Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

WARP: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Rewarded Policies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.16768 v1 pith:TJ5GE6UH submitted 2024-06-24 cs.LG cs.AI

WARP: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Rewarded Policies

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords policieswarpinitializationmodelrewardweightalignmentaveraged
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) aligns large language models (LLMs) by encouraging their generations to have high rewards, using a reward model trained on human preferences. To prevent the forgetting of pre-trained knowledge, RLHF usually incorporates a KL regularization; this forces the policy to remain close to its supervised fine-tuned initialization, though it hinders the reward optimization. To tackle the trade-off between KL and reward, in this paper we introduce a novel alignment strategy named Weight Averaged Rewarded Policies (WARP). WARP merges policies in the weight space at three distinct stages. First, it uses the exponential moving average of the policy as a dynamic anchor in the KL regularization. Second, it applies spherical interpolation to merge independently fine-tuned policies into a new enhanced one. Third, it linearly interpolates between this merged model and the initialization, to recover features from pre-training. This procedure is then applied iteratively, with each iteration's final model used as an advanced initialization for the next, progressively refining the KL-reward Pareto front, achieving superior rewards at fixed KL. Experiments with GEMMA policies validate that WARP improves their quality and alignment, outperforming other open-source LLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Extrapolative Weight Averaging Reveals Correctness-Efficiency Frontiers in Code RL

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Extrapolative weight averaging of RL checkpoints trained under nested unit-test coverage extends a correctness-efficiency frontier and boosts ensemble pass rates in code generation across model scales and inference modes.

  2. REVA-PO: Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning for Chest X-ray Report Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    REVA-PO stabilizes GRPO-style RL for CXR report generation via response-level adaptive KL weights and validation-anchored policy resets, reporting new SOTA BLEU and clinical F1 scores.

  3. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    ReOPD offline-distills multi-turn agentic LLMs via teacher-prefix replay plus step-decay sampling, matching online OPD accuracy at ≥4× speed with zero tool calls.

  4. EMAgnet: Parameter-Space EMA Regularization for Policy Gradient Self-Play in Large Games

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    EMAgnet replaces uniform-magnet regularization in PPO self-play with an EMA of last-iterate policy parameters and reports lower exploitability on most tested zero-sum benchmarks, especially those with dominated strategies.

  5. Spectral Souping: A Unified Framework for Online Preference Alignment

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Spectral Souping learns offline specialized policies for fine-grained preferences and merges them online using a discovered universal spectral representation for efficient LLM alignment.

  6. Decouple before Integration: Test-time Synthesis of SFT and RLVR Task Vectors

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    DoTS decouples SFT and RLVR training then synthesizes their task vectors at inference time to match integrated training results at ~3% compute cost.

  7. Robust Reward Modeling for Large Language Models via Causal Decomposition

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A decoder-based reconstruction error regularizer improves reward model accuracy on RewardBench from 0.832 to 0.868 while favoring shorter, less sycophantic outputs.

  8. CoLD: Counterfactually-Guided Length Debiasing for Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CoLD mitigates length bias in process reward models for mathematical reasoning via counterfactual guidance, length penalties, bias estimation, and joint training, improving step selection accuracy and conciseness on M...

  9. Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunities

    cs.LG 2024-08 accept novelty 4.0

    The paper introduces a new taxonomy for model merging methods and reviews their applications in LLMs, MLLMs, continual learning, multi-task learning, and other subfields while outlining open challenges.