Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 40 references

Shubnikov-de Haas quantum oscillations with large spin splitting in highmobility Al0.8Ga0.2Sb/InAs/ Al0.8Ga0.2Sb quantum-well heterostructures

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that tuning the aluminum-to-gallium ratio in AlGaSb barriers of an InAs quantum well yields ultra-high electron mobility, giant magnetoresistance, and a large effective g-factor, positioning the heterostructure as a…

desk verdict Solid growth-and-transport paper with one underreported number (g* = 12.93) that needs a reproducibility fix before the spin-splitting claim is trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12219 v1 pith:TIY334DM submitted 2025-05-18 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zhenghang Zhi , Hanzhi Ruan , Jiuming Liu , Xinpeng Li , Yong Zhang , Qi Yao , Chenjia Tang , Yujie Xiao
show 1 more author
Xufeng Kou
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords InAsquantumwellAlGaSbbarriermolecularbeamepitaxyShubnikov-deHaasoscillationselectronmobilityeffectiveg-factorspin-orbitcouplingmagnetoresistance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that an epitaxial Al0.8Ga0.2Sb/InAs/Al0.8Ga0.2Sb quantum well, with the barrier composition chosen using TCAD band-structure simulations, achieves an electron mobility of $9.24\times 10^{5}$ cm²/V·s, a magnetoresistance ratio of $3.65\times 10^{5}\%$, and Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations that survive to 30 K with a single frequency of 31.1 T. A tilted-field analysis gives a large effective g-factor of 12.93, interpreted as strong spin splitting in the two-dimensional electron gas. The significance is that one barrier composition combines high mobility, long scattering time, and strong spin-orbit coupling in a single InAs-based platform, which the authors argue is useful for energy-efficient spintronics. The paper thus establishes barrier-alloy engineering, not just channel growth, as a way to control both transport quality and spin properties.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Al0.8Ga0.2Sb/InAs/Al0.8Ga0.2Sb quantum well, grown by molecular beam epitaxy with a 10 nm/20 nm/20 nm trilayer configuration and an insulating AlGaAsSb buffer. The load-bearing analysis tools are the Onsager relation $F=(\Phi_0/2\pi^2)S_F$, which converts the measured oscillation frequency to a Fermi surface; the Lifshitz–Kosevich thermal-damping formula, used to extract the cyclotron mass; and the coincidence method, in which the effective g-factor is obtained from the tilt angle at which the Shubnikov–de Haas phase reverses, via $g^{*}=(m_e/m_{\mathrm{cyc}})\cos\Theta_0$. TCAD band-diagram simulation is used to justify that the chosen Al:Ga ratio maintains strong confinement while compromising lattice mismatch. These elements together connect a single growth parameter to mobility, Landau-level resolution, and spin splitting.

