Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 cited by

Designing Singing Syllabi with Virtual Avatars: AI-Assisted Syllabus Reauthoring

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims a static text syllabus can be reauthored into a sung, avatar-performed video through a reproducible AI-assisted pipeline.

desk verdict The supplied full text is an unrelated astrophysics paper, so the singing-syllabus submission is unverdictable — the abstract alone is too thin to justify referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11872 v3 pith:TIUUFI2U submitted 2025-08-16 cs.CY cs.AIcs.LGcs.MM

Xinxing Wu This is my paper
classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.LGcs.MM
keywords singingsyllabusreauthoringAI-assistedworkflowavatarsynthesismusicgenerationvideocompositioncoursedesigneducationaltechnology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the reason course syllabi go unread is a communication-design failure, and that this failure can be addressed by reauthoring the syllabus as a sung, video-based performance delivered by a virtual avatar. It documents a complete AI-assisted pipeline—lyrical adaptation, music generation, video composition, avatar synthesis, and optional browser interaction—and reports a concrete example produced with it. The paper's stated contribution is the reproducible workflow and the example, not a proof of effectiveness; it explicitly leaves empirical evaluation of learning outcomes to future work.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the reauthoring pipeline itself: a reproducible sequence of transformations from syllabus text to singable lyrics, then to generated music, then to a composed video, then to an avatar performance, with an optional interactive browser artifact at the end. The pipeline's reproducibility, not any single AI model, is what supports the paper's contribution.

What would settle it

A controlled study in which one group receives the written syllabus and another receives the sung-avatar version of the same content, with recall and later use of syllabus information measured; if the sung version does not outperform the text version, the pedagogical motivation collapses even though the workflow may remain reproducible.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that a traditional text syllabus can be transformed into a musical, video-based, and avatar-enhanced learning artifact through a staged AI-assisted workflow, and that this transformation is worth treating as a design practice rather than as a one-off novelty. The stages are lyrical adaptation of the syllabus content, music generation, video composition, avatar synthesis, and an optional browser-based interactive layer. The paper positions the resulting singing syllabus as a supplement to—not a replacement for—the formal written syllabus, and it frames future empirical evaluation as the next step. The complete implementation is said to be

Load-bearing premise

The paper's motivating premise is that students who ignore text syllabi will engage with and retain a sung, avatar-performed version; this premise is supported only by classroom observation, and the paper defers empirical testing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An instructor can reproduce the singing-syllabus artifact for their own course by following the documented stages.
  • The sung, avatar-performed format becomes an additional entry point to syllabus information, sitting alongside the authoritative written document.
  • The workflow gives teachers a concrete way to act on the observation that students skim or skip text syllabi, without discarding the formal syllabus.
  • Future empirical work can test whether the artifact actually improves attention, recall, or course-start behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond syllabus documents, the same pipeline could be applied to other low-compliance text genres such as safety instructions, consent forms, or onboarding materials.
  • The paper does not isolate which stage drives any benefit; a factorial comparison of lyric-only, music-only, and avatar-only versions would locate the source of engagement.
  • A minimal test of the motivating premise is a randomized comparison of the sung-avatar syllabus against plain text and against a narrated video with identical content.
  • The reproducibility claim can be checked by running the public implementation on a standard syllabus and seeing whether the stated tools and steps produce a comparable artifact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper under review, as identified by its arXiv number and abstract, claims to document an AI-assisted workflow for transforming a traditional course syllabus into a musical, video-based, avatar-enhanced artifact, with a reproducible pipeline (lyrical adaptation, music generation, video composition, avatar synthesis, optional browser interaction), a concrete example, and a public GitHub implementation. The abstract positions the work as a design documentation paper and explicitly defers empirical evaluation of pedagogical effectiveness to future work. However, the full text supplied with this submission is not the singing-syllabus manuscript. It is a gravitational-wave astrophysics paper, 'Limitations in constraining neutron star radii and nuclear properties from inspiral gravitational wave detections,' by Zhenyu Zhu and Richard O'Shaughnessy. The supplied body contains no description of syllabi, avatars, AI-assisted reauthoring, or the repository cited in the abstract. Consequently, the claimed contribution cannot be checked on the material before me.

