Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.11440 v3 pith:TNDWLB4H submitted 2023-10-17 cs.CV

EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models

classification cs.CV
keywords modelsmetricslargegenerationgenerativequalitiesvideoalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The vision and language generative models have been overgrown in recent years. For video generation, various open-sourced models and public-available services have been developed to generate high-quality videos. However, these methods often use a few metrics, e.g., FVD or IS, to evaluate the performance. We argue that it is hard to judge the large conditional generative models from the simple metrics since these models are often trained on very large datasets with multi-aspect abilities. Thus, we propose a novel framework and pipeline for exhaustively evaluating the performance of the generated videos. Our approach involves generating a diverse and comprehensive list of 700 prompts for text-to-video generation, which is based on an analysis of real-world user data and generated with the assistance of a large language model. Then, we evaluate the state-of-the-art video generative models on our carefully designed benchmark, in terms of visual qualities, content qualities, motion qualities, and text-video alignment with 17 well-selected objective metrics. To obtain the final leaderboard of the models, we further fit a series of coefficients to align the objective metrics to the users' opinions. Based on the proposed human alignment method, our final score shows a higher correlation than simply averaging the metrics, showing the effectiveness of the proposed evaluation method.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. KeyFrame-Compass: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation of Keyframe-Conditioned Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    KeyFrame-Compass tests nine video generators on 386 keyframe-sequence tasks and finds a consistent trade-off between keyframe fidelity and natural video quality, with control degrading under dense keyframes and open-s...

  2. MiraBench: Evaluating Action-Conditioned Reliability in Robotic World Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MiraBench defines action-conditioned reliability via three levels (physics adherence, action-following fidelity, optimism bias detection) and applies it to 12 model configurations using a 16,000-judgment human corpus,...

  3. MSAVBench: Towards Comprehensive and Reliable Evaluation of Multi-Shot Audio-Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MSAVBench is the first comprehensive benchmark for multi-shot audio-video generation featuring four dimensions, challenging scenarios, and an adaptive hybrid evaluation framework that achieves 91.5% Spearman correlati...

  4. MSAVBench: Towards Comprehensive and Reliable Evaluation of Multi-Shot Audio-Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    MSAVBench is the first comprehensive benchmark for multi-shot audio-video generation, spanning video, audio, shot, and reference dimensions with an adaptive evaluation framework that reaches 91.5% Spearman correlation...

  5. OpenVid-1M: A Large-Scale High-Quality Dataset for Text-to-video Generation

    cs.CV 2024-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    OpenVid-1M supplies 1 million high-quality text-video pairs and introduces MVDiT to improve text-to-video generation by better using both visual structure and text semantics.

  6. A Good Talk Does not Look Like a Summary, It Teaches You! Measuring Takeaways from Paper-to-Video Talks

    cs.MM 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    EffectivePresentationScorer evaluates paper-to-video talks for instructional quality by checking clear explanation of ideas, prerequisite concepts, and links to contributions, finding that current systems cover topics...

  7. How Far Are Video Models from True Multimodal Reasoning?

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Current video models succeed on basic understanding but achieve under 25% success on logically grounded generation and near 0% on interactive generation, exposing gaps in multimodal reasoning.

  8. We'll Fix it in Post: Improving Text-to-Video Generation with Neuro-Symbolic Feedback

    cs.CV 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NeuS-E is a post-generation refinement method that uses neuro-symbolic analysis of a formal video representation to detect and correct semantic and temporal inconsistencies in text-to-video outputs, improving prompt a...