What would settle it

Measure the Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations with fine angular steps to locate the phase-reversal angle precisely; if the actual coincidence angle is different from the value used in the formula, the g-factor will change, and if the Lifshitz–Kosevich fit of the effective mass is redone with a different background subtraction, the reported $m_{\mathrm{cyc}}=0.0497\,m_e$ and $g^{*}=12.93$ would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that tuning the Al-to-Ga ratio in the AlGaSb barrier to 4:1 enhances quantum confinement in the InAs quantum well enough to produce an ultra-high electron mobility of $9.24\times 10^{5}$ cm²/V·s, a Fermi velocity of $7.16\times 10^{5}$ m/s, and a giant magnetoresistance ratio of $3.65\times 10^{5}\%$ at low temperature. The Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations are single-frequency at 31.1 T, indicating a well-defined Fermi surface with no subband mixing, and they persist to 30 K. From the Lifshitz–Kosevich thermal damping, the cyclotron effective mass is extracted as $m_{\mathrm{cyc}}=0.0497\,m_e$; from the angular dependence of the oscillations, the coincidence method gives $g^{*}=12.93$. The paper interprets the high-field double-peak structure as Zeeman splitting and finds a zero Berry phase, concluding that the band alignment has moved from type-II to type-I, making this a topologically trivial but high-mobility platform with strong spin-orbit coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The headline g-factor assumes that the exact tilt angle at which the quantum oscillations flip phase is known, but the paper reports only that the flip occurs somewhere between 45° and 60°, and the extraction also depends on the effective mass obtained from the same oscillation data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported mobility and g-factor are correct, AlGaSb/InAs quantum wells offer a single material platform in which high-speed transport and spin manipulation can coexist, supporting efficient spin injection and detection in proposed spintronic devices.
  • The persistence of single-frequency Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations to 30 K implies a clean single-subband two-dimensional electron gas, which is favorable for quantum-coherence experiments such as weak antilocalization or ballistic interferometry.
  • The zero Berry phase and inferred type-I band alignment define this specific composition as topologically trivial, meaning that varying the Al fraction could provide a controllable route between trivial and inverted band alignments.
  • The giant magnetoresistance ratio at fields up to 14 T suggests that these heterostructures could be useful as magnetic-field sensors operating at cryogenic temperatures without requiring gate tuning.
  • The demonstration that the Al-to-Ga ratio, not just the channel material, controls the magneto-transport properties provides a concrete design rule for future InAs-based quantum wells.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the analysis does not state the precise coincidence angle $\Theta_0$, only that phase reversal occurs between 45° and 60°; the reported g-factor of 12.93 assumes a specific value in that window, and a reader should treat the g-factor as a range of roughly 10–14 until the exact angle is reported.
  • Editorial inference: the same g-factor extraction depends on the cyclotron mass from the Lifshitz–Kosevich fit; a different fit procedure could shift both $m_{\mathrm{cyc}}$ and $g^{*}$, so an independent measurement of the effective mass (for example from temperature-dependent quantum oscillation amplitude at a fixed field with a known carrier density) would test the strength of the spin-splittin
  • Editorial inference: if the type-II to type-I crossover with aluminum content is real, a composition series (for instance $x=0.5$, $0.8$, $1.0$) should show a systematic change in Berry phase, effective mass, and SdH frequency, which would be a direct testable extension of the paper's band-engineering picture.
  • Editorial inference: the reported high mobility and strong spin-orbit coupling together suggest that this may be a promising platform for studying spin–orbit torque or spin Hall effects in a two-dimensional electron gas, though the paper itself does not measure those effects.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports MBE growth and magnetotransport characterization of Al0.8Ga0.2Sb/InAs/Al0.8Ga0.2Sb quantum wells, with the Al-to-Ga ratio guided by TCAD band-structure simulations. The authors report a peak Hall mobility of 9.24e5 cm2/Vs at 25 K, a low-temperature magnetoresistance ratio of 3.64e5% at 14 T, Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations persisting from 1.5 K to 30 K with a single FFT frequency of 31.1 T, an effective mass of 0.0497 m_e from a Lifshitz-Kosevich fit, zero Berry phase from a Landau fan diagram, and an effective g-factor of 12.93 extracted from angular-dependent SdH measurements via the coincidence method. The high-field double-peak structure is interpreted as Zeeman splitting, and the platform is proposed for spintronic applications.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a useful materials data point: one Al0.8Ga0.2Sb barrier composition that simultaneously gives ultra-high mobility, long quantum coherence time, and large spin splitting in an InAs quantum well. The central mobility and magnetoresistance claims are direct measurements and are visually supported by the figures. The single-frequency SdH analysis and the Berry-phase extraction are standard. However, the quantitative spin-splitting claim rests on the g-factor of 12.93, and that number is currently not reproducible from the reported information because the critical coincidence angle is not stated and the formula convention is ambiguous. The paper's significance is therefore conditional on a transparent, corrected g-factor derivation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 4a and surrounding text (Section 4)] The coincidence angle Θ0 is not reported. The text states only that the SdH phase reverses when θ is increased from 45° to 60°; with m_cyc = 0.0497 m_e this interval corresponds to g* ≈ 10.1–14.2, and the quoted 12.93 corresponds to Θ0 ≈ 50°, which never appears in the manuscript. Because the abstract and title foreground large spin splitting, please specify the exact angle used, the criterion for determining the phase reversal, and an uncertainty estimate for g*.
  2. [Section 4, g* = (m_e/m_cyc) cos Θ0] The written coincidence formula appears to omit a factor of 2 relative to the standard condition g* = 2(m_e/m_cyc) cos Θ0, which follows from aligning the Zeeman splitting g* μ_B B with the cyclotron energy ℏω_c. If the standard convention is intended, the derived g* would be about 25.9 for Θ0 ≈ 50°, not 12.93; if a nonstandard definition is used, it should be stated explicitly. This directly affects the magnitude of the spin splitting claimed in the abstract.
  3. [Section 2/Fig. 1c and Section 3/Fig. 3b] The text says the 2DEG forms at both InAs/AlGaSb hetero-interfaces, while later it uses the single FFT frequency to conclude the absence of parallel conduction channels and sub-band mixing. These statements are in tension: two populated interfaces would normally produce two SdH frequencies unless one channel dominates. Since the g-factor and effective-mass analyses assume a single Fermi surface, please clarify whether one interface dominates the transport and how the two-interface picture is reconciled with the single-frequency observation.
  4. [Fig. 3c and L-K fit] The L-K fit that yields m_cyc = 0.0497 m_e is presented without the fit range, fitted prefactors, or residuals, and no uncertainty is assigned to m_cyc. Because m_cyc enters g* linearly and also determines the Fermi velocity and scattering-time estimates, the absence of an uncertainty makes it impossible to assess the error bars on the derived spin-splitting parameters. Please provide the fit details and propagate the uncertainty into g*.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The word 'MBE-gorwn' should be 'MBE-grown'.
  2. [Section 3, FFT paragraph] The phrase 'absence of neither parallel conduction channels nor sub-band mixing' contains a double negative; it should read 'absence of both parallel conduction channels and sub-band mixing' or 'no parallel conduction channels or sub-band mixing'.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] The Fig. 4 caption says the phase shift occurs when θ ≥ 60°, while the text says it occurs as θ increases from 45° to 60°; please make the criterion consistent.
  4. [Section 2, Matthiessen-rule fit] The temperature-dependent mobility fit is shown without the fitted prefactors for μ_POP ∝ T^-4.03 and μ_PE ∝ T^-1.5; reporting them would improve reproducibility.
  5. [Abstract and Section 3] The abstract gives the Fermi velocity as 7.16e5 m/s while the text gives 7.155e5 m/s; these are consistent but should be rounded consistently.
  6. [Reference [35]] Given the factor-of-2 ambiguity in the coincidence formula, the authors should cite the specific equation or page in Fang and Stiles where their exact formula appears, so that the convention is unambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: all headline quantities trace to independent measurements; the under-reported coincidence angle is a reproducibility issue, not a self-referential reduction.

