REVIEW 2 cited by
No Fair Lunch: A Causal Perspective on Dataset Bias in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As machine learning methods gain prominence within clinical decision-making, addressing fairness concerns becomes increasingly urgent. Despite considerable work dedicated to detecting and ameliorating algorithmic bias, today's methods are deficient with potentially harmful consequences. Our causal perspective sheds new light on algorithmic bias, highlighting how different sources of dataset bias may appear indistinguishable yet require substantially different mitigation strategies. We introduce three families of causal bias mechanisms stemming from disparities in prevalence, presentation, and annotation. Our causal analysis underscores how current mitigation methods tackle only a narrow and often unrealistic subset of scenarios. We provide a practical three-step framework for reasoning about fairness in medical imaging, supporting the development of safe and equitable AI prediction models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Causal Transfer in Medical Image Analysis
Causal Transfer Learning unifies structural causal models, invariant risk minimisation and counterfactuals with transfer learning to produce domain-robust medical image models.
-
CAPRI-CT: Causal Analysis and Predictive Reasoning for Image Quality Optimization in Computed Tomography
CAPRI-CT predicts CT signal-to-noise ratio from images and scan metadata with a VAE ensemble, but its causal intervention and counterfactual claims rest on an unjustified identifiability assumption.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.