integrals in quantum mechanics”, J. Math. Phys.38(5), 2354, (1995)

    work page 1995

  42. [42]

    B. R. Holstein, ”Semiclassical treatement of the double well”, Am. J. Phys.56(4), 338, (1988)

    work page 1988

  43. [43]

    Banerjee and S

    K. Banerjee and S. P. Bhatanagar, ”Two-well oscillator”, Phys. Rev. D18, 4767, (1978)

    work page 1978

  44. [44]

    F. Zhou, Z. Cao and Q. Shen, ”Energy splitting in symmetric double-well”, Phys. Rev. A67, 062112, (2003)

    work page 2003

  45. [45]

    Gildener and A

    E. Gildener and A. Patrasciou, ”Pseudoparticle contributions to the energy spectrum of a one-dimensional system”, Phys. Rev. D16 (2), 423, (1977)

    work page 1977

  46. [46]

    Sch¨ afer and E

    T. Sch¨ afer and E. V. Shuryak, ”Instantons in QCD”, Rev. Mod. Phys.70(2), 323, (1998)

    work page 1998

  47. [47]

    A. V. Turbiner, ”One-dimensional quasi-exactly solvable Schr¨ odinger equations”, Phys. Rep.642, 1, (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    A. V. Turbiner, ” Double well potential: perturbation theory, tunneling, WKB (beyond instantons)”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25, 647, (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    A. V. Turbiner, ”Anharmonic oscillator and double-well potential: Approximating eigenfunctions”, Lett. Math. Phys.74,169, (2005)

    work page 2005

  50. [50]

    Okopi´ nska, ”Fokker-Planck equation for bistable potential in the optimized expansion”, Phys

    A. Okopi´ nska, ”Fokker-Planck equation for bistable potential in the optimized expansion”, Phys. Rev. E65, 062101, (2002)

    work page 2002

  51. [51]

    Janssen, J

    O. Janssen, J. Karlsson, F. Riccardi and M. Varrone,”An ode to instantons”, arXiv:2603.06575, (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Liang and H

    J.-Q. Liang and H. J. W. M¨ uller-Kirsten, ”Nonvacuum bounces and quantum tunneling at finite energy”, Phys. Rev. D50(10), 6519, (1994)

    work page 1994

  53. [53]

    Shi-Kuo Liu, Zun-Tao Fu, Shi-Da Liu, and Qiang Zhao, Basic and fluctuating periodic instantons in quantum tunneling”, Commun. Theor. Phys.65, 145, (2016)

    work page 2016