full rationale

I walked the paper's derivation chain and found no load-bearing step that reduces to its own inputs. The high mobility (9.24e5 cm2/Vs) and giant magnetoresistance ratio (3.65e5%) are direct Hall and longitudinal resistance measurements, not fitted quantities renamed as results. The SdH frequency (31.1 T) is obtained by FFT of measured oscillations, and the Fermi surface and k_F follow from the Onsager relation. The cyclotron mass m_cyc = 0.0497 m_e is extracted from a Lifshitz-Kosevich thermal-damping fit of the same SdH amplitudes; this is a standard coupled analysis, not a circular one, because the mass is not defined in terms of the g-factor and the g-factor is not fed back into the mass fit. The g-factor is then obtained from the coincidence method, g* = (m_e/m_cyc) cos(Theta0), using an experimentally observed SdH phase reversal; the formula is an independent textbook relation, and the quoted agreement with prior reports [36,37] is external, not self-citational. The paper does report only that the phase reversal occurs between 45 and 60 degrees without stating the exact Theta0, which makes the 12.93 value quantitatively underdetermined from the text; however, underdetermination or incomplete reporting is a reproducibility and correctness concern, not circularity, because no quantity is defined in terms of another quantity it is supposed to predict. There are no self-citations used as load-bearing evidence, no imported uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation. The type-II to type-I band-alignment statement is supported by TCAD simulation, which is an independent modeling step. Accordingly, the central claims are self-contained against the reported measurements and external references, and no circular step can be exhibited with a specific equation-to-equation reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental growth and transport study. No new entities are postulated. The main fitted parameters are the effective mass (L-K fit), the effective g-factor (via coincidence method with an unreported angle), and phonon-scattering prefactors in the Matthiessen-rule mobility fit. The analysis relies on standard quantum oscillation theory (Onsager, Lifshitz-Kosevich) and the coincidence method for g-factor extraction, all treated as accepted domain assumptions.