Significance. If the claimed workflow and repository exist, the paper would offer a modest but useful design-research contribution: a reproducible, openly available pipeline for a low-stakes educational artifact, with an honest boundary (supplement, not replacement; no effectiveness claim). The release of implementation details is a positive feature for reproducibility. But because the submitted full text is an unrelated paper, the actual artifact, its workflow documentation, and the repository are entirely unverifiable in this submission. The pedagogical premise in the abstract is anecdotal ('in practical teaching, we observe...') and explicitly unevaluated; that alone would cap the significance rather than invalidate the design contribution. The immediate issue is not the scientific claim's strength but the absence of the claimed manuscript.

major comments (2)
  1. [Full text (entire body)] The body of arXiv:2508.11872 is not the singing-syllabus paper announced in the abstract. It is arXiv:2508.11875v2, 'Limitations in constraining neutron star radii and nuclear properties from inspiral gravitational wave detections' by Zhu and O'Shaughnessy. None of the claimed components — lyrical adaptation, music generation, video composition, avatar synthesis, browser interaction — appears in the supplied text. The abstract's central claim that 'the paper contributes a reproducible workflow and a concrete example of syllabus reauthoring' is therefore unsupported by any section, equation, or figure in the submitted manuscript. This is a load-bearing mismatch that cannot be repaired by local revisions; the correct manuscript must be submitted.
  2. [Abstract vs. body] The public implementation claim ('complete implementation described in this paper is publicly available at https://github.com/xinxingwu-uk/SSVA') cannot be checked. The body contains no repository reference, no code listing, no pipeline details, and no artifact description. Even if the link resolves, the submission itself does not provide the documentation necessary to evaluate reproducibility. This concern is secondary to the full-text mismatch but is independently load-bearing for the paper's reproducibility claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the abstract's workflow claim is independent of the (mismatched) full text, so the issue is manuscript integrity, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The supplied full text for arXiv:2508.11872 is actually a different paper (Zhu & O'Shaughnessy, arXiv:2508.11875v2, on neutron star EoS constraints). This is a serious manuscript-integrity issue: the abstract's central claim of a reproducible AI-assisted syllabus-reauthoring workflow and a public GitHub implementation is not supported by the body text at all. However, the circularity pass looks for reasoning chains in which a conclusion reduces to its own premise, fitted inputs are renamed predictions, or load-bearing arguments rely on self-citations. The abstract describes a workflow (lyrical adaptation, music generation, video composition, avatar synthesis, browser interaction) and presents the resulting artifact as an external construction. It does not define any term in terms of its claimed result, fit parameters to a dataset and then 'predict' that same dataset, or lean on a self-citation chain. The pedagogical motivation ('in practical teaching, we observe...') is anecdotal and unevaluated, but that is a weakness of evidence, not circularity. The unverifiability of the GitHub repo is likewise a verification gap, not a circular derivation. Therefore, no circular steps can be identified; the paper receives a circularity score of 0. The appropriate verdict is 'unverdictable due to mismatched manuscript content,' but that falls outside the circularity rubric.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Qualitative design case study, so the ledger is short: three domain assumptions, no fitted parameters, no invented entities. The virtual avatar is an assembled artifact made with existing synthesis technology, not a postulated entity with falsifiable consequences. All three assumptions concern educational value and tooling, and none can be tested from the abstract alone.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Few students thoroughly read or comprehend text-based syllabi.
    Abstract: 'in practical teaching, we observe that few students thoroughly read or fully comprehend the information provided in traditional, text-based course syllabi.' Anecdotal; no data or citation supplied. This premise motivates the entire design.
  • domain assumption A musical, video-based, avatar-enhanced format can serve as a useful supplement to the formal syllabus.
    The abstract 'positions the singing syllabus as a supplement to, not a replacement for, the formal written syllabus' and 'identifies future directions for empirical evaluation.' The effectiveness premise is explicitly unverified.
  • domain assumption The AI tools (lyrics, music, avatar, video) can together produce the described artifact from syllabus text.
    Underpins the reproducibility claim. Unverifiable here: the supplied body is a different paper, and the GitHub repository cannot be inspected from this record.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Designing Singing Syllabi with Virtual Avatars: AI-Assisted Syllabus Reauthoring." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TIUUFI2U

@misc{pith2026250811872,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Designing Singing Syllabi with Virtual Avatars: AI-Assisted Syllabus Reauthoring},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TIUUFI2U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11872}
}
read the original abstract

