Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.15627 v4 pith:TKM6AVGV submitted 2024-06-21 cs.CL cs.LG

Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords benchmarklm-polygraphtechniquesapproacheseffectiveevaluationhttpslanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has stimulated researchers to seek effective and efficient approaches to deal with LLM hallucinations and low-quality outputs. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a key element of machine learning applications in dealing with such challenges. However, research to date on UQ for LLMs has been fragmented in terms of techniques and evaluation methodologies. In this work, we address this issue by introducing a novel benchmark that implements a collection of state-of-the-art UQ baselines and offers an environment for controllable and consistent evaluation of novel UQ techniques over various text generation tasks. Our benchmark also supports the assessment of confidence normalization methods in terms of their ability to provide interpretable scores. Using our benchmark, we conduct a large-scale empirical investigation of UQ and normalization techniques across eleven tasks, identifying the most effective approaches. Code: https://github.com/IINemo/lm-polygraph Benchmark: https://huggingface.co/LM-Polygraph

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Token-Level Density-Based Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Eliciting Truthfulness of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Adapts multi-layer token-level Mahalanobis distance with supervised linear regression to yield improved uncertainty scores for LLM truthfulness tasks.

  2. When to Answer and When to Defer: A Decision Framework for Reliable Code Predictions

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces a unified framework integrating uncertainty estimation, calibration, and tool-based abstention for reliable code predictions in language models.

  3. On-the-Fly Input Adaptation for Reliable Code Intelligence

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Proposes a two-stage on-the-fly input adaptation framework to reduce mispredictions in code language models across understanding tasks without retraining or additional supervision.

  4. Self-Reported Confidence of Large Language Models in Gastroenterology: Analysis of Commercial, Open-Source, and Quantized Models

    cs.CL 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LLMs show improved accuracy on gastroenterology questions but remain overconfident in self-reported certainty across commercial, open-source, and quantized variants.