free parameters (3)
  • m_cyc (cyclotron effective mass) = 0.0497 me
    Extracted by fitting the temperature dependence of the normalized SdH amplitude to the Lifshitz-Kosevich formula; enters the g-factor and Fermi velocity calculations.
  • Theta0 (critical coincidence angle) = Not stated in text; implied near 50 degrees
    The text reports phase reversal between 45 and 60 degrees; the g-factor result 12.93 implies a specific angle, but the exact value and its uncertainty are absent.
  • Phonon scattering prefactors in Matthiessen-rule fit = Not reported
    The mobility fit (Fig 1c) uses mu_POP ~ T^-4.03 and mu_PE ~ T^-1.5, but the fitted prefactors and the constant neutral-impurity term are not given, so the fit cannot be independently checked.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Lifshitz-Kosevich theory describes the temperature damping of SdH oscillation amplitude.
    Used to extract m_cyc from the ΔRxx(T) fit in Fig 3c.
  • standard math Onsager relation F = (Φ0/2π²) S_F links SdH frequency to Fermi surface area.
    Used to convert fSdH = 31.1 T to S_F and k_F in Section 3.
  • domain assumption The coincidence method g* = (me/m_cyc) cos Θ0 relates the phase-flip angle to the effective g-factor.
    Central to the g* = 12.93 claim; assumes the phase reversal is a true coincidence crossing of spin-split Landau levels.
  • domain assumption The 2DEG has a single parabolic band with a circular Fermi surface.
    Needed to interpret the single FFT peak as one clean Fermi surface and to extract k_F from S_F.
  • domain assumption Matthiessen's rule separates phonon and impurity scattering in the mobility fit.
    Used in Fig 1c to describe the μ vs T curve; the fitted prefactors are not reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Shubnikov-de Haas quantum oscillations with large spin splitting in highmobility Al0.8Ga0.2Sb/InAs/ Al0.8Ga0.2Sb quantum-well heterostructures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TIY334DM

@misc{pith2026250512219,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Shubnikov-de Haas quantum oscillations with large spin splitting in highmobility Al0.8Ga0.2Sb/InAs/ Al0.8Ga0.2Sb quantum-well heterostructures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TIY334DM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12219}
}
read the original abstract

We report the epitaxial growth of high-quality Al0.8Ga0.2Sb-InAs-Al0.8Ga0.2Sb quantum well films featured by high carrier mobility and strong spin-orbit coupling. By appropriately optimizing the Al-to-Ga ratio in the AlGaSb barrier layer, the quantum confinement of the heterostructure is significantlyenhanced, which results in both an ultra-high electron mobility of 924000 cm2/Vs and a giant magnetoresistance ratio of 365000 at low temperatures. Meanwhile, pronounced Shubnikov-deHaas quantum oscillations persist up to 30 K, and their single-frequency feature indicates a well defined Fermi surface without subband mixing in the two-dimensional electron gas channel. Moreover, the large effective g-factor of 12.93 leads to the observation of Zeeman splitting at large magnetic fields. Our results validate the AlGaSb/InAs quantum well heterostructures as a suitable candidate for constructing energy-efficient topological spintronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12219 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Moiseev, and Y .P

    Mikhailova, M.P., K.D. Moiseev, and Y .P. Yakovlev, Discovery of III –V Semiconductors: Physical Properties and Application. Semiconductors, 2019. 53(3): p. 273-290

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    + 1 2 𝑔∗𝜇𝐵𝐵 , the Z eeman splitting will be visible only when the Zeeman energy term 𝑔𝜇𝐵𝐵 becomes comparable to the Landau energy ℏ𝜔𝑐[38]. Accordingly, this high-field Zeeman splitting feature can be attributed to the small effective mass, large effective g -factor and strong spin -orbit coupling in our AlGaSb /InAs QW heterostructures, thereafter allowin...