Traditional syllabi often function as static reference documents rather than engaging introductions to a course. In practical teaching, we observe that few students thoroughly read or fully comprehend the information provided in traditional, text-based course syllabi, which can leave essential information underused. This paper reframes syllabus communication as a design problem and documents an AI-assisted workflow for transforming a traditional syllabus into a musical, video-based, and avatar-enhanced learning artifact. The paper traces the process of lyrical adaptation, music generation, video composition, avatar synthesis, and optional browser-based interaction. And the paper contributes a reproducible workflow and a concrete example of syllabus reauthoring. The discussion in this paper positions the singing syllabus as a supplement to, not a replacement for, the formal written syllabus and identifies future directions for empirical evaluation. The complete implementation described in this paper is publicly available at https://github.com/xinxingwu-uk/SSVA

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Talking Slide Avatars: Open-Source Multimodal Communication Approach for Teaching

    cs.HC 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The study documents an open-source pipeline that converts text scripts and portraits into talking-head videos to restore narrative and expressive elements in slide-based online teaching.

  2. Talking Slide Avatars: Open-Source Multimodal Communication Approach for Teaching

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Presents an open-source pipeline using OpenVoice and Ditto-TalkingHead to generate talking slide avatars from scripts and images, framed as a multimodal communication model with practical and ethical guidelines for ed...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V . B. Adya, and et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collabora- tion), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ack- ley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V . B. Adya, and et al., Physical Review X9, 011001 (2019), arXiv:1805.11579 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ack- ley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V . B. Adya, and et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Physical Review Letters121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, and A. Vuorinen, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 172703 (2018), arXiv:1711.02644 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Dietrich, A

    T. Dietrich, A. Samajdar, S. Khan, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, R. Dudi, and W. Tichy, Phys. Rev. D100, 044003 (2019), arXiv:1905.06011 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Punturo, M

    M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. Anders- son, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Barsuglia, M. Beker, and et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 084007 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Sathyaprakash, M

    B. Sathyaprakash, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, P. Ajith, B. Allen, P. Amaro-Seoane, N. Andersson, S. Aoudia, K. Arun, P. Astone, and et al., Classical and Quantum Gravity29, 124013 (2012), arXiv:1206.0331 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Maggiore, C

    M. Maggiore, C. Van Den Broeck, N. Bartolo, E. Belgacem, D. Bertacca, M. A. Bizouard, M. Branchesi, S. Clesse, S. Foffa, J. Garc´ıa-Bellido, , and et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2020, 050 (2020), arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Reitze, R

    D. Reitze, R. X. Adhikari, S. Ballmer, B. Barish, L. Barsotti, G. Billingsley, D. A. Brown, Y . Chen, D. Coyne, R. Eisenstein, M. Evans, P. Fritschel, E. D. Hall, A. Lazzarini, G. Lovelace, J. Read, B. S. Sathyaprakash, D. Shoemaker, J. Smith, C. Tor- rie, S. Vitale, R. Weiss,...

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    P. K. Gupta, A. Puecher, P. T. H. Pang, J. Janquart, G. Koekoek, and C. Van Den Broeck, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2205.01182 (2022), arXiv:2205.01182 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Ghosh, B

    T. Ghosh, B. Biswas, and S. Bose, Phys. Rev. D106, 123529 (2022), arXiv:2203.11756 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Walker, R

    K. Walker, R. Smith, E. Thrane, and D. J. Reardon, Phys. Rev. D110, 043013 (2024), arXiv:2401.02604 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  5. [13]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Ar- zoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, R. M. Ludlam, S. Mahmoodifar, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, T. E. Strohmayer, K. S. Wood, T. Enoto, R. Foster, T. Okajima, G. Prigozhin,...

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, P. S. Ray, R. M. Lud- lam, S. Guillot, Z. Arzoumanian, C. L. Baker, A. V . Bilous, D. Chakrabarty, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, S. M. Morsink, and T. E. Strohmayer, Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L21 (2019), arXiv:...

    2019 arXiv

  7. [15]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Ar- zoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lat- timer, M. Loewenstein, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, M. T. Wolff, C. L. Baker, T. Cazeau, S. Manthripragada, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, S. Pollard, I. Cog...

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray, S. Bogdanov, S. Guil- lot, S. M. Morsink, A. V . Bilous, Z. Arzoumanian, D. Choud- hury, J. S. Deneva, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, R. M. Ludlam, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, C. Prescod-Weinste...

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    H. Hu, M. Kramer, N. Wex, D. J. Champion, and M. S. Kehl, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.497, 3118 (2020), arXiv:2007.07725 [astro-ph.SR]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Fonseca, H

    E. Fonseca, H. T. Cromartie, T. T. Pennucci, P. S. Ray, A. Y . Kirichenko, S. M. Ransom, P. B. Demorest, I. H. Stairs, Z. Ar- zoumanian, L. Guillemot, A. Parthasarathy, M. Kerr, I. Cog- nard, P. T. Baker, H. Blumer, P. R. Brook, M. DeCesar, T. Dolch, F. A. Dong, E. C. Ferrara,...

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Kramer, I

    M. Kramer, I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, N. Wex, A. T. Deller, W. A. Coles, M. Ali, M. Burgay, F. Camilo, I. Cog- nard, T. Damour, G. Desvignes, R. D. Ferdman, P. C. C. Freire, S. Grondin, L. Guillemot, G. B. Hobbs, G. Janssen, R. Karuppusamy, D. R. Lorimer, A. G. Lyne, J. W...

    2021

  12. [20]

    Adhikari, H

    D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic, K. Aniol, D. S. Arm- strong, T. Averett, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, S. Barcus, V . Bellini, R. S. Beminiwattha, J. F. Benesch, H. Bhatt, D. Bhatta Pathak, D. Bhetuwal, B. Blaikie, andet al. (PREX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 172502 (2021)...

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Adhikari, H

    D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic, K. A. Aniol, D. S. Armstrong, T. Averett, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, S. K. Barcus, V . Bellini, R. S. Beminiwattha, J. F. Benesch, H. Bhatt, D. Bhatta Pathak, D. Bhetuwal, B. Blaikie, andet al. (CREX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 042501 (2...

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. D. Walecka, Annals of Physics83, 491 (1974)

    1974

  15. [23]

    H. Shen, H. Toki, K. Oyamatsu, and K. Sumiyoshi, Nuclear Physics A637, 435 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9805035 [nucl-th]

    1998 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Li, L.-W

    B.-A. Li, L.-W. Chen, and C. M. Ko, Physics Reports464, 113 (2008), arXiv:0804.3580 [nucl-th]

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    M. G. Alford, L. Brodie, A. Haber, and I. Tews, Phys. Rev. C 106, 055804 (2022), arXiv:2205.10283 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Fischer, I

    T. Fischer, I. Sagert, G. Pagliara, M. Hempel, J. Schaffner- Bielich, T. Rauscher, F. K. Thielemann, R. K ¨appeli, G. Mart´ınez-Pinedo, and M. Liebend ¨orfer, Astrophys. J., Supp. 194, 39 (2011), arXiv:1011.3409 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A. W. Steiner, M. Hempel, and T. Fischer, Astrophys. J.774, 17 (2013), arXiv:1207.2184 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Zhu and L

    Z. Zhu and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D104, 083004 (2021), arXiv:2102.07721 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    C. A. Raithel, V . Paschalidis, and F. ¨Ozel, Phys. Rev. D104, 063016 (2021), arXiv:2104.07226 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Camilletti, L

    A. Camilletti, L. Chiesa, G. Ricigliano, A. Perego, L. C. Lip- pold, S. Padamata, S. Bernuzzi, D. Radice, D. Logoteta, and F. M. Guercilena, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.516, 4760 (2022), arXiv:2204.05336 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    S. Zha, E. P. O’Connor, S. M. Couch, S.-C. Leung, and K. Nomoto, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.513, 1317 (2022), arXiv:2112.15257 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Z. Zhu, S. Zha, and S. Han, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.17569 (2025), arXiv:2506.17569 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  25. [33]

    Zhu and A

    Z.-Y . Zhu and A. Li, Phys. Rev. C97, 035805 (2018), arXiv:1802.07441 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Zhu, E.-P

    Z.-Y . Zhu, E.-P. Zhou, and A. Li, Astrophys. J.862, 98 (2018), arXiv:1802.05510 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Z. Zhu, A. Li, J. Hu, and H. Shen, Phys. Rev. C108, 025809 (2023), arXiv:2305.16058 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Traversi, P

    S. Traversi, P. Char, and G. Pagliara, Astrophys. J.897, 165 (2020), arXiv:2002.08951 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Z. Zhu, A. Li, and T. Liu, Astrophys. J.943, 163 (2023), arXiv:2211.02007 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Legred, L

    I. Legred, L. Brodie, A. Haber, R. Essick, and K. Chatzi- ioannou, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.07677 (2025), arXiv:2505.07677 [nucl-th]

    2025

  31. [39]