    work page

  3. [3]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 2007

    Lelarge, F., et al., Recent Advances on InAs/InP Quantum Dash Based Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Amplifiers Operating at 1.55$ \mu $ m. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 2007. 13(1): p. 111-124

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Physical Review B, 1990

    Luo, J., et al., Effects of inversion asymmetry on electron energy band structures in GaSb/InAs/GaSb quantum wells. Physical Review B, 1990. 41(11): p. 7685

    work page 1990

  5. [5]

    New Journal of Physics,

    Nichele, F., et al., Edge transport in the trivial phase of InAs/GaSb. New Journal of Physics,

    work page

  6. [6]

    2022, World Scientific

    Du, R.-R., Topology and Interactions in InAs/GaSb Quantum Wells , in Memorial Volume for Shoucheng Zhang. 2022, World Scientific. p. 243-261

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Xue, F. and A.H. MacDonald, Time-reversal symmetry -breaking nematic insulators near quantum spin Hall phase transitions. Physical Review Letters, 2018. 120(18): p. 186802

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Wang, R., et al., Excitonic topological order in imbalanced electron –hole bilayers. Nature,

    work page

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Physical Review B, 2018

    Knox, C., et al., Deconvolution of Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling by crystal axis dependent measurements of coupled InAs/GaSb quantum wells. Physical Review B, 2018. 98(15): p. 155323

    2018

  2. [10]

    Iutzi, R.M. and E.A. Fitzgerald, Defect and temperature dependence of tunneling in InAs/GaSb heterojunctions. Applied Physics Letters, 2015. 107(13)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Applied Physics Letters, 1997

    Rybaltowski, A., et al., High power InAsSb/InP AsSb/InAs mid-infrared lasers. Applied Physics Letters, 1997. 71(17): p. 2430-2432

    1997

  4. [12]

    IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2012

    Lu, Y ., et al., Performance of AlGaSb/InAs TFETs with gate electric field and tunneling direction aligned. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2012. 33(5): p. 655-657

    2012

  5. [13]

    Physical Review B —Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2013

    Kallaher, R., et al., Spin and phase coherence lengths in InAs wires with diffusive boundary scattering. Physical Review B —Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2013. 88(20): p. 205407

    2013

  6. [14]

    Grützmacher, and M.I

    Rieger, T., D. Grützmacher, and M.I. Lepsa, InAs nanowires with AlxGa1− xSb shells for band alignment engineering. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2015. 425: p. 80-84

    2015

  7. [15]

    Yoon, S., et al., Study of In0. 48Ga0. 52P/In0. 2Ga0. 8As/GaAs pseudomorphic high electron mobility transistor using a two-dimensional device simulator. Microelectronics journal, 1999. 30(8): p. 745-752

    1999

  8. [16]

    Journal of Applied Physics, 1987

    Adachi, S., Band gaps and refractive indices of AlGaAsSb, GaInAsSb, and InP AsSb: Key properties for a variety of the 2 –4‐μm optoelectronic device applications. Journal of Applied Physics, 1987. 61(10): p. 4869-4876

    1987

  9. [17]

    Belser, R.B. and W.H. Hicklin, Temperature coefficients of resistance of metallic films in the temperature range 25 to 600 C. Journal of Applied Physics, 1959. 30(3): p. 313-322

    1959

  10. [18]

    Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2010

    Zahmani, A.H., et al., Temperature dependence of the resistance of AlGaN/GaN heterostructures and their applications as temperature sensors. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2010. 49(4S): p. 04DF14

    2010

  11. [19]

    Journal of Crystal Growth, 2005

    Knap, W., et al., Influence of dislocation and ionized impurity scattering on the electron mobility in GaN/AlGaN heterostructures. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2005. 281(1): p. 194-201. 17

    2005

  12. [20]

    Stillman, and J.O

    Wolfe, C.M., G.E. Stillman, and J.O. Dimmock, Ionized Impurity Density in n‐Type GaAs. Journal of Applied Physics, 1970. 41(2): p. 504-507

    1970

  13. [21]

    Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 1994

    Sugiyama, Y ., Temperature dependence of an InGaAs-2DEG Hall device with large magnetic sensitivity. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 1994. 40(2): p. 135-140

    1994

  14. [22]

    Advances in Physics, 1972

    Bass, J., Deviations from Matthiessen's rule. Advances in Physics, 1972. 21(91): p. 431-604

    1972

  15. [23]

    V olcheck, V . and V . Stempitsky. Mobility of a two-dimensional electron gas in the AlGaN/GaN heterostructure: simulation and analysis. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. IOP Publishing

    2019

  16. [24]

    Liu, and R

    Zhang, X.-B., N.-Z. Liu, and R. -H. Yao, Polar optical phonon scattering of two -dimensional electron gas in AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020. 69(15): p. 157303-1-157303-6

    2020

  17. [25]

    Ohtomo, A. and H. Hwang, A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nature, 2004. 427(6973): p. 423-426

    2004

  18. [26]

    Science, 2007

    Tsukazaki, A., et al., Quantum Hall Effect in Polar Oxide Heterostructures. Science, 2007. 315(5817): p. 1388-1391

    2007

  19. [27]

    2008: Springer Science & Business Media

    Bimberg, D., Semiconductor nanostructures. 2008: Springer Science & Business Media

    2008

  20. [28]

    Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2010

    Kunc, J., et al., Enhancement of the spin gap in fully occupied two-dimensional Landau levels. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2010. 82(11): p. 115438

    2010

  21. [29]

    Applied Physics Letters, 2023

    Karmakar, C., et al., Enhanced quantum oscillations and scattering effect in quaternary InAlGaN/GaN two-dimensional electron gas. Applied Physics Letters, 2023. 122(20)

    2023

  22. [30]

    The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1952

    Onsager, L., Interpretation of the de Haas -van Alphen effect. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1952. 43(344): p. 1006-1008

    1952

  23. [31]

    Lifshitz, I. and A. Kosevich, Theory of magnetic susceptibility in metals at low temperatures. Sov. Phys. JETP, 1956. 2(4): p. 636-645

    1956

  24. [32]

    Physical Review B, 2020

    Maurya, V .K., et al., Magnetotransport and Berry phase in magnetically doped ${\mathrm{Bi}}_{0.97\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Sb}}_{0.03}$ single crystals. Physical Review B, 2020. 102(14): p. 144412

    2020

  25. [33]

    Physical Review B, 2015

    Doiron-Leyraud, N., et al., Berry phase in cuprate superconductors. Physical Review B, 2015. 91(24): p. 245136

    2015

  26. [34]

    Physical Review Letters, 2017

    Nichele, F., et al., Giant spin -orbit splitting in inverted InAs/GaSb double quantum wells. Physical Review Letters, 2017. 118(1): p. 016801

    2017

  27. [35]

    Applied Physics Letters, 2003

    Nitta, J., et al., Gate-controlled electron g factor in an InAs-inserted-channel In 0.53 Ga 0.47 As/In 0.52 Al 0.48 As heterostructure. Applied Physics Letters, 2003. 83(22): p. 4565-4567

    2003

  28. [36]

    Fang, F. and P. Stiles, Effects of a tilted magnetic field on a two -dimensional electron gas. Physical Review, 1968. 174(3): p. 823

    1968

  29. [37]

    Sullivan, and R

    Mu, X., G. Sullivan, and R. -R. Du, Effective g -factors of carriers in inverted InAs/GaSb bilayers. Applied Physics Letters, 2016. 108(1)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Physical Review B, 2005

    Björk, M.T., et al., Tunable effective $g$ factor in InAs nanowire quantum dots. Physical Review B, 2005. 72(20): p. 201307

    2005

  31. [39]

    Physics of the Solid State, 2002

    Tarasenko, S.A., The effect of Zeeman splitting on Shubnikov -de Haas oscillations in two - dimensional systems. Physics of the Solid State, 2002. 44(9): p. 1769-1773

    2002

  32. [40]

    Physical Review B, 2018

    Ruskov, R., et al., Electron g-factor of valley states in realistic silicon quantum dots. Physical Review B, 2018. 98(24): p. 245424

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.