    Y . Yang, M. Hippert, E. Speranza, and J. Noronha, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2504.07805 (2025), arXiv:2504.07805 [nucl-th]

    2025

  32. [40]

    Chabanov and L

    M. Chabanov and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D111, 044074 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Chabanov and L

    M. Chabanov and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 071402 (2025), arXiv:2307.10464 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    C. A. Raithel, F. ¨Ozel, and D. Psaltis, Astrophys. J.875, 12 (2019), arXiv:1902.10735 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Zhang, B.-A

    N.-B. Zhang, B.-A. Li, and J. Xu, Astrophys. J.859, 90 (2018), arXiv:1801.06855 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Essick, I

    R. Essick, I. Tews, P. Landry, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 192701 (2021), arXiv:2102.10074 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Veitch, V

    J. Veitch, V . Raymond, B. Farr, W. Farr, P. Graff, S. Vitale, B. Aylott, K. Blackburn, N. Christensen, M. Coughlin, W. Del Pozzo, F. Feroz, J. Gair, C. J. Haster, V . Kalogera, T. Litten- berg, I. Mandel, R. O’Shaughnessy, M. Pitkin, C. Rodriguez, C. R ¨over, T. Sidery, R. Sm...

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    I. M. Romero-Shawet al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.499, 3295 (2020), arXiv:2006.00714 [astro-ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Wofford, A

    J. Wofford, A. B. Yelikar, H. Gallagher, E. Champion, D. Wysocki, V . Delfavero, J. Lange, C. Rose, V . Valsan, S. Morisaki, J. Read, C. Henshaw, and R. O’Shaughnessy, Phys. Rev. D107, 024040 (2023), arXiv:2210.07912 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Lange, R

    J. Lange, R. O’Shaughnessy, and M. Rizzo, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1805.10457 (2018), arXiv:1805.10457 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Cutler and ´E

    C. Cutler and ´E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D49, 2658 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9402014 [gr-qc]

    1994 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Poisson and C

    E. Poisson and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D52, 848 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9502040 [gr-qc]

    1995 arXiv

  43. [51]

    H.-S. Cho, E. Ochsner, R. O’Shaughnessy, C. Kim, and C.-H. Lee, Phys. Rev. D87, 024004 (2013), arXiv:1209.4494 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  44. [52]

    O’Shaughnessy, B

    R. O’Shaughnessy, B. Farr, E. Ochsner, H.-S. Cho, C. Kim, and C.-H. Lee, Phys. Rev. D89, 064048 (2014), arXiv:1308.4704 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  45. [53]

    B. Wang, Z. Zhu, A. Li, and W. Zhao, Astrophys. J., Supp.250, 6 (2020), arXiv:2005.12875 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Iacovelli, M

    F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, Astro- phys. J., Supp.263, 2 (2022), arXiv:2207.06910 [astro-ph.IM]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Iacovelli, M

    F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, Astro- phys. J.941, 208 (2022), arXiv:2207.02771 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Huxford, R

    R. Huxford, R. Kashyap, S. Borhanian, A. Dhani, I. Gupta, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D109, 103035 (2024), arXiv:2307.05376 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ack- ley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V . B. Adya, and et al., Physical Review X13, 011048 (2023), arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    M. M. Forbes, S. Bose, S. Reddy, D. Zhou, A. Mukherjee, and S. De, Phys. Rev. D100, 083010 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    Iacovelli, M

    F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, C. Mondal, A. Puecher, T. Dietrich, F. Gulminelli, M. Maggiore, and M. Oertel, Phys. Rev. D108, 122006 (2023), arXiv:2308.12378 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Alsing, H

    J. Alsing, H. O. Silva, and E. Berti, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 478, 1377 (2018), arXiv:1709.07889 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Hinderer, B

    T. Hinderer, B. D. Lackey, R. N. Lang, and J. S. Read, Phys. Rev. D81, 123016 (2010), arXiv:0911.3535 [astro-ph.HE]

    2010 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Z. Zhu, A. Li, and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D102, 084058 (2020), arXiv:2005.02677 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    R. Li, S. Han, Z. Lin, L. Wang, K. Zhou, and S. Shi, Phys. Rev. D111, 074026 (2025), arXiv:2501.15810 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Lindblom, Astrophys

    L. Lindblom, Astrophys. J.398, 569 (1992)

    1992

  57. [65]

    Lindblom, Phys

    L. Lindblom, Phys. Rev. D58, 024008 (1998), arXiv:gr- qc/9802072 [gr-qc